Public safety investigations-A new evolutionary step in safety enhancement?

Reliability Engineering and System Safety

Volumn 94, Issue 9, 2009, Pages 1471-1479

  Stoop, John ^a   Roed Larsen, Sverre ^b  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b SRL SHE Consulting   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENTS;

ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION; CRITICAL CHALLENGES; EVOLUTIONARY DEVELOPMENT; HUMAN OPERATOR MODELS; INSTITUTIONAL CHANGE; SAFETY ENHANCEMENT; SAFETY INVESTIGATION; TRANSPORT INDUSTRY;

RISK PERCEPTION;

EID: 67349122277     PISSN: 09518320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2009.02.016     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Freer D. The roots of internationalism 1783-1903. ICAO Bulletin 41 3 (1986)
2. Freer D. ICAO at 50 years: riding the flywheel of technology. ICAO Journal 49 7 (1994) 19-32
3. Cairns, D. Report of the committee on civil aircraft accident investigation and licence control. London, her majesty's Stationary Office, 1960, 1961.
4. Smart K. Credible investigation of air accidents. Journal of Hazardous Materials 111 1-3 (2004)
5. ETSC. Transport accident and incident investigations in the European union (2001), European Transport Safety Council, Brussels
6. McIntyre G. Patterns in safety thinking (2000), Ashgate, Aldershot
7. Van Vollenhoven, P. High risk. Inaugural lecture. Twente University, 28 April 2006. 〈www.itsasafety.org〉 2006.
8. MPM. Main points memorandum. Independent accident investigation 2002. Independent disaster and accident investigation project (2002), Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom Relations, The Hague, The Netherlands
9. ERTMS. An independent investigation into the relevance of adapting the HSL-train control system ERTMS. In: Stoop J.A., Baggen J.H., Vleugel J.M., de Kroes en J.L., and Vrancken J.L.M. (Eds). Assignment by the research and verification bureau of the Dutch Parliament (2007), Delft University of Technology [Summary in English]
10. Petroski H. To engineer is human. The role of failure in successful design (1992), Vintage Books
11. Carper K. Forensic engineering (2001), CRC Press LLC
12. Rosenthal, U. International conference on the future of European crisis management. The Hague, November 7-9, 1999. Challenges of crisis management in Europe, 1999.
13. Blaikie A., et al. At risk-natural hazards, people's vulnerability and disasters (1994), Routledge, London
14. Kahan J. Safety board methodology. In: Hengst S., Smit K., and Stoop J.A. (Eds). Second world congress on safety of transportation. 18-20 February 1998 (1999), Delft University Press, Delft
15. Dekker S. The field guide to understanding human error (2006), Ashgate Publishing
16. Stoop, J. Blame, the paradigm of monocausality. Lund University, School of Aviation, September 6, 2007. Lund, Sweden, 2007.
17. ATSB. Analysis, causality and proof in safety investigations. Aviation Research Discussion Paper AR-2007-053, ATSB Transport Safety Report, 2008.
18. Rasmussen J., and Svendung. Proactive risk management in a dynamic society (2000), Swedish Rescue Services Agency, Karlstad, Sweden
19. Leveson N. A new accident model for engineering safer systems. Safety Science 42 (2004) 237-270
20. Lees, F. Loss prevention in the process industries, vol. 1. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann; 1960.
21. RIVM. Coping rationally with risks. Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu. RIVM rapport 251701047. Bilthoven, The Netherlands, 2003.
22. Edwards E. Man and machine: systems for safety (1972), Loughborough University of Technology, United Kingdom
23. Hale, A. Method in your madness: system in your safety. Valedictory lecture, 15th September 2006, Delft University of Technology, 2006.
24. Johnson, K. Personal conversation, in his key note address to ITSA meeting. 16th May 2007.
25. Mertens, F. Supervision in a polycentric society. Inaugural lecture. Delft University of Technology, 26 April 2006 [in Dutch].
26. Steenhuisen J., and Van Eeten M. Invisible trade-offs of public values: inside Dutch railways. Public Money & Management (2008) 147-152
27. De Bruijn, H. An easy truth; why we do not learn from investigation committees. NSOB, 2007, Leiden, The Netherlands, 2007 [in Dutch].
28. Young M., Braithwaite G., Shorrock S., and Faulkner J. The (R)Evolution of human factors in transport safety investigation (2005), ISASI Forum
29. Stoop J. Accident scenarios as a tool for safety enhancement. In: Hale, Wilpert, and Freitag (Eds). After the event. From accident to organisational learning (1997), Pergamon Press, Oxford 79-94
30. Sklet, S. Methods for accident investigation. NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology. Trondheim, Norway, 2002.
31. CTSB. ISIM, integrated safety investigation methodology (2000), Transportation Safety Board of Canada
32. ATSB. ATSB safety investigation guidelines (2006), Australian Transport Safety Bureau March 2006
33. Stoop J. Accident investigations: trends, paradoxes and opportunities. International Journal of Emergency Management 1 2 (2002) 170-182
34. Stoop, J. Divergence and convergence, trends in accident investigation. Second Workshop on the Investigation and Reporting of Incidents and Accidents, IRIA 2003. NASA/CP-2003-212642, 2003.
35. Perrow C. Normal accidents (1984), Basic Books, New York
36. Hendriksen, B. Feasibility of the complexiteitstheory in learning from maritime disaster. Masters Thesis, Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, Delft University of Technology, 2008, in press.
37. Stoop, J. Independent accident investigation: a modern safety tool. Special Issue of the Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2004;111:39-45 [Papers from the JRC/ESReDA Seminar on Safety Investigation of Accidents, Petten, the Netherlands, 12-13 May 2003].