Research ethics in sign language communities

Sign Language Studies

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2008, Pages

  Harris, Raychelle ^a   Holmes, Heidi M ^b   Mertens, Donna M ^a  

^a GALLAUDET UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 64249164275     PISSN: 03021475     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (61)

1. American Psychological Association, Joint Task Force of Divisions 17 and 45. 2002. Guidelines on Multicultural Education, Training, Research, Practice, and Organizational Change for Psychologists. Washington, D.C.: Author.
2. Australasian Evaluation Society, Inc. 2006. AES Ethics Committee, http:// www.aes.asn.au/about (accessed September 30, 2008).
3. Bauman, H.-D. 2004. Audism: Exploring the Metaphysics of Oppression. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 9: 239-46.
4. Belmont Report, The. 1979. The National Institutes of Health: Regulations and Ethical Guidelines, http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/guidelines/belmont.html (accessed September 30, 2008).
5. Bienvenu, M. 2003. Developing a Prototype for a Monolingual ASL Dictionary. Ph.D. diss., Union Institute and University, Cincinnati, Ohio. Retrieved April 29, 2007, from ProQuest Digital Dissertations database.
6. Brugge, D., and M. Missaghian. 2003. Research Ethics and Environmental Health: Protecting the Navajo People through Tribal Regulation of Research. http://www .researchethics.org/articles.asp?viewrec=27 (accessed September 30, 2008).
7. Brydon-Miller, M. 1997. Participatory Action Research: Psychology and Social Change. Journal of Social Issues 53(4): 657-66.
8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2006. Community-based Participatory Prevention Research Grants, http://www.cdc.gov/od/science/ PHResearch/grants/community/ (accessed September 30, 2008).
9. Chilisa, B. 2005. Educational Research within Postcolonial Africa: A Critique of HIV/AIDS Research in Botswana. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 18: 659-84.
10. Cram, E, A. Ormond, and L. Carter. 2004. Researching Our Relations: Reflections on Ethics and Marginalization. Paper presented at the Kamehauneha Schools 2004 Research Conference on Hawaiian Well-being. Kea'au, Hawaii. http://www.ksbe.edu/pase/pdf/KSResearchConference/ 2004presentations/ (accessed September 30, 2008).
11. Cummins, J. 2000. Language, Power, and Pedagogy: Bilingual Children in the Crossfire. Buffalo, N.Y.: Multilingual Matters.
12. Duchesneau, S., and C. McCullough. 2006. Walking on Eggshells: Deaf and Hearing in Consultation. ASC on the Couch, http://www.ascdeaf.com/ blog/?p=136 (accessed October I, 2008).
13. Edno, T., T. Joh, and H. C. Yu. 2003. Voices from the Field: Health and Evaluation Leaders on Multicultural Evaluation. Oakland: Social Policy Research Associates.
14. Erting, C. 2003. Signs of Literacy: An Ethnographic Study of American Sign Language and English Literacy Acquisition. In The Young Deaf or Hard of Hearing Child: A Family-centered Approach to Early Education, ed. B. Bodner-Johnson and M. Sass-Lehrer, 455-467. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
15. - C. Thumann-Prezioso, and B. Benedict. 2000. Bilingualism in a Deaf Family: Fingerspelling in Early Childhood. In The Deaf Child in the Family and at School, ed. P. Spencer, C. Erting, and M. Marschark, 41-54. Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum.
16. Foster, S. 1994. Outsider in the Deaf World: Reflections of an Ethnographic Researcher. Journal of the American Rehabilitation Association 27: 1-11.
17. Gilmore, P., and D. Smith. 2005. Seizing Academic Power: Indigenous Subaltern Voices, Metaliteracy, and Counternarratives in Higher Education. In Language, Literacy, and Power in Schooling, ed. T. McCarty, 67-88. Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum.
18. Ginsberg, P., and D. M. Mertens.(2009). Frontiers in Social Research Ethics: Fertile Ground for Evolution. In Handbook of Social Research Ethics, ed. D. M. Mertens and P. Ginsberg. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.
19. Greenwood, D. 2006. Intellectual Property AND Action Research. Action Research 4: 81-95.
20. Guba, E., and Y. Lincoln. 2005. Paradigmatic Controversies, Contradictions, and Emerging Confluences. In Handbook of Qualitative Research, 3d ed., ed. N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, 191-216. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage.
21. Guzman, B. 2003. Examining the Role of Cultural Competency in Program Evaluation: Visions for New Millennium Evaluators. In Evaluating Social Programs and Problems: Visions for the New Millennium, ed. S. Donaldson and M. Scriven, 167-182. Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum.
22. Kirkhart, K. 1995. Seeking Multicultural Validity: A Postcard from the Road. Evaluation Practice. 16(1): 1-12.
23. Kirkhart, K. 2005. Through a Cultural Lens: Reflections on Validity and Theory in Evaluation. In The Role of Culture and Cultural Context: A Mandate for Inclusion, the Discovery of Truth and Understanding in Evaluative Theory and Practice, ed. S. Hood, R. Hopson, and H. Frierson, 21-38. Greenwich, Conn.: Information Age Publishing.
24. Kitchener, K. S., and R. F. Kitchener. (2009). Social Science Research Ethics: Historical and Philosophical Issues. In Handbook of Social Research Ethics, ed. D. M. Mertens and P. Ginsberg. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.
25. Ladd, P. 2003. Understanding Deaf Culture: In Search of Deafhood. Tonawanda, N.Y.: Multilingual Matters.
