MUFINS: Multi-formalism interaction network simulator

npj Systems Biology and Applications

Volumn 2, Issue , 2016, Pages

  Wu, Huihai ^a   Von Kamp, Axel ^b   Leoncikas, Vytautas ^a   Mori, Wataru ^c   Sahin, Nilgun ^d   Gevorgyan, Albert ^e   Linley, Catherine ^a   Grabowski, Marek ^f   Mannan, Ahmad A ^a   Stoy, Nicholas ^a   Stewart, Graham R ^a   Ward, Lara T ^g   Lewis, David Jm ^a   Sroka, Jacek ^f   Matsuno, Hiroshi ^c   Klamt, Steffen ^b   Westerhoff, Hans V ^d,h,i   McFadden, Johnjoe ^a   Plant, Nicholas J ^a   Kierzek, Andrzej M ^a,j  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SURREY   (United Kingdom)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR DYNAMICS OF COMPLEX TECHNICAL SYSTEMS   (Germany)

^c YAMAGUCHI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^d VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^e MEDIMMUNE LTD   (United Kingdom)

^f UNIVERSITY OF WARSAW   (Poland)

^g ASTRAZENECA   (United Kingdom)

^h UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^j CERTARA UK LIMITED   (United Kingdom)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85030102047     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20567189     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/npjsba.2016.32     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Gillespie, D. T. Exact stochastic simulation of coupled chemical-reactions. J. Phys. Chem. 81, 2340–2361 (1977).
2. Tyson, J. J., Chen, K. & Novak, B. Network dynamics and cell physiology. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2, 908–916 (2001).
3. Bordbar, A. et al. Constraint-based models predict metabolic and associated cellular functions. Nat. Rev. Genet. 15, 107–120 (2014).
4. Orth, J. D., Thiele, I. & Palsson, B. O. What is flux balance analysis? Nat. Biotechnol. 28, 245–248 (2010).
5. Lewis, N. E., Nagarajan, H. & Palsson, B. O. Constraining the metabolic genotype-phenotype relationship using a phylogeny of in silico methods. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 10, 291–305 (2012).
6. Klamt S. et al. A methodology for the structural and functional analysis of signaling and regulatory networks. BMC Bioinformatics 7, 56 (2006).
7. Remy, E. et al. A description of dynamical graphs associated to elementary regulatory circuits. Bioinformatics 19, II172–II178 (2003).
8. Ruths D. et al. The signaling petri net-based simulator: a non-parametric strategy for characterizing the dynamics of cell-specific signaling networks. PLoS Comput. Biol. 4, e1000005 (2008).
9. Fisher, C. P. et al. QSSPN: dynamic simulation of molecular interaction networks describing gene regulation, signalling and whole-cell metabolism in human cells. Bioinformatics 29, 3181–3190 (2013).
10. Hucka, M. et al. The systems biology markup language (SBML): a medium for representation and exchange of biochemical network models. Bioinformatics 19, 524–531 (2003).
11. Chelliah, V. et al. BioModels: ten-year anniversary. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, D542–D548 (2015).
12. Jones, H. M. & Rowland-Yeo, K. Basic concepts in physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling in drug discovery and development. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst. Pharmacol. 2, e63–e63 (2013).
13. Karr, J. R. et al. A whole-cell computational model predicts phenotype from genotype. Cell 150, 389–401 (2012).
14. Krauss M. et al. Integrating cellular metabolism into a multiscale wholebody model. PLoS Computat. Biol. 8, e1002750 (2012).
15. Ruths, D., Nakhleh, L. & Ram, P. T. Rapidly exploring structural and dynamic properties of signaling networks using PathwayOracle. BMC Syst. Biol. 2, 76 (2008).
16. Covert, M. W. et al. Integrating metabolic, transcriptional regulatory and signal transduction models in Escherichia coli. Bioinformatics 24, 2044–2050 (2008).
17. Covert, M. W., Schilling, C. H. & Palsson, B. Regulation of gene expression in flux balance models of metabolism. J. Theor. Biol. 213, 73–88 (2001).
18. Puchalka, J. & Kierzek, A. M. Bridging the gap between stochastic and deterministic regimes in the kinetic simulations of the biochemical reaction networks. Biophys. J. 86, 1357–1372 (2004).
19. Gevorgyan, A. et al. SurreyFBA: a command line tool and graphics user interface for constraint-based modeling of genome-scale metabolic reaction networks. Bioinformatics 27, 433–434 (2011).
20. Becker S. A. & Palsson B. O. Context-specific metabolic networks are consistent with experiments. PLoS Computat. Biol. 4, e1000082 (2008).
21. Schmidt, B. J. et al. GIM(3)E: condition-specific models of cellular metabolism developed from metabolomics and expression data. Bioinformatics 29, 2900–2908 (2013).
