Healthcare professionals' views of the enhanced recovery after surgery programme: A qualitative investigation

BMC Health Services Research

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2017, Pages

  Herbert, Georgia ^a   Sutton, Eileen ^a   Burden, Sorrel ^a,b   Lewis, Stephen ^a,c   Thomas, Steve ^a,d   Ness, Andy ^a   Atkinson, Charlotte ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS BRISTOL NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^c DERRIFORD HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Enhanced recovery after surgery Programme; Healthcare professionals; Normalisation process theory; Qualitative

Indexed keywords

ADULT; DRAWING; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE CENTER; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LEADERSHIP; MALE; MONEY; PALATABILITY; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; STAFF TRAINING; SURGERY; TEAMWORK; THEORETICAL STUDY; VELOCITY; COLORECTAL SURGERY; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HOSPITAL PERSONNEL; NUTRITIONAL SUPPORT; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; REHABILITATION; TEACHING HOSPITAL; THORAX SURGERY; UNITED KINGDOM;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; COLORECTAL SURGERY; HOSPITALS, TEACHING; HUMANS; LEADERSHIP; NUTRITIONAL SUPPORT; PATIENT CARE TEAM; PERIOPERATIVE CARE; PERSONNEL, HOSPITAL; THORACIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 85028631552     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726963     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12913-017-2547-y     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Programme ERP. Delivering enhanced recovery: helping patients to get better sooner after surgery. London: Department of Health; 2010.
2. Kehlet H, Wilmore DW. Evidence-based surgical care and the evolution of fast-track surgery. Ann Surg. 2008;248:189-98.
3. Zhuang C-L, Ye X-Z, Zhang X-D, Chen B-C, Yu Z. Enhanced recovery after surgery programs versus traditional care for colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Dis Colon rectum. 2013;56:667-78.
4. Øvretveit J. Understanding the conditions for improvement: research to discover which context influences affect improvement success. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011;20:i18-23.
5. Baker EA, Brennan Ramirez LK, Claus JM, Land G. Translating and disseminating research- and practice-based criteria to support evidence-based intervention planning. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2008;14:124-30.
6. Keenan SP. Moving beyond numbers. the next step forward in improving patient care. Crit Care Med. 2007;35:960-1.
7. Kahokehr A, Sammour T, Zargar-Shoshtari K, Thompson L, Hill AG. Implementation of ERAS and how to overcome the barriers. Int J Surg. 2009;7:16-9.
8. Lyon A, Solomon MJ, Harrison JD. A qualitative study assessing the barriers to implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery. World J Surg. 2014;38:1374-80.
9. Pearsall EA, Meghji Z, Pitzul KB, Aarts M-A, McKenzie M, McLeod RS, et al. A qualitative study to understand the barriers and enablers in implementing an enhanced recovery after surgery program. Ann Surg. 2015;261:92-6.
10. Ament SM, Gillissen F, Moser A, Maessen JM, Dirksen CD, von Meyenfeldt MF, et al. Identification of promising strategies to sustain improvements in hospital practice: a qualitative case study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:641.
11. Alawadi ZM, Leal I, Phatak UR, Flores-Gonzalez JR, Holihan JL, Karanjawala BE, et al. Facilitators and barriers of implementing enhanced recovery in colorectal surgery at a safety net hospital: a provider and patient perspective. Surg. 2014:700-12.
12. Gotlib Conn L, McKenzie M, Pearsall EA, McLeod RS. Successful implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery programme for elective colorectal surgery: a process evaluation of champions' experiences. Implement Sci. 2015;10:99.
13. Kahokehr A, Robertson P, Sammour T, Soop M, Hill AG. Perioperative care: a survey of New Zealand and Australian colorectal surgeons. Color Dis. 2011;13:1308-13.
14. Paton F, Chambers D, Wilson P, Eastwood A, Craig D, Fox D, et al. Effectiveness and implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery programmes: a rapid evidence synthesis. BMJ Open. 2014;4
15. Taylor C, Burch J. Feedback on an enhanced recovery programme for colorectal surgery. Br J Nurs. 2011;20:286-90.
16. Millar E. Reducing the impact of preoperative fasting on patients: nurses have an important part of play in ensuring preoperative patients do not fast longer than is necessary, thus avoiding uncessary harm and distress. Nursing New Zealand: 2009.
17. Drover JW, Cahill NE, Kutsogiannis J, Pagliarello G, Wischmeyer P, Wang M, et al. Nutrition therapy for the critically ill surgical patient: we need to do better! J Parenter Enter Nutr. 2010;34:644-52.
18. May C, Finch T. Implementing embedding and integrating practices: an outline of normalization process theory. Sociology. 2009;43:535-54.
