In search of visualization challenges: The development and implementation of visualization tools for supporting dialogue in urban planning processes

Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science

Volumn 44, Issue 6, 2017, Pages 1012-1035

  Billger, Monica ^a   Thuvander, Liane ^a   Wästberg, Beata Stahre ^b  

^a CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

built environment; decision support; sustainability; urban planning; Visualization

Indexed keywords

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; ORGANIZATIONAL FRAMEWORK; PLANNING PROCESS; STAKEHOLDER; SUSTAINABILITY; URBAN DESIGN; URBAN PLANNING; VISUALIZATION;

EID: 85033481728     PISSN: 23998083     EISSN: 23998091     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0265813516657341     Document Type: Article

References (132)

1. Aaltonen M, Holmström J, (2010) Multi-ontology topology of the strategic landscape in three practical cases. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 77: 1519–1526.
2. Abelson J, Forest P-G, Eyles J, (2003) Deliberations about deliberative methods: Issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes. Social Science & Medicines 57: 239–251.
3. Al-Douri FA, (2010) The impact of 3D modeling function usage on the design content of urban design plans in US cities. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 37: 75–98.
4. Al-Kodmany K, (1999) Using visualization techniques for enhancing public participation in planning and design: Process, implementation, and evaluation. Landscape and Urban Planning 45: 37–45.
5. Al-Kodmany K, (2002) Visualization tools and methods in community planning: From freehand sketches to virtual reality. Journal of Planning Literature 17: 189–211.
6. Amirebrahimi S and Rajabifard A (2012) An integrated web-based 3D modeling and visualization platform to support sustainable cities. In: XXII ISPRS congress, Annals of the Photogrammetry, Melbourne, Australia, 25 August–1 September 2012, pp. 299–304
7. Ang SH (2014) Research Design for Business & Management. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
8. Appleton K, Lovett A, (2005) GIS-based visualisation of development proposals: Reactions from planning and related professionals. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 29: 321–339.
9. Arnstein SR, (1969) A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 35: 216–224.
10. Ashraf Khan M and Dong A (2011) Geo-located augmented reality as a platform for citizen engagement. In: Proceedings of the C&T 2011 workshop on government and citizen engagement, Brisbane, Australia, 29 June–2 July 2011. International Institute for Socio-Informatics (ISII)
11. Bailey K, Blandford B, Grossardt T, (2011) Planning, technology, and legitimacy: Structured public involvement in integrated transportation and land-use planning in the United States. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 38: 447–467.
12. Balakrishnan B, Muramoto K and Kalisperis LN (2007) Spatial presence: An explication from an architectural point of view. In: 27th annual conference of the association for computer aided design in architecture, ACADIA07, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, 1–7 October 2007, pp. 120–129
13. Ban Y, Jakobsson P, Kjelldahl L, et al. (2011) Visualization in ViSuCity, a tool for sustainable city planning. In: SIGRAD 2011
14. Batty M, (2012) Smart cities, big data. Editorial. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 39: 191–193.
15. Batty M, (2013) We make our technologies and then they make us. Editorial. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 40: 761–762.
16. Batty M, Axhausen K, Fosca G, (2012) Smart cities of the future. UCL Working Papers Series. London.
17. Benenson I, (2011) Geospatial analysis and visualization: Keeping pace with the data explosion. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 35: 91–92.
18. Bennett R, Senot H, Pettit C, (2012) Using digital globes to visualize climate change impact. In: Shi G, Lees Leung (eds) Advances in Geo-Spatial Information Science, London: Taylor & Francis Group, pp. 205–217.
19. Billger M, Alfredsson K and Kain J-H (2012) Urban games: Gaming and visualization for sustainable urban transformation, options and opportunities. In: Book of abstracts Conference Planet under Pressure, London, UK, 26–29 March 2012
20. Billger M, Heldal I, Stahre B, et al. (2004) Perception of color and space in virtual reality: A comparison between a real room and virtual reality models. In: Proceedings of SPIE: Human Vision and Electronic Imaging IX, San Jose, CA, USA, 19–21 January 2004, pp. 90–98
21. Bishop ID, Pettit CJ, Sheth F, (2013) Evaluation of data visualisation options for land-use policy and decision making in response to climate change. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 40: 213–233.
