Strategic decisions in task-oriented reading

Spanish Journal of Psychology

Volumn 18, Issue , 2015, Pages

  Salmerón, Ladislao ^a   Vidal Abarca, Eduardo ^a   Martínez, Tomás ^a   Mañá, Amelia ^a   Gil, Laura ^a   Naumann, Johannes ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

^b GERMAN INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Reading comprehension assessment; Reading literacy; Task oriented reading

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT BEHAVIOR; COMPREHENSION; EDUCATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGY; READING; SCHOOL; STUDENT;

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT BEHAVIOR; COMPREHENSION; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; READING; SCHOOLS; STUDENTS;

EID: 85027955423     PISSN: 11387416     EISSN: 19882904     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/sjp.2015.101     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Bednarik R., & Tukiainen M. (2007). Validating the restricted focus viewer: A study using eye-movement tracking. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 274-282. http:// dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03193158
2. Cataldo M. G., & Oakhill J. (2000). Why are poor comprehenders inefficient searchers? An investigation into the effects of text representation and spatial memory on the ability to locate information in text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 791-799. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92
3. Cerdán R., Gilabert R., & Vidal-Abarca E. (2010). Estrategias de selección de información en tareas de contestación a preguntas [Information selection strategies in question-answering tasks]. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 33, 449-460. http://dx.doi.org/10.1174/021037010793139626
4. Cerdán R., Vidal-Abarca E., Martínez M., Gilabert R., & Gil L. (2009). Impact of question-answering tasks on search processes and reading comprehension. Learning & Instruction, 19, 13-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc. 2007.12.003
5. Fairchild A. J., MacKinnon D. P., Taborga M. P., & Taylor A. B. (2009). R2 effect-size measures for mediation analysis. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 486-498. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.2.486
6. Gallagher N. (2000). DELTA's key to the TOEFL test. McHenry, IL: Delta.
7. Green S. W., & Wolf I. K. (2000). How to prepare for the GRE. Hauppauge, NY: Barron.
8. Hinkel E. (2004). TOEFL test strategies. Hauppauge, NY: Barron.
9. Jansen A. R., Blackwell A. F., & Marriot K. (2003). A tool for tracking visual attention: The restricted focus viewer. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers 35, 57-69. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03195497
10. Just M. A., & Carpenter P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99, 122-149. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.99.1.122
11. Kintsch W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
12. Llorens A. C., Gil L., Vidal-Abarca E., Martínez T., Mañá A., & Gilabert R., (2011). Evaluación de la competencia lectora: La prueba de Competencia Lectora para Educación Secundaria (CompLEC) [Assessment of reading literacy: Test of reading literacy for secondary education (CompLEC)]. Psicothema, 23, 808-817.
13. Mañá A., Vidal-Abarca E., Domínguez C., Gil L., & Cerdán R. (2009). Papel de los procesos metacognitivos en una tarea de pregunta-respuesta con textos escritos [The role of metacognitive processes involved in a question-answer task with written texts]. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 32, 553-565. http://dx.doi.org/10.1174/021037009789610412
14. Martínez T., Vidal-Abarca E., Gil L., & Gilaber R. (2009). On-line assessment of comprehension processes. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 12, 308-319. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1138741600001700
15. McCrudden M. T., & Schraw G. (2007). Relevance and goal-focusing in text processing. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 113-139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9010-7
16. McCrudden M. T., Schraw G., & Kambe G. (2005). The effect of relevance instructions on reading time and learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 88-102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.1.88
17. McNamara D. S., & Magliano J. P. (2009). Towards a comprehensive model of comprehension. In B. Ross (Ed), The psychology of learning and motivation, (Vol. 51, pp. 297-284). New York, NY: Elsevier Science.
18. OECD (2009). PISA 2009 Assessment framework - Key competencies in reading, mathematics, and science. Paris, France: OECD.
