Kidney allograft offers: Predictors of turndown and the impact of late organ acceptance on allograft survival

American Journal of Transplantation

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2018, Pages 391-401

  Cohen, J B ^a   Shults, J ^a   Goldberg, D S ^a   Abt, P L ^a   Sawinski, D L ^a   Reese, P P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

clinical research practice; donors and donation: deceased; ethics and public policy; kidney (allograft) function dysfunction; kidney transplantation nephrology; organ acceptance; organ allocation; organ procurement and allocation; waitlist management

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; DELAYED GRAFT FUNCTION; GRAFT FAILURE; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HUMAN; KIDNEY ALLOGRAFT; KIDNEY DONOR; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTOR VARIABLE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK; ADOLESCENT; ALLOGRAFT; CHRONIC KIDNEY FAILURE; DONOR; DONOR SELECTION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GLOMERULUS FILTRATION RATE; KIDNEY FUNCTION TEST; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; MALE; PROCEDURES; PROGNOSIS; REGISTER; RISK FACTOR; STANDARDS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TRANSPLANTATION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ALLOGRAFTS; DONOR SELECTION; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HUMANS; KIDNEY FAILURE, CHRONIC; KIDNEY FUNCTION TESTS; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROGNOSIS; REGISTRIES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; TISSUE AND ORGAN PROCUREMENT; TISSUE DONORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 85028603863     PISSN: 16006135     EISSN: 16006143     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/ajt.14449     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network: National Data. Richmond, VA; 2017. https://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov. Accessed January 10, 2017.
2. Marrero WJ, Naik AS, Friedewald JJ, et al. Predictors of deceased donor kidney discard in the United States. Transplantation. 2016;101:1690-1697.
3. Reese PP, Harhay MN, Abt PL, Levine MH, Halpern SD. New solutions to reduce discard of kidneys donated for transplantation. J Am Soc Nephrol: JASN. 2016;27(4):973-980.
4. Heilman RL, Mathur A, Smith ML, Kaplan B, Reddy KS. Increasing the use of kidneys from unconventional and high-risk deceased donors. Am J Transplant. 2016;16(11):3086-3092.
5. Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network: COIIN project studying effective practices at model hospitals, OPOs: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2016. https://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/news/coiin-project-studying-effective-practices-at-model-hospitals-opos/. Accessed January 6, 2017.
6. National Kidney Foundation Statement on Organ Discards. https://www.kidney.org/news/national-kidney-foundation-statement-organ-discards 2016. Accessed January 26, 2017.
7. Friedewald JJ, Samana CJ, Kasiske BL, et al. The kidney allocation system. Surg Clin North Am. 2013;93(6):1395-1406.
8. Rao PS, Schaubel DE, Guidinger MK, et al. A comprehensive risk quantification score for deceased donor kidneys: The kidney donor risk index. Transplantation. 2009;88(2):231-236.
9. Bae S, Massie AB, Luo X, et al. Changes in discard rate after the introduction of the Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI). Am J Transplant. 2016;16(7):2202-2207.
10. Long JS, Freese J. Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables Using Stata, 2nd edn. College Station, TX: Stata Press; 2006.
11. Smith JM, Biggins SW, Haselby DG, et al. Kidney, pancreas and liver allocation and distribution in the United States. Am J Transplant. 2012;12(12):3191-3212.
12. Cohen JB, Bloom RD, Reese PP, Porrett PM, Forde KA, Sawinski DL. National outcomes of kidney transplantation from deceased diabetic donors. Kidney Int. 2015;89(3):636-647.
13. Lin DY, Wei LJ. The robust inference for the Cox proportional hazards model. J Am Statist Assoc. 1989;84(408):1074-1078.
14. Therneau TM, Grambsch PM. Modeling Survival Data: Extending the Cox Model (Statistics for Biology and Health). New York: Springer; 2001.
15. Erickson KF, Zheng Y, Winkelmayer WC, Ho V, Bhattacharya J, Chertow GM. Consolidation in the dialysis industry, patient choice, and local market competition. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;12:536-545.
16. OPTN/UNOS Policy Notice Eligible Death Data Definitions. https://optntransplanthrsagov/media/2012/opo_policynotice_ie_20130701pdf; 2017.
17. Goldberg DS, French B, Lewis JD, et al. Liver transplant center variability in accepting organ offers and its impact on patient survival. J Hepatol. 2016;64(4):843-851.
18. Yarlagadda SG, Coca SG, Formica RN, Poggio ED, Parikh CR. Association between delayed graft function and allograft and patient survival: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2009;24(3):1039-1047.
19. Butala NM, Reese PP, Doshi MD, Parikh CR. Is delayed graft function causally associated with long-term outcomes after kidney transplantation? Instrumental variable analysis. Transplantation. 2013;95(8):1008-1014.
20. Reese PP, Feldman HI, Asch DA, et al. Transplantation of kidneys from donors at increased risk for blood-borne viral infection: Recipient outcomes and patterns of organ use. Am J Transplant. 2009;9(10):2338-2345.
21. Lai JC, Kahn JG, Tavakol M, Peters MG, Roberts JP. Reducing infection transmission in solid organ transplantation through donor nucleic acid testing: A cost-effectiveness analysis. Am J Transplant. 2013;13(10):2611-2618.
22. Kucirka LM, Sarathy H, Govindan P, et al. Risk of window period hepatitis-C infection in high infectious risk donors: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Transplant. 2011;11(6):1188-1200.
23. Reese PP, Tehrani T, Lim MA, et al. Determinants of the decision to accept a kidney from a donor at increased risk for blood-borne viral infection. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;5(5):917-923.
24. Goldberg DS, Blumberg E, McCauley M, Abt P, Levine M. Improving organ utilization to help overcome the tragedies of the opioid epidemic. Am J Transplant. 2016;16(10):2836-2841.
25. Cho PS, Saidi RF, Cutie CJ, Ko DS. Competitive Market analysis of transplant centers and discrepancy of wait-listing of recipients for kidney transplantation. Int J Organ Transplant Med. 2015;6(4):141-149.
26. Adler JT, Sethi RK, Yeh H, Markmann JF, Nguyen LL. Market competition influences renal transplantation risk and outcomes. Ann Surg. 2014;260(3):550-556; discussion 6-7.
27. Kayler LK, Sokolich J, Magliocca J, Schold JD. Import kidney transplants from nonmandatory share deceased donors: Characteristics, distribution and outcomes. Am J Transplant. 2011;11(1):77-85.
28. Aufhauser Jr DD, Wang Z, Murken DR, et al. Improved renal ischemia tolerance in females influences kidney transplantation outcomes. J Clin Invest. 2016;126(5):1968-1977.
29. Miller AJ, Kiberd BA, Alwayn IP, Odutayo A, Tennankore KK. Donor-recipient weight and sex mismatch and the risk of graft loss in renal transplantation. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;12(4):669-676.
30. Parikh CR, Hall IE, Bhangoo RS, et al. Associations of perfusate biomarkers and pump parameters with delayed graft function and deceased donor kidney allograft function. Am J Transplant. 2016;16(5):1526-1539.
31. Davis AE, Mehrotra S, Kilambi V, et al. The effect of the Statewide Sharing variance on geographic disparity in kidney transplantation in the United States. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014;9(8):1449-1460.