22. Diamant, I. et al. A network-based method for predicting gene-nutrient interactions and its application to yeast amino-acid metabolism. Mol. Biosyst. 5, 1732–1739 (2009).
23. Breitling, R. et al. A structured approach for the engineering of biochemical network models, illustrated for signalling pathways. Brief. Bioinform. 9, 404–421 (2008).
24. Mendum T. A. et al. Lipid metabolism and Type VII secretion systems dominate the genome scale virulence profile of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in human dendritic cells. BMC Genomics 16, 372 (2015).
25. Rohr, C., Marwan, W. & Heiner, M. Snoopy-a unifying Petri net framework to investigate biomolecular networks. Bioinformatics 26, 974–975 (2010).
26. Mendum T. A. et al. Interrogation of global mutagenesis data with a genome scale model of Neisseria meningitidis to assess gene fitness in vitro and in sera. Genome Biol. 12, R127 (2011).
27. Beste D. J. V. et al. GSMN-TB: a web-based genome scale network model of Mycobacterium tuberculosis metabolism. Genome Biol. 8, R89 (2007).
28. Cottret, L. et al. MetExplore: a web server to link metabolomic experiments and genome-scale metabolic networks. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, W132–W137 (2010).
29. Bordbar A. et al. Model-driven multi-omic data analysis elucidates metabolic immunomodulators of macrophage activation. Mol. Syst. Biol. 8, 558 (2012).
30. Dasika, M. S., Burgard, A. & Maranas, C. D. A computational framework for the topological analysis and targeted disruption of signal transduction networks. Biophys. J. 91, 382–398 (2006).
31. Vardi, L., Ruppin, E. & Sharan, R. A linearized constraint-based approach for modeling signaling networks. J. Computat. Biol. 19, 232–240 (2012).
32. Shlomi T. et al. A genome-scale computational study of the interplay between transcriptional regulation and metabolism. Mol. Syst. Biol. 3, 101 (2007).
33. Kolodkin, A. et al. Optimization of stress response through the nuclear receptor-mediated cortisol signalling network. Nat. Commun. 4, 1972 (2013).
34. Kolodkin, A. N. et al. Design principles of nuclear receptor signaling: how complex networking improves signal transduction. Mol. Syst. Biol. 6, 446 (2010).
35. Le Novere, N. et al. The systems biology graphical notation. Nat. Biotechnol. 27, 735–741 (2009).
36. Thiele, I. et al. A community-driven global reconstruction of human metabolism. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 419 (2013).
37. Gille, C. et al. HepatoNet1: a comprehensive metabolic reconstruction of the human hepatocyte for the analysis of liver physiology. Mol. Syst. Biol. 6, 411 (2010).
38. Kolker, E. et al. MOPED: Model Organism Protein Expression Database. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, D1093–D1099 (2012).
39. El-Sankary, W., Plant, N. & Gibson, G. Regulation of the CYP3A4 gene by hydrocortisone and xenobiotics: role of the glucocorticoid and pregnane X receptors. Drug Metab. Dispos. 28, 493–496 (2000).
40. Plant, N. The human cytochrome P450 3A sub-family: transcriptional regulation, inter-individual variation and interaction networks. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1770, 478–488 (2007).
41. Losordo, D. W. & Isner, J. M. Estrogen and angiogenesis—A review. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 21, 6–12 (2001).
42. Zheng, J. et al. Estrogen and progesterone receptors, cell proliferation, and c-fos expression in the ovine uterus during early pregnancy. Endocrinology 137, 340–348 (1996).
43. Kuhl, H. Pharmacology of estrogens and progestogens: influence of different routes of administration. Climacteric 8, 3–63 (2005).
44. Plant, N. & Gibson, G. G. Evaluation of the toxicological relevance of CYP3A4 induction. Curr. Opin. Drug Discov. Dev. 6, 50–56 (2003).
45. Leoncikas, V. et al. Generation of 2,000 breast cancer metabolic landscapes reveals a poor prognosis group with active serotonin production. Sci. Rep. 6, 19771 (2016).
46. Curtis, C. et al. The genomic and transcriptomic architecture of 2,000 breast tumours reveals novel subgroups. Nature 486, 346–352 (2012).
47. DiNatale, B. C. et al. Kynurenic acid is a potent endogenous aryl hydrocarbon receptor ligand that synergistically induces interleukin-6 in the presence of inflammatory signaling. Toxicol. Sci. 115, 89–97 (2010).
48. Opitz, C. A. et al. An endogenous tumour-promoting ligand of the human aryl hydrocarbon receptor. Nature 478, 197–203 (2011).
49. Hoops, S. et al. COPASI—a COmplex PAthway SImulator. Bioinformatics 22, 3067–3074 (2006).