22. Boroushaki S, Malczewski J, (2010) Measuring consensus for collaborative decision-making: A GIS-based approach. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 34: 322–332.
23. Brand J, Kinash S, (2013) Crafting minds in minecraft. Learning and Teaching papers. Paper 53. Available at: http://epublications.bond.edu.au/tls/53 (accessed 27 April 2015).
24. Braun V, Clarke V, (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3: 77–101.
25. Brown G, Kyttä M, (2014) Key issues and research priorities for public participation GIS (PPGIS): A synthesis based on empirical research. Applied Geography 46: 122–136.
26. Carver S, Evans A, Kingston R, (2001) Public participation, GIS, and cyberdemocracy: Evaluating on-line spatial decision support systems. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 28: 907–921.
27. Cederbom M (2013) Urbania. Available at: https://www.behance.net/gallery/8595533/Urbania (accessed 23 November 2015)
28. Cheng T, Haworth J, Manley E, (2012) Advances in geocomputation (1996–2011). Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 36: 481–487.
29. Cheshire J, Batty M, (2012) Editorial. Visualisation tools for understanding big data. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 39: 413–415.
30. Cirulis A, Brigmanis KB, (2013) 3D outdoor augmented reality for architecture and urban planning. Procedia Computer Science 25: 71–79.
31. Crawford P, (2006) Digital animation as a participatory tool for exploring community visions. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 33: 481–484.
32. Cubukcu E, (2011) Does the level of visual detail in virtual environments affect the user's spatial knowledge? Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 38: 741–752.
33. Dawood N, Sikka S, (2008) Measuring the effectiveness of 4D planning as a valuable communication tool. Journal of Information Technology in Construction 13: 630–636.
34. De Longueville B, (2010) Community-based geoportals: The next generation? Concepts and methods for the geospatial Web 2.0. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 34: 299–308.
35. Drettakis G, Roussou M, Reche A, (2006) Design and evaluation of a real-world virtual environment for architecture and urban planning. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 16: 318–332.
36. Dykes J, Andrienko G, Andrienko N, (2010) Editorial – GeoVisualization and the digital city. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 34: 443–451.
37. Döllner (2009) Towards the automated construction of digital cities. In: Fritsch D, (ed.) Photogrammetric Week ‘09. Heidelberg: Wichmann Verlag, pp., 341–348.
38. Döllner J, Buchholz H, Nienhaus M, et al. (2005) Illustrative visualization of 3D city models. In: Erbacher RF, Roberts JC, Grohn MT, et al. (eds) Proc. SPIE 5669, visualization and data analysis 2005, San Jose, CA, 17 January 2005
39. Gill L, Lange E, Morgan E, (2013) An analysis of usage of different types of visualisation media within a collaborative planning workshop environment. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 40: 742–754.
40. Goodchild M, (2012) GI science in the 21st century. In: Shi G, Goodchild M, Lees B, Leung Y, (eds) Advances in geo-spatial information science. International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (ISPRS) book series, London: Taylor & Francis Group, pp. 3–10.
41. Gordon E, Schirra S, Hollander J, (2011) Immersive planning: A conceptual model for designing public participation with new technologies. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 38: 505–519.
42. Gupta J, Bouvier J and Gordon E (2012) Exploring new modalities of public engagement – An evaluation of digital gaming platforms on civic capacity and collective action in the Boston Public School District, Evaluation white paper, Report, Public agenda, Engagement Lab
43. Habermann M, Billger M and Haeger-Eugensson M (2015) Land use regression as method to model air pollution. Previous results for Gothenburg/Sweden. Procedia Engineering 115: 21–28
44. Halttunen V, Juustila A, Nuojua J, (2010) Technologies to support communication between citizens and designers in participatory urban planning process. In: Wallin S, Horelli L, Saad-Sulonen J, (eds) Digital tools in participatory planning, 79–92.
