Construction of and efficient sampling from the simplicial configuration model

Physical Review E

Volumn 96, Issue 3, 2017, Pages

  Young, Jean Gabriel ^a   Petri, Giovanni ^b   Vaccarino, Francesco ^b,c   Patania, Alice ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

^b ISI FOUNDATION   (Italy)

^c POLITECNICO DI TORINO   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MARKOV PROCESSES;

BETTI NUMBERS; CONFIGURATION MODEL; EFFICIENT SAMPLING; EMPIRICAL DATA; LOCAL SCALE; MARKOV CHAIN MONTE-CARLO; REAL SYSTEMS; SIMPLICIAL COMPLEX;

COMPLEX NETWORKS;

EID: 85029828746     PISSN: 24700045     EISSN: 24700053     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.96.032312     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. R. Pastor-Satorras, C. Castellano, P. Van Mieghem, and A. Vespignani, Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 925 (2015). RMPHAT 0034-6861 10.1103/RevModPhys.87.925
2. Y.-Y. Liu and A.-L. Barabási, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 035006 (2016). RMPHAT 0034-6861 10.1103/RevModPhys.88.035006
3. M. A. Porter, J.-P. Onnela, and P. J. Mucha, Notices AMS 56, 1082 (2009).
4. M. E. J. Newman, Nat. Phys. 8, 25 (2012). 1745-2473 10.1038/nphys2162
5. Y. Dabaghian, F. Mémoli, L. Frank, and G. Carlsson, PLoS Comput. Biol. 8, e1002581 (2012). 1553-7358 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002581
6. C. Giusti, R. Ghrist, and D. S. Bassett, J. Comput. Neurosci. 41, 1 (2016). JCNEFR 0929-5313 10.1007/s10827-016-0608-6
7. K. Xia and G.-W. Wei, Int. J. Numer. Methods Biomed. Eng. 30, 814 (2014). 2040-7939 10.1002/cnm.2655
8. L. Hébert-Dufresne, E. Laurence, A. Allard, J.-G. Young, and L. J. Dubé, Phys. Rev. E 92, 062809 (2015). PLEEE8 1539-3755 10.1103/PhysRevE.92.062809
9. B. Stolz, H. Harrington, and M. A. Porter, arXiv:1610.00752 (unpublished).
10. K. Zuev, O. Eisenberg, and D. Krioukov, J. Phys. A 48, 465002 (2015). 1751-8113 10.1088/1751-8113/48/46/465002
11. S. P. Ellis and A. Klein, Homology, Homotopy Appl. 16, 245 (2014). 1532-0073 10.4310/HHA.2014.v16.n1.a14
12. C. Curto and V. Itskov, PLoS Comput. Biol. 4, e1000205 (2008). 1553-7358 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000205
13. D. Horak, S. Maletić, and M. Rajković, J. Stat. Mech. Theor. Exp. (2009) P03034. 1742-5468 10.1088/1742-5468/2009/03/P03034
14. A. Patania, F. Vaccarino, and G. Petri, EPJ Data Sci. 6, 7 (2017). 2193-1127 10.1140/epjds/s13688-017-0104-x
15. G. Petri, M. Scolamiero, I. Donato, and F. Vaccarino, PloS One 8, e66506 (2013). 1932-6203 10.1371/journal.pone.0066506
16. A. Sizemore, C. Giusti, and D. S. Bassett, J. Complex Netw. 5, 245 (2017) 10.1093/comnet/cnw013.
17. J. M. Chan, G. Carlsson, and R. Rabadan, PNAS 110, 18566 (2013). PNASA6 0027-8424 10.1073/pnas.1313480110
18. G. Petri, P. Expert, F. Turkheimer, R. Carhart-Harris, D. Nutt, P. Hellyer, and F. Vaccarino, J. R. Soc. Interface 11, 20140873 (2014). 1742-5689 10.1098/rsif.2014.0873
