Grammar resources for modelling dialogue dynamically

Cognitive Neurodynamics

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 347-363

  Gargett, Andrew ^a   Gregoromichelaki, Eleni ^a   Kempson, Ruth ^a   Purver, Matthew ^b   Sato, Yo ^c  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HERTFORDSHIRE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Context; Dialogue modelling; Ellipsis; Incrementality; Natural language processing; Pragmatics; Semantics; Syntax

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DYNAMICS; GRAMMAR; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LANGUAGE; MODEL;

EID: 72249121620     PISSN: 18714080     EISSN: 18714099     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11571-009-9088-y     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. M Arbib 2005 From monkey-like action recognition to human language: an evolutionary framework for neurolinguistics Behav Brain Sci 28 105 167 16201457
2. Atterer M, Schlangen D (2009) RUBISC-a robust unification-based incremental semantic chunker. In: Proceedings of SRSL 2009, the 2nd workshop on semantic representation of spoken language, Association for Computational Linguistics, Athens, Greece, pp 66-73. http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W09-0509
3. J Barwise R Cooper 1981 Generalized quantifiers and natural language Ling Philos 4 159 219 10.1007/BF00350139
4. Billard A, Schaal S (2006) Special issue on the brain mechanisms of imitation learning. Neural Netw 19(3):251-253. The Brain Mechanisms of Imitation Learning
5. P Blackburn W Meyer-Viol 1994 Linguistics, logic and finite trees Bull IGPL 2 3 31 10.1093/jigpal/2.1.3
6. Bonaiuto J, Thórisson K (2008) Towards a neural model of realtime turntaking in face-to-face dialogue. In: Wachsmuth I, Lenzen M, Knoblich G (eds) Embodied communication in humans and machines. Oxford University Press, Oxford
7. Bunt H (2009) Multifunctionality and multidimensional dialogue semantics. In: Proceedings of DiaHolmia, 13th SEMDIAL workshop
8. R Byrne 1999 Imitation without intentionality. using string parsing to copy the organization of behaviour Anim Cogn 2 63 72 10.1007/s100710050025
9. RW Byrne 2003 Imitation as behaviour parsing Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 358 1431 529 536 10.1098/rstb.2002.1219 1:STN:280: DC%2BD3s7ntFCqsg%3D%3D 12689378 (Pubitemid 36380532)
10. Cann R, Kempson R, Marten L (2005) The dynamics of language. Elsevier, Oxford
11. R Cann R Kempson M Purver 2007 Context and well-formedness: the dynamics of ellipsis Res Lang Comput 5 3 333 358 10.1007/s11168-007-9033-3
12. Chomsky N (1965) Aspects of the theory of syntax. MIT, Cambridge, MA
13. Clark HH (1996) Using language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
14. F Costa P Frasconi V Lombardo G Soda 2003 Towards incremental parsing of natural language using recursive neural networks Appl Intell 19 1-2 9 25 10.1023/A:1023860521975
15. M Dalrymple SM Shieber FCN Pereira 1991 Ellipsis and higher-order unification Ling Philos 14 4 399 452 10.1007/BF00630923
16. G. Evans 1980 Pronouns Ling Inquiry 11 2 337 362
17. Fernández R (2006) Non-sentential utterances in dialogue: classification, resolution and use. Ph.D. thesis, King's College London, University of London
18. Fiengo R, May R (1994) Indices and identity. MIT Press, Cambridge
19. Gargett A, Gregoromichelaki E, Howes C, Sato Y (2008) Dialogue-grammar correspondence in dynamic syntax. In: Proceedings of the 12th SEMDIAL (LONDIAL)
20. E Gibson 1998 Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies Cognition 68 1 76 10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00034-1 1:STN:280:DyaK1cvkvVKmtw%3D%3D 9775516
21. Ginzburg J (2009) The interactive stance: meaning for conversation. CSLI (forthcoming)
22. J Ginzburg R Cooper 2004 Clarification, ellipsis, and the nature of contextual updates in dialogue Ling Philos 27 3 297 365 10.1023/B:LING. 0000023369.19306.90
23. Ginzburg J, Sag I, Purver M (2003) Integrating conversational move types in the grammar of conversation. In: Kühnlein P, Rieser H, Zeevat H (eds) Perspectives on dialogue in the new millennium, pragmatics and beyond new series, vol 114. John Benjamins, pp 25-42
24. Healey P (2008) Interactive misalignment: the role of repair in the development of group sub-languages. In: Cooper R, Kempson R (eds) Language in flux. College Publications, Dartmouth
25. Healey P, Eshghi A (in prep) What is a conversation? Distinguishing dialogue contexts. Queen Mary University of London
26. B Hommel J Müsseler G Aschersleben W Prinz 2001 The theory of event coding (tec): a framework for perception and action planning Behav Brain Sci 24 849 937 1:STN:280:DC%2BD38vnvVehsQ%3D%3D 12239891
27. Hurley S (2005) The shared circuits hypothesis: a unified functional architecture for control, imitation, and simulation. In: Hurley S, Chater N (eds) Perspectives on imitation: from mirror neurons to memes. MIT Press, Cambridge
28. Kecskes I, Mey J (eds) (2008) Intention, common ground and the egocentric speaker-hearer. Mouton de Gruyter
29. E Keenan B MacWhinney D Mayhew 1977 Pragmatics in memory: a study of natural conversation J Verb Learn Behav 16 549 560 10.1016/S0022-5371(77)80018-2
30. Kempson R, Meyer-Viol W, Gabbay D (2001) Dynamic syntax. Blackwell, Oxford
31. Kempson R, Gargett A, Gregoromichelaki E (2007) Clarification requests: an incremental account. In: Proceedings of the 11th workshop on the semantics and pragmatics of dialogue (DECALOG)
