Assessing the impact of pen-based computing on students' peer review strategies using the peer review comment inventory

ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages

  House, Richard ^a   Watt, Anneliese ^a   Williams, Julia ^a,b  

^a ROSE HULMAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b Planning and Assessment

Author keywords

Peer review; Pen based computing; Tablet PC; Technical communication

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; CURRICULA; PERSONAL COMPUTERS; STUDENTS; TEACHING;

PEER REVIEW; PEN BASED COMPUTING; TABLET PC; TECHNICAL COMMUNICATION;

ENGINEERING EDUCATION;

EID: 85029028465     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21535965     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Miller, R.L. and B.M. Olds, "Performance Assessment of EC-2000 Student Outcomes in the Unit Operations Laboratory," Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference (electronic), Charlotte, North Carolina, 1999.
2. Dannels, D., C. Anson, L. Bullard and S. Peretti, "Challenges in Learning Communication Skills in Chemical Engineering", Communication Education, in press (2002).
3. Ludlow, D.K., "Using Critical Evaluation and Peer-Review Writing Assignments in a Chemical Process Safety Course, " Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference (electronic), Albuquerque, New Mexico, 2001.
4. Newell, J.A., "The Use of Peer-Review in the Undergraduate Laboratory," Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference (electronic), Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 1997.
5. Miller, D. and J. Williams, "Incorporating Peer Review into the Chemical Engineering Laboratory," "Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference (electronic), Salt Lake City, Utah, 2004.
6. Kirtley, S. interviewed in "New Interactive Software Is an A+ Tool," Converge Online. [Online]. Available: http://www.convergemag. com/story.php?catid=232&storyid=96769
7. Kirtley, S., D. Mutchler, J. Williams, et al, "The world is our classroom." Presentation at the HP Higher Education Mobile Technology Solutions Conference, November 4-5, 2004.
8. Kirtley, S. Z. Chambers, D. Mutchler, J. Williams, M. Zoetewey, "Pen-based tablet PCs with DyKnow in introductory 'studio' physics classes." Presented at Workshop on the Impact of Pen-based Technology on Education (WIPTE), April 6-7, 2006.
9. Williams, J., Z. Chambers, S. Kirtley, D. Mutchler, M. Zoetewey, "Implementing Tablet computers in the Technical Communication classroom: measuring the impact of mobility on communication skills," Workshop on the Impact of Penbased Technology on Education (WIPTE), April 6-7, 2006.
10. Williams, J., and S. Sexton, "Implementing Tablet Computers in the Technical Communication Classroom: Measuring the Impact of Mobility on Communication Skills." In The Impact of Tablet PCs and Pen-based Technology on Education: Vignettes, Evaluations, and Future Directions. Ed. J. Prey, D. Berque, and R. Reed. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press, 2006.
11. Van der Geest, T., and T. Remmers, "The computer as a means of communication for peer-review groups," Computers and Composition, vol. 11, pp. 237-250, 1994.
12. Peckham, I., "If it ain't broke, why fix it?: disruptive and constructive computer-mediated response group practices," Computers and Composition, pp. 327-339, 1996.
13. Marx, M.X., "Distant writers, distant critics, and close readings: linking composition classes through a peer critiquing network," Computers and Composition, vol. 8, pp. 23-37, 1991.
14. Sire, G., and T. Reynolds, "The face of collaboration in the networked writing classroom," Computers and Composition, vol. 7, pp. 53-69, 1990.
15. Elbow, P., and P. Belanoff, Sharing and Responding. New York: Random House, 1989.
16. Smith, S., "The genre of the end comment," College Composition and Communication, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 249-268, 1997.
17. Keh, C.L. "Feedback in the writing process: a model and method for implementation," ELT, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 294304, 1990.
18. Brannon, L., and C. H. Knoblauch, "On students' rights to their own texts: a model of teacher response," College Composition and Communication, vol. 33, pp. 157-166, 1997.
19. Mackiewicz, J., "Hinting at what they mean: indirect suggestions in writing tutors' interactions with engineering students," IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 365-376, 2005.
20. Straub, R., The Practice of Response: Strategies for Commenting on Student Writing. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, 2000.
21. Mackiewicz, J., "The functions of formulaic and nonformulaic compliments in interactions about technical writing," IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, vol. 49, no. 1, pp.12-27, 2006.