Antibacterial activity of restorative dental biomaterials in vitro

Caries Research

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 101-107

  Boeckh, Clemens ^a   Schumacher, Eliane ^a   Podbielski, Andreas ^b   Haller, Bernd ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ULM   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ROSTOCK   (Germany)

^c Dept Oper Dent Periodontol P ^*  (Germany)

Author keywords

Antibacterial activity; Dental restorations; Fluoride; Glass ionomer; Resin composites; Secondary caries

Indexed keywords

ARISTON PHC; GLASS IONOMER; KETAC MOLAR; KETAC-MOLAR; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; PHOTAC FIL; PHOTAC-FIL; RESIN; TETRIC CERAM; TOOTH CEMENT; ZINC OXIDE EUGENOL;

ARTICLE; BACTERIAL COUNT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; DRUG EFFECT; DRUG SCREENING; METHODOLOGY; MICROBIOLOGICAL EXAMINATION; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; RECURRENT DISEASE; STREPTOCOCCUS MUTANS;

COLONY COUNT, MICROBIAL; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL CEMENTS; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DRUG EVALUATION, PRECLINICAL; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; METHACRYLATES; MICROBIAL SENSITIVITY TESTS; RECURRENCE; RESINS, SYNTHETIC; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; STREPTOCOCCUS MUTANS; ZINC OXIDE-EUGENOL CEMENT;