45. Hannibal C, Brown A, Knight M, (2005) An assessment of the effectiveness of sketch representations in early stage digital design. International Journal of Architectural Computing 3: 107–126.
46. Hanzl M, (2007) Information technology as a tool for public participation in urban planning: A review of experiments and potentials. Design Studies 28: 289–307.
47. Heo J, Jeong S, Park H-K, (2013) Productive high-complexity 3D city modeling with point clouds collected from terrestrial LiDAR. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 41: 26–38.
48. Horelli L, Wallin S, (2010) Developing a new approach to e-planning within community development – the case of ubiquitous Helsinki. In: Wallin S, Horelli L, Saad-Sulonen J, (eds) Digital tools in participatory planning, 109–134.
49. Hudson-Smith A, Evans S, Batty M, et al. (2002) Online participation: The Woodberry down experiment. Centre for advanced spatial analysis, Working Paper Series, London
50. Hultgren M (2011) The story of my blocks. Available at: http://www.byggbloggarna.se/matshultgren/2011/11/the-story-of-my-blocks/ (accessed 27 April 2015)
51. Jacob R, Winstanley A, Togher N, (2012) Pedestrian navigation using the sense of touch. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 36: 513–525.
52. Jerrett M, Arain A, Kanaroglou P, (2005) A review and evaluation of intraurban air pollution exposure models. Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology 15: 185–204.
53. Johansson V (2012) A Time and Place for Everything? Social Visualisation Tools and Critical Literacies. Borås: Swedish School of Library and Information Science University of Borås
54. Kahila M, Kyttä M, (2010) SoftGIS as a bridge-builder in collaborative urban planning. In: Wallin S, Horelli L, Saad-Sulonen J, (eds) Digital tools in participatory planning, 13–36.
55. Kanervo A, (2010) The users as co-producers on a neighbourhood website. In: Wallin S, Horelli L, e Saad-Sulonen J, (eds) Digital tools in participatory planning, 93–108.
56. Karlsson MA, Arby H, Billger M, et al. (2013) GO Smart: An innovative solution to the seamless journey. In: Nationella konferensen i transportforskning, Göteborg 2, 22–23 October 2013.
57. Kingston R (2002) The role of e-government and public participation in the planning process. In: XVI AESOP Congress. Volos, Greece
58. Kjems E, (2004) VR for decision support in urban planning. In: Andersen PB, Qvortrup L, (eds) Virtual Applications: Applications with Virtual Inhabited 3D Worlds, Springer-Verlag: London.
59. Klosterman RE, (2012) Simple and complex models. Commentary. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 39: 1–6.
60. Kolb D, (1999) The Kolb Learning Style Inventory, Boston: Hay Group.
61. Kyttä M, Broberg A, Tzoulas T, (2013) Towards contextually sensitive urban densification: Location-based softGIS knowledge revealing perceived residential environmental quality. Landscape and Urban Planning 113: 30–46.
62. Lai PC, Kwong K-H, Mak ASH, (2010) Assessing the applicability and effectiveness of 3D visualisation in environmental impact assessment. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 37: 221–233.
63. Lai S-K, Ding C, Tsai P-C, (2008) A game-theoretic approach to urban land development in China. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 35: 847–862.
64. Laing R, Davies A-M, Miller D, (2009) The application of visual environmental economics in the study of public preference and urban greenspace. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 36: 355–375.
65. Lange E, (2005) Issues and Questions for Research in Communicating with the Public through Visualization, Heidelberg: Wichmann Verlag.
66. Larsson T, Kjelldahl L and Jää-Aro KM (eds) Evaluations of Graphics and Visualization – Efficiency, Usefulness, Accessibility, Usability. In: Proceedings of SIGRAD 2011. Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings 65, Stockholm, Sweden, 17–18 November 2011. Linköping University Electronic Press
67. Lewis JL, (2012) More art than science: The sources and effects of stylistic variation in visualization for planning and design. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 39: 551–565.
