Autonomously generating hints by inferring problem solving policies

L@S 2015 - 2nd ACM Conference on Learning at Scale

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 195-204

  Piech, Chris ^a   Huang, Jonathan ^a   Sahami, Mehran ^a   Guibas, Leonidas ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Educational data mining; Hint generation; Problem solving policy

Indexed keywords

STUDENTS;

EDUCATIONAL DATA MINING; GENERATION SYSTEMS; HINT GENERATION; ONLINE COURSE; STATE-OF-THE-ART METHODS;

DATA MINING;

EID: 84928038975     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2724660.2724668     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Ahmadzadeh, M., Elliman, D., and Higgins, C. An analysis of patterns of debugging among novice computer science students. In ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, vol. 37, ACM (2005), 84-88.
2. Aleven, V. A., and Koedinger, K. R. An effective metacognitive strategy: Learning by doing and explaining with a computer-based cognitive tutor. Cognitive science 26, 2 (2002), 147-179.
3. Barnes, T., and Stamper, J. Toward automatic hint generation for logic proof tutoring using historical student data. In Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Springer (2008), 373-382.
4. Cheang, B., Kurnia, A., Lim, A., and Oon, W.-C. On automated grading of programming assignments in an academic institution. Computers & Education 41, 2 (2003), 121-131.
5. Fitzgerald, S., Lewandowski, G., McCauley, R., Murphy, L., Simon, B., Thomas, L., and Zander, C. Debugging: finding, fixing and flailing, a multi-institutional study of novice debuggers. Computer Science Education 18, 2 (2008), 93-116.
6. Fleiss, J. L., Levin, B., and Paik, M. C. The measurement of interrater agreement. Statistical methods for rates and proportions 2 (1981), 212-236.
7. Huang, J., Piech, C., Nguyen, A., and Guibas, L. Syntactic and functional variability of a million code submissions in a machine learning MOOC. In AIED 2013 Workshops Proceedings Volume, Citeseer (2013), 25.
8. Kulkarni, C., Wei, K. P., Le, H., Chia, D., Papadopoulos, K., Cheng, J., Koller, D., and Klemmer, S. R. Peer and self assessment in massive online classes. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 20, 6 (2013), 33.
9. Nguyen, A., Piech, C., Huang, J., and Guibas, L. Codewebs: scalable homework search for massive open online programming courses. In Proceedings of the 23rd international Conference on World wide web, International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee (2014), 491-502.
10. Pappano, L. The year of the MOOC. The New York Times 2, 12 (2012), 2012.
11. Piech, C., Sahami, M., Koller, D., Cooper, S., and Blikstein, P. Modeling how students learn to program. In Proceedings of the 43rd ACM technical symposium on Computer Science Education, ACM (2012), 153-160.
12. Puterman, M. L. Markov decision processes: discrete stochastic dynamic programming, vol. 414. John Wiley & Sons, 2009.
13. Ritter, S., Anderson, J. R., Koedinger, K. R., and Corbett, A. Cognitive tutor: Applied research in mathematics education. Psychonomic bulletin & review 14, 2 (2007), 249-255.
14. Rivers, K., and Koedinger, K. R. A canonicalizing model for building programming tutors. In Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Springer (2012), 591-593.
15. Rivers, K., and Koedinger, K. R. Automating hint generation with solution space path construction. In Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Springer (2014), 329-339.
16. Roll, I., Baker, R. S., Aleven, V., and Koedinger, K. R. On the benefits of seeking (and avoiding) help in online problem-solving environments. Journal of the Learning Sciences, just-accepted (2014).
17. Shapley, L. S. Stochastic games. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 39, 10 (1953), 1095.
18. Singh, R., Gulwani, S., and Solar-Lezama, A. Automated feedback generation for introductory programming assignments. In ACM SIGPLAN Notices, vol. 48, ACM (2013), 15-26.
19. Szczerba, R. J., Galkowski, P., Glicktein, I., and Ternullo, N. Robust algorithm for real-time route planning. Aerospace and Electronic Systems, IEEE Transactions on 36, 3 (2000), 869-878.
20. Watson, C., Li, F. W., and Godwin, J. L. Bluefix: Using crowd-sourced feedback to support programming students in error diagnosis and repair. In Advances in Web-Based Learning-ICWL 2012. Springer, 2012, 228-239.
21. Weld, D. S., Adar, E., Chilton, L., Hoffmann, R., Horvitz, E., Koch, M., Landay, J., Lin, C. H., and Mausam, M. Personalized online educationa crowdsourcing challenge. In Workshops at the Twenty-Sixth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2012).
22. Whitehill, J., Wu, T.-f., Bergsma, J., Movellan, J. R., and Ruvolo, P. L. Whose vote should count more: Optimal integration of labels from labelers of unknown expertise. In Advances in neural information processing systems (2009), 2035-2043.