If it ain't broke, why fix it?: Disruptive and constructive computer-mediated response group practices

Computers and Composition

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 327-339

  Peckham, Irvin ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Computers; Daedalus; Editing; Evaluation; New users; Pedagogy; Peer response; Technology

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030509725     PISSN: 87554615     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S8755-4615(96)90021-3     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Balester Valerie. The Holt guide to using Daedalus. 1995;Harcourt Brace, New York.
2. Barron Ronald. What I wish I had known about peer-response groups but didn't. English Journal. 80:(5):1991;24-34.
3. Berkenkotter Carol. Student writers and their sense of authority over texts. College Composition and Communication. 35:1984;312-319.
4. Berlin James. Rhetoric and reality: Writing instruction in American colleges, 1900-1985. 1987;Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, IL.
5. Bouton Kathleen, Tutty Gary. The effect of peer-evaluated student composition on writing improvement. The English Record. 1975, Fall;64-69.
6. Bridwell-Bowles Lillian. Research in composition: Issues and methods. An introduction to composition studies. 1991;Oxford University Press, New York.
7. Calkins Lucy McCormick. Lessons from a child: On the teaching and learning of children. 1983;Heinemann, Portsmouth, NH.
8. Copeland Jean. A twelve week study on the effects of peer evaluation for improving narrative writing performance. 1980;Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.
9. Dahl Karin. Writers teaching writers: What children learn in peer conferences. English Quarterly. 21:1988;164-173.
10. Dewey John. Experience and education. 1970;Collier, New York.
11. Dixon John. Growth through English: A report based on the Dartmouth seminar 1966. 1967;National Association for the Teaching of English, Reading, England.
12. Elbow Peter. Writing without teachers. 1973;Oxford University Press, New York.
13. Elbow Peter, Belanoff Pat. Sharing and responding. 2nd ed. 1995;McGraw-Hill, New York.
14. Ford Bob. The effects of peer editing grading on the grammar-usage and theme-composition ability of college freshman. 1973;University of Oklahoma, Norman. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.
15. Fulkerson Richard. Making peer editing work. 1995, Oct. 20;WPA-L@asuvm.inre.asu.edu. [Online]. Available on e-mail 〈listserv@asuvm.inre.asu.edu〉.
16. Geest Thea van der, Remmers Tim. The computer as means of communication for peer-review groups. Computers and Composition. 11:1994;237-250.
17. Graner Michael. Revision workshops: An alternative to peer editing. English Journal. 76:1987;40-45.
18. Hale Connie, Wyche-Smith Susan. Student writing groups: Demonstrating the process. 1991;Wordshop Productions, Tacoma, WA.
19. James David. Peer teaching in the writing classroom. English Journal. 70:(7):1981;48-50.
20. Karegianes Myra, Pascarella Ernest, Pflaum Susanna. The effects of peer editing on the writing proficiency of low-achieving tenth grade students. Journal of Educational Research. 73:1980;203-207.
21. Laguna Jean. The development, implementation and evaluation of a model for teaching composition which utilizes individualized learning and peer grouping. 1974;University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.
22. Mabrito Mark. Electronic mail as a vehicle for peer response: Conversations of high- and low-apprehensive writers. Written Communication. 8:1991;509-532.
23. Marx Michael Steven. Distant writers, distant critics, and close readings: Linking composition classes through a peer-critiquing network. Computers and Composition. 8:1990;23-39.
24. Moffett James. Teaching the universe of discourse. 1968;Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
25. Peckham Irvin. Peer evaluation. English Journal. 67:(10):1978;61-63.
26. Stroble Elizabeth. A look at writers' comments shared on computer screens: Can electronic mail facilitate peer group response? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans, LA :1988, April.
27. Sultan Gerry. No more sixes, nines, and red lines: Peer group and revision. English Journal. 77:(5):1988;65-68.