Single-trial effective brain connectivity patterns enhance discriminability of mental imagery tasks

Journal of Neural Engineering

Volumn 14, Issue 5, 2017, Pages

  Rathee, Dheeraj ^a   Cecotti, Hubert ^a   Prasad, Girijesh ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ULSTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

brain computer interface; effective connectivity; mental imagery; partial Granger causality

Indexed keywords

BRAIN; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; INTERFACES (COMPUTER); STATISTICAL TESTS;

EFFECTIVE BRAIN CONNECTIVITIES; EFFECTIVE CONNECTIVITIES; GRANGER CAUSALITY; MENTAL IMAGERY; RELIABLE PERFORMANCE; SPATIAL FILTERINGS; SPATIAL NAVIGATION; STATE-OF-THE-ART METHODS;

BRAIN COMPUTER INTERFACE;

ARTICLE; BRAIN COMPUTER INTERFACE; BRAIN MAPPING; CAUSALITY; COGNITION; DIGITAL FILTERING; DIRECTED TRANSFER FUNCTION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; FUNCTIONAL CONNECTIVITY; IMAGERY; MENTAL IMAGERY; PARTIAL GRANGER CAUSALITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL PROCESSING; SINGLE TRIAL DIRECTED FUNCTIONAL CONNECTIVITY; SPATIAL ORIENTATION; SUBTRACTION IMAGERY; TRANSFER ENTROPY; WORD GENERATION; BRAIN; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMAGINATION; NERVE CELL NETWORK; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES;

BRAIN; BRAIN-COMPUTER INTERFACES; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; HUMANS; IMAGINATION; NERVE NET;

