A new paradigm for accident investigation and analysis in the era of big data

Process Safety Progress

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 2018, Pages 42-48

  Huang, Lang ^a   Wu, Chao ^a   Wang, Bing ^a   Ouyang, Qiumei ^a  

^a CENTRAL SOUTH UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

accident model; accidents investigation; Big Data; safety information; safety knowledge

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENTS; SAFETY ENGINEERING;

ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION; ACCIDENT MODELS; AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERS; CONCEPTUAL MODEL; PYRAMIDAL STRUCTURES; SAFETY INFORMATION; SAFETY KNOWLEDGE; SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING;

BIG DATA;

EID: 85028033448     PISSN: 10668527     EISSN: 15475913     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prs.11898     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. S. Sklet, Comparison of some selected methods for accident investigation, J Hazard Mater 111 (2004), 29–37.
2. E.C. Silva, Why are major accidents still occurring? Process Saf Prog 35 (2015), 253–257.
3. J.A. Stoop, Independent accident investigation: A modern safety tool, J Hazard Mater 111 (2004), 39–44.
4. S.G. Balasubramanian and J.F. Louvar, Study of major accidents and lessons learned, Process Saf Prog 21 (2002), 237–244.
5. N. Leveson, A new accident model for engineering safer systems, Saf Sci 42 (2004), 237–270.
6. S. Roed-Larsen and J. Stoop, Modern accident investigation-four major challenges, Saf Sci 50 (2012), 1392–1397.
7. A.I. Naimi and D.J. Westreich, Big data: A revolution that will transform how we live, work, and think, Am J Epidemiol 17 (2014), 181–183.
8. Big data, Nature 455 (2008), 1–136.
9. Dealing with data, Science 334 (2011), 692–729.
10. Q. Shi and M. Abdel-Aty, Big data applications in real-time traffic operation and safety monitoring and improvement on urban expressways, Trans Res C 58 (2015), 380–394.
11. D. Gil and I.Y. Song, Modeling and management of big data: Challenges and opportunities, Future Gener Comput Syst 63 (2016), 96–99.
12. J. Rowley, The wisdom hierarchy: Representations of the DIKW hierarchy, J Inf Sci 33 (2007), 163–180.
13. F. Salguero-Caparros, M. Suarez-Cebador, and J.C. Rubio-Romero, Analysis of investigation reports on occupational accidents, Saf Sci 72 (2015), 329–336.
14. J. Lundberg, C. Rollenhagen, and E. Hollnagel, What you find is not always what you fix-how other aspects than causes of accidents decide recommendations for remedial actions, Accid Anal Prev 42 (2010), 2132–2139.
15. Y.S. Yoon, D.H. Ham, and C.Y. Wan, Application of activity theory to analysis of human-related accidents: Method and case studies, Reliab Eng Syst Saf 150 (2016), 22–34.
16. D.A. Wiegmann and S.A. Shappell, Human error perspectives in aviation, Int J Aviat Psychol 11 (2001), 341–357.
17. Y. Dien, N. Dechy, and E. Gillaume, Accident investigation: From searching direct causes to finding in-depth causes – problem of analysis or/and of analyst, Saf Sci 50 (2012), 1398–1407.
18. J. Rasmussen, Risk management in a dynamic society: A modelling problem, Saf Sci 27 (1997), 183–213.
19. D.A. Wiegmann and S.A. Shappell, A Human Error Approach to Aviation Accident Analysis: The Human Factors Analysis and Classification System. VT Ashgate Press, Burlington, 2003.
20. P. Katsakiori, G. Sakellaropoulos, and E. Manatakis, Towards an evaluation of accident investigation methods in terms of their alignment with accident causation models, Saf Sci 47 (2009), 1007–1015.
21. B. Wang and C. Wu, Study on the innovation research of safety science based on the safety big data, Sci Technol MRes 1 (2017), 37–43.
22. X. Jin, B.W. Wah, X. Cheng, and Y. Wang, Significance and challenges of big data research, Big Data Res 2 (2015), 59–64.
23. H.V. Jagadish, Big data and science: Myths and reality, Big Data Res 2 (2015), 49–52.
24. A. Gandomi and M. Haider, Beyond the hype: Big data concepts, methods, and analytics, Int J Inf M 35 (2015), 137–144.
25. C. Zins, Conceptual approaches for defining data, information, and knowledge, J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 58 (2007), 479–493.
26. C. Wu and M. Yang, Study of safety science principles and their constructions, Chin Saf Sci J 22 (2012), 3–10.
27. J. Stoop and S. Roed-Larsen, Public safety investigations-a new evolutionary step in safety enhancement? Reliab Eng Syst Saf 94 (2009), 1471–1479.
28. Y. Dien, N. Dechy, and J. Stoop, Perspectives regarding industrial events investigation, Saf Sci 50 (2012), 1377–1379.
29. L. Jiang and T.M. Probst, Transformational and passive leadership as cross-level moderators of the relationships between safety knowledge, safety motivation, and safety participation, J Saf Res 57 (2016), 27–32.
30. S.Y. Guo, L.Y. Ding, H.B. Luo, and X.Y. Jiang, A big-data-based platform of workers' behavior: Observations from the field, Acci Anal Prev 93 (2015), 299–309.
31. C. Zhao and X. Zhou, Preliminary study of accident-causing based on safety information missing, W Sci Technol Res Dev 34 (2012), 6–9.
32. J. Fan, F. Han, and H. Liu, Challenges of big data analysis, Nat Sci Rev 1 (2014), 293–314.
33. Accident investigation report of the fire and explosion in Tianjin Port, Available at http://www.chinasafety.gov.cn/newpage/Channel_21382.htm.
34. R.J. Willey, J. Murphy, and A. Baulch, The explosion in Tianjin, China, August 12, 2015, Process Saf Prog 34 (2015), 312.
35. P. Huang and J. Zhang, Facts related to August 12, 2015 explosion accident in Tianjin, China, Process Saf Prog 34 (2015), 313–314.
36. B. Sun, Tianjin Port explosions, Process Saf Prog 34 (2015), 315.
37. G. Fu, J.H. Wang, and M.W. Yan, Anatomy of Tianjin port fire and explosion: Process and causes, Process Saf Prog 35 (2016), 216–220.
38. A. Hakeem, H. Gupta, A. Kanaujia, T.E. Choe, K. Gunda, and A. Scanlon, “Video analytics for business intelligence,” Video Analytics for Business Intelligence, C. Shan, F. Porikli, T. Xiang, and S. Gong, (Editors), Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012, 309–354.