Feedback in conversation as incremental semantic update

IWCS 2015 - Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Computational Semantics

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 261-271

  Eshghi, Arash ^a   Howes, Christine ^b   Gregoromichelaki, Eleni ^c   Hough, Julian ^d   Purver, Matthew ^e  

^a HERIOT WATT UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^c KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^d BIELEFELD UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^e QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLARIFICATION; CLARIFIERS; REPAIR;

DYNAMIC SYNTAXES; INCREMENTAL MODELING; INTENTION RECOGNITION; SEMANTIC PROCESSING; SEMANTIC STRUCTURES; SEMANTIC UPDATES;

SEMANTICS;

EID: 85028557784     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (35)

1. Allwood, J., J. Nivre, and E. Ahlsén (1992). On the semantics and pragmatics of linguistic feedback. Journal of Semantics 9(1), 1-26. Also published as Gothenburg Papers in Theoretical Linguistics 64.
2. Blackburn, P. and W. Meyer-Viol (1994). Linguistics, logic and finite trees. Logic Journal of the Interest Group of Pure and Applied Logics 2(1), 3-29.
3. Buschmeier, H. and S. Kopp (2013). Co-constructing grounded symbols-feedback and incremental adaptation in human-agent dialogue. KI-Künstliche Intelligenz 27(2), 137-143.
4. Cann, R. (2011). Towards an account of the English auxiliary system: building interpretations incrementally. In R. Kempson, E. Gregoromichelaki, and C. Howes (Eds.), Dynamics of Lexical Interfaces. Chicago: CSLI Press.
5. Cann, R., R. Kempson, and L. Marten (2005). The Dynamics of Language. Oxford: Elsevier.
6. Cathcart, N., J. Carletta, and E. Klein (2003). A shallow model of backchannel continuers in spoken dialogue. In Proceedings of the 10th conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL), pp. 51-58.
7. Clark, H. H. (1996). Using Language. Cambridge University Press.
8. Clark, H. H. and E. F. Schaefer (1989). Contributing to discourse. Cognitive Science 13(2), 259-294.
9. Colman, M. and P. Healey (2011, July). The distribution of repair in dialogue. In C. Hoelscher and T. Shipley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Boston, MA, pp. 1563-1568.
10. Cooper, R. (2005). Records and record types in semantic theory. Journal of Logic and Computation 15(2), 99-112.
11. Dobnik, S., R. Cooper, and S. Larsson (2012). Modelling language, action, and perception in type theory with records. In Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Constraint Solving and Language Processing (CSLP-12), pp. 51-63.
12. Eshghi, A., J. Hough, M. Purver, R. Kempson, and E. Gregoromichelaki (2012). Conversational interactions: Capturing dialogue dynamics. In From Quantification to Conversation, Volume 19 of Tributes, pp. 325-349. College Publications.
13. Gargett, A., E. Gregoromichelaki, R. Kempson, M. Purver, and Y. Sato (2009). Grammar resources for modelling dialogue dynamically. Cognitive Neurodynamics 3(4), 347-363.
14. Ginzburg, J. (2012). The Interactive Stance: Meaning for Conversation. Oxford University Press.
15. Ginzburg, J., R. Fernández, and D. Schlangen (2014, June). Disfluencies as intra-utterance dialogue moves. Semantics and Pragmatics 7(9), 1-64.
16. Goodwin, C. (1979). The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, pp. 97-121. New York: Irvington Publishers.
17. Goodwin, C. (1986). Audience diversity, participation and interpretation. Tex 6(3), 283-316.
18. Gravano, A. and J. Hirschberg (2009). Backchannel-inviting cues in task-oriented dialogue. In INTERSPEECH, pp. 1019-1022.
19. Heldner, M., A. Hjalmarsson, and J. Edlund (2013). Backchannel relevance spaces. In Nordic Prosody: Proceedings of XIth Conference, Tartu 2012, pp. 137-146.
20. Hough, J. and M. Purver (2012, September). Processing self-repairs in an incremental type-theoretic dialogue system. In Proceedings of the 16th SemDial Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue, Paris, pp. 136-144.
21. Howes, C., P. G. T. Healey, M. Purver, and A. Eshghi (2012, August). Finishing each other's... responding to incomplete contributions in dialogue. In Proc. 34th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Sapporo, Japan, pp. 479-484.
22. Kempson, R., R. Cann, A. Eshghi, E. Gregoromichelaki, and M. Purver (2014). Ellipsis. In S. Lappin and C. Fox (Eds.), Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory. Willey-Blackwell Publications.
23. Kempson, R., W. Meyer-Viol, and D. Gabbay (2001). Dynamic Syntax: The Flow of Language Understanding. Blackwell.
24. Kjellmer, G. (2009). Where do we backchannel? on the use of mm, mhm, uh huh and such like. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 14(1), 81-112.
25. Koschmann, T. and C. D. LeBaron (2003). Reconsidering common ground: Examining Clark's contribution theory in the OR. In Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 81-98. Kluwer.
26. Matheson, C., M. Poesio, and D. Traum (2000, April). Modeling grounding and discourse obligations using update rules. In Proc. 1st Meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (NAACL), Seattle.
27. Poesio, M. and H. Rieser (2010). Completions, coordination, and alignment in dialogue. Dialogue and Discourse 1, 1-89.
28. Poesio, M. and D. Traum (1997). Conversational actions and discourse situations. Computational Intelligence 13(3), 309-347.
29. Purver, M., A. Eshghi, and J. Hough (2011, January). Incremental semantic construction in a dialogue system. In J. Bos and S. Pulman (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computational Semantics, Oxford, UK, pp. 365-369.
30. Purver,M., J. Ginzburg, and P. G. T. Healey (2003). On the means for clarification in dialogue. In R. Smith and J. van Kuppevelt (Eds.), Current and New Directions in Discourse & Dialogue, pp. 235-255. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
31. Purver, M., E. Gregoromichelaki,W.Meyer-Viol, and R. Cann (2010, June). Splitting the 'I's and crossing the 'You's: Context, speech acts and grammar. In Proc. 14th SemDial Workshop on Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue, Poznán, pp. 43-50.
32. Sato, Y. (2011). Local ambiguity, search strategies and parsing in Dynamic Syntax. In E. Gregoromichelaki, R. Kempson, and C. Howes (Eds.), The Dynamics of Lexical Interfaces, pp. 205-233. CSLI.
33. Traum, D. (1994). A Computational Theory of Grounding in Natural Language Conversation. Ph. D. thesis, U. Rochester.
34. Visser, T., D. Traum, D. DeVault, and R. op den Akker (2014). A model for incremental grounding in spoken dialogue systems. Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces 8(1), 61-73.
35. Wang, Z., J. Lee, and S. Marsella (2011). Towards more comprehensive listening behavior: beyond the bobble head. In Intelligent Virtual Agents, pp. 216-227. Springer.