EID: 85029845502     PISSN: 17412560     EISSN: 17412552     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/aa785c     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Valbuena D, Cyriacks M, Friman O, Volosyak I and Graser A 2007 Brain-computer interface for high-level control of rehabilitation robotic systems Proc. of the IEEE 10th Int. Conf. on Rehabilitation Robotics pp 619-25
2. Cecotti H 2011 Spelling with non-invasive brain-computer interfaces - current and future trends J. Physiol. 105 106-14
3. Velasco-Alvarez F, Ron-Angevin R and Lopez-Gordo M A 2013 BCI-based navigation in virtual and real environments 12th Int. Work-Conf. on Artificial Neural Networks (Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol 7903 (Berlin: Springer) pp 404-12
4. Rodríguez M, Giménez R, Diez P, Avila E, Laciar E, Orosco L and Correa A G 2013 Playing with your mind J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 477 012038
5. Zander T O and Kothe C 2011 Towards passive brain-computer interfaces: applying brain-computer interface technology to human-machine systems in general J. Neural Eng. 8 025005
6. Meena Y K, Cecotti H, Wong-Lin K and Prasad G 2015 Towards increasing the number of commands in a hybrid brain-computer interface with combination of gaze and motor imagery Proc. of 37th Annual Int. Conf. of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society pp 506-9
7. Wu J et al 2015 Connectivity measures are robust biomarkers of cortical function and plasticity after stroke Brain 138 2359-69
8. Prasad G, Herman P, Coyle D, McDonough S and Crosbie J 2010 Applying a brain-computer interface to support motor imagery practice in people with stroke for upper limb recovery: a feasibility study J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 7 1
9. Lu J, McFarland D J and Wolpaw J R 2012 Adaptive laplacian filtering for sensorimotor rhythm-based brain-computer interfaces J. Neural Eng. 10 016002
10. Bai O, Lin P, Vorbach S, Floeter M K, Hattori N and Hallett M 2007 A high performance sensorimotor beta rhythm-based brain-computer interface associated with human natural motor behavior J. Neural Eng. 5 24
11. Wolpaw J R and McFarland D J 2004 Control of a two-dimensional movement signal by a noninvasive brain-computer interface in humans Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101 17849-54
12. Ghassemzadeh N and Haghipour S 2016 A review on EEG based brain computer interface systems feature extraction methods Int. J. Adv. Biol. Biomed. Res. 4 117-23
13. Hamedi M, Salleh S and Noor A M 2016 Electroencephalographic motor imagery brain connectivity analysis for BCI: a review Neural Comput. 28 999-1041
14. Takeuchi H, Taki Y, Sassa Y, Hashizume H, Sekiguchi A, Fukushima A and Kawashima R 2013 Brain structures associated with executive functions during everyday events in a non-clinical sample Brain Struct. Funct. 218 1017-32
15. Krusienski D J, McFarland D J and Wolpaw J R 2012 Value of amplitude, phase, and coherence features for a sensorimotor rhythm-based brain-computer interface Brain Res. Bull. 87 130-4
16. Grosse-Wentrup M 2009 Understanding brain connectivity patterns during motor imagery for brain-computer interfacing Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems pp 561-8
17. Billinger M, Brunner C and Müller-Putz G R 2013 Single-trial connectivity estimation for classification of motor imagery data J. Neural Eng. 10 046006
18. Zhang H, Chavarriaga R and Millán J d R 2015 Discriminant brain connectivity patterns of performance monitoring at average and single-trial levels NeuroImage 120 64-74
19. Schreiber T 2000 Measuring information transfer Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 461
20. Kaminski M J and Blinowska K J 1991 A new method of the description of the information flow in the brain structures Biol. Cybern. 65 203-10
21. Baccalá L A and Sameshima K 2001 Partial directed coherence: a new concept in neural structure determination Biol. Cybern. 84 463-74
22. Xu L, Zhang H, Hui M, Long Z, Jin Z, Liu Y and Yao L 2014 Motor execution and motor imagery: a comparison of functional connectivity patterns based on graph theory Neuroscience 261 184-94
23. Rathee D, Cecotti H and Prasad G 2016 Estimation of effective fronto-parietal connectivity during motor imagery using partial granger causality analysis Proc. of Int. Joint Conf. on Neural Networks pp 2055-62
24. Guo S, Seth A K, Kendrick K M, Zhou C and Feng J 2008 Partial granger causality-eliminating exogenous inputs and latent variables J. Neurosci. Methods 172 79-93
25. Papana A, Kyrtsou C, Kugiumtzis D and Diks C 2013 Simulation study of direct causality measures in multivariate time series Entropy 15 2635-61
26. Olejarczyk E, Marzetti L, Pizzella V and Zappasodi F 2017 Comparison of connectivity analyses for resting state EEG data J. Neural Eng. 14 036017
27. Hytti H, Takalo R and Ihalainen H 2006 Tutorial on multivariate autoregressive modelling J. Clin. Monit. Comput. 20 101-8
28. Tangermann M et al 2012 Review of the BCI competition IV Front. Neurosci. 6 55
29. Scherer R, Faller J, Friedrich E V, Opisso E, Costa U, Kübler A and Müller-Putz G R 2015 Individually adapted imagery improves brain-computer interface performance in end-users with disability PloS One 10 e0123727
30. Perrin F, Bertrand O and Pernier J 1987 Scalp current density mapping: value and estimation from potential data IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 4 283-8
31. Cohen M X 2015 Comparison of different spatial transformations applied to EEG data: a case study of error processing Int. J. Psychophysiol. 97 245-57
32. Ding M, Bressler S L, Yang W and Liang H 2000 Short-window spectral analysis of cortical event-related potentials by adaptive multivariate autoregressive modeling: data preprocessing, model validation and variability assessment Biol. Cybern. 83 35-45
33. Morf M, Vieira A, Lee D and Kailath T 1978 Recursive multichannel maximum entropy spectral estimation IEEE Trans. Geosci. Electron. 16 85-94
34. Porcaro C, Coppola G, Pierelli F, Seri S, Di Lorenzo G, Tomasevic L, Salustri C and Tecchio F 2013 Multiple frequency functional connectivity in the hand somatosensory network: an EEG study Clin. Neurophys. 124 1216-24
35. Porcaro C, Zappasodi F, Rossini P M and Tecchio F 2009 Choice of multivariate autoregressive model order affecting real network functional connectivity estimate Clin. Neurophysiol. 120 436-48
36. Schwarz G 1978 Estimating the dimension of a model Ann. Stat. 6 461-4
37. Akaike H 1974 A new look at the statistical model identification IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 19 716-23
38. Durbin J and Watson G S 1951 Testing for serial correlation in least squares regression. II Biometrika 38 159-77
39. Seth A K 2010 A MATLAB toolbox for Granger causal connectivity analysis J. Neurosci. Methods 186 262-73
40. Niso G, Bruña R, Pereda E, Gutiérrez R, Bajo R, Maestú F and del Pozo F 2013 HERMES: towards an integrated toolbox to characterize functional and effective brain connectivity Neuroinformatics 11 405-34
41. Fawcett T 2006 An introduction to ROC analysis Pattern Recognit. Lett. 27 861-74
42. Hetu S, Gregoire M, Saimpont A, Coll M P, Eugene F, Michon P E and Jackson P L 2013 The neural network of motor imagery:an ALE meta-analysis Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 37 930-49
43. Miller K J, Schalk G, Fetz E, den Nijs M, Ojemann J G and Rao R P N 2010 Cortical activity during motor execution, motor imagery and imagery-based online feedback Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 107 4430-5
44. Smith M M, Weaver K E, Grabowski T J, Rao R P N and Darvas F 2014 Non-invasive detection of high gamma band activity during motor imagery Front. Human Neurosci. 8 817
45. Hermes D, Miller K J, Vansteensel M J, Aarnoutse E J, Leijten F S S and Ramsey N F 2012 Neurophysiologic correlates of fMRI in human motor cortex Human Brain Mapp. 33 1689-99
46. Conner C R, Ellmore T M, Pieters T A, DiSano M A and Tandon N 2011 Variability of the relationship between electrophysiology and BOLD-fMRI across cortical regions in humans J. Neurosci. 31 12855-65
47. Youssofzadeh V, Prasad G, Naeem M and Wong-Lin K 2016 Temporal information of directed causal connectivity in multi-trial ERP data using partial granger causality Neuroinformatics 14 99-120
48. Friedrich E V, Scherer R and Neuper C 2012 The effect of distinct mental strategies on classification performance for brain-computer interfaces Int. J. Psychophysiol. 84 86-94
49. Friedrich E V, Scherer R and Neuper C 2013 Long-term evaluation of a 4-class imagery-based brain-computer interface Clin. Neurophysiol. 124 916-27
50. Haufe S, Nikulin V V, Müller K-R and Nolte G 2013 A critical assessment of connectivity measures for EEG data: a simulation study Neuroimage 64 120-33
51. Jatoi M A, Kamel N, Malik A S, Faye I and Begum T 2014 A survey of methods used for source localization using EEG signals Biomed. Signal Process. Control 11 42-52
52. van den Broek S P, Reinders F, Donderwinkel M and Peters M 1998 Volume conduction effects in EEG and MEG Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 106 522-34
53. Baillet S, Mosher J C and Leahy R M 2001 Electromagnetic brain mapping IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 18 14-30