19. OECD (2010). Programme for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies (PIAAC). Retrieved from OECD Webpage www.oecd.org/els/employment/piaac
20. Ozuru Y., Best R., Bell C., Witherspoon A., & McNamara D. S. (2007). Influence of question format and text availability on the assessment of expository text comprehension. Cognition and Instruction, 25, 399-438. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07370000701632371
21. Payne S. J., & Reader W. R. (2006). Constructing structure maps of multiple on-line texts. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 64, 461-474. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.09.003
22. Perfetti C. (2007). Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 357-383. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10888430701530730
23. Preacher K. J., & Hayes A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717-731. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03206553
24. Preacher K. J., Rucker D. D., & Hayes A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Statistics, 42, 185-227. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/ 00273170701341316
25. Reynolds R. E., Trathen W., Sawyer M. L., & Shepard C. R. (1993). Causal and epiphenomenal use of the selective attention strategy in prose comprehension. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18, 258-278. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1993.1020
26. Richter T., Isberner M.-B., Naumann J., & Neeb Y. (2013) Lexical quality and reading comprehension in primary school children. Scientific Studies of Reading. 17, 415-434. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2013.764879
27. Rogers B. (2005). TOEFL success. Lawrenceville, NJ: Thomson Peterson's.
28. Rouet J. F. (2006). The skills of document use: From text comprehension to Web-based learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
29. Rupp A. A., Ferne T., & Choi H. (2006). How assessing reading comprehension with multiple choice questions shapes the construct: A cognitive processing perspective. Language Testing, 23, 441-447. http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/ 0265532206lt337oa
30. Rymniak M., & Shanks J. (2002). TOEFL CBT exam. New York, NY: Kaplan.
31. Salmerón L., Cerdán R., & Naumann J. (2015). How adolescents navigate Wikipedia to answer questions [Cómo navegan los adolescentes en Wikipedia para contestar preguntas?]. Infancia y Aprendizaje: Journal for the Study of Education and Development, 38, 435-471. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02103702.2015. 1016750
32. Salmerón L., Naumann J., García V., & Fajardo I. (in press). Scanning and deep processing of information in hypertext: An eye-tracking and cued retrospective think-aloud study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning.
33. Sullivan P. N., Brenner G. A., & Zhong G. L. Q. (2004). Master the TOEFL 2005. Lawrenceville, NJ: Thomson/ Peterson.
34. Tzeng Y., van den Broek P., Kendeou P., & Lee C. (2005). The computational implementation of the landscape model: Modeling inferential processes and memory representations of text comprehension. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 277-286. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03192695
35. van den Broek P., Risden K., & Husebye-Hartmann E. (1995). The role of readers' standards for coherence in the generation of inferences during reading. In R. F. Lorch, & E. J. O'Brien (Eds.), Sources of coherence in reading (pp. 353-373). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
36. van den Broek P., Young M., Tzeng Y., & Linderholm T. (1999). The landscape model of reading: Inferences and the online construction of a memory representation. In H. van Oostendorp & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading (pp. 71-98). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
37. Vidal-Abarca E., Gilabert R., Martínez T., Sellés P., Abad N., & Ferrer C. (2007). TEC. Test de Estrategias de Comprensión [Test of Comprehension Strategies]. Madrid, Spain: ICCE.
38. Vidal-Abarca E., Mañá A., & Gil L. (2010). Individual differences for self-regulating task-oriented reading activities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 817-826. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0020062
39. Vidal-Abarca E., Martínez T., Salmerón L., Cerdán R., Gilabert R., Gil L.,...., & Ferris R. (2011). Recording online processes in task-oriented reading with Read & Answer. Behavior Research Methods, 43, 179-192. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-010-0032-1
40. Vidal-Abarca E., Salmerón L., & Mañá A. (2011). Individual differences in task-oriented reading. In M. T. McCrudden, J. P. Magliano, & G. Schraw (Eds.), Text relevance and learning from text. (pp. 267-294) Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.