26. - .In press. Ethics and Politics of Research Design and Practice: The Post-deaf Studies Perspective. In Research and Deafness, ed. A. Young and S. Foster. New York: Oxford University Press.
27. Lane, H. 1999. The Mask of Benevolence: Disabling the Deaf Community. San Diego: DawnSignPress.
28. - , R. Hoffmeister, and B. Bahan. 1996. A Journey into the DEAF-WORLD. San Diego: DawnSignPress.
29. Lincoln, Y, and N. Denzin. 2005. The Eighth and Ninth Moments: Qualitative Research in/and the Fractured Future. In The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, ed. N. Lincoln and Y Denzin, 1115-26. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.
30. Maher, J. 1996. Seeing Language in Sign:TheWork of William C. Stokoe. Washington, D.C.: Gallaudet University Press.
31. Matsumoto, D. 1996. Culture and Psychology. Pacific Grove, Calif.: Brooks/ Cole.
32. - , and L. Juang. 2008. Culture and Psychology, 4th ed. Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth/Thomson.
33. McCullough, C. 2007. Hearing Researchers: Why Do They Study Deaf People? ASC on the Couch. http://www.ascdeaf.com/blog/?p=323 (accessed October 3, 2008).
34. Mertens, D. M. 2000. Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing People in Court: Using an Emancipatory Perspective to Determine Their Needs. In Research and Inequality, ed. C. Truman, D. Mertens, and B. Humphries, 111-25. London: Taylor and Francis.
35. - . 2005. Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology: Integrating Diversity with Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methods, 2d ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage.
36. - . 2009. Transformative Research and Evaluation. New York: Guilford Press.
37. - , and P. Ginsberg, eds. 2009. Handbook of Social Research Ethics. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage.
38. Mertens, D. M., and J. McLaughlin. 2004. Research and Evaluation Methods in Special Education. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Corwin.
39. Mi'kmaq College Institute. 2006. Research Principles and Protocols: Mi'kmaw Ethics Watch, http://mrc.uccb.ns.ca/prinpro.html (accessed October 3, 2008).
40. Myers, C. 2004. Differences from Somewhere: The Normativity of Whiteness in Bioethics in the United States. American Journal of Bioethics 3: 1-11.
41. Myklebust, H. 1964. The Psychology of Deafness: Sensory Deprivation, Learning, and Adjustment, 2d ed. New York: Grune and Stratton.
42. National Center for Deaf Health Research. 2006. Deaf Health Community Committee, http://www.urmc.rochester.edu/ncdhr/dhcc.html (accessed October 3, 2008).
43. National Institutes of Health. 2007. Community-based Participatory Research at NIMH. http://researchfunding.duke.edu/detail.asp?OppID=1396 (accessed October 3, 2008).
44. Oliver, M., and C. Barnes. 1997. All We Are Saying Is Give Disabled Researchers a Chance. Disability and Society 12(5): 811-13.
45. Osborne, R., and R. McPhee. 2000. Indigenous Terms of Reference (ITR). Presented at the 6th UNESCO-ACEID International Conference on Education, Bangkok, December 12-15.
46. Pollard, R. 1992. Cross-cultural Ethics in the Conduct of Deafness Research. Rehabilitation Psychology 37(2): 87-101.
47. - . 1994. Cross-cultural Ethics in the Conduct of Deafness Research. Journal of the American Deafness and Rehabilitation Association 27(3): 29-41.
48. - . 1996. Professional Psychology and Deaf People: The Emergence of a Discipline. American Psychologist 51(4): 389-96.
49. - . 2002. Ethical Conduct in Research Involving Deaf People. In Ethics in Mental Health and Deafness, ed. V. Gutman, 162-78. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
50. Reason, P., and H. Bradbury, eds. 2001. Handbook of Action Research: Participatory Inquiry and Practice. London: Sage.
51. Review of Publications. 1965, American Annals of the Deaf 110: 213.
52. SenGupta, S., R. Hopson, and M. Thompson-Robinson, eds. 2004. In Search of Cultural Competence in Evaluation toward Principles and Practices: New Directions for Evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
53. Shakespeare, T. 1996. Rules of Engagement: Doing Disability Research. Disability and Society, 11(I), 115-19.
54. Silka, L. 2005. Building Culturally Competent Research Partnerships. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, August, Washington, DC.
55. Smith, L. T. 1999. Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. London: Zed Press.
56. Stinson, M. 1994. Research on Deaf Individuals by Hearing Persons: One Deaf Researcher's Perspective. Journal of the American Rehabilitation Association 27: 17-21.
57. Sue, D W, and D. Sue. 2003. Counseling the Culturally Diverse: Theory and Practice, 4th. ed. New York: Wiley and Sons.
58. Symonette, H. 2004. Walking Pathways toward Becoming a Culturally Competent Evaluator: Boundaries, Borderlands, and Border Crossings. In In Search of Cultural Competence in Evaluation toward Principles and Practices: New Directions for Evaluation, ed. M. Thompson-Robinson, R. Hopson, and S. SenGupta, 95-110. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
59. Tillman, L. C. 2002. Culturally Sensitive Research Approaches: An African-American Perspective. Educational Researcher 31: 3-12.
60. Wallwork, E. 2002. Ethical Analysis of Group and Community Rights: Case Study Review of the "Collaborative Initiative for Research Ethics in Enviromental Health." http://www.researchethics.org/uploads/pdf/ EthicalAnalysis3 (Accessed November 21, 2008).
61. Young, A., and J. Ackerman. 2001. Reflections on Validity and Epistemol-ogy in a Study of Working Relations between Deaf and Hearing Professionals. Qualitative Health Research 11: 179-89.