Exploring regional futures: Lessons from Metropolitan Chicago's online MetroQuest

Technological Forecasting and Social Change

Volumn 82, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 23-33

  Haas Lyons, Susanna ^a   Walsh, Mike ^b   Aleman, Erin ^c   Robinson, John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b Metro   (Canada)

^c Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning   (United States)

Author keywords

Community engagement; Gaming and simulation; Online deliberation; Participatory scenarios; Regional planning; Sustainability

Indexed keywords

EID: 84894924153     PISSN: 00401625     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.05.009     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Abelson J., Gauvin F.P. Assessing the Impacts of Public Participation: Concepts, Evidence and Policy Implications, Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis Working Paper Series 2008-01, Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis (CHEPA) 2006, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
2. ActionMedia Advancing Prosperity Through Regional Development: Focus Group Findings 2008, Funders' Network for Smart Growth and Livable Communities, Minneapolis, MN.
3. Bäckstrand K. Civic science for sustainability: reframing the role of experts, policy-makers and citizens in environmental governance. Glob. Environ. Polit. 2003, 3(4):24-41.
4. Beierle T.C., Cayford J. Democracy in Practice: Public Participation in Environmental Decisions 2002, Resources for the Future, Washington DC.
5. Black L., Burkhalter S., Gastil J., Stromer-Galley J.J. Methods for analyzing and measuring group deliberation. Sourcebook of Political Communication Research: Methods, Measures, and Analytical Techniques 2011, Routledge, New York. L. Holbert (Ed.).
6. Bulkeley H., Mol A.P.J. Participation and environmental governance: consensus, ambivalence and debate. Environ. Values 2003, 12(2):143-154.
7. Burgess J., Clark J., Chilvers J. Going 'upstream': issues arising with UK experiments in participatory science and technology assessment. Socilogia e Politiche Sociali 2005, 8:107-136.
8. Carmichael J., Talwar S., Tansey J., Robinson J. Where do we want to be? Making sustainability indicators integrated, dynamic and participatory. Community Indicators Measuring Systems (pp. 178-204) 2005, Ashgate Publishing Ltd, London. R. Phillips (Ed.).
9. Carmichael J., Tansey J., Robinson J. An integrated assessment modeling tool. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2004, 14:171-183.
10. CMAP Invent the Future Results Indicate Northeastern Illinois Residents Want More Transit Options and Compact Development 2009, (Retrieved from http://www.cmap.illinois.gov/news/invent_input_12-8-09).
11. Cohen J. Deliberation and democratic legitimacy. The Good Polity: Normative Analysis of the State 1989, Blackwell, New York. A. Hamlin, P. Petit (Eds.).
12. de la Porte C., Nanz P. The OMC - a deliberative-democratic mode of governance? The cases of employment and pensions. J. Eur. Public Policy 2004, 11(2):267-288.
13. Depoe S.P., Delicath J.W., Elsenbeer M.F. Communication and Public Participation in Environmental Decision Making 2004, State University of New York Press, Albany.
14. Dryzek J.S. Legitimacy and economy in deliberative democracy. Polit. Theory 2001, 29(5):651-669.
15. Fagotto E., Fung A. Sustaining Public Engagement Embedded Deliberation in Local Communities 2009, Everyday Democracy and the Kettering Foundation, East Hartford.
16. Fearon J. Deliberation as discussion. Deliberative Democracy 1998, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. J. Elster (Ed.).
17. Fishkin J.S. Democracy and Deliberation: New Directions for Democratic Reform 1991, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
18. Foth M. Sociocultural animation. Encyclopedia of Developing Regional Communities With Information and Communication Technology (pp. 640-645) 2006, Idea Group Reference (IGI Global). S. Marshall, W. Taylor, X. Yu (Eds.).
19. Frewer L. Evaluating public participation exercises. Evaluating Public Participation in Policy Making 2005, 85-107. OECD Publications.
20. Friedman W. Deliberative democracy and the problem of scope. J. Public Deliberation 2006, 2(1).
21. Fung A. Recipes for public spheres: eight institutional design choices and their consequences. J. Polit. Philos. 2003, 11(3):338-367.
22. Fung A., Wright E. Deepening democracy: innovations in empowered local governance. Polit. Soc. 2001, 29(1):5-41.
23. Kaushik A. Standard Metrics Revisited: #3: Bounce Rate 2007, (Retrieved from http://www.kaushik.net/avinash/2007/08/standard-metrics-revisited-3-bounce-rate.html).
24. Lathrop D., Ruma L. Open Government: Collaboration, Transparency, and Participation in Practice 2010, O'Reilly Media, Inc.
25. Lukensmeyer C., Brigham S. Taking democracy to scale: large scale interventions - for citizens. J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 2005, 41(1):47-60.
26. Niemeyer S.J., Ayirtman S., HartzKarp J. Achieving Success in Large Scale Deliberation: Analysis of the Fremantle Bridge Community Engagement Process, in: Micropolitics in Deliberation Reports, Canberra: Deliberative Democracy Research Group 2008, The Australian National University, Research School of Social Sciences.
27. Parkinson J. Legitimacy problems in deliberative democracy. Polit. Stud. 2003, 51(1):180-196.
28. Robinson J. Future subjunctive: backcasting as social learning. Futures 2003, 35(8):839-856.
29. Robinson J., Tinker J. Reconciling ecological, economic, and social imperatives. The Cornerstone of Development - Integrating Environmental, Social and Economic Policies 1998, International Development Research Centre and Lewis Publishers, Ottawa and New York. J. Schnurr, S. Holtz (Eds.).
30. Robinson J., Burch S., Talwar S., O'Shea M., Walsh M. Envisioning sustainable development paths: recent progress in the use of participatory scenario-based approaches for sustainability research. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2011, 78:756-768.
31. Robinson J., Carmichael J., Van Wynsberghe R., Tansey J., Journeay M., Rogers L. Sustainability as a problem of design: interactive science in the Georgia Basin. Integr. Assess. J. 2006, 6(4):165-192.
32. Schlosberg D., Dryzek J.S. Digital democracy: authentic or virtual?. Organ. Environ. 2002, 15(3):332-335.
33. Silverpop International Email Marketing Metrics Benchmark Study 2009, Silverpop Systems Inc.
34. Smith A. Mobile Access 2010 2010, Pew Internet & American Life Project.
35. Wack P. Scenarios: uncharted waters ahead. Harv. Bus. Rev. 1985, 5:72-89.
36. Wroblewski L. Web Form Design: Filling in the Blanks 2008, Roosenfeld Media, Brooklyn, NY.