Citizen Design Science: A strategy for crowd-creative urban design

Cities

Volumn 72, Issue , 2018, Pages 181-188

  Mueller, Johannes ^a   Lu, Hangxin ^b   Chirkin, Artem ^b   Klein, Bernhard ^a   Schmitt, Gerhard ^b  

^a FUTURE CITIES LABORATORY   (Singapore)

^b ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Citizen design science; Citizen participation; Crowd creativity; Crowdsourcing; Participatory planning; qua kit

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; NEIGHBORHOOD; SMART CITY; SOFTWARE; URBAN DESIGN; URBAN PLANNING;

EID: 85028890931     PISSN: 02642751     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2017.08.018     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Abers, R., Inventing local democracy: Grassroots politics in Brazil. 2000, Lynne Rienner Publishers.
2. Adler, R.P., Goggin, J., What do we mean by “civic engagement”?. Journal of Transformative Education 3:3 (2005), 236–253.
3. Alexander, C., The state of the art in design methods. DMG Newsletter 5.3 (1971), 3–7.
4. Arnstein, S., A ladder of citizen participation. Jaip 35:4 (1969), 216–224 (Retrieved from http://lithgow-schmidt.dk/sherry-arnstein/ladder-of-citizen-participation_en.pdf on 24/04/2017).
5. Battarra, R., Gargiulo, C., Pappalardo, G., Boiano, D.A., Oliva, J.S., Planning in the era of information and communication technologies. Discussing the “label: Smart” in South-European cities with environmental and socio-economic challenges. Cities 59 (2016), 1–7.
6. Beebeejaun, Y., The Participatory City. 2016, Jovis Verlag GmbH.
7. Berman, T., Public participation as an instrument for incorporating local knowledge into planning processes, State of Australian Cities Conference, 2015.
8. Berntzen, L., Johannessen, M.R., The role of citizen participation in municipal smart city projects: Lessons learned from. 2016, 299–314, 10.1007/978-3-319-17620-8.
9. Billger, M., Thuvander, L., Wästberg, B.S., In search of visualization challenges: The development and implementation of visualization tools for supporting dialogue in urban planning processes. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 2016 http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0265813516657341.
10. Bonney, R., Cooper, C.B., Dickinson, J., Kelling, S., Phillips, T., Rosenberg, K.V., Shirk, J., Citizen science: A developing tool for expanding science knowledge and scientific literacy. Bioscience 59:11 (2009), 977–984.
11. Brown, M., Wyckoff-Baird, B., Designing integrated conservation and development projects. (No. 333.95 B879d ing.). 1992, Biodiversity Support Program, Washington, US.
12. Bryson, J.M., Quick, K.S., Slotterback, C.S., Crosby, B.C., Designing public participation processes. Public Administration Review 73:1 (2013), 23–34.
13. Carpini, M.X.D., Cook, F.L., Jacobs, L.R., Public deliberation, discursive participation, and citizen engagement: A review of the empirical literature. Annual Review of Political Science 7 (2004), 315–344.
14. Chirkin, A.M., König, R., Concept of interactive machine learning in urban design problems. Proceedings of the SEACHI 2016 on smart cities for better living with HCI and UX, 2016, ACM, 10–13.
15. Collins, K., Ison, R., Dare we jump off Arnstein's ladder?. Social learning as a new policy paradigm, 2006.
16. Dambruch, J., Stein, A., Ivanova, V., Innovative approaches to urban data management using emerging technologies. REAL CORP 2016–SMART ME UP! How to become and how to stay a Smart City, and does this improve quality of life?, Proceedings of 21st International Conference on Urban Planning, Regional Development and Information Society, 2016, June, CORP–Competence Center of Urban and Regional Planning, 375–384.
17. ETH Zurich, Standards for citizen science. Principles and guidelines for citizen science projects at universities and other research institutions, 2015.
18. Ewing, R., Handy, S., Measuring the unmeasurable: Urban design qualities related to walkability. Journal of Urban Design 14:1 (2009), 65–84.
19. Fung, A., Varieties of participation in complex governance. Public Administration Review 66:s1 (2006), 66–75.
20. Goldsmith, S., Crawford, S., The responsive city: Engaging communities through data-smart governance. 2014, John Wiley & Sons.
21. Gregory, S., The design method. 1966, Butterworth, London.
22. Grönlund, Å., ICT is not participation is not democracy–eParticipation development models revisited, International Conference on Electronic Participation, 2009, September, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 12–23.
23. Heller, K., Price, R., Riger, S., Reinharz, S., Wandersman, A., Psychology and community change. 2nd edition, 1984, Dorsey, Homewood, IL.
