When, Where, and How Nature Matters for Ecosystem Services: Challenges for the Next Generation of Ecosystem Service Models

BioScience

Volumn 67, Issue 9, 2017, Pages 820-833

  Rieb, Jesse T ^a   Chaplin Kramer, Rebecca ^b   Daily, Gretchen C ^b,c   Armsworth, Paul R ^d   Böhning Gaese, Katrin ^e,f   Bonn, Aletta ^g,h,i   Cumming, Graeme S ^j   Eigenbrod, Felix ^k   Grimm, Volker ^g,h   Jackson, Bethanna M ^l   Marques, Alexandra ^e,g,n   Pattanayak, Subhrendu K ^o   Pereira, Henrique M ^g,m   Peterson, Garry D ^p   Ricketts, Taylor H ^q   Robinson, Brian E ^r   Schröter, Matthias ^g,h   Schulte, Lisa A ^s   Seppelt, Ralf ^h,m   Turner, Monica G ^t   Bennett, Elena M ^a   more..

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Stanford University   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

^e BIODIVERSITY AND CLIMATE RESEARCH CENTRE BIK F   (Germany)

^f GOETHE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^g GERMAN CENTRE FOR INTEGRATIVE BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH IDIV HALLE JENA LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^h HELMHOLTZ CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH UFZ   (Germany)

ⁱ FRIEDRICH SCHILLER UNIVERSITY JENA   (Germany)

^j JAMES COOK UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^k UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^l VICTORIA UNIVERSITY OF WELLINGTON   (New Zealand)

^m MARTIN LUTHER UNIVERSITY HALLE WITTENBERG   (Germany)

ⁿ LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^o DUKE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^p STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^q UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT   (United States)

^r MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^s IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^t UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

decision making; decision support tools; ecosystem services; modeling; natural capital

Indexed keywords

EID: 85029689597     PISSN: 00063568     EISSN: 15253244     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/biosci/bix075     Document Type: Review

References (116)

