Development of a novel, multilayered presentation format for clinical practice guidelines

Chest

Volumn 147, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 754-763

  Kristiansen, Annette ^a,b,c   Brandt, Linn ^a,b,c   Alonso Coello, Pablo ^d   Agoritsas, Thomas ^e   Akl, Elie A ^f   Conboy, Tara ^g   Elbarbary, Mahmoud ^g   Ferwana, Mazen ^g   Medani, Wedad ^g   Murad, Mohammad Hassan ^h   Rigau, David ^d   Rosenbaum, Sarah ⁱ   Spencer, Frederick A ^e   Treweek, Shaun ^j   Guyatt, Gordon ^e   Vandvik, Per Olav ^a,b,i  

^a INNLANDET HOSPITAL TRUST   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^c DIAKONHJEMMET HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^d BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE SANT PAU IIB SANT PAU   (Spain)

^e MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^f AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF BEIRUT   (Lebanon)

^g KING SAUD BIN ABDULAZIZ UNIVERSITY FOR HEALTH SCIENCES   (Saudi Arabia)

^h MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

ⁱ NORWEGIAN KNOWLEDGE CENTRE FOR THE HEALTH SERVICES   (Norway)

^j UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAINSTORMING; CLINICAL RESEARCH; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; PHYSICIAN; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL TRIAL; ELECTRONICS; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; INTERVIEW; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MULTICENTER STUDY; PUBLISHING; STANDARDS;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; ELECTRONICS; HUMANS; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; PRACTICE PATTERNS, PHYSICIANS'; PUBLISHING;

