Generating data-driven hints for open-ended programming

Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Educational Data Mining, EDM 2016

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 191-198

  Price, Thomas W ^a   Dong, Yihuan ^a   Barnes, Tiffany ^a  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; DATA MINING; OPEN DATA;

DATA DRIVEN; DATA-DRIVEN ALGORITHM; FEEDBACK TO STUDENTS; GENERATION TECHNIQUES; INTELLIGENT TUTORING SYSTEM (ITSS); NOVICE PROGRAMMING; PROGRAMMING ASSIGNMENTS;

STUDENTS;

EID: 85030165920     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. T. Barnes and J. Stamper. Toward Automatic Hint Generation for Logic Proof Tutoring Using Historical Student Data. In Proc. of the 9th Int. Conf. on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, pages 373–382, 2008.
2. S. Cooper, Y. J. Nam, and L. Si. Initial Results of Using an Intelligent Tutoring System with Alice. In Proc. of the 17th Annual ACM ITiCSE Conf., pages 138–143. ACM Press, 2012.
3. A. Corbett. Cognitive Computer Tutors: Solving the Two-Sigma Problem. In Proc. of the 8th Int. Conf. on User Modeling, pages 137–147, 2001.
4. A. Corbett and J. Anderson. Locus of Feedback Control in Computer-Based Tutoring: Impact on Learning Rate, Achievement and Attitudes. In Proc. of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Computer Interaction, pages 245–252, 2001.
5. W. Dann, D. Cosgrove, and D. Slater. Mediated transfer: Alice 3 to Java. In Proc. of the 43rd Annual ACM SIGCSE Conf., pages 141–146, 2012.
6. M. Eagle, M. Johnson, and T. Barnes. Interaction Networks: Generating High Level Hints Based on Network Community Clustering. In Proc. of the 5th Int. Conf. on Educational Data Mining, pages 164–167, 2012.
7. D. Fossati, B. Di Eugenio, S. Ohlsson, C. Brown, and L. Chen. Data Driven Automatic Feedback Generation in the iList Intelligent Tutoring System. Technology, Instruction, Cognition and Learning, 10(1):5–26, 2015.
8. D. Garcia, B. Harvey, and T. Barnes. The Beauty and Joy of Computing. ACM Inroads, 6(4):71–79, 2015.
9. W. Jin, T. Barnes, and J. Stamper. Program Representation for Automatic Hint Generation for a Data-driven Novice Programming Tutor. In Proc. of the 11th Int. Conf. on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, pages 1–6, 2012.
10. T. Lazar and I. Bratko. Data-Driven Program Synthesis for Hint Generation in Programming Tutors. In Proc. of the 12th Int. Conf. on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, pages 306–311. Springer, 2014.
11. B. Moskal, D. Lurie, and S. Cooper. Evaluating the Effectiveness of a New Instructional Approach. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 36(1):75–79, 2004.
12. T. Murray. Authoring Intelligent Tutoring Systems: An Analysis of the State of the Art. Int. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 10:98–129, 1999.
13. M. Pawlik and N. Augsten. RTED: A Robust Algorithm for the Tree Edit Distance. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, 5(4):334–345, 2011.
14. B. Peddycord III, A. Hicks, and T. Barnes. Generating Hints for Programming Problems Using Intermediate Output. In Proc. of the 7th Int. Conf. on Educational Data Mining, pages 92–98, 2014.
15. D. Perelman, S. Gulwani, and D. Grossman. Test-Driven Synthesis for Automated Feedback for Introductory Computer Science Assignments. In Proc. of the Workshop on Data Mining for Educational Assessment and Feedback, 2014.
16. C. Piech, M. Sahami, J. Huang, and L. Guibas. Autonomously Generating Hints by Inferring Problem Solving Policies. In Proc. of the 2nd ACM Conf. on Learning @ Scale, pages 1–10, 2015.
17. T. W. Price and T. Barnes. An Exploration of Data-Driven Hint Generation in an Open-Ended Programming Problem. In Proc. of the Workshop on Graph-Based Data Mining held at EDM’15, 2015.
18. T. W. Price and T. Barnes. Comparing Textual and Block Interfaces in a Novice Programming Environment. In Proc. of the Int. Computing Education Research Conference, 2015.
19. M. Resnick, J. Maloney, H. Andrés, N. Rusk, E. Eastmond, K. Brennan, A. Millner, E. Rosenbaum, J. Silver, B. Silverman, and Y. Kafai. Scratch: Programming for All. Communications of the ACM, 52(11):60–67, 2009.
20. K. Rivers and K. Koedinger. A Canonicalizing Model for Building Programming Tutors. In Proc. of the 11th Int. Conf. on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, pages 591–593, 2012.
21. K. Rivers and K. Koedinger. Automatic Generation of Programming Feedback: A Data-driven Approach. In Proc. of the First Workshop on AI-supported Education for Computer Science, pages 50–59, 2013.
22. K. Rivers and K. R. Koedinger. Data-Driven Hint Generation in Vast Solution Spaces: a Self-Improving Python Programming Tutor. Int. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 2015.
23. R. Singh, S. Gulwani, and A. Solar-Lezama. Automated Feedback Generation for Introductory Programming Assignments. ACM SIGPLAN Notices, 48(6), 2013.
24. J. Stamper, M. Eagle, T. Barnes, and M. Croy. Experimental Evaluation of Automatic Hint Generation for a Logic Tutor. Int. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 22(1):3–17, 2013.
25. I. Utting, S. Cooper, and M. Kölling. Alice, Greenfoot, and Scratch – A Discussion. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 10(4), 2010.
26. K. Zimmerman and C. R. Rupakheti. An Automated Framework for Recommending Program Elements to Novices. In Proc. of the 30th Int. Conf. on Automated Software Engineering, 2015.