68. Lin H, Chen M, Lu G, (2013) Virtual geographic environments (VGEs): A new generation of geographic analysis tool. Earth-Science Reviews 126: 74–84.
69. Lindholm M, Behrends S, Billger M, (2014) Slutrapport Sendsmart, Göteborg: Lindholmen Science Park AB/Closer.
70. Long Y, Shen Z, Mao Q, (2011) An urban containment planning support system for Beijing. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 35: 297–307.
71. Lorenz H, Döllner J, (2010) 3D feature surface properties and their application in geovisualization. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 34: 476–483.
72. Mavridou M, (2012) Perception of three-dimensional urban scale in an immersive virtual environment. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 39: 33–47.
73. Morckel V, (2010) A call for stakeholder participation in evaluating the implementation of plans. Commentary. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 37: 769–774.
74. Morello E, Ratti C, (2009) A digital image of the city: 3D isovists in Lynch's urban analysis. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 36: 837–853.
75. Nebiker S, Bleisch S, Christen M, (2010) Rich point clouds in virtual globes – A new paradigm in city modeling? Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 34: 508–517.
76. Neto PL, (2006) Public perception in contemporary Portugal: The digital representation of space. Journal of Urban Design 11: 347–366.
77. Ostermann FO, (2010) Digital representation of park use and visual analysis of visitor activities. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 34: 452–464.
78. Paar P, (2006) Landscape visualizations: Applications and requirements of 3D visualization software for environmental planning. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 30: 815–839.
79. Pack ML, (2010) Visualization in transporation: Challenges and opportunities for everyone. Visualization Viewpoints. Published by IEEE Computer Society July/August.
80. Pelzer P and Geertman S (2013) From integrative to interdisciplinary: PSS to support frame reflection among disciplines. In: Proceedings for CUPUM 2013–13th International Conference on Computers in Urban Planning and Urban Management, Utrecht, The Netherlands, 2–5 July 2013
81. Pettit C, Imhof M, Cox M, (2012a) An online geographical visualisation portal for communicating and sharing natural resource information. In: Shi G, Goodchild M, Lees B, Leung Y, (eds) Advances in geo-spatial information science. International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (ISPRS) book series, London: Taylor & Francis Group, pp. 219–232.
82. Pettit C, Widjaja I, Russo P, et al. (2012b) Visualisation support for exploring urban space and place. In: ISPRS annals of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and apatial information sciences, XXII ISPRS Congress, Melbourne, Australia, 25 August–1 September 2012
83. Pettit CJ, (2005) Use of a collaborative GIS-based planning-support system to assist in formulating a sustainable-development scenario for Hervey Bay, Australia. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 32: 523–545.
84. Pettit CJ, Cartwright W, Berry M, (2006) Geographical visualization: A participatory planning support tool for imagining landscape futures. Applied GIS 2: 22.21-22.17.
85. Plaisant C (2004) The challenge of Information visualization evaluation. In: IEEE Proc. of the working conference on Advanced visual interfaces AVI 2004, Gallipoli, Italy, 25–28 May 2004, pp. 109–116
86. Plata-Rocha W, Gómez-Delgado M, Bosque-Sendra J, (2011) Simulating urban growth scenarios using GIS and multicriteria analysis techniques: A case study of the Madrid region, Spain. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 38: 1012–1031.
87. Poplin A, (2012) Playful public participation in urban planning: A case study for online serious games. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 36: 195–206.
88. Poplin A, (2014) Digital serious game for urban planning: “B3 – design your marketplace!”. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 41: 493–511.
89. Rae A, (2011) Flow-data analysis with geographical information systems: A visual approach. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 38: 776–794.