EID: 84924897965     PISSN: 00123692     EISSN: 19313543     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1378/chest.14-1366     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Wears RL, Berg M. Computer technology and clinical work: still waiting for Godot. JAMA. 2005;293(10):1261-1263.
2. Michie S, Johnston M. Changing clinical behaviour by making guidelines specific. BMJ. 2004;328(7435):343-345.
3. Ely JW, Osheroff JA, Chambliss ML, Ebell MH, Rosenbaum ME. Answering physicians' clinical questions: obstacles and potential solutions. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005;12(2):217-224.
4. Aboulsoud S, Huckson S, Wyer P, Lang E. Survey of preferred guideline attributes: what helps to make guidelines more useful for emergency health practitioners? Int J Emerg Med. 2012;5(1):42.
5. Qaseem A, Forland F, Macbeth F, Ollenschläger G, Phillips S, van der Wees P; Board of Trustees of the Guidelines International Network. Guidelines International Network: toward international standards for clinical practice guidelines. Ann Intern Med. 2012;156(7):525-531.
6. Graham R, Mancher M, Wolman DM. Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press;2011.
7. Alonso-Coello P, Irfan A, SolàI, et al. The quality of clinical practice guidelines over the last two decades: a systematic review of guideline appraisal studies. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19(6):e58.
8. Kung J, Miller RR, Mackowiak PA. Failure of clinical practice guidelines to meet institute of medicine standards: two more decades of little, if any, progress. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172(21):1628-1633.
9. Shaneyfelt TM, Centor RM. Reassessment of clinical practice guidelines: go gently into that good night. JAMA. 2009;301(8):868-869.
10. Smith R. What clinical information do doctors need? BMJ. 1996:1062-1068.
11. Francke AL, Smit MC, de Veer AJE, Mistiaen P. Factors influencing the implementation of clinical guidelines for health care professionals: a systematic meta-review. B MC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2008;8:38.
12. Farquhar CM, Kofa EW, Slutsky JR. Clinicians' attitudes to clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review. Med J Aust. 2002;177(9):502-506.
13. Shiffman RN, Dixon J, Brandt C, et al. BMC Medical Informatics and The GuideLine Implementability Appraisal (GLIA): development of an instrument to identify obstacles to guideline implementation. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2005;25(3):1-8.
14. Akl EA, Oxman AD, Herrin J, et al. Using alternative statistical formats for presenting risks and risk reductions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;3(3):CD006776.
15. Akl EA, Maroun N, Guyatt G, et al. Symbols were superior to numbers for presenting strength of recommendations to health care consumers: a randomized trial. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(12):1298-1305.
16. Reyna V, Brainerd C. Numeracy, ratio bias, and denominator neglect in judgments of risk and probability. Learn Individ Differ. 2008;18(1):89-107.
17. Rosenbaum SE, Glenton C, Oxman AD. Summary-of-findings tables in Cochrane reviews improved understanding and rapid retrieval of key information. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(6):620-626.
18. Spiegelhalter D, Pearson M, Short I. Visualizing uncertainty about the future. Science. 2011;333(6048):1393-1400.
19. Langendam MW, Akl EA, Dahm P, Glasziou P, Guyatt G, Schünemann HJ. Assessing and presenting summaries of evidence in Cochrane Reviews. Syst Rev. 2013;2:81
20. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al GRADE Working Group. Going from evidence to recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336(7652):1049-1051.
21. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, et al GRADE Working Group. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336(7650):924-926.
22. Treweek S, Oxman AD, Alderson P, et al DECIDE Consortium. Developing and Evaluating Communication Strategies to Support Informed Decisions and Practice Based on Evidence(DECIDE): protocol and preliminary results. Implement Sci. 2013;8:6.
23. Vandvik PO, Brandt L, Alonso-Coello P, et al. Creating clinical practice guidelines we can trust, use, and share: a new era is imminent. Chest. 2013;144(2):381-389.
24. Creating trustworthy guidelines, evidence summaries and decision aids that we can all use and share. Magic Project website. http://www.magicproject.org. Accessed May 2014.
25. Goldet G, Howick J. Understanding GRADE: an introduction. J Evid Based Med. 2013;6(1):50-54.
26. th ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. C hest. 2012;141(2- suppl):e637S-e668S.
27. th ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2012;141(2-suppl):e531S-e575S.
28. The National Collaborating Centre for Chronic Conditions. Type 2 Diabetes National Clinical Guideline for Management in Primary and Secondary Care (Update). London, Englad: Royal College of Physicians; 2008.
29. Wroblewski L. Mobile First. La Vergne, TN: Ingram; 2011:123.
30. Blueprint. Groosoft website. http://www.groosoft.com/blueprint. Accessed January 2013.
31. Morville P. User experience design. 2004. Semantics Studio website. http://semanticstudios.com/publications/semantics/000029.php. Accessed December 2013.
32. Rosenbaum SE. Improving the User Experience of Evidence. A Design Approach to Evidence-Informed Health Care. Oslo, Norway: Oslo School of Architecture and Design; 2010:108-116.
33. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Vist GE, Falck-Ytter Y, Schünemann HJ; GRADE Working Group. What is "quality of evidence" and why is it important to clinicians? BMJ. 2008;336(7651):995-998.
34. Brouwers MC. Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II. AGREE website. http://www.agreetrust.org/resourcecentre/agree-ii/. Accessed February 2014.
35. Gagliardi AR, Brouwers MC, Palda VA, Lemieux-Charles L, Grimshaw JM. How can we improve guideline use? A conceptual framework of implementability. Implement Sci. 2011;6(1):26.
36. Michie S, Lester K. Words matter: increasing the implementation of clinical guidelines. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14(5):367-370.
37. Lomotan EA, Michel G, Lin Z, Shiffman RN. How "should" we write guideline recommendations? Interpretation of deontic terminology in clinical practice guidelines: survey of the health services community. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19(6):509-513.
38. Codish S, Shiffman RN. A model of ambiguity and vagueness in clinical practice guideline recommendations. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005;146-150.
39. McGettigan P, Sly K, O'Connell D, Hill S, Henry D. The effects of information framing on the practices of physicians. J Gen Intern Med. 1999;14(10):633-642.
40. Schünemann HJ, Best D, Vist G, Oxman AD; GRADE Working Group. Letters, numbers, symbols and words: how to communicate grades of evidence and recommendations. CMAJ. 2003;169(7):677-680.
41. Estrada C, Barnes V, Collins C, Byrd JC. Health literacy and numeracy. JAMA. 1999;282(6):527.
42. Perneger TV, Agoritsas T. Doctors and patients' susceptibility to framing bias: a randomized trial. J Gen Intern Med. 2011;26(12):1411-1417.
43. Rosenbaum SE, Glenton C, Nylund HK, Oxman AD. User testing and stakeholder feedback contributed to the development of understandable and useful Summary of Findings tables for Cochrane reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(6):607-619.
44. Woloshin S, Schwartz LM. Communicating data about the benefits and harms of treatment: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(2):87-96.
45. Trevena LJ, Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Edwards A, et al. Presenting quantitative information about decision outcomes: a risk communication primer for patient decision aid developers. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13(suppl 2):S7.
46. Vandvik PO, Santesso N, Akl EA, et al. Formatting modifications in GRADE evidence profiles improved guideline panelists comprehension and accessibility to information. A randomized trial. J Clin Epidemiol. 2012;65(7):748-755.
47. Gigerenzer G, Edwards A. Simple tools for understanding risks: from innumeracy to insight. BMJ. 2003;327(7417):741-744.
48. GRADEPro. Guideline development tool. McMaster University and Evidence Prime Inc website. http://www.guidelinedevelopment.org/. Accessed May 2014.
49. MAGIC. Magic app website. http://www.magicapp.org/public. Accessed May 2014.
50. th ed. Chest. 2014;146(3):735-761.