Indicators for science, technology and innovation on the crossroad to foresight

Science, Technology and Innovation Policy for the Future: Potentials and Limits of Foresight Studies

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 257-288

  Gokhberg, Leonid ^a  

^a NATIONAL RESEARCH UNIVERSITY HIGHER SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84961382426     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-31827-6_15     Document Type: Chapter

References (48)

1. Abramo G, D’Angelo CA, DiCosta F, Solazzi M (2009) University-industry collaboration in Italy: a bibliometric examination. Technovation 29:498-507.
2. Archibugi D, Pianta M (1996) Measuring technological change through patents and innovation surveys. Technovation 16(9):451-468.
3. Balconi M, Breschi S, Lissoni F (2004) Networks of inventors and the role of academia: an exploration of Italian patent data. Res Policy 33(2004):127-145.
4. Bezold C (2010) Lessons from using scenarios for strategic foresight. Technol Forecast Soc Change 77:1513-1518.
5. Blind K (2008) Regulatory foresight: methodologies and selected applications. Technol Forecast Soc Change 75:496-516.
6. Bloch C (2007) Assessing recent developments in innovation measurement: the third edition of the Oslo Manual. Sci Public Pol 34(1):23-34.
7. Braun T, Dicispatonyi I (2005) Counting the gatekeepers of international science journals a worthwhile science indicator. Curr Sci 89(9):1548-1551.
8. Butcher J, Jeffrey P (2005) The use of bibliometric indicators to explore industry-academia collaboration trends over time in the field of membrane use for water treatment. Technovation 25:1273-1280.
9. Cantwell J, Janne O (1999) Technological globalisation and innovative centres: the role of corporate technological leadership and locational hierarchy. Res Policy 28:119-144.
10. Chan L, Daim T (2012) Exploring the impact of technology foresight studies on innovation: case of BRIC countries. Futures 44:618-630.
11. Dlouha J, Barton A, Janouskova S, Dlouhy J (2012) Social learning indicators in sustainability-oriented regional learning networks. J Clean Prod 1-10, http://dx.doi.org/10.10167j.jclepro.2012.07.023.
12. Donovan C (2007) The qualitative future of research evaluation. Sci Public Policy 34(8):585-597.
13. Donovan C (2011) State of the art in assessing research impact: introduction to a special issue. an integrated impact indicator: a new definition of ‘Impact’ with policy relevance. Res Eval 21 (3):183-188.
14. Dosi G (1988) Sources, procedures and microeconomic effects of innovation. J Econ Lit 26:1120-1171.
15. Freeman C (1982) The economics of industrial innovation. MIT Press, Cambridge.
16. Freeman C, Soete L (2009) Developing science, technology and innovation indicators: what we can learn from the past. Res Policy 38:583-589.
17. Georghiou L, Laredo P (2006) Evaluation of publicly funded research: recent trends and perspectives. In: Futures, Volume 44, Issue 10, December 2012, Pages 905-913 OECD science, technology and industry outlook. OECD, Paris. pp 177-199.
18. Godin B (2004) The who, what, why and how of S&T measurement, project on the history and sociology of S&T statistics, working paper no. 26, http://www.csiic.ca/PDF/Godin_26_a.pdf. Last accessed 30 Oct 2012.
19. Godinho MM, Ferreira V (2012) Analyzing the evidence of an IPR take-off in China and India. Res Policy 41:499-511.
20. Gokhberg L (2000) Intellektual’naya deatel’nost’ v structure ekonomiki informacionnogo obschestva (voprosy metodologii). Voprosy statistiki N 6 pp 41-51 (in Russian) [Intellectual activity in the structure of the information society economy (methodological issues)].
21. Gokhberg L (2003) Statistika nauki. TEIS, Moscow (in Russian) [Statistics of Science].
22. Gokhberg L (ed) (2012) Ekonomika znaniy v terminakh statistiki: nauka, tekhnologii, innovacii, obrazovanie, informacionnoe obschestvo. Moscow: Ekonomika (in Russian) [Economics of knowledge in terms of statistics: science, technology, innovation, education, information society. Glossary].
23. Gokhberg L, Boegh-Nielsen P (eds) (2007) Information society statistics in the Russian Federation: harmonization with international standards. Higher School of Economics, Moscow.
24. Gokhberg L, Fursov K, Miles I, Perani G (2013) Developing and using indicators of emerging and enabling technologies. In: Gault F (ed) Handbook of innovation indicators and measurement. Elgar, Cheltenham/Northampton, Ch. 15.
