Incremental semantic construction in a dialogue system

Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computational Semantics, IWCS 2011

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 365-369

  Purver, Matthew ^a   Eshghi, Arash ^a   Hough, Julian ^a  

^a QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATION THEORY; SPEECH PROCESSING; SYNTACTICS;

DIALOGUE SYSTEMS; DYNAMIC SYNTAXES; EVENT-BASED SEMANTICS; GRAMMAR BASED APPROACH; SEMANTIC INTERPRETATION; TYPE THEORY;

SEMANTICS;

EID: 84991019645     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Buß, O., T. Baumann, and D. Schlangen (2010). Collaborating on utterances with a spoken dialogue system using an ISU-based approach to incremental dialogue management. In Proceedings of the SIGDIAL 2010 Conference.
2. Cann, R., R. Kempson, and L. Marten (2005). The Dynamics of Language. Oxford: Elsevier.
3. Cann, R., R. Kempson, and M. Purver (2007). Context and well-formedness: the dynamics of ellipsis. Research on Language and Computation 5(3), 333-358.
4. Cooper, R. (2005). Records and record types in semantic theory. Journal of Logic and Computation 15(2), 99-112.
5. Davidson, D. (1980). Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
6. DeVault, D., K. Sagae, and D. Traum (2009). Can I finish? learning when to respond to incremental interpretation results in interactive dialogue. In Proceedings of the SIGDIAL 2009 Conference.
7. Fernández, R. (2006). Non-Sentential Utterances in Dialogue: Classification, Resolution and Use. Ph. D. thesis, King's College London, University of London.
8. Fernández, R., J. Ginzburg, H. Gregory, and S. Lappin (2004). SHARDS: Fragment resolution in dialogue. In H. Bunt and R. Muskens (Eds.), Computing Meaning, Volume 3. Kluwer Academic Publishers. To appear.
9. Gargett, A., E. Gregoromichelaki, R. Kempson, M. Purver, and Y. Sato (2009). Grammar resources for modelling dialogue dynamically. Cognitive Neurodynamics 3(4), 347-363.
10. Kempson, R., W. Meyer-Viol, and D. Gabbay (2001). Dynamic Syntax: The Flow of Language Understanding. Blackwell.
11. Lerner, G. H. (2004). Collaborative turn sequences. In Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation, pp. 225-256. John Benjamins.
12. Purver, M., E. Gregoromichelaki, W. Meyer-Viol, and R. Cann (2010). Splitting the 'I's and crossing the 'You's: Context, speech acts and grammar. In Aspects of Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue. SemDial 2010, 14th Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue.
13. Purver, M. and R. Kempson (2004). Incremental context-based generation for dialogue. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Natural Language Generation (INLG04).
14. Sato, Y. (2010). Local ambiguity, search strategies and parsing in Dynamic Syntax. In E. Gregoromichelaki, R. Kempson, and C. Howes (Eds.), The Dynamics of Lexical Interfaces. CSLI. to appear.
15. Schlangen, D. and G. Skantze (2009). A general, abstract model of incremental dialogue processing. In Proceedings of the 12th Conference of the European Chapter of the ACL (EACL 2009).
16. Skantze, G. and A. Hjalmarsson (2010). Towards incremental speech generation in dialogue systems. In Proceedings of the SIGDIAL 2010 Conference.
17. Skantze, G. and D. Schlangen (2009). Incremental dialogue processing in a micro-domain. In Proceedings of the 12th Conference of the European Chapter of the ACL (EACL 2009).
18. Yngve, V. H. (1970). On getting a word in edgewise. In Papers from the 6th regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society.