90. Reinart B, Poplin A, (2014) Games in urban planning – A comparative study. In: Schrenk M, Popovich VV, Zeile P, Elisei P, (eds) REAL CORP 2014 proceedings/Tagungsband, Vienna, Austria, 21–23 May 2014.
91. Rinner C, Bird M, (2009) Evaluating community engagement through argumentation maps – A public participation GIS case study. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 36: 588–601.
92. Rixon AJ, Burn S, (2008) Visualisation techniques for facilitating stakeholder decision making in urban planning. The Journal of Community Informatics 4. Digital Journal. Available at: http://ci-journal.net/index.php/ciej/article/view/264.
93. Rocha EM, (1997) A ladder of empowerment. Journal of Planning Education and Research 17: 31–44.
94. Roupé M (2013) Development and implementations of virtual reality for decision-making in urban planning and building design. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Chalmers University Technology, Gothenburg
95. Roupé M and Gustafsson M (2013) Judgement and decision-making aspects on the use of virtual reality in volume studies. In: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on computer-aided architectural design research in Asia, CAADRIA, Singapore, 15–17 May 2013, pp. 437–446
96. Roupé M, Bosch-Sijtsema P, Johansson M, (2014) Interactive navigation interface for virtual reality using the human body. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 43: 42–50.
97. Roussou M and Drettakis G (2005) Can VR be useful and usable in real world contexts? Observations from the application and evaluation of VR in realistic usage conditions. In: HCI international 2005 – 11th international conference on virtual reality, Las Vegas, USA, 22–27 July 2005
98. Saad-Sulonen J, Botero A, (2010) The urban mediator as a tool for public participation – A case of collaboration between designers and city planners. In: Wallin S, Horelli L, Saad-Sulonen J, (eds) Digital tools in participatory planning, 59–78.
99. San José R, Pérez JL and González-Barras RM (2011) 3D visualization of air quality data. In: The 11th international conference “Reliability and statistics in transportation and communication, RelStat, Riga, Latvia, 19–22 October 2011, pp. 1–9
100. Schively Slotterback C, (2011) Planners' perspectives on using technology in participatory processes. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 38: 468–485.
101. Schwarz N, Haase D, Seppelt R, (2010) Omnipresent sprawl? A review of urban simulation models with respect to urban shrinkage. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 37: 265–283.
102. Senbel M, Church SP, (2011) Design empowerment: The limits of accessible visualization media in neighborhood densification. Journal of Planning Education and Research 31: 423–437.
103. Shen Z, Kawakami M, (2010) An online visualization tool for Internet-based local townscape design. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 34: 104–116.
104. Sieber R, (2006) Public participation geographic information systems: A literature review and framework. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 96: 491–507.
105. Slater M, Steed A and Chrysanthou Y (2002) Computer Graphics and Virtual Environments: From Realism to Real-time. Harlow: Pearson Education Ltd
106. Staffans A, Rantanen H, Nummi P, (2010) Online environments shake up urban planning – Developing local internet forums. In: Wallin S, Horelli L, Saad-Sulonen J, (eds) Digital tools in participatory planning, 59–78.
107. Stahre B and Billger M (2006) Physical measurements vs visual perception: Comparing colour appearance in reality to virtual reality. In: Proceedings for CGIV 2006, Leeds, UK, 19–22 June
108. Stahre B, Billger M, Fridell Anter K, (2009) To colour the virtual world. IJAC – International Journal of Architectural Computing (1478-0771) 07: 289–308.
109. Stahre Wästberg B, Billger M, (2015) User evaluation of a virtual colour laboratory as a tool for demonstrating colour appearance. Color Research & Application. Epub ahead of print 13 October 2015. DOI: 10.1002/col.22000.