24. Hughes, J.A., Randall, D., Shapiro, D., From ethnographic record to system design. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 1:3 (1992), 123–141.
25. Jannack, A., Münster, S., Noennig, J.R., Enabling massive participation: Blueprint for a collaborative urban design environment. Schiuma, G., (eds.) Proceedings of IFKAD 2015, International forum on knowledge asset dynamics, 2016, 2363–2380.
26. Jansma, J.E., Veen, E.J., Visser, A.J., van der Valk, A.J.J., From protective space to embedded place. Developing urban agriculture in Almere Oosterwold, 2014.
27. Kensing, F., Blomberg, J., Participatory design: Issues and concerns. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 7:3–4 (1998), 167–185.
28. Khan, Z., Ludlow, D., Loibl, W., Soomro, K., ICT enabled participatory urban planning and policy development: The UrbanAPI project. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy 8:2 (2014), 205–229.
29. Kondepudi, S.N., Smart sustainable cities analysis of definitions. The ITU-T focus group for smart sustainable cities, 2014.
30. Le Corbusier, Eardley, Anthony, The Athens Charter. 1973, Grossman Publishers, New York, NY.
31. Lorimer, A., Mass-participation architecture: Social media and the decentralisation of architectural agency as a commercial imperative. 2016.
32. Lynch, K., The image of the city. 1960, Joint Center for Urban Studies, Cambridge, MA.
33. Lyons, S.H., Walsh, M., Aleman, E., Robinson, J., Exploring regional futures: Lessons from metropolitan Chicago's online MetroQuest. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 82 (2014), 23–33.
34. Moggridge, B., Atkinson, B., Designing interactions. Vol. 14, 2007, MIT press, Cambridge, MA.
35. Moore, K.R., Elliott, T.J., From participatory design to a listening infrastructure: A case of urban planning and participation. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 30:1 (2016), 59–84.
36. Oliveira, M.A., Carvalho, A., Bartola, L., Public discussion of Oportós municipal master plan: An e-democracy service supported by a geographical information system, Third International Conference, EGOV 2004, 2004, Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3183.
37. Participate in Design, Designing with people - and not just for people. 2016 (Singapore).
38. Pomeroy, J., Smart Cities 2.0. A 8-part tv series. Retrieved from https://www.jasonpomeroy.sg/smart-cities, 2017 (on 24/04/2017).
39. Raddick, M.J., Bracey, G., Gay, P.L., Lintott, C.J., Cardamone, C., Murray, P., Vandenberg, J., Galaxy zoo: Motivations of citizen scientists. 2013 (arXiv preprint arXiv:1303.6886).
40. Riesch, H., Potter, C., Davies, L., Combining citizen science and public engagement: The open AirLaboratories programme. JCOM 12:3 (2013), 1–19.
41. Saad-Sulonen, J.C., Horelli, L., The value of community informatics to participatory urban planning and design: A case-study in Helsinki. The Journal of Community Informatics, 6(2), 2010.
42. Sanders, E.B.N., From user-centered to participatory design approaches. Design and the social sciences: Making connections, 2002, CRC Press, 1–8.
43. Sanders, E.B.N., Design research in 2006. Design Research Quarterly, 1(1), 2006 (Design Research Society).
44. Sanders, E.B.N., On modeling an evolving map of design practice and design research. Interactions 15:6 (2008), 13–17.
45. Sanders, E.B.N., Stappers, P.J., Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. Co-design 4:1 (2008), 5–18.
46. Smith, D.H., Synanthrometrics: On progress in the development of a general theory of voluntary action and citizen participation. International perspectives on voluntary action research, 1983, University Press of America, Washington, DC, 80–94.
47. Stimmel, C.L., Building smart cities: Analytics, ICT, and design thinking. 2015, CRC Press.
48. Tritter, J.Q., McCallum, A., The snakes and ladders of user involvement: Moving beyond Arnstein. Health Policy 76:2 (2006), 156–168.
49. Tunnard, C., Pushkarev, B., Man-Made America - Chaos or Control?. 1963, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
50. Van Doesburg, T., Towards a collective construction. 1923 (De Stij).
51. Vogt, M., Fröhlich, P., Understanding cities and citizens: Developing novel participatory development methods and public service concepts. REAL CORP 2016–SMART ME UP! How to become and how to stay a Smart City, and does this improve quality of life?, Proceedings of 21st International Conference on Urban Planning, Regional Development and Information Society, 2016, June, CORP–Competence Center of Urban and Regional Planning, 991–995.
52. White, C.S., Depoliticising development: The uses and abuses of participation. Development in Practice 6:1 (1996), 6–15.
53. White, C.S., Citizen participation and the internet: Prospects for civic deliberation in the information age. The Social Studies 88:1 (1997), 23–28.