Publisher Correction: Combining Biomarkers with EMR Data to Identify Patients in Different Phases of Sepsis (Scientific Reports, (2017), 7, 1, (10800), 10.1038/s41598-017-09766-1);Combining Biomarkers with EMR Data to Identify Patients in Different Phases of Sepsis

Scientific Reports

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2017, Pages

  Taneja, Ishan ^a,c,d   Reddy, Bobby ^a,c,d   Damhorst, Gregory ^a,c   Dave Zhao, Sihai ^b   Hassan, Umer ^a,c   Price, Zachary ^a,c   Jensen, Tor ^a,c   Ghonge, Tanmay ^a,c   Patel, Manish ^a,c   Wachspress, Samuel ^a,c,d   Winter, Jake ^a,c,d   Rappleye, Michael ^a,c   Smith, Gillian ^a,c   Healey, Ryan ^a,c   Ajmal, Muhammad ^c   Khan, Muhammad ^c   Patel, Jay ^c   Rawal, Harsh ^c   Sarwar, Raiya ^c   Soni, Sumeet ^c   Anwaruddin, Syed ^c   Davis, Benjamin ^c   Kumar, James ^c   White, Karen ^c   Bashir, Rashid ^a,c   Zhu, Ruoqing ^b   more..

^a University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^c CARLE FOUNDATION HOSPITAL   (United States)

^d Prenosis Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MARKER;

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MACHINE LEARNING; PATHOLOGY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PROCEDURES; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SEPSIS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; UNITED STATES;

BIOMARKERS; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; ELECTRONIC DATA PROCESSING; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; HUMANS; MACHINE LEARNING; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; ROC CURVE; SEPSIS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 85029125816     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-53691-4     Document Type: Erratum

References (36)