1. Akçakaya HR, Pereira HM, Canziani GA, Mbow C, Mori A, Palomo MG, Soberón J, Thuiller W, Yachi S. 2016. Improving the rigour and usefulness of scenarios and models through ongoing evaluation and refinement. Pages 323-369 in Ferrier S, et al., eds. IPBES (2016): Methodological Assessment of Scenarios and Models of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Secretariat of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services.
2. Arkema KK, Guannel G, Verutes G, Wood SA, Guerry A, Ruckelshaus M, Kareiva P, Lacayo M, Silver JM. 2013. Coastal habitats shield people and property from sea-level rise and storms. Nature Climate Change 3: 913-918.
3. Armsworth P, Chan K, Daily G, Ehrlich P, Kremen C, Ricketts T, Sanjayan M. 2007. Ecosystem-service science and the way forward for conservation. Conservation Biology 21: 1383-1384.
4. Baccini A, et al. 2012. Estimated carbon dioxide emissions from tropical deforestation improved by carbon-density maps. Nature Climate Change 2: 182-185.
5. Bagstad KJ, Semmens DJ, Waage S, Winthrop R. 2013. A comparative assessment of decision-support tools for ecosystem services quantification and valuation. Ecosystem Services 5: 27-39.
6. Baldeck CA, Asner GP, Martin RE, Anderson CB, Knapp DE, Kellner JR, Wright SJ. 2015. Operational tree species mapping in a diverse tropical forest with airborne imaging spectroscopy. PLOS ONE 10 (art. e0118403).
7. Bateman IJ, et al. 2013. Bringing ecosystem services into economic decision-making: Land use in the United Kingdom. Science 341: 45-50.
8. Bennett EM. 2016. Research frontiers in ecosystem service science. Ecosystems 20: 31-37.
9. Bennett EM, Chaplin-Kramer R. 2016. Science for the sustainable use of ecosystem services. F1000Research 5 (art. 2622).
10. Bennett EM, et al. 2015. Linking biodiversity, ecosystem services, and human well-being: Three challenges for designing research for sustainability. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 14: 76-85.
11. Bhagabati NK, et al. 2014. Ecosystem services reinforce Sumatran tiger conservation in land use plans. Biological Conservation 169: 147-156.
12. Bonn A, et al. 2014. Investing in nature: Developing ecosystem service markets for peatland restoration. Ecosystem Services 9: 54-65.
13. Braat LC, de Groot R. 2012. The ecosystem services agenda: Bridging the worlds of natural science and economics, conservation and development, and public and private policy. Ecosystem Services 1: 4-15
14. Bratman GN, Hamilton JP, Daily GC. 2012. The impacts of nature experience on human cognitive function and mental health. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1249: 118-136.
15. Carpenter SR, Bennett EM, Peterson GD. 2006. Scenarios for ecosystem services: An overview. Ecology and Society 11 (art. 29).
16. Carpenter SR, et al. 2009. Science for managing ecosystem services: Beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106: 1305-1312.
17. Chan KMA, et al. 2012. Where are cultural and social in ecosystem services A framework for constructive engagement. BioScience 62: 744-756.
18. Chaplin-Kramer R, et al. 2015a. Degradation in carbon stocks near tropical forest edges. Nature Communications 6 (art. 10158).
19. Chaplin-Kramer R, et al. 2015b. Spatial patterns of agricultural expansion determine impacts on biodiversity and carbon storage. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112: 7402-7407.
20. Chichilnisky G, Heal G. 1998. Economic returns from the biosphere. Nature 391: 629-630.
21. Christian B, Krishnayya NSR. 2009. Classification of tropical trees growing in a sanctuary using Hyperion (EO-1) and SAM algorithm. Current Science 96: 1601-1607.
22. Civantos E, Thuiller W, Maiorano L, Guisan A, Araújo MB. 2012. Potential impacts of climate change on ecosystem services in Europe: The case of pest control by vertebrates. BioScience 62: 658-666.
23. Clark WC, Jones DD, Holling CS. 1979. Lessons for ecological policy design: A case study of ecosystem management. Ecological Modelling 7: 1-53.
24. [CMM] Communauté métropolitaine de Montréal. 2011. Règlement numéro 2011-51 sur le plan métropolitain d'aménagement et de développement. CMM. Coca-Cola. 2015. 2014/2015 Sustainability Report. Coca-Cola.