19. Y. Hiraoka, T. Nakamura, A. Hirata, E. G. Escolar, K. Matsue, and Y. Nishiura, PNAS 113, 7035 (2016). PNASA6 0027-8424 10.1073/pnas.1520877113
20. M. Kahle, AMS Contemp. Math. 620, 201 (2014). 9780-8218 10.1090/conm/620
21. A. Costa and M. Farber, in Configuration Spaces (Springer, Berlin, 2016), pp. 129-153.
22. O. T. Courtney and G. Bianconi, Phys. Rev. E 93, 062311 (2016). 2470-0045 10.1103/PhysRevE.93.062311
23. G. Bianconi and C. Rahmede, Phys. Rev. E 93, 032315 (2016). 2470-0045 10.1103/PhysRevE.93.032315
24. Z. Wu, G. Menichetti, C. Rahmede, and G. Bianconi, Sci. Rep. 5, 10073 (2015). 2045-2322 10.1038/srep10073
25. B. K. Fosdick, D. B. Larremore, J. Nishimura, and J. Ugander, arXiv:1608.00607 (unpublished).
26. C. Orsini, M. M. Dankulov, A. Jamakovic, P. Mahadevan, P. Colomer-de Simón, A. Vahdat, K. E. Bassler, Z. Toroczkai, M. Boguñá, G. Caldarelli, Nat. Commun. 6, 8627 (2015). 2041-1723 10.1038/ncomms9627
27. M. Molloy and B. A. Reed, Rand. Struct. Alg. 6, 161 (1995). 1042-9832 10.1002/rsa.3240060204
28. M. E. J. Newman, S. H. Strogatz, and D. J. Watts, Phys. Rev. E 64, 026118 (2001). 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.64.026118
29. A. Hatcher, Algebraic Topology (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2000).
30. I. Miklós, P. L. Erdos, and L. Soukup, Electron. J. Combin. 20, P16 (2013).
31. E. A. Bender and E. R. Canfield, J. Combin. Theo. A 24, 296 (1978). JCBTA7 0097-3165 10.1016/0097-3165(78)90059-6
32. We provide a reference c ++ implementation of the sampler as well as tutorials at https://www.github.com/jg-you/scm.
33. M. Kato, T. Kakutani, T. Inoue, and T. Itino, Contr. Biol. Lab. Kyoto Univ. 27, 309 (1990).
34. K.-I. Goh, M. E. Cusick, D. Valle, B. Childs, M. Vidal, and A.-L. Barabási, PNAS 104, 8685 (2007). PNASA6 0027-8424 10.1073/pnas.0701361104
35. S. Decker, C. W. Kohfeld, R. Rosenfeld, and J. Sprague, St. Louis Homicide Project: Local Responses to a National Problem (University of Missouri, St. Louis, 1991).
36. We represent the support of the SCM as a graph (Equation presented). If (Equation presented) is an expander, then the sampler yields uncorrelated configuration with high probability after (Equation presented) steps; the suggested (Equation presented) follows from the loose upper bound (Equation presented). A proof that (Equation presented) is in fact an expander will depend on (Equation presented); however, we note that (Equation presented) shares two important properties with all expanders for sufficiently large (Equation presented): It is connected and not bipartite.
37. M. E. J. Newman, Phys. Rev. E 68, 026121 (2003). 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.68.026121
38. C. A. Hidalgo, Applied Network Science 1, 6 (2016). 2364-8228 10.1007/s41109-016-0010-3
39. V. Havel, Casopis Pest. Mat. 80, 477 (1955).
40. S. L. Hakimi, J. Soc. Ind. Appl. Math. 10, 496 (1962). JSIMAV 0368-4245 10.1137/0110037
41. M. E. J. Newman and M. Girvan, Phys. Rev. E 69, 026113 (2004). PLEEE8 1539-3755 10.1103/PhysRevE.69.026113