Valuing water quality improvements from peatland restoration: Evidence and challenges

Ecosystem Services

Volumn 9, Issue , 2014, Pages 34-43

  Martin Ortega, Julia ^a   Allott, Timothy E H ^b   Glenk, Klaus ^c   Schaafsma, Marije ^d,e  

^a SCOTTISH CROP RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^c SCOTTISH AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Blanket raised bogs; Ecosystem services; Non market values; Water Framework Directive

Indexed keywords

EID: 85027946001     PISSN: 22120416     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.06.007     Document Type: Article

References (91)

1. Acreman M. Ethical aspects of water and ecosystems. Water Policy 2001, 3:257-265.
2. Anderson P., Buckler M., Walker J. Moorland restoration: potential and progress. Drivers of Environmental Change in Uplands 2009, 432-447. Routledge, London. A. Bonn, T. Allott, K. Hubacek, J. Stewart (Eds.).
3. Anderson, P., Worrall, P., Ross, S., Hammond, G., Keen, A., 2011. United Utilities sustainable catchment management programme. Vol. 2: Restoring drained, burned and grazed moorlands. Report to United Utilities by Penny Anderson Associates. Available from (accessed 22.08.12). http://corporate.unitedutilities.com/scamp-monitoring-reports.aspx.
4. Armstrong A., Holden J., Kay P., Francis B., Foulgar M., Gledhill S., McDonald A.T., Walker A. The impact of peatland drain-blocking on dissolved organic carbon loss and discolouration of water: results from a national survey. J. Hydrol. 2010, 381:112-120.
5. Bain, C.G., Bonn, A., Stoneman, R., Chapman, S., Coupar, A., Evans, M., Gearey, B., Howat, M., Joosten, H., Keenleyside, C., Labadz, J., Lindsay, R., Littlewood, N., Lunt, P., Miller, C.J., Moxey, A., Orr, H., Reed, M., Smith, P., Swales, V., Thompson, D.B.A., Thompson, P.S., Van de Noort, R.,Wilson, J.D.,Worrall,F., 2011. IUCN UK Commission of Inquiry on Peatlands. IUCN UK. Peatland Programme, Edinburgh.
6. Baker B., Metcalfe P., Butler S., Gueron Y., Sheldon R., East J. Report on the Benefits of Water Framework Directive Programmes of Measure in England and Wales 2007, DEFRA, United Kingdom.
7. Barkmann J., Glenk K., Keil A., Leemhuis C., Dietrich N., Gerold G., Marggraf R. Confronting unfamiliarity with ecosystem functions: the case for an ecosystem service approach to environmental valuation with stated preference methods. Ecol. Econ. 2008, 65:48-62.
8. Bateman, I.J., 2011. Catchment Hydrology, Resources, Economics and Management: Integrated Modelling of WFD Impacts upon Rural Land Use and Farm Incomes. End of Award Report. ( accessed June 2014). http://www.cserge.ac.uk/sites/default/files/110616%20-%20ChREAM%20Project%20Report%20-%20Revised.pdf.
9. Bateman I.J., Carson R.T., Day B., Hanemann M., Hanley N., Hett T., Jones-Lee M., Loomes G., Mourato S., Özdemiroglu E., Pearce D.W., Sugden R., Swanson J. Economic Valuation with Stated Preference Techniques A manual 2002, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham.
10. Bateman I.J., Brouwer R., Ferrini S., Schaafsma M., Barton D.N., Dubgaard A., Hasler B., Hime S., Liekens I., Navrud S. Making benefit transfers work: deriving and testing principles for value transfers for similar and dissimilar sites. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2011, 50(3):365-387.
11. Bilotta G.S., Brazier R.E. Understanding the influence of suspended solids on water quality and aquatic biota. Water Res. 2008, 42:2842-2861.
12. Black J., Milner-Gulland E.J., Sotherton N., Mourato S. Valuing complex environmental goods: landscape and biodiversity in the North Pennines. Environ. Conserv. 2010, 37(2):136-146.