25. Colléter M, Valls A, Guitton J, Gascuel D, Pauly D, Christensen V. 2015. Global overview of the applications of the Ecopath with Ecosim modeling approach using the EcoBase models repository. Ecological Modelling 302: 42-53.
26. Costanza R, et al. 1997. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387: 253-260.
27. Cox PM, Betts RA, Jones CD, Spall SA, Totterdell IJ. 2000. Acceleration of global warming due to carbon-cycle feedbacks in a coupled climate model. Nature 408: 184-187.
28. Daniel TC, et al. 2012. Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109: 8812-8819.
29. Davies KK, Fisher KT, Dickson ME, Thrush SF, Le Heron R. 2015. Improving ecosystem service frameworks to address wicked problems. Ecology and Society 20 (art. 37).
30. Daw TM, Brown K, Rosendo S, Pomeroy R. 2011. Applying the ecosystem services concept to poverty alleviation: The need to disaggregate human well-being. Environmental Conservation 38: 370-379.
31. Daw TM, Coulthard S, Cheung WWL, Brown K, Abunge C, Galafassi D, Peterson GD, McClanahan TR, Omukoto JO, Munyi L. 2015. Evaluating taboo trade-offs in ecosystems services and human well-being. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112: 6949-6954.
32. Daw TM, et al. 2016. Elasticity in ecosystem services: Exploring the variable relationship between ecosystems and human well-being. Ecology and Society 21 (art. 11).
33. Dawson N, Martin A. 2015. Assessing the contribution of ecosystem services to human wellbeing: A disaggregated study in western Rwanda. Ecological Economics 117: 62-72.
34. DeFries RS, Rudel T, Uriarte M, Hansen M. 2010. Deforestation driven by urban population growth and agricultural trade in the twenty-first century. Nature Geoscience 3: 178-181.
35. [DHS] US Department of Homeland Security. 2011. Risk Management Fundamentals: Homeland Security Risk Management Doctrine. DHS.
36. Díaz S, et al. 2015. The IPBES Conceptual Framework-Connecting nature and people. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 14: 1-16.
37. Eigenbrod F, Armsworth PR, Anderson BJ, Heinemeyer A, Gillings S, Roy DB, Thomas CD, Gaston KJ. 2010. The impact of proxy-based methods on mapping the distribution of ecosystem services. Journal of Applied Ecology 47: 377-385.
38. Ellis AM, Myers SS, Ricketts TH. 2015. Do pollinators contribute to nutritional health PLOS ONE 10 (art. e114805).
39. Farber SC, Costanza R, Wilson MA. 2002. Economic and ecological concepts for valuing ecosystem services. Ecological Economics 41: 375-392.
40. Fischer J, et al. 2015. Advancing sustainability through mainstreaming a social-ecological systems perspective. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 14: 144-149.
41. Fisher B, et al. 2008. Ecosystem services and economic theory: Integration for policy-relevant research. Ecological Applications 18: 2050-2067.
42. Fisher B, Turner RK, Morling P. 2009. Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecological Economics 68: 643-653.
43. García-Nieto AP, García-Llorente M, Iniesta-Arandia I, Martín-López B. 2013. Mapping forest ecosystem services: From providing units to beneficiaries. Ecosystem Services 4: 126-138.
44. Goldstein JH, Caldarone G, Duarte TK, Ennaanay D, Hannahs N, Mendoza G, Polasky S, Wolny S, Daily GC. 2012. Integrating ecosystem-service tradeoffs into land-use decisions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109: 7565-7570.
45. Goulder LH, Williams RC. 2012. The choice of discount rate for climate change policy evaluation. Climate Change Economics 3 (art. 1250024).
46. Grêt-Regamey A, Rabe S-E, Crespo R, Lautenbach S, Ryffel A, Schlup B. 2014. On the importance of non-linear relationships between landscape patterns and the sustainable provision of ecosystem services. Landscape Ecology 29: 201-212.
47. Grimm V, Berger U. 2016. Structural realism, emergence, and predictions in next-generation ecological modelling: Synthesis from a special issue. Ecological Modelling 326: 177-187.
48. Guerry AD, et al. 2015. Natural capital and ecosystem services informing decisions: From promise to practice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112: 7348-7355.