32. Kempson R, Gregoromichelaki E, Purver M, Mills G, Gargett A, Howes C (2009a) How mechanistic can accounts of interaction be? In: Proceedings of Diaholmia, the 13th workshop on the semantics and pragmatics of dialogue
33. Kempson R, Gregoromichelaki E, Sato Y (2009b) Incrementality, speaker-hearer switching and the disambiguation challenge. In: Proceedings of SRSL 2009, the 2nd workshop on semantic representation of spoken language. Association for Computational Linguistics, Athens, Greece, pp 74-81. http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W09-0510
34. W Kintsch E Bates 1977 Recognition memory for statements from a classroom lecture J Exp Psychol Human Learn Mem 3 2 150 159 10.1037/0278-7393.3.2.150
35. Ladusaw WA (1979) Polarity sensitivity as inherent scope relations. Ph.D. thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Amherst, MA
36. Levinson SC (1983) Pragmatics. Cambridge textbooks in linguistics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
37. Levinson S (1992) Activity types and language. In: Drew P, Heritage J (eds) Talk at work. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 66-100
38. Lewis RL, Vasishth S (2005) An activation-based model of sentence processing as skilled memory retrieval. Cogn Sci 29:1-45. http://www.ling.uni- potsdam.de/vasishth/Papers/cogsci05lewis vasishth.pdf
39. A Liberman I Mattingly 1989 A specialization for speech perception Science 243 4890 489 494 10.1126/science.2643163 1:STN:280:DyaL1M7gtVaqtQ%3D%3D 2643163
40. A Liberman D Whalen 2000 On the relation of speech to language Trends Cogn Sci 4 5 187 196 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01471-6 10782105 (Pubitemid 30227508)
41. Merchant J (2001) The syntax of silence: sluicing, islands, and the theory of ellipsis. Oxford University Press, Oxford
42. Merchant J (2007) Three kinds of ellipsis: syntactic, semantic, pragmatic?. Ms University of Chicago, Chicago
43. Morgan J (1973) Sentence fragments and the notion 'sentence'. In: Jashru YMB, Lees R (eds) Issues in linguistics. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, pp 719-751
44. Morgan J (1989) Sentence fragments revisited. In: Chametzky R (ed) Proceedings of the 25th meeting of the Chicago linguistics society. CLS
45. Ono T, Thompson S (1995) What can conversation tell us about syntax? Amsterdam studies in the theory and history of linguistic sciences 4, pp 213-272
46. M Pickering S Garrod 2004 Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue Behav Brain Sci 27 169 226 15595235
47. Poesio M, Rieser H (2009) Completions, coordination, and alignment in dialogue. Ms (to appear)
48. Polanyi L, Scha R (1984) A syntactic approach to discourse semantics. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on computational linguistics (COLING10). Stanford, CA, pp 413-419
49. Purver M (2004) The theory and use of clarification requests in dialogue. Ph.D. thesis, University of London
50. M Purver R Cann R Kempson 2006 Grammars as parsers: meeting the dialogue challenge Res Lang Comput 4 2-3 289 326 10.1007/s11168-006-9007-x (Pubitemid 44411817)
51. Purver M, Howes C, Gregoromichelaki E, Healey P (2009) Split utterances in dialogue: a corpus study. In: Proceedings of SigDial 2009
52. Ross J (1967) Constraints on variables in syntax. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
53. Rühlemann C (2007) Conversation in context: a corpus-driven approach. Continuum
54. Sacks H, Schegloff E, Jefferson G (1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, pp 696-735
55. E Schegloff 1979 The relevance of repair to syntax-for-conversation Discourse Syntax 12 261 88
56. E Schegloff H Sacks 1973 Opening up closings Semiotica 7 4 289 327
57. Schlangen D (2003) A coherence-based approach to the interpretation of non-sentential utterances in dialogue. Ph.D. thesis, University of Edinburgh
58. Schlangen D, Lascarides A (2003) The interpretation of non-sentential utterances in dialogue. In: Proceedings of the 4th SIGdial workshop on discourse and dialogue. Association for Computational Linguistics, Sapporo, Japan, pp 62-71
59. N Sebanz H Bekkering G Knoblich 2006 Joint action: bodies and minds moving together Trends Cogn Sci 10 70 76 10.1016/j.tics.2005.12.009 16406326 (Pubitemid 43177181)
60. N Sebanz G Knoblich W Prinz E Wascher 2006 Twin peaks: an ERP study of action planning and control in co-acting individuals J Cogn Neurosci 15 99 104
61. Skantze G, Schlangen D (2009) Incremental dialogue processing in a micro-domain. In: Proceedings of the 12th conference of the European chapter of the ACL (EACL 2009). Association for Computational Linguistics, Athens, Greece, pp 745-753. http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/E09-1085
62. Sperber D, Wilson D (1995) Relevance: communication and cognition, 2nd edn. Blackwell, Oxford
63. Stainton R (2006) Words and thoughts: subsentences, ellipsis, and the philosophy of language. Oxford University Press, Oxford
64. Stalnaker R (1999) Context and content. Oxford University Press, Oxford
65. Stoness S, Tetreault J, Allen J (2004) Incremental parsing with reference interaction. In: In ACL workshop on incremental parsing, pp 18-25
66. P Sturt M Crocker 1996 Monotonic syntactic processing: a cross-linguistic study of attachment and reanalysis Lang Cogn Process 11 448 494
67. van Leusen N, Muskens R (2003) Construction by description in discourse representation. In: Peregrin J (ed) Meaning: the dynamic turn, pp 33-65 (Chap 12)
68. Wilson M, Wilson T (2005) An oscillator model of the timing of turn-taking. Psychon Bull Rev 957-968