13. Bonn, A., Holden, J., Parnell, M., Worrall, F., Chapman, P.J., Evans. C.D., Termansen, M., Beharry-Borg, N., Acreman, M.C., Rowe, E., Emmett, B., Tsuchiya, A., 2010. Ecosystem services of peat - Phase 1. DEFRA Project code: SP0572.
14. Bonn A., Reed M.S., Bain C., Joosten H., Farmer J., Evans C., Artz R., Glenk K., Smith P., Emmer I., Couwenberg J., Worrall F., Holden J. Investing in nature: developing ecosystem service markets for peatland restoration. Ecosyst. Serv. 2014, 9:54-65.
15. Boyd J., Banzhaf S. What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units. Ecol. Econ. 2007, 63(2-3):616-626.
16. Brouwer R., Martin-Ortega J., Berbel J. Spatial preference heterogeneity: a choice experiment. Land Econ. 2010, 863:552-568.
17. Carson R.T., Mitchell R. The value of clean water: the public's willingness to pay for boatable, fishable and swimmable quality water. Water Resour. Res. 1993, 297:2445.
18. CICES - Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services, 2012. Consultation on Version 4, August-December 2012. EEA Framework Contract No EEA/IEA/09/003. (last accessed 05.06.14). http://cices.eu/.
19. Clarke J.M., Chapman P.J., Adamson J.K., Lane S.N. Influence of drought-induced acidification on the mobility of dissolved organic carbon in peat soils. Glob. Change Biol. 2005, 11:791-809.
20. Clarke J.M., Bottrell S.H., Evans C.D., Monteith D.T., Bartlett R., Rose R., Newton R.J., Chapman P.J. The importance of the relationship between scale and process in understanding long-term DOC dynamics. Sci. Total Environ. 2010, 408:2768-2775.
21. Corbera E., Pascual U. Ecosystem services: heed social goals. Science 2012, 335(10):355-356.
22. Daniels S.M., Evans M.G., Agnew C.T., Allott T.E.H. Sulphur leaching from headwater catchments in an eroded peatland, South Pennines, UK. Sci. Total Environ. 2008, 407:481-496.
23. Daniels S.M., Evans M.G., Agnew C.T., Allott T.E.H. Ammonium release from a blanket peatland into headwater stream systems. Environ. Pollut. 2012, 163:261-272.
24. Del-Saz-Salazar S., Hernández-Sancho F., Sala-Garrido R. The social benefits of restoring water quality in the context of the Water Framework Directive: a comparison of willingness to pay and willingness to accept. Sci. Total Environ. 2009, 407(16):4574-4583.
25. Drake B., Smart J., Termansen M., Hubacek K. Public preferences for production of local and global ecosystem services. Reg. Environ. Change J. 2013, 13(3):649-659.
26. Engel S., Pagiola S., Wunder S. Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: an overview of the issues. Ecol. Econ. 2008, 65(4):663-674.
27. Environment Agency, no date. Water Framework Directive - Surface Water Classification Status and Objectives. Available from (last accessed 23.05.14). http://www.data.gov.uk/datasets/wfd-surface-water-classification-status-and-objectives.
28. European Commission, 2003. Economics and the Environment: The Implementation Challenge of the 21 Water Framework. Directive - WATECO: A Guidance Document. EC, Brussels.
29. Evans M.G., Warburton J., Yang J. Sediment budgets for eroding blanket peat catchments: global and local implications of upland organic sediment budgets. Geomorphology 2006, 79:45-57.
30. Evans M.G., Warburton J. Geomorphology of Upland Peat: Erosion, Form and Landscape Change 2007, Blackwell, Oxford.
31. Evans, M.G., Pawson, R., Daniels, S, Yang, J., Wilkinson, R., 2009. Monitoring carbon flux from moorland restoration sites. Report to Natural England and Moors. Upland Environments Research Unit, University of Manchester, 36 pp.
32. Evans C.D., Bonn A., Holden J., Reed M.S., Worrall F., Evans M., Glenk K., Parnell M., et al. Relationships between anthropogenic pressures and ecosystem functions in UK blanket bogs: linking process understanding to ecosystem service valuation. Ecosyst. Serv. 2014, 9:5-19.
33. Fisher B., Turner K.R., Morling P. Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecol. Econ. 2009, 68(3):643-653.
34. Gibson H.S., Worrall F., Burt T.P., Adamson J.K. DOC budgets of drained peat catchments: implications for DOC production in peat soils. Hydrol. Processes 2009, 23:1901-1911.
35. Glenk K., Colombo S. Designing policies to mitigate the agricultural contribution to climate change: an assessment of soil based carbon sequestration and its ancillary effects. Clim. Change 2011, 105:43-66.
36. Glenk K., Colombo S. How sure can you be? A framework for considering delivery uncertainty in benefit assessments based on stated preference methods. J. Agric. Econ. 2011, 62(1):25-46.
37. Glenk K., Lago M., Moran D. Public preferences for water quality improvements: implications for the implementation of the EC Water Framework Directive in Scotland. Water Policy 2011, 13(5):645-662.
38. Glenk K., Colombo S. Modelling outcome-related risk in choice experiments. Aust. J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 2013, 57(4):559-578.
39. Glenk K., Schaafsma M., Moxey A., Martin-Ortega J., Hanley N. Valuing peatland restoration for spatially targeted ecosystem service delivery. Ecosyst. Serv. 2014, 9:20-33. 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.04.007.
40. Hanley N., Wright R., Álvarez-Farizo B. Estimating the economic value of improvements in river ecology using choice experiments: an application to the Water Framework Directive. J. Environ. Manag. 2006, 78:183-193.
41. Hirst, V., Bain, C., Bonn, A., Evans, C., Glenk, K., Holder, J., Martin-Ortega, J., Reed, M., 2012. Catchment management using payments for ecosystem services to restore and maintain upland peat. Joint water@leeds and IUCN-Valuing Nature Network Workshop 09.05.12. Available at: . (last accessed 16.01.13). http://www.wateratleeds.org/uploads/files/Peat%20PES%20Briefing%20Note.pdf.
42. Holden J., Chapman P.J., Labadz J.C. Artificial drainage of peatlands: hydrological and hydrochemical process and wetland restoration. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 2004, 28:95-123.
43. Holden J., Gascoign M., Bosanko N.R. Erosion and natural revegetation associated with surface land drains in upland peatlands. Earth Surf. Process. Landf. 2007, 32:1547-1557.
44. Ioris A. The political nexus between water and economics in Brazil: a critique of recent policy reforms. Rev. Radic. Polit. Econ. 2010, 42(2):231-250.
45. Janssen R., Goosen H., Verhoeven M.L., Verhoeven J.T., Omtzigt A.Q.A., Maltby E. Decision support for integrated wetland management. Environ. Model. Softw. 2005, 20(2):215-229.
46. Kataria M., Bateman I.J., Christensen T., Dubgaard A., Hasler B., Hime S., Ladenburg J., Levin G., Martinsen L., Nissen C. Scenario realism and welfare estimates in choice experiments - a non-market valuation study on the European water framework directive. J. Environ. Manag. 2012, 94(1):25-33.
47. Kenter J.O., Reed M.S., Irvine K.N., O'Brien E., Brady E., Bryce R., Christie M., Church A., Cooper N., Davies A., Hockley N., Fazey I., Jobstvogt N., Molloy C., Orchard-Webb J., Ravenscroft N., Ryan M., Watson V. UK National Ecosystem Assessment Follow-on phase, Technical report: Shared, Plural and Cultural Values of Ecosystems 2014, UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge.
48. Kosoy N., Corbera E. Payments for ecosystem services as commodity fetishism. Ecol. Econ. 2010, 69:1228-1236.
49. Maltby, E., Ormerod, S.J., 2011. Freshwaters-openwaters, wetlands and floodplains. The UK National Ecosystem Assessment Technical Report. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, pp. 295-360.
50. Martin-Ortega J. Economic prescriptions and policy applications in the implementation of the European Water Framework Directive. Environ. Sci. Policy 2012, 24:83-91.
51. Martin-Ortega J., Skuras D., Perni A., Holen S., Psaltopoulos D. The disproportionality principle in the WFD: how to actually apply it?. Economics of Water Management in Agriculture 2014, Science Publishers. T. Bournaris, J. Berbel, B. Manos, D. Viaggi (Eds.).
52. Mesa-Jurado A., Martin-Ortega J., Berbel J., Ruto E. The economic value of guaranteed water supply for irrigation under scarcity conditions. Agric. Water Manag. 2012, 113:10-18.
53. Metcalfe, P.J., Baker, W., Andrews, K., Atkinson, G., Bateman, I.J., Butler, S., Carson, R.T., East, J., Gueron, Y., Sheldon, R., Train, K., 2012. An Assessment of the Nonmarket Benefits of the Water Framework Directive for Households in England and Wales,. Water Resources Research, 48, W03526, 18 pp.
54. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Current State and Trends 2005, Island Press, Washington, DC.
55. Monteith D.T., Stoddard J.D., Evans C.D., de Wit H.A., Forsius M., Høgåsen T., Wilander A., Skjelkvåle B.L., Jeffries D.S., Vuorenmaa J., Keller B., Kopácek J., Vesely J. Dissolved organic carbon trends resulting from changes in atmospheric deposition chemistry. Nature 2007, 450:537-541.
56. Parry L.E., Holden J., Chapman P.J. Restoration of blanket peatlands. J. Environ. Manag. 2014, 133:193-205.
57. Pearce D., Turner R.K. Economics of Natural Resources and the Environment 1990, Pearson Education Ltd., Essex.
58. Perni A., Martinez-Paz J., Martinez-Carrasco F. Social preferences and economic valuation for water quality and river restoration: the Segura River, Spain. Water Environ. J. 2012, 26:274-284.
59. Plieninger T., Dijks S., Oteros-Rozas E., Bieling C. Assessing, mapping and quantifying cultural ecosystem services. Land Use Policy 2013, 33:118-129.
60. Ramajo-Hernandez J., Del-Saz-Salazar S. Estimating the non-market benefits of water quality improvement for a case study in Spain: a contingent valuation approach. Environ. Sci. Policy 2012, 22:47-59.
61. Ramchunder S.J., Brown L.E., Holden J. Environmental effects of drainage, drain-blocking and prescribed vegetation burning in UK upland peatlands. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 2009, 33(1):49-79.
62. Ramchunder S.J., Brown L.E., Holden J. Catchment-scale peatland restoration benefits stream ecosystem biodiversity. J. Appl. Ecol. 2012, 49:182-191.
63. Reed M.S., Bonn A., Evans C., Glenk K., Hansjurgens B. Editorial: assessing and valuing peatland ecosystem services for sustainable management. Ecosyst. Serv. 2014, 9:1-4.
64. Reed M., Moxey A., Prager K., Hanley N., Skates J., Bonn A., Evans C.D., Glenk K., Thomson K. Improving the link between payments and the provision of ecosystem services in agri-environment schemes in UK peatlands. Ecosyst. Serv. 2014, 9:44-53.
65. Rigby D., Alcon F., Burton M. Supply uncertainty and the economic value of irrigation water. Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ. 2010, 37(1):97-117.
66. Rothwell J.J., Evans M.G., Daniels S.M., Allott T.E.H. Peat soils as a source of lead contamination to upland fluvial systems. Environ. Pollut. 2008, 153:582-589.
67. Rothwell J.J., Taylor K.G., Chenery S., Cundy A., Evans M.G., Allott T.E.H. Storage and behavior of As, Sb, Pb and Cu in omrotrophic peat bogs under contrasting water table conditions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44:8497-8502.
68. Rydin H., Jeglum J.Y. The Biology of Peatlands 2006, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
69. Schaafsma M., Brouwer R., Rose J. Directional heterogeneity in WTP models for environmental valuation. Ecol. Econ. 2012, 79:21-31.
70. Schaafsma M., Brouwer R., Gilbert A., van den Bergh J.C.J.M., Wagtendonk A. Estimation of distance-decay functions to account for substitution and spatial heterogeneity in stated preference research. Land Econ. 2013, 89(3):514-537.
71. Sharp E.L., Parsons S.A., Jefferson B. Seasonal variations in natural organic matter and its impact on coagulation in water treatment. Sci. Total Environ. 2006, 363:183-194.
72. Singer P.C. Humic substances as precursors for potentially harmful disinfection by-products. Chemosphere 1999, 54:1017.
73. Steinberg C.E.W., Wright R.F. Acidification of freshwater ecosystems: implications for the future. Bioscience 1994, 45:4.
74. Strange N., Jacobsen J.G., Thorsen B.J., Tarp P. Value for money: protecting endangered species on Danish Heathland. Environ. Manag. 2007, 40(5):761-774.
75. Trepel M. Assessing the cost-effectiveness of the water purification function of wetlands for environmental planning. Ecol. Complex. 2010, 7(3):320-326.
76. UK NEA - UK National Ecosystem Assessment The UK National Ecosystem Assessment: Synthesis of the Key Findings 2011, UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge.
77. UKTAG - UK Technical Advisory Group on the Water Framework Directive, 2007. Recommendations on surface water classification schemes for the purposes of the water framework directive. Available from (last accessed 23.05.14). http://www.wfduk.org.
78. UKWIR - UK Water Industry Research, 2011. CL08B201 - Climate Change Implications for Water Treatment Interim Report on the likely changes in water quality due to climate change, April 2011.
79. UKWIR - UK Water Industry Research, 2012. Quantifying the benefits of water quality catchment management initiatives. 1-84057-648-0. http://www.ukwir.org/ukwirlibrary/95165.
80. United Utilities, 2010. SCaMP Sustainable Catchment Management Programme. Monitoring Progress Report Year 4. Penny Anderson Associates Ltd. http://www.unitedutilities.com/SCaMPdatalibrary.aspx.
81. van Berkel D.B., Verburg P.H. Spatial quantification and valuation of cultural ecosystem services in an agricultural landscape. Ecol. Indic. 2014, 37:163-174.
82. Van der Wal, R., Bonn, A., Monteith, D., Reed, M., Blackstock, K., Hanley, N., Thompson, D., Evans, M., Alonso, I, Allott, T., Armitage, H., Beharry, N., Glass, J., Johnson, S., McMorrow, J., Ross, L., Pakeman, R., Perry, S., Tinch, D., 2011. Mountains, Moorlands and Heaths. UK National Ecosystem Assessment. The UK National Ecosystem Assessment Technical Report. UNEP-WCMN, Cambridge, pp. 105-159.
83. Viscusi W.K., Huber J., Bell J. Estimating discount rates for environmental quality from utility-based choice experiments. J. Risk Uncertain. 2008, 37:199-220.
84. Wallage Z.E., Holden J., McDonald A.T. Drain blocking: an effective treatment for reducing dissolved organic carbon loss and water discolouration in a drained peatland. Sci. Total Environ. 2006, 367:811-821.
85. Wichtmann W., Wichmann S. Environmental, social and economic aspects of a sustainable biomass production. J. Sustain. Energy Environ. 2011, 77:81. (special issue).
86. White P.C.L., Lovett J.C. Public preferences and willingness-to-pay for nature conservation in the North York Moors National Park, UK. J. Environ. Manag. 1999, 55(1):1-13.
87. Whitehead, P., Futter, M., Wilby, R., 2006. Impacts of climate change on hydrology, nitrogen and carbon in upland and lowland streams: assessment of adaptation strategies to meet Water Framework Directive objectives. In: Proceedings of BHS 9th National Hydrology Symposium, Durham.
88. Whitfield S., Reed M., Thomson K., Christie M., Stringer L.C., Quinn C.H., Anderson R., Moxey A., Hubacek K. Managing peatland ecosystem services: current UK policy and future challenges in a changing world. Scott. Geogr. J. 2011, 127(3):209-230.
89. Wielgus J., Gerber L.R., Sala E., Bennett J. Including risk in stated-preference economic valuations: experiments on choices for marine recreation. J. Environ. Manag. 2009, 90:3401-3409.
90. Wilson L., Wilson J., Holden J., Johnstone I., Armstrong A., Morris M. Ditch blocking, water chemistry and organic carbon flux: evidence that blanket bog restoration reduces erosion and fluvial carbon loss. Sci. Total Environ. 2011, 409:2010-2018.
91. Worrall F., Armstrong A., Holden J. Short-term impact of peat drain-blocking on water colour, dissolved organic carbon concentration, and water table depth. J. Hydrol. 2007, 337:315-325.