49. Güneralp B, Seto KC, Ramachandran M. 2013. Evidence of urban land teleconnections and impacts on hinterlands. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 5: 445-451.
50. Guswa AJ, Brauman KA, Brown C, Hamel P, Keeler BL, Sayre SS. 2014. Ecosystem services: Challenges and opportunities for hydrologic modeling to support decision making. Water Resources Research 50: 4535-4544.
51. Haines-Young R, Potschin M. 2010. The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being. Pages 110-139 in Raffaelli DG, Frid CLJ, eds. Ecosystem Ecology: A New Synthesis. Cambridge University Press.
52. Harris R, Sleight P, Webber R. 2005. Geodemographics, GIS and neighbourhood targeting. Wiley.
53. Holland RA, et al. 2015. Global impacts of energy demand on the freshwater resources of nations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112: E6707-E6716.
54. [IDB] Inter-American Development Bank. 2016. Sustainability Report 2015. IDB.
55. Jackson B, Pagella T, Sinclair F, Orellana B, Henshaw A, Reynolds B, McIntyre N, Wheater H, Eycott A. 2013. Polyscape: A GIS mapping framework providing efficient and spatially explicit landscape-scale valuation of multiple ecosystem services. Landscape and Urban Planning 112: 74-88.
56. Keeler BL, Polasky S. 2014. Land-use change and costs to rural households: A case study in groundwater nitrate contamination. Environmental Research Letters 9 (art. 074002).
57. Kremen C. 2005. Managing ecosystem services: What do we need to know about their ecology Ecology Letters 8: 468-479.
58. Lang DJ, Wiek A, Bergmann M, Stauffacher M, Martens P, Moll P, Swilling M, Thomas CJ. 2012. Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: Practice, principles, and challenges. Sustainability Science 7: 25-43.
59. Lautenbach S, Volk M, Strauch M, Whittaker G, Seppelt R. 2013. Optimization-based trade-off analysis of biodiesel crop production for managing an agricultural catchment. Environmental Modelling and Software 48: 98-112.
60. Lavorel S, Grigulis K, Lamarque P, Colace MP, Garden D, Girel J, Pellet G, Douzet R. 2011. Using plant functional traits to understand the landscape distribution of multiple ecosystem services. Journal of Ecology 99: 135-147.
61. Lawler JJ, Lewis DJ, Nelson E, Plantinga AJ, Polasky S, Withey JC, Helmers DP, Martinuzzi S, Pennington D, Radeloff VC. 2014. Projected land-use change impacts on ecosystem services in the United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111: 7492-7497.
62. Le QB, Tamene L, Vlek PL. 2012. Multi-pronged assessment of land degradation in West Africa to assess the importance of atmospheric fertilization in masking the processes involved. Global and Planetary Change 92: 71-81.
63. Levins R. 1966. The strategy of model building in population biology. American Scientist 54: 421-431.
64. Li C, et al. 2015. Impacts of conservation and human development policy across stakeholders and scales. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112: 7396-7401.
65. Liu J, et al. 2015. Systems integration for global sustainability. Science 347 (art. 1258832).
66. Liu J, Yang W, Li S. 2016. Framing ecosystem services in the telecoupled Anthropocene. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 14: 27-36.
67. Maantay JA, Maroko AR, Herrmann C. 2007. Mapping population distribution in the urban environment: The Cadastral-Based Expert Dasymetric System (CEDS). Cartography and Geographic Information Science 34: 77-102.
68. MacDonald GK, Brauman KA, Sun S, Carlson KM, Cassidy ES, Gerber JS, West PC. 2015. Rethinking agricultural trade relationships in an era of globalization. BioScience 65: 275-289.
69. Mandle L, Bryant BP, Ruckelshaus M, Geneletti D, Kiesecker JM, Pfaff A. 2015. Entry points for considering ecosystem services within infrastructure planning: How to integrate conservation with development in order to aid them both. Conservation Letters 9: 221-227.
70. Maron M, Mitchell MGE, Runting RK, Rhodes JR, Mace GM, Keith DA, Watson JEM. 2017. Towards a threat assessment framework for ecosystem services. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 32: 240-248.
71. Martín-López B, Gómez-Baggethun E, García-Llorente M, Montes C. 2014. Trade-offs across value-domains in ecosystem services assessment. Ecological Indicators 37A: 220-228.