19. Ritchie J, Spencer L, and O'Connor W, Carrying out qualitative analysis, in Qualitative Research Practice: a guide for social science students and researchers, J. Ritchie and J. Lewis, Editors. 2003, Sage: London. p. 219-262.
20. May C, Mair F, Finch T, MacFarlane A, Dowrick C, Treweek S, et al. Development of a theory of implementation and integration: normalization process theory. Implement Sci. 2009;4:29.
21. Elwyn G, Legare F, van der Weijden T, Edwards A, May C. Arduous implementation: does the normalisation process model explain why it's so difficult to embed decision support technologies for patients in routine clinical practice. Implement Sci. 2008;3:1748-5908.
22. Gask L, Rogers A, Campbell S, Sheaff R. Beyond the limits of clinical governance? The case of mental health in English primary care. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008;8:1472-6963.
23. May C, Finch T, Cornford J, Exley C, Gately C, Kirk S, et al. Integrating telecare for chronic disease management in the community: what needs to be done? BMC Health Serv Res. 2011;11:1-11.
24. Mair F, May C, O'Donnell C, Finch T, Sullivan F, Murray E. Factors that promote or inhibit the implementation of e-health systems: an explanatory systematic review. Bull World Health Organ. 2012;90:357-64.
25. McEvoy R, Ballini L, Maltoni S, O'Donnell C, Mair F, MacFarlane A. A qualitative systematic review of studies using the normalization process theory to research implementation processes. Implement Sci. 2014;9:2.
26. Berwick DM. Disseminating innovations in health care. JAMA. 2003;289:1969-75.
27. Hoff T, Sutcliffe K. Studying patient safety in health care organizations: accentuate the qualitative. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2006;32:5-15.
28. Grol R, Wensing M, Eccles M. Improving patient care: the implementation of change in clinical practice. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;15:447.
29. Nadler A, Pearsall EA, Victor JC, Aarts MA, Okrainec A, McLeod RS. Understanding surgical residents' postoperative practices and barriers and enablers to the implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) guideline. J Surg Educ. 2014;71:632-8.
30. Ovretveit J, Klazinga N. Learning from large-scale quality improvement through comparisons. Int J Qual Health Care. 2012;24:463-9.
31. Denis JL, Hebert Y, Langley A, Lozeau D, Trottier LH. Explaining diffusion patterns for complex health care innovations. Health Care Manag Rev. 2002;27:60-73.
32. Gustafson DH, Sainfort F, Eichler M, Adams L, Bisognano M, Steudel H. Developing and testing a model to predict outcomes of organizational change. Health Serv Res. 2003;38:751-76.
33. Short V, Atkinson C, Ness AR, Thomas S, Burden S, Sutton E. Patient experiences of perioperative nutrition within an enhanced recovery after surgery programme for colorectal surgery: a qualitative study. Color Dis. 2016;18:O74-80.
34. Ihedioha U, Vaughan S, Mastermann J, Singh B, Chaudhri S. Patient education videos for elective colorectal surgery: results of a randomized controlled trial. Color Dis. 2013;15:1436-41.
35. Dixon-Woods M, McNicol S, Martin G. Ten challenges in improving quality in healthcare: lessons from the Health Foundation's programme evaluations and relevant literature. BMJ Quality & Safety. 2012;21:876-84.
36. Fitzgerald L, Ferlie E, Wood M, Hawkins C. Interlocking interactions, the diffusion of innovations in health care. Hum Relat. 2002;55:1429-49.
37. Øvretveit J, Bate P, Cleary P, Cretin S, Gustafson D, McInnes K, et al. Quality collaboratives: lessons from research. Qual Saf Health Care. 2002;11:345-51.
38. Aveling E-L, Martin G, Herbert G, Armstrong N. Optimising the community-based approach to healthcare improvement: comparative case studies of the clinical community model in practice. Soc Sci Med. 2017;173:96-103.
39. Aveling EL, Martin G, Armstrong N, Banerjee J, Dixon-Woods M. Quality improvement through clinical communities: eight lessons for practice. J Health Organ Manag. 2012;26:158-74.
40. Lassen K, Hannemann P, Ljungqvist O, Fearon K, Dejong CH, von Meyenfeldt MF, et al. Patterns in current perioperative practice: survey of colorectal surgeons in five northern European countries. BMJ. 2005;330:1420-1.
41. Walter C, Smith A, Guillou P. Perceptions of the application of fast-track surgical principles by general surgeons. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2006;88:191-5.
42. Hasenberg T, Keese M, Langle F, Reibenwein B, Schindler K, Herold A, et al. 'Fast-track' colonic surgery in Austria and Germany - results from the survey on patterns in current perioperative practice. Colorect Dis. 2008;11:162-7.
43. Hannemann P, Lassen K, Hausel J, Nimmo S, Ljungqvist O, Nygren J, et al. Patterns in current anaesthesiological peri-operative practice for colonic resections: a survey in five northern-European countries. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2006;50:1152-60.
44. Delaney CP, Senagore AJ, Gerkin TM, Beard TL, Zingaro WM, Tomaszewski KJ, et al. Association of surgical care practices with length of stay and use of clinical protocols after elective bowel resection: results of a national survey. Am J Surg. 2010;199:299-304.