EID: 0036490076     PISSN: 00086568     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000057867     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Benderh Y, Ulukapi H, Balkanli O, Kulekci G: In vitro plaque formation on some dental filling materials J Oral Rehabil 1997,24:80-83.
2. Brännström M, Nordenvall KJ, Torstenson B: Pulpal reaction to IRM cement: An intermediate restorative material containing eugenol ASDC J Dent Child 1981;48:259-263.
3. Browne RM, Tobias RS: Microbial microleakage and pulpal inflammation: A review. Endod Dent Traumatol 1986;2:177-183.
4. Chandler NP, Heling I: Efficacy of three cavity liners in eliminating bacteria from infected dentinal tubules. Quintessence Int 1995;26:655-659.
5. Coogan MM, Creaven PJ: Antibacterial properties of eight dental cements. Int Endod J 1993;26: 355-361.
6. DeSchepper EJ, White RR, von der Lehr W: Anti-bacterial effects of glass ionomers. Am J Dent 1989;2:51-56.
7. Dijkman GE, Arends J: Secondary caries in situ around fluoride-releasing light-curing composites: A quantitative model investigation on four materials with a fluoride content between 0 and 26 vol%. Caries Res 1992;26:351-357.
8. Donly KJ. Segura A, Wefel JS, Hogan MM: Evaluating the effects of fluoride-releasing dental materials on adjacent interproximal caries. J Am Dent Assoc 1999;130:817-825.
9. Fairbourn DR, Charbeneau GT, Loesche WJ: Effect of improved Dycal and IRM on bacteria in deep carious lesions. J Am Dent Assoc 1980; 100:547-552.
10. Forss H, Jokinen J, Spets Happonen S. Seppa L, Luoma H: Fluoride and mutans streptococci in plaque grown on glass ionomer and composite. Caries Res 1991;25:454-458.
11. Friedl KH, Hiller KA, Schmalz G: Placement and replacement of composite restorations in Germany. Oper Dent 1995;20:34-38.
12. Friedl KH, Schmalz G, Hiller KA, Shams M: Resin-modified glass ionomer cements: Fluoride release and influence on Streptococcus mutans growth. Eur J Oral Sci 1997;105:81-85.
13. Geurtsen W, Spahl W, Leyhausen G: Residual monomer/additive release and variability in cytotoxicity of light-curing glass-ionomer cements and compomers. J Dent Res 1998;77: 2012-2019.
14. Gonzalez Cabezas C, Li Y. Noblitt TW. Gregory RL, Kafrawy AH, Stookey GK.: Detection of mutans streptococci in secondary carious lesions using immunofluorescent techniques and confocal laser scanning microscopy. Caries Res 1995;29:198-203.
15. Haller B, Trojanski A: Effect of multi-step dentin bonding systems and resin-modified glass ionomer cement liner on marginal quality of dentin-bonded resin composite class II restorations. Clin Oral Investig 1998;2.130-136.
16. Herrera M, Castillo A, Baca P. Carrion P: Antibacterial activity of glass-ionomer restorative cements exposed to cavity-producing microorganisms. Oper Dent 1999;24:286-291.
17. Herrera M, Castillo A, Bravo M, Liébana J, Carnon P: Antibacterial activity of resin adhesives, glass ionomer and resin-modified glass ionomer cements and a corapomer in contact with dentin caries samples. Oper Dent 2000; 25:265-269.
18. Karantakis P, Hetvatjoglou-Antoniades M, Theodoridou-Pahini S. Papadogiannis Y: Fluoride release from three glass ionomers, a compomer, and a composite resin in water, artificial saliva and lactic acid. Oper Dent 2000;25:20-25.
19. Kidd EA, Toffenetti F. Mjor IA: Secondary caries. Int Dent J 1992;42:127-138.
20. Klimm W, Buchmann G, Dorniok R, Pöschmann M, Koch R: Mikrobielle Randspaltbesiedelung bei Klasse-V-Restaurationen in vitro. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1996;51:90-95.
21. Loyola Rodriguez JP, Garcia Godoy F, Lindquist R: Growth inhibition of glass ionomer cements on mutans streptococci. Pediatr Dent 1994;16: 346-349.
22. Meiers JC, Miller GA: Antibacterial activity of dentin bonding systems, resin-modified glass ionomers, and polyacid-modified composite resins. Oper Dent 1996;21:257-264.
23. Meryon SD Johnson SG: The modified model cavity method for assessing antibacterial properties of dental restorative materials. J Dent Res 1989;68:835-839.
24. Palenik CJ, Behnen MJ, Setcos JC, Miller CH: Inhibition of microbial adherence and growth by various glass ionomers in vitro. Dent Mater 1992;8:16-20.
25. Palenik CJ, Setcos JC: Antimicrobial abilities of various dentine bonding agents and restorative materials. J Dent 1996;24:289-295.
26. Podbielski A, Boeckh C, Haller B: Growth inhibitory activity of Gutta-percha points containing root canal medications on common endodontic bacterial pathogens as determined by an optimized quantitative in vitro assay. J Endod 2000; 26:398-403.
27. Prati C, Fava F, Di Gioia D, Selighini M, Pashley DH: Antibacterial effectiveness of dentin bonding systems. Dent Mater 1993;9:338-343.
28. Randall RC, Wilson NH: Glass-ionomer restoratives: A systematic review of a secondary caries treatment effect. J Dent Res 1999;78; 628-637
29. Svanberg M, Krasse B, Ornerfeldt HO: Mutans streptococci in interproximal plaque from amalgam and glass ionomer restorations. Caries Res 1990;24:133-136.
30. Tobias RS: Antibacterial properties of dental restorative materials: A review. Int Endod J 1988; 21:155-160.
31. Torii Y, Itota T, Okamoto M, Nakabo S. Nagamine M, Inoue K: Inhibition of artificial secondary canes in root by fluoride-releasing restorative materials. Oper Dent 2001;26:36-43.
32. Tyas MJ: Cariostatic effect of glass ionomer cement: A five-year clinical study. Aust Dent J 1991;36:236-239.
33. Wandera A, Spencer P, Bohaty B: In vitro comparative fluoride release, and weight and volume change in light-curing and self-curing glass ionomer materials. Pediatr Dent 1996;18:210-214.
34. Weerheijm KL, Kreulen CM, de Soet JJ, Groen HJ, van Amerongen WE: Bacterial counts in carious dentine under restorations: Two-year in vivo effects. Caries Res 1999;33:130-134.
35. Yap AU, Khor E, Foo SH: Fluoride release and antibacterial properties of new-generation tooth-colored restoratives. Oper Dent 1999;24: 297-295.