110. Stahre B, van Raalte S and Heldal I (2008) Sketching techniques in virtual reality: Evaluation of texturing in an urban planning model. In: VSMM ’08 – Conference on virtual systems and multi media, Limassol, Cyprus, 20–26 October, pp. 230–237
111. Stahre Wästberg B, Tornberg J, Billger M, et al. (2013) How to visualize the invisible simulating air pollution dispersions in a 3D city model. In: Proceedings for CUPUM 2013 – 13th international conference on computers in urban planning and urban management, Utrecht, the Netherlands, 2–5 July
112. Statens offentliga utredningar (SOU) (2012) Femton hinder för hållbar stadsutveckling. Delegationen för hållbara städer, Statens offentliga utredningar M 2011:01/2012/66, Stockholm
113. Sunesson K, Allwood CM, Paulin D, (2008) Virtual reality as a new tool in the city planning process. Tsinghua Science & Technology 13: 255–260.
114. Svensk Byggtjänst (2013) Mina Kvarter: ett samarbete kring hållbar upprustning av miljonprogrammet. Svensk Byggtjänst: Stockholm. Available at: http://www.mynewsdesk.com/se/svensk_byggtjanst/documents/mina-kvarter-tidningen-30488
115. te Brömmelstroet M, (2012) Transparency, flexibility, simplicity: From buzzwords to strategies for real PSS improvement. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 36: 96–104.
116. te Brömmelstroet M, (2013) Performance of planning support systems what is it, and how do we report on it? Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 41: 299–308.
117. te Brömmelstroet M, Pelzer P, Klerkx R, et al. (2013) Do planning support systems improve planning? Testing the claim in a controlled experiment. In: Proceedings for CUPUM 2013 – 13th international conference on computers in urban planning and urban management Utrecht, The Netherlands, 2–5 July 2013
118. te römmelstroet M, Schrijnen PM, (2010) From planning support systems to mediated planning support: A structured dialogue to overcome the implementation gap. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 37: 3–20.
119. Thaung J, Billger M, Löfving B, et al. (2012) Visualization tool for increased quality of vision. In: Proceedings for ARCH12 (ed P Fröst), Gothenburg, Sweden, 12–14 November
120. Thuvander L (2002) Towards Environmental Informatics for Building Stocks. A Conceptual Model for an Environmental Building Stock Information System for Sustainable Development – EBSIS. Doctoral Thesis, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg
121. Thuvander L and Tornberg J (2005) A GIS energy model for the building stock of Göteborg. In: 25th ESRI international user conference, San Diego, 25–29 July 2005
122. van Lammeren R, Houtkamp J, Colijn S, (2010) Affective appraisal of 3D land use visualization. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 34: 465–475.
123. Wang S, Li W, (2010) The Implementation of 3D scene walkthrough in air pollution visualization. I.J. Information Engineering and Electronic Business 1: 44–50.
124. Wang X, Yu Z, Cinderby S, (2008) Enhancing participation: Experiences of participatory geographic information systems in Shanxi province, China. Applied Geography 28: 96–109.
125. Wallin S, Horelli L and Saad-Sulonen J (eds) (2010) Digital tools in participatory planning. Centre for urban and regional studies publications, C79, Aalto University, Espoo
126. Watson B, Müller P, Wonka P, (2008) Procedural urban modeling in practice. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 28: 18–26.
127. Westerdahl B, Sunesson K, Wernemyr C, (2006) Users' evaluation of a virtual reality architectural model compared with the experience of the completed building. Automation in Construction 15: 150–165.
128. Wissen Hayek U, (2011) Which is the appropriate 3D visualization type for participatory landscape planning workshops? A portfolio of their effectiveness. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 38: 921–939.
129. Wridt P, (2010) A qualitative GIS approach to mapping urban neighborhoods with children to promote physical activity and child-friendly community planning. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 37: 129–147.
130. Wu H, He Z, Gong J, (2010) A virtual globe-based 3D visualization and interactive framework for public participation in urban planning processes. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 34: 291–298.
131. Yang C, Raskin R, Goodchild M, (2010) Geospatial cyberinfrastructure: Past, present and future. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 34: 264–277.
132. Zhang Y, Fung T, (2013) A model of conflict resolution in public participation GIS for land-use planning. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 40: 550–568.