72. McKenzie E, Posner S, Tillmann P, Bernhardt JR, Howard K, Rosenthal A. 2014. Understanding the use of ecosystem service knowledge in decision making: Lessons from international experiences of spatial planning. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 32: 320-340.
73. Mitchell MGE, Bennett EM, Gonzalez A. 2014. Forest fragments modulate the provision of multiple ecosystem services. Journal of Applied Ecology 51: 909-918.
74. Mogollón B, Villamagna AM, Frimpong EA, Angermeier PL. 2016. Mapping technological and biophysical capacities of watersheds to regulate floods. Ecological Indicators 61: 483-499.
75. Mulligan M. 2012. WaterWorld: A self-parameterising, physically-based model for application in data-poor but problem-rich environments globally. Hydrology Research 44: 748-769.
76. Myers SS, Gaffikin L, Golden CD, Ostfeld RS, Redford KH, Ricketts TH, Turner WR, Osofsky SA. 2013. Human health impacts of ecosystem alteration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110: 18753-18760.
77. Nagendra H, Lucas R, Honrado JP, Jongman RH, Tarantino C, Adamo M, Mairota P. 2013. Remote sensing for conservation monitoring: Assessing protected areas, habitat extent, habitat condition, species diversity, and threats. Ecological Indicators 33: 45-59.
78. Norgaard RB. 2008. Finding hope in the millennium ecosystem assessment. Conservation Biology 22: 862-869.
79. -. 2010. Ecosystem services: From eye-opening metaphor to complexity blinder. Ecological Economics 69: 1219-1227.
80. Ouyang Z, et al. 2016. Improvements in ecosystem services from investments in natural capital. Science 352: 1455-1459.
81. Palomo I, Felipe-Lucia MR, Bennett EM, Martín-López B, Pascual U. 2016. Disentangling the pathways and effects of ecosystem service co-production. Advances in Ecological Research 54: 245-283.
82. Pattanayak S, K., Ross MT, Depro BM, Bauch SC, Timmins C, Wendland KJ, Alger K. 2009. Climate change and conservation in Brazil: CGE evaluation of health and wealth impacts. B. E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy 9 (art. 6).
83. Peña L, Casado-Arzuaga I, Onaindia M. 2015. Mapping recreation supply and demand using an ecological and a social evaluation approach. Ecosystem Services 13: 108-118.
84. Qiu J, Turner MG. 2013. Spatial interactions among ecosystem services in an urbanizing agricultural watershed. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110: 12149-12154.
85. Rathwell KJ, Peterson GD. 2012. Connecting social networks with ecosystem services for watershed governance: A social-ecological network perspective highlights the critical role of bridging organizations. Ecology and Society 17 (art. 24).
86. Raudsepp-Hearne C, Peterson GD, Tengö M, Bennett EM, Holland T, Benessaiah K, MacDonald GK, Pfeifer L. 2010. Untangling the environmentalist's paradox: Why is human well-being increasing as ecosystem services degrade BioScience 60: 576-589.
87. Reed MS, et al. 2013. Participatory scenario development for environmental management: A methodological framework illustrated with experience from the UK uplands. Journal of Environmental Management 128: 345-362.
88. Remme RP, Schröter M, Hein L. 2014. Developing spatial biophysical accounting for multiple ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services 10: 6-18.
89. Renard D, Rhemtulla JM, Bennett EM. 2015. Historical dynamics in ecosystem service bundles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112: 13411-13416.
90. Reyers B, Biggs R, Cumming GS, Elmqvist T, Hejnowicz AP, Polasky S. 2013. Getting the measure of ecosystem services: A social-ecological approach. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 11: 268-273.
91. Ricketts TH, Lonsdorf E. 2013. Mapping the margin: Comparing marginal values of tropical forest remnants for pollination services. Ecological Applications 23: 1113-1123.
92. Rosenthal A, Verutes G, McKenzie E, Arkema KK, Bhagabati N, Bremer LL, Olwero N, Vogl AL. 2015. Process matters: A framework for conducting decision-relevant assessments of ecosystem services. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services and Management 11: 190-204.
93. Schmidt S, Manceur AM, Seppelt R. 2016. Uncertainty of monetary valued ecosystem services: Value transfer functions for global mapping. PLOS ONE 11 (art. e0148524).
