TESOL Quarterly Research Guidelines

TESOL Quarterly

Volumn 50, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 42-65

  Mahboob, Ahmar ^a   Paltridge, Brian ^a   Phakiti, Aek ^a   Wagner, Elvis ^b   Starfield, Sue ^c   Burns, Anne ^c   Jones, Rodney H ^d   De Costa, Peter I ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF READING   (United Kingdom)

^e MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85028430588     PISSN: 00398322     EISSN: 15457249     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tesq.288     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. American Psychological Association (APA). (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
2. Antaki, C., Billig, M., Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (2002). Discourse analysis means doing analysis: A critique of six analytic shortcomings. Discourse Analysis Online, 1(1). Retrieved from http://extra.shu.ac.uk/daol/previous/v1_n1.html
3. Barkhuizen, G. (2011). Narrative knowledging in TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 45, 391-414. doi:10.5054/tq.2011.261888
4. Blom, E., & Unsworth, S. (Eds.). (2010). Experimental methods in language acquisition. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
5. British Association for Applied Linguistics (BAAL). (2006). Recommendations on good practice in applied linguistics. Retrieved from http://www.baal.org.uk/about_goodpractice:full.pdf
6. Brown, J. D. (2001). Using surveys in language programs. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
7. Burns, A. (2014). "Systematic inquiry made public": Teacher reports from a national action research program. Research Notes, 56, 4-6. Retrieved from http://www.cambridgeenglish.org/images/170903-research-notes-56-document.pdf
8. Cambridge English Language Assessment. (2015). English Australia/Cambridge English Action Research Program 5. Research Notes, 60. Retrieved from http://www.cambridgeenglish.org/images/228055-research-notes-60.pdf
9. Cameron, D., Frazer, E., Harvey, P., Rampton, M. B. H., & Richardson, K. (1992). Researching language: Issues of power and method. London, England: Routledge.
10. Canagarajah, A. S. (2012). Teacher development in a global profession: An autoethnography. TESOL Quarterly, 46, 258-279. doi:10.1002/tesq.18
11. Chapelle, C., & Duff, P. (Eds.). (2003). Some guidelines for conducting quantitative and qualitative research in TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 37, 157-178. doi:10.2307/3588471
12. Cheng, L., Klinger, D., Fox, J., Doe, C., Jin, Y., & Wu, J. (2014). Motivation and test anxiety in test performance across three testing contexts: The CAEL, CET, and GEPT. TESOL Quarterly, 48, 300-330. doi:10.1002/tesq.105
13. Chun, C. W. (2016). Addressing racialized multicultural discourses in an EAP textbook: Working toward a critical pedagogies approach. TESOL Quarterly, 50, 109-131. doi:10.1002/tesq.216
14. De Costa, P. I. (2014). Making ethical decisions in an ethnographic study. TESOL Quarterly, 48, 413-422. doi:10.1002/tesq.163
15. De Costa, P. I. (Ed.). (2016). Ethics in applied linguistics research: Language researcher narratives. New York, NY: Routledge.
16. Dewey, J. (2004). Democracy and education. New York, NY: Continuum. (Original work published 1916.)
17. Dörnyei, Z., with Taguchi, T. (2010). Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration, and processing (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
18. ELT Research. (2015). The newsletter of the IATEFL Research Special Interest Group, (January), 30. Retrieved from http://resig.weebly.com/issue-30.html
19. Fink, A. (1995). How to sample in surveys. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20. Freire, P. (2007). Pedagogy of the oppressed (M. Ramos, Trans). New York, NY: Continuum. (Original work published 1970.)
21. Gass, S. (2015). Experimental research. In B. Paltridge & A. Phakiti (Eds.), Research methods in applied linguistics: A practical resource (pp. 101-117). London, England: Bloomsbury.
22. Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York, NY: Basic Books.
23. Green, J., Franquiz, M., & Dixon, C. (1997). The myth of the objective transcript: Transcribing as a situated act. TESOL Quarterly, 31, 172-176. doi:10.2307/3587984
24. Guilar, J. D. (2006). Intersubjectivity and dialogic instruction. Radical Pedagogy. Retrieved from http://www.radicalpedagogy.org/radicalpedagogy/Intersubjectivity_and_Dialogic_Instruction.html
25. Hafner, C. A. (2014). Embedding digital literacies in English language teaching: Students' digital video projects as multimodal ensembles. TESOL Quarterly, 48, 655-685. doi:10.1002/tesq.138
26. Hammersley, M. (2010). Ethnography. In P. Peterson, E. Baker, & B. McGaw (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (3rd ed., pp. 386-391). Oxford, England: Elsevier.
27. Hammond, K. (2006). More than a game: A critical discourse analysis of a racial inequality exercise in Japan. TESOL Quarterly, 40, 545-571. doi:10.2307/40264543