1. Vincent, J.-L. et al. Assessment of the worldwide burden of critical illness: the Intensive Care Over Nations (ICON) audit. Lancet Respir. Med. 2, 380-386 (2014).
2. Cohen, J. et al. Sepsis: a roadmap for future research. Lancet Infect. Dis. 15, 581-614 (2015).
3. Singer, M. et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 315, 801 (2016).
4. Lagu, T. et al. Hospitalizations, costs, and outcomes of severe sepsis in the United States 2003 to 2007. Criti. Care Med. 40, 754-761 (2012).
5. Rivers, E. et al. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N. Engl. J. Med. 345, 1368-77 (2001).
6. Dellinger, R. P. et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012. Crit. Care Med. 41, 580-637 (2013).
7. Novosad, S. A. et al. Vital Signs: Epidemiology of Sepsis: Prevalence of Health Care Factors and Opportunities for Prevention. MMWR. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 65, 864-869 (2016).
8. Mouncey, P. R. et al. Trial of Early, Goal-Directed Resuscitation for Septic Shock. N. Engl. J. Med. 372, 1301-1311 (2015).
9. Nguyen, S. Q. et al. Automated electronic medical record sepsis detection in the emergency department. PeerJ 2, e343 (2014).
10. Hooper, M. H. et al. Randomized trial of automated, electronic monitoring to facilitate early detection of sepsis in the intensive care unit. Crit. Care Med. 40, 2096-2101 (2012).
11. Alsolamy, S. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of a screening electronic alert tool for severe sepsis and septic shock in the emergency department. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 14, 105 (2014).
12. Henry, K., Hager, D., Pronovost, P. & Saria, S. A targeted real-time early warning score (TREWScore) for septic shock. Sci. Transl. Med. 7, (2015).
13. Tsoukalas, A., Albertson, T. & Tagkopoulos, I. From Data to Optimal Decision Making: A Data-Driven, Probabilistic Machine Learning Approach to Decision Support for Patients With Sepsis. JMIR Med. Informatics 3, e11 (2015).
14. Marlin, B. M., Kale, D. C., Khemani, R. G. & Wetzel, R. C. Unsupervised pattern discovery in electronic health care data using probabilistic clustering models. in Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGHIT symposium on International health informatics-IHI '12 DOI:10. 1145/2110363. 2110408 (2012).
15. Gultepe, E. et al. From vital signs to clinical outcomes for patients with sepsis: a machine learning basis for a clinical decision support system. J. Am. Med. Informatics Assoc. 21, 315-325 (2014).
16. Pierrakos, C. & Vincent, J.-L. Sepsis biomarkers: a review. Crit. Care 14, R15 (2010).
17. Li, S. et al. Neutrophil CD64 expression as a biomarker in the early diagnosis of bacterial infection: a meta-analysis. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 17, e12-e23 (2013).
18. Shahkar, L., Keshtkar, A., Mirfazeli, A., Ahani, A. & Roshandel, G. The Role of IL-6 for Predicting Neonatal Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Iranian Journal of Pediatrics 21, 411-417 (2011).
19. Wacker, C., Prkno, A., Brunkhorst, F. M. & Schlattmann, P. Procalcitonin as a diagnostic marker for sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect. Dis. 13, 426-435 (2013).
20. Docke, W.-D. Monitoring Temporary Immunodepression by Flow Cytometric Measurement of Monocytic HLA-DR Expression: A Multicenter Standardized Study. Clin. Chem. 51, 2341-2347 (2005).
21. Wong, H. R. et al. A multibiomarker-based outcome risk stratification model for adult septic shock. Crit. Care Med. 42, 781-9 (2014).
22. Oved, K. et al. A Novel Host-Proteome Signature for Distinguishing between Acute Bacterial and Viral Infections. PLoS One 10, e0120012 (2015).
23. Gibot, S. et al. Combination Biomarkers to Diagnose Sepsis in the Critically Ill Patient. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 186, 65-71 (2012).
24. Wong, H. R. et al. The Temporal Version of the Pediatric Sepsis Biomarker Risk Model. PLoS One 9, e92121 (2014).
25. Shapiro, N. I. et al. A prospective, multicenter derivation of a biomarker panel to assess risk of organ dysfunction, shock, and death in emergency department patients with suspected sepsis. Crit. Care Med. 37 (2009).
26. Tsalik, E. L. et al. Host gene expression classifiers diagnose acute respiratory illness etiology. Sci. Transl. Med. 8, 322ra11-322ra11 (2016).
27. Langley, R. J. et al. An Integrated Clinico-Metabolomic Model Improves Prediction of Death in Sepsis. Sci. Transl. Med. 5, 195ra95-195ra95 (2013).
28. Samraj, R. S., Zingarelli, B. & Wong, H. R. Role of Biomarkers in Sepsis Care. Shock 40, 358-365 (2013).
29. Kobeissi, Za & Zanotti-Cavazzoni, S. L. Biomarkers of sepsis. Yearb. Crit. Care Med. 2010, 227-228 (2010).
30. Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R. & Friedman, J. The Elements of Statistical Learning. Elements 1, (Springer New York, 2009).
31. Chang, Y.-W. & Lin, C.-J. Feature ranking using linear svm. Causation Predict. Challenge, Challenges Mach. Learn. 53-64 (2008).
32. Louppe, G., Wehenkel, L., Sutera, A. & Geurts, P. Understanding variable importances in forests of randomized trees. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 26, 431-439 doi:NIPS2013-4928 (2013).
33. Rhee, C. et al. Diagnosing sepsis is subjective and highly variable: a survey of intensivists using case vignettes. Crit. Care 20, 89 (2016).
34. Oda, S. et al. Sequential measurement of IL-6 blood levels in patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS)/sepsis. Cytokine 29, 169-175 (2005).
35. Otto, G. P. et al. The late phase of sepsis is characterized by an increased microbiological burden and death rate. Crit. Care Doi 10. 1186/cc10332 (2013).
36. Friedman, J., Hastie, T. & Tibshirani, R. Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent. J. Stat. Softw. 33, (2010).