94. Schröter M, Remme RP. 2016. Spatial prioritisation for conserving ecosystem services: Comparing hotspots with heuristic optimisation. Landscape Ecology 31: 431-450.
95. Schröter M, Remme RP, Sumarga E, Barton DN, Hein L. 2015. Lessons learned for spatial modelling of ecosystem services in support of ecosystem accounting. Ecosystem Services 13: 64-69.
96. Schultz L, Folke C, Olsson P. 2007. Enhancing ecosystem management through social-ecological inventories: Lessons from Kristianstads Vattenrike, Sweden. Environmental Conservation 34: 140-152.
97. Seitzinger SP, et al. 2012. Planetary stewardship in an urbanizing world: Beyond city limits. Ambio 41: 787-794.
98. Seppelt R, Dormann CF, Eppink FV, Lautenbach S, Schmidt S. 2011. A quantitative review of ecosystem service studies: Approaches, shortcomings and the road ahead. Journal of Applied Ecology 48: 630-636.
99. Sharp R, et al. 2014. InVEST User's Guide. The Natural Capital Project, Stanford University, University of Minnesota, The Nature Conservancy, World Wildlife Fund. (13 June 2017; http: //data. naturalcapitalproject. org/nightly-build/invest-users-guide/html)
100. Sonter LJ, Watson KB, Wood SA, Ricketts TH. 2016. Spatial and temporal dynamics and value of nature-based recreation, estimated via social media. PLOS ONE 11 (art. e0162372).
101. Steffen W, Broadgate W, Deutsch L, Gaffney O, Ludwig C. 2015. The trajectory of the Anthropocene: The great acceleration. Anthropocene Review 2: 81-98.
102. Stillman RA, Wood KA, Goss-Custard JD. 2016. Deriving simple predictions from complex models to support environmental decision-making. Ecological Modelling 326: 134-141.
103. Syrbe R-U, Walz U. 2012. Spatial indicators for the assessment of ecosystem services: Providing, benefiting and connecting areas and landscape metrics. Ecological Indicators 21: 80-88.
104. [TEEB] The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity. 2010. Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB. TEEB.
105. Terrado M, Tauler R, Bennett EM. 2015. Landscape and local factors influence water purification in the Monteregian agroecosystem in Québec, Canada. Regional Environmental Change 15: 1743-1755.
106. Thiele JC, Grimm V. 2015. Replicating and breaking models: Good for you and good for ecology. Oikos 124: 691-696.
107. Topping CJ, Alrøe HF, Farrell KN, Grimm V. 2015. Per aspera ad astra: Through complex population modeling to predictive theory. American Naturalist 186: 669-674.
108. Van Den Hoek J, Burnicki A, Ozdogan M, Zhu AX. 2015. Using a pattern metric-based analysis to examine the success of forest policy implementation in Southwest China. Landscape Ecology 30: 1111-1127.
109. Van der Ploeg S, de Groot R. 2010. The TEEB Valuation Database: A Searchable Database of 1310 Estimates of Monetary Values of Ecosystem Services. Foundation for Sustainable Development.
110. Van Oudenhoven APE, Petz K, Alkemade R, Hein L, de Groot RS. 2012. Framework for systematic indicator selection to assess effects of land management on ecosystem services. Ecological Indicators 21: 110-122.
111. Villa F, Bagstad KJ, Voigt B, Johnson GW, Portela R, Honzák M, Batker D. 2014. A methodology for adaptable and robust ecosystem services assessment. PLOS ONE 9 (art. e91001).
112. Vis M, Klijn F, De Bruijn KM, Van Buuren M. 2003. Resilience strategies for flood risk management in the Netherlands. International Journal of River Basin Management 1: 33-40.
113. Voinov A, Seppelt R, Reis S, Nabel JEMS, Shokravi S. 2014. Values in socio-environmental modelling: Persuasion for action or excuse for inaction. Environmental Modelling and Software 53: 207-212.
114. White D, Minotti PG, Barczak MJ, Sifneos JC, Freemark KE, Santelmann MV, Steinitz CF, Kiester AR, Preston EM. 1997. Assessing risks to biodiversity from future landscape change. Conservation Biology 11: 349-360.
115. Wolff S, Schulp CJE, Verburg PH. 2015. Mapping ecosystem services demand: A review of current research and future perspectives. Ecological Indicators 55: 159-171.
116. Wood SA, Guerry AD, Silver JM, Lacayo M. 2013. Using social media to quantify nature-based tourism and recreation. Scientific Reports 3: 1-7.