Peri-Implantitis Associated with Type of Cement: A Retrospective Analysis of Different Types of Cement and Their Clinical Correlation to the Peri-Implant Tissue

Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research

Volumn 17, Issue , 2015, Pages e434-e443

  Korsch, Michael ^a   Walther, Winfried ^a  

^a Dental Academy for Continuing Professional Development   (Germany)

Author keywords

Bone loss; Cement retained dentures; Excess cement; Implants; Inflammation; Peri implantitis

Indexed keywords

ACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; ACRYLIC ACID METHYL ESTER; TOOTH CEMENT; ZINC OXIDE EUGENOL;

ADULT; ADVERSE DEVICE EFFECT; AGED; DRUG EFFECTS; FEMALE; GINGIVA; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERIIMPLANTITIS; PROCEDURES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; YOUNG ADULT;

ACRYLATES; ADULT; AGED; DENTAL CEMENTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS RETENTION; FEMALE; GINGIVA; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERI-IMPLANTITIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; YOUNG ADULT; ZINC OXIDE-EUGENOL CEMENT;

EID: 85028213347     PISSN: 15230899     EISSN: 17088208     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/cid.12265     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Callan DP, Cobb CM. Excess cement and peri-implant disease. JIACD 2009; 1:61-68.
2. Dumbrigue HB, Abanomi AA, Cheng LL. Techniques to minimize excess luting agent in cement-retained implant restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 87:112-114.
3. Gapski R, Neugeboren N, Pomeranz AZ, Reissner MW. Endosseous implant failure influenced by crown cementation: a clinical case report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008; 23:943-946.
4. Busscher HJ, Rinastiti M, Siswomihardjo W, van der Mei HC. Biofilm formation on dental restorative and implant materials. J Dent Res 2010; 89:657-665.
5. Korsch M, Robra BP, Walther W. Predictors of excess cement and tissue response to fixed implant-supported dentures after cementation. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2013. doi: 10.1111/cid.12122; Epub.
6. Wilson TG Jr. The positive relationship between excess cement and peri-implant disease: a prospective clinical endoscopic study. J Periodontol 2009; 80:1388-1392.
7. Linkevicius T, Vindasiute E, Puisys A, Linkeviciene L, Maslova N, Puriene A. The influence of the cementation margin position on the amount of undetected cement. A prospective clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013; 24:71-76.
8. Wadhwani C, Pineyro A. Technique for controlling the cement for an implant crown. J Prosthet Dent 2009; 102:57-58.
9. Vindasiute E, Puisys A, Maslova N, Linkeviciene L, Peciuliene V, Linkevicius T. Clinical factors influencing removal of the cement excess in implant-supported restorations. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2013. doi: 10.1111/cid.12170; Epub.
10. Santosa RE, Martin W, Morton D. Effects of a cementing technique in addition to luting agent on the uniaxial retention force of a single-tooth implant-supported restoration: an in vitro study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010; 25:1145-1152.
11. Korsch M, Obst U, Walther W. Cement-associated peri-implantitis: a retrospective clinical observational study of fixed implant-supported restorations using a methacrylate cement. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013. doi: 10.1111/cid.12170; Epub.
12. Wadhwani C, Hess T, Pineyro A, Opler R, Chung KH. Cement application techniques in luting implant-supported crowns: a quantitative and qualitative survey. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012; 27:859-864.
13. Wadhwani C, Rapoport D, La Rosa S, Hess T, Kretschmar S. Radiographic detection and characteristic patterns of residual excess cement associated with cement-retained implant restorations: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2012; 107:151-157.
14. Schwedhelm ER, Lepe X, Aw TC. A crown venting technique for the cementation of implant-supported crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2003; 89:89-90.
15. Linkevicius T, Vindasiute E, Puisys A, Peciuliene V. The influence of margin location on the amount of undetected cement excess after delivery of cement-retained implant restorations. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011; 22:1379-1384.
16. Wadhwani C, Hess T, Faber T, Pineyro A, Chen CS. A descriptive study of the radiographic density of implant restorative cements. J Prosthet Dent 2010; 103:295-302.
17. Yanikoglu N, Yesil Duymus Z. Evaluation of the solubility of dental cements in artificial saliva of different pH values. Dent Mater J 2007; 26:62-67.
18. Mombelli A, Muhle T, Bragger U, Lang NP, Burgin WB. Comparison of periodontal and peri-implant probing by depth-force pattern analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997; 8:448-454.
19. Boeckh C, Schumacher E, Podbielski A, Haller B. Antibacterial activity of restorative dental biomaterials in vitro. Caries Res 2002; 36:101-107.
20. Nissan J, Narobai D, Gross O, Ghelfan O, Chaushu G. Long-term outcome of cemented versus screw-retained implant-supported partial restorations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011; 26:1102-1107.
21. Sailer I, Muhlemann S, Zwahlen M, Hammerle CH, Schneider D. Cemented and screw-retained implant reconstructions: a systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23(Suppl 6):163-201.
22. Garg P, Gupta G, Prithviraj DR, Pujari M. Retentiveness of various luting agents used with implant-supported prostheses: a preliminary in vitro study. Int J Prosthodont 2013; 26:82-84.