Targeted innovation policy and practice intelligence (TIP2E): concepts and implications for theory, policy and practice

Journal of Technology Transfer

Volumn 42, Issue 3, 2017, Pages 460-484

  Carayannis, Elias G ^a   Meissner, Dirk ^b   Edelkina, Anastasia ^b  

^a GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NATIONAL RESEARCH UNIVERSITY HIGHER SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

Collaboration; Entrepreneurship and innovation ecosystems; Foresight networks; Higher order learning; Innovation management process; Intelligent clusters; Research and innovation smart specialization strategies; Targeted open innovation

Indexed keywords

ECOLOGY; ECOSYSTEMS;

COLLABORATION; HIGHER-ORDER LEARNING; INNOVATION MANAGEMENT; INTELLIGENT CLUSTERS; OPEN INNOVATION;

INNOVATION;

EID: 85027975709     PISSN: 08929912     EISSN: 15737047     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10961-015-9433-8     Document Type: Article

References (90)

1. Abe, H., Ashiki, T., Suzuki, A., Jinno, F., & Sakuma, H. (2009). Integrating business modeling and roadmapping methods—The Innovation Support Technology (IST) approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(1), 80–90.
2. Afuah, A. (2002). Innovation management: Strategies, implementation, and profits (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
3. Arnkil, R., et al. (2010). “Exploring the quadruple helix.” Report of quadruple helix research for the CLIQ project. Tampere: Work Research Centre, University of Tampere.
4. Bilgram, V., Brem, A., & Voigt, K.-I. (2008). User-centric innovations in new product development—Systematic identification of lead users harnessing interactive and collaborative online-tools. International Journal of Innovation Management, 12(03), 419–458.
5. Boehm, D. N., & Hogan, T. (2014). ‘A jack of all trades’: The role of PIs in the establishment and management of collaborative networks in scientific knowledge commercialisation. Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(1), 134–149.
6. Bullinger, A. C., et al. (2010). Community-based innovation contests: Where competition meets cooperation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(3), 290–303.
7. Cachia, R., Compañó, R., & Da Costa, O. (2007). Grasping the potential of online social networks for foresight. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74(8), 1179–1203.
8. Carayannis, E. G. (2001). The strategic management of technological learning: Learning to learn and learning to learn-how-to-learn as drivers of strategic choice and firm performance in global, technology-driven markets. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
9. Carayannis, E. G. (2013a) Innovation diplomacy as driver of democracy, innovation and development: the case of Greece. The Innovation Union in Europe: A Socio-Economic Perspective on EU Integration, 123.
10. Carayannis, E. G. (2013b). Encyclopedia of creativity, invention, innovation and entrepreneurship. Dordrecht: Springer.
11. Carayannis, E. G. (2013c). Unpacking open innovation: Highlights from a co-evolutionary inquiry, Palgrave studies in democracy, innovation, and entrepreneurship for growth. London, UK.
12. Carayannis, E., & Alexander, J. (1999). Winning by co-opeting in strategic government-university-industry R&D partnerships: The power of complex, dynamic knowledge networks. Journal of Technology Transfer, 24(2–3), 197–210.
13. Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2009). ‘Mode 3’ and ‘Quadruple Helix’: Toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, 46(3/4), 201–234.
14. Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2010). Triple helix, quadruple helix and quintuple helix, and how do knowledge, innovation and the environment relate to each other? A proposed framework for a transdisciplinary analysis of sustainable development and social ecology. International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development, 1(1), 41–69.
15. Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2012). Mode 3 knowledge production in quadruple helix innovation systems. New York: Springer.
16. Carayannis, E. G., & Chanaron, J.-C. (2007). Leading and managing creators, inventors, and innovators: The art, science, and craft of fostering creativity, triggering invention, and catalyzing innovation. Santa Barbara: Greenwood Publishing Group.
17. Carayannis, E., & Coleman, J. (2005). Creative system design methodologies: The case of complex technical systems. Technovation, 25(8), 831–840.
18. Carayannis, E. G., & Formica, P. (2006). Intellectual venture capitalists: An emerging breed of knowledge entrepreneurs. Industry and Higher Education, 20(3), 151–156.
19. Carayannis, E. G., & Gonzalez, E. (2003). Creativity and innovation = Competitiveness? When, how and why? In L. V. Shavinina (Ed.), The international handbook on innovation (pp. 587–605). Boston: Elsevier Science.
20. Carayannis, E. G., Gonzalez, E., & Wetter, J. (2003). The nature and dynamics of discontinuous and disruptive innovations from a learning and knowledge management perspective. The international handbook on innovation. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
21. Carayannis, E. G., Grigoroudis, E., Sindakis, S., & Walter, C. (2014). Business model innovation as antecedent of sustainable enterprise excellence and resilience. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 5(3), 440–463.
22. Carayannis, E. G., & Popescu, D. (2005). Profiling a methodology for economic growth and convergence: Learning from the EU e-procurement experience for central and eastern European countries. Technovation, 25(1), 1–14.
23. Carayannis, E. G., Popescu, D., Sipp, C., & Stewart, M. D. (2005). Technological learning for entrepreneurial development (TL4ED) in the knowledge economy (KE): Case studies and lessons learned. Technovation, 26(4), 419–443.
24. Carayannis, E. G., & Provance, M. (2008). Measuring firm innovativeness: Towards a composite innovation index built on firm innovative posture, propensity and performance attributes. International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development, 1(1), 90–107.
25. Carayannis, E. G., & Sipp, C. M. (2010). Why, when and how are real options used in strategic technology venturing? Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 1(2), 70–85.
26. Carayannis, E. G., & Von Zedtwitz, M. (2005). Architecting gloCal (global–local), real-virtual incubator networks (G-RVINs) as catalysts and accelerators of entrepreneurship in transitioning and developing economies: Lessons learned and best practices from current development and business incubation practices. Technovation, 25(2), 95–110.
27. Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). The era of open innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(3), 35–41.
28. Chesbrough, H. (2006). Open innovation: A new paradigm for understanding industrial innovation. In H. Chesbrough, W. Vanhaverbeke, & J. West (Eds.), Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
29. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). Why hard-nosed executives should care about management theory. Harvard Business Review, 81(9), 66–75.
30. Coates, J., Durance, P., & Godet, M. (2010). Strategic foresight issue: Introduction, technological forecasting and social change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77(9), 1423–1425.
31. Commission, European. (2010). The fifth report on economic, social and territorial cohesion: The future of cohesion. Brussels: European Union.
32. Dahlander, L., & Magnusson, M. (2008). How do firms make use of open source communities? Long Range Planning, 41(6), 629–649.
33. European Commission. (2012). RIS3 guide. Brussels: European Union.
34. European Commission. (2014). Smart specialization and Europe’s growth agenda. Brussels: European Union.
35. Foray, D., David, P., & Hall, B. (2009). Smart specialisation—The concept. Knowledge Economists Policy Brief, 9, 100.
36. Foray, D., Goddard, J., Beldarrain, X. G., Landabaso, M., McCann, P., Morgan, K., et al. (2012). Guide to research and innovation strategies for smart specialisations (RIS 3). Brussels: European Union.
37. Franke, N., Von Hippel, E., & Schreier, M. (2006). Finding commercially attractive user innovations: A test of lead-user theory*. Journal of product Innovation Management, 23(4), 301–315.
38. Friesike, S., Widenmayer, B., Gassmann, O., & Schildhauer, T. (2015). Opening science: Towards an agenda of open science in academia and industry. Journal of Technology Transfer, 40(4), 581–601.
39. Gassmann, O., & Enkel, E. (2004). Towards a theory of open innovation: Three core process archetypes. In R&D management conference (Vol. 6).
40. Georghiou, L. (2001). Third generation foresight—Integrating the socio-economic dimension. In Conference contribution, NISTEP, Japan.
41. Gokhberg, L. (2013). Indicators for science, technology and innovation on the crossroad to foresight. In D. Meissner, L. Gokhberg, & A. Sokolov (Eds.), Science, technology and innovation policy for the future: Potentials and limits of foresight studies (pp. 257–288). New York: Springer.
42. Gokhberg, L., & Meissner, D. (2013). Innovation: Superpowered invention. Nature, 501, 313–314.
43. Gokhberg, L., & Sokolov, A. (2013). Targeting STI policy interventions—Future challenges for foresight. In D. Meissner, L. Gokhberg, & A. Sokolov (Eds.), Science, technology and innovation policy for the future: Potentials and limits of foresight studies (pp. 289–292). New York: Springer.
44. Hagedoorn, J. (1993). Interorganizational modes of cooperation. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 371–385.
45. Hagedoorn, J. (2002). Inter-firm R&D partnerships: An overview of major trends and patterns since 1960. Research Policy, 31(4), 477–492.
46. Hamel, G. (2002). Leading the revolution. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
47. Herstatt, C., & Kalogerakis, K. (2005). How to use analogies for breakthrough innovations. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 2(03), 331–347.
48. Herzog, P. (2011). Open and closed innovation: Different cultures for different strategies. New York: Springer.
49. Howells, J. (2006). Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation. Research Policy, 35(5), 715–728.
50. Howells, J. (2008). New directions in R&D: Current and prospective challenges. R&D Management, 38(3), 241–252.
51. Johnston, R. (2002). The state and contribution of foresight: New challenges. In Proceedings of the workshop on the role of foresight in the selection of research policy priorities, Seville.
52. Johnston, R. (2007). Priority setting for future critical and key industrial technologies as driving forces for economic development and competitiveness. In UNIDO technology foresight summit, Budapest, Hungary, September 27–29 2007.
53. Katz, R., & Allen, T. J. (1982). Investigating the Not Invented Here (NIH) syndrome: A look at the performance, tenure, and communication patterns of 50 R&D Project Groups. R&D Management, 12(1), 7–20.
54. Khramova, E., Meissner, D., & Sagieva, G. (2013). Statistical patent analysis indicators as a means of determining country technological specialisation. HSE working papers, 09/STI/2013.
55. Kim, C. W., & Mauborgne, R. (2004). Value innovation: The strategic logic of high growth. Harvard Business Review, 82(7–8), 172–180.
56. Kotsemir, M., Abroskin, A., & Meissner, D. (2013). Innovation concepts and typology—An evolutionary discussion. HSE working papers, 05/STI/2013.
57. Kotsemir, M., & Meissner, D. (2013). Conceptualizing the innovation process—Trends and outlook. HSE working papers, 10/STI/2013.
58. Laperche, B., Lefebvre, G., & Langlet, D. (2011). Innovation strategies of industrial groups in the global crisis: Rationalization and new paths. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(2011), 1319–1331.
59. Luoma-aho, V., & Halonen, S. (2010). Intangibles and innovation intangibles and innovation: The role of communication in the innovation ecosystem, Department of Communication, University of Jyvaskyla, Finland. Innovation Journalism, 7(2), 3–20.
60. Lüthje, C. (2004). Characteristics of innovating users in a consumer goods field: An empirical study of sport-related product consumers. Technovation, 24, 683–695.
61. Meissner, D. (2012). Results and impact of national foresight studies. Futures, 44(10), 905–913.
62. Meissner, D. (2013). Instruments to measure foresight. In D. Meissner, L. Gokhberg, & A. Sokolov (Eds.), Science, technology and innovation policy for the future: Potentials and limits of foresight studies (pp. 43–62). New York: Springer.
63. Meissner, D. (2014, June). Approaches for developing national STI Strategies. STI Policy Review, 5(1). http://www.stipolicyreview.net.
64. Meissner, D., Gokhberg, L., & Sokolov, A. (2013). The meaning of foresight for science, technology and innovation policy. In D. Meissner, L. Gokhberg, & A. Sokolov (Eds.), Science, technology and innovation policy for the future: Potentials and limits of foresight studies (pp. 1–7). New York: Springer.
65. Meissner, D., & Zaichenko, S. A. (2012). Regional balance of technology transfer and innovation in transitional economy: Empirical evidence from Russia. International Journal of Transitions and Innovation Systems, 2(1), 38–71.
66. Midtkandal, I., & Sörvik, J. (2012). What is smart specialisation. Saatavissa, 2, 2013.
67. Moore, G. A. (2005). Dealing with Darwin: How great companies innovate at every phase of their evolution. New York: Penguin Group.
68. Nambisan, S., & Baron, R. A. (2010). Different roles, different strokes: Organizing virtual customer environments to promote two types of customer contributions. Organization Science, 21(2), 554–572.
69. Nayyar, D. (2006). Globalisation, history and development: A tale of two centuries. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 30(1), 137–159.
70. Piller, F. T., & Walcher, D. (2006). Toolkits for idea competitions: A novel method to integrate users in new product development. r&D Management, 36(3), 307–318.
71. Pisano, G. (2006). Profiting from innovation and the intellectual property revolution. Research Policy, 35(8), 1122–1130.
72. Reitzig, M., Henkel, J., & Heath, C. (2007). On sharks, trolls, and their patent prey—Unrealistic damage awards and firms’ strategies of “being infringed”. Research Policy, 36(1), 134–154.
73. Rudzinski, C., & Uerz, G. (2012). Foresight & open innovation for supporting strategy at Volkswagen Group. In The proceedings of the XXIII ISPIM conference, Barcelona, Spain.
74. Sagi, J., Carayannis, E., Dasgupta, S., & Thomas, G. (2006). Globalization and e-commerce: A cross-cultural. Advanced Topics in Global Information Management, 5, 128.
75. Schildhauer, T. (2011) Open Innovation Und Digitale Kommunikation – Vier Thesen zum Aufbruch in neue und unbekannte Welten, In: T. Schildhauer, N. Tropisch, & C. Busch (Hrsg.), Magie und Realitaet des Heldenprinzips heute – Arbeitsbuch fur Wissenschaft, Wirtschaft und Weiterbildung, Verlagshaus Monsenstein und Vannerdat, Münster (pp. 152–157).
76. Schwarz, J. O. (2008). Assessing the future of futures studies in management. Futures, 40(3), 237–246.
77. Sekhar, J., & Dismukes, J. P. (2009). Generic innovation dynamics across the industrial technology life cycle: Platform equation modeling of invention and innovation activity. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(1), 192–203.
78. Sieg, J. H., Wallin, M. W., & Von Krogh, G. (2010). Managerial challenges in open innovation: A study of innovation intermediation in the chemical industry. R&d Management, 40(3), 281–291.
79. Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfounds of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management, 28(2007), 1319–1350.
80. Urban, G. L., & Von Hippel, E. (1988). Lead user analyses for the development of new industrial products. Management Science, 34(5), 569–582.
81. van der Valk, T., Chappin, M. H., & Gijsbers, G. W. (2011). Evaluating innovation networks in emerging technologies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(1), 25–39.
82. Vishnevskiy, K., Karasev, O., & Meissner, D. (2014). Integrated roadmaps and corporate Foresight as tools of innovation management: The case of Russian companies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2014, 42.
83. Vishnevskiy, K., Meissner, D., Karasev, O., & Khripunova, A. (2013). Intelligent data systems to aid decision-making at tenders for oil and gas fields development. HSE working papers, 07/STI/2013.
84. Viskari, S., Salmi, P., & Torkkeli, M. (2007). Implementation of open innovation paradigm. Cases: Cisco Systems, DuPont, IBM, Intel, Lucent, P&G, Philips and Sun Microsystems, Research Report, Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Lappeenranta University of Technology, Lappeenranta, Finland, 2007.
85. Von Hippel, E. (1986). Lead users: A source of novel product concepts. Management Science, 32(7), 791–805.
86. von Hippel, E. A. (2005). Democratizing innovation. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. http://ssrn.com/abstract=712763.
87. Von Hippel, E. A., & Von Krogh, G. (2006). Free revealing and the private-collective model for innovation incentives. R&D Management, 36(3), 295–306.
88. West, J., & Lakhani, K. R. (2008). Getting clear about communities in open innovation. Industry and Innovation, 15(2), 223–231.
89. World Competitiveness Yearbook. (2004). IMD. Lausanne, Switzerland.
90. Ziegler, A., Claudia, S., Elisabeth, D., & Joachim, S. (2014). Citizens’ perceptions of justice in international climate policy—Empirical insights from China, Germany and the US. Working paper Sustainability and Innovation No. S2/201, Fraunhofer ISI, Karlsruhe 2014. http://www.isi.fraunhofer.de/isi-wAssets/docs/e-x/working-paperssustainability-andinnovation/WP02-2014_citizensperceptions-of-justice.pdf.