25. Hidalgo A, Gabaly S (2012) Use of prediction methods for patent and trademark applications in Spain. World Patent Inform 34:19-29.
26. Jappe A (2006) Four major task domains of science for sustainability. Fraunhofer ISI discussion papers innovation system and policy analysis, no 10/2006.
27. Kleinknecht A, Montford Kv, Brouwer E (2002) The non-trivial choice between innovation indicators. Econ Innov New Technol 11(2):109-121.
28. Kuhlmann S (2003) Evaluation of research and innovation policies: a discussion of trends with examples from Germany. J Technol Manage 26(2-4):131-149.
29. Lepori B, Reale E (2012) S&T indicators as a tool for formative evaluation of research programs. Evaluation 18:451.
30. Luukkonen T (1998) The difficulties in assessing the impact of EU framework programs. Res Policy 27(6):599-610.
31. Lyall C (2005) Concurrent power. The role of policy networks in the multi-level governance of science and innovation in Scotland. INNOGEN working paper no. 33, May 2005.
32. Lyall C, Tait J (2005) Shifting policy debates and the implications for governance. In: Lyall C, Tait J (eds) New Modes of governance: developing an integrated policy approach to science, technology, risk and environment. Ashgate Publishing, Aldershot/Burlington, pp 1-18.
33. Mendonca S, Pereira TS, Godinho MM (2004) Trademarks as an indicator of innovation and industrial change. Res Policy 33(9):1385-1404.
34. OHIM (2012) Statistics on community trade marks, community designs and appeals. Office for the harmonization in the internal market 2012. http://oami.europa.eu/ows/rw/resource/documents/OHIM/statistics/ssc009-statistics_of_community_trade_marks_2012.pdf. Accessed 30 Sept 2012.
35. Pavitt K (1988) Uses and abuses of patent statistic. In: van Raan AFJ (ed) Handbook of quantitative studies of science and technology. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
36. Pawson R (2002) Evidence-based policy: the promise of ‘Realist Synthesis’. Evaluation 8 (3):340-358.
37. Rennkamp B, Stamm A (2009) Towards innovation systems for sustainability -the role of international cooperation. In: Federal Ministry for Education and Research: innovation for sustainability in a changing world. Proceedings of the 2nd South-African-German dialogue on science for sustainability, Bonn, pp 72-77.
38. Ritchey T (1998) General morphological analysis -a general method for non-quantified modeling. In: Presented at the 16th EURO conference on operational analysis, Brussels, 1998, available http://www.swemorph.com/pdf/gma.pdf. Accessed 20 Dec 2012.
39. Scharnhorst A, Wouters P (2006) Webindicators: a new generation of S&T indicators. Cybermetrics 10(1). ISSN 11375019. http://www.cindoc.csic.es/cybermetrics/articles/v10i1p6.html. Accessed 30 July 2012.
40. Shearer AW (2005) Approaching scenario-based studies: three perceptions about the future and considerations for landscape planning. Environ Plann B Plann Des 32(1):67-87.
41. Thomson R, Holland J (2003) Hindsight, foresight and insight: the challenges of longitudinal qualitative research. Int J Soc Res Methodol 6(3):233-244.
42. Trochim WM, Marcus SE, Masse LC, Moser RP, Weld PC (2008) The evaluation of large research initiatives: a participatory integrative mixed methods approach. Am J Eval 29:8-28.
43. Van Der Sluijs JP, Craye M, Funtowicz S, Kloprogge P, Ravetz J, Risbey J (2005) Combining quantitative and qualitative measures of uncertainty in model-based environmental assessment: the NUSAP system. Risk Anal 25:481-492.
44. Wagner CS, Leydesdorff L (2012) An integrated impact indicator: a new definition of ‘Impact’ with policy relevance. Res Eval 21(3):183-188.
45. Wenst0p F, Seip K (2001) Legitimacy and quality of multi-criteria environmental policy analysis: a meta analysis of five MCE studies in Norway. J Multi-Criteria Decis Anal, Special Issue: Multicriteria Anal Environ Manage 10(2):53-64.
46. Wieczorek AJ, Hekkert M, Smits R (2010) Systemic policy instruments and their role in addressing sustainability challenges. http://umconference.um.edu.my/upload/43-1/papers/014%20AnnaJWieczorek_MarkoHekkert_RuudSmits.pdf. Accessed 30 July 2012.
47. WIPO (2011) International classification of goods and services for the purpose of the registration of marks (nice classification), 10th edn, Part II with list of goods and services in class order. WIPO Publication No. 500.2E/10.
48. Yusuf S, Nabeshima K (2009) Tiger economies under threat -a comparative analysis of Malaysia’s industrial prospects and policy options. The World Bank, Washington, DC.