28. Holliday, A. (2015). Qualitative research and analysis. In B. Paltridge & A. Phakiti (Eds.), Research methods in applied linguistics: A practical resource (pp. 49-62). London, England: Bloomsbury.
29. Hudson, T., & Llosa, L. (2015). Design issues and inference in experimental L2 research. Language Learning, 65, 76-96. doi:10.1111/lang.12113
30. Johns, A. M., & Makalela, L. (2011). Needs analysis, critical ethnography, and context: Perspectives from the client-and the consultant. In D. Belcher, A. M. Johns, & B. Paltridge (Eds.), New directions in English for specific purposes research (pp. 197-221). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
31. Kayi-Aydar, H. (2014). Social positioning, participation, and second language learning: Talkative students in an academic ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 48, 686-714. doi:10.1002/tesq.139
32. Kono, N. (2013). Ethics in research. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
33. Kubanyiova, M. (2013). Ethical debates in research on language and interaction. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
34. Kwan, B. S. C. (2010). An investigation of instruction in research publishing in doctoral programs: The Hong Kong case. Higher Education, 59(1), 55-68. doi:10.1007/s10734-009-9233-x
35. Larson-Hall, J., & Herrington, R. (2010). Improving data analysis in second language acquisition by utilizing modern developments in applied statistics. Applied Linguistics, 31, 368-390. doi:10.1093/applin/amp038
36. Larson-Hall, J., & Plonsky, L. (2015). Reporting and interpreting quantitative research findings: What gets reported and recommendations for the field. Language Learning, 65(special issue), 127-159. doi:10.1111/lang.12115
37. Murphey, T., & Falout, J. (2010). Critical participatory looping: Dialogic member checks with whole classes. TESOL Quarterly, 44, 811-821. doi:10.5054/tq.2010.237337
38. Ong, J., & Zhang, L. J. (2012). Effects of the manipulation of cognitive process on EFL writers' text quality. TESOL Quarterly, 47, 375-398. doi:10.1002/tesq.55
39. Ortega, L. (2005). For what and for whom is our research? The ethical as transformative lens in instructed SLA. The Modern Language Journal, 89, 427-443. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2005.00315.x
40. Paltridge, B. (2014). Genre and second language academic writing. Language Teaching, 47, 303-318. doi:10.1017/S0261444814000068
41. Perry, F. (2011). Researching applied linguistics: Becoming a discerning consumer (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
42. Phakiti, A. (2014). Experimental research methods in language learning. London, England: Bloomsbury.
43. Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 57-101). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
44. Pratt, M. L. (1991). Arts of the contact zone. Profession, 91, 33-40.
45. Purpura, J. E., Brown, J. D., & Schoonen, R. (2015). Improving the validity of quantitative measures in applied linguistics research. Language Learning, 65, 37-75. doi:10.1111/lang.12112
46. Shohamy, E. (2004). Reflections on research guidelines, categories, and responsibility. TESOL Quarterly, 38, 728-731. doi:10.2307/3588291
47. Smith, R., Connelly, T., & Rebolledo, P. (2014). Teacher-research as continuing professional development: A project with Chilean secondary schools. In D. Hayes (Ed.), Innovations in the continuing professional development of English language teachers (pp. 111-132). London, England: The British Council. Retrieved from http://englishagenda.britishcouncil.org/sites/ec/files/E168%20Innovations%20in%20CPD_FINAL%20V2%20web.pdf
48. Starfield, S. (2013). Researcher reflexivity. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), Encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 1-7). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
49. Swain, M. (2006). Languaging, agency and collaboration in advanced second language proficiency. In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Advanced language learning (pp. 95-108). London, England: Continuum.
50. Talmy, S. (2013). Critical ethnography. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), Encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 1-6). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
51. TESOL International Association. (2014). TESOL International Association research agenda 2014. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
52. Vogt, W. (2007). Quantitative research methods for professionals. Boston, MA: Pearson.
53. Wagner, E. (2015). Survey research. In B. Paltridge & A. Phakiti (Eds.), Research methods in applied linguistics: A practical resource (pp. 83-100). London, England: Bloomsbury.
54. Waring, H. Z. (2012). "Any questions?": Investigating the nature of understanding-checks in the language classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 46, 722-752. doi:10.1002/tesq.48
55. Wertsch, J. V. (2006). Generalized collective dialogue and advanced foreign language capacities. In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Advanced language learning (pp. 58-71). London, England: Continuum.