Managing Peatland Ecosystem Services: Current UK Policy and Future Challenges in a Changing World

Scottish Geographical Journal

Volumn 127, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 209-230

  Whitfield, Stephen ^a   Reed, Mark ^a   Thomson, Ken ^b   Christie, Mike ^c   Stringer, Lindsay C ^d   Quinn, Claire H ^d   Anderson, Russell ^e   Moxey, Andrew ^f   Hubacek, Klaus ^g  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

^b SCOTTISH CROP RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^c ABERYSTWYTH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^e FOREST RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

^f Pareto Consulting   (United Kingdom)

^g UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

biodiversity; carbon storage; ecosystem services; provision services; trade offs

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; LAND USE PLANNING; PEATLAND; SUSTAINABILITY; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; TRADE-OFF;

UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 84859254507     PISSN: 14702541     EISSN: 1751665X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14702541.2011.616864     Document Type: Review

References (89)

1. Alexander, P. D., Bragg, N. C., Meade, R., Padelopoulos, G. and Watts, O. 2008. Peat in horticulture and conservation: the UK response to a changing world. Mires and Peat, 3(8) http://www.mires-and-peat.net/map03/map_03_08.pdf
2. Beharry-Borg, N., Hubacek, K., Smart, J., Termansen, M., Chapman, P. J., Robroek, B. J.M., Holden, J., Irvine, B. and Ashley, D. 2009. "Determining the socio-economic implications of different land management policies in Yorkshire Water's catchments". Yorkshire Water project report (Bradford: Yorkshire Water).
3. Belyea, L. R. and Malmer, N. 2004. Carbon sequestration in peatland: patterns and mechanisms of response to climate change. Global Change Biology, 10(7): 1043-1052. doi:10.1111/j.1529-8817.2003.00783.x
4. Benayas, J. M.R., Newton, A. C., Diaz, A. and Bullock, J. M. 2009. Enhancement of biodiversity and ecosystem services by ecological restoration: a meta-analysis. Science, 325(5944): 1121-1124. doi:10.1126/science.1172460
5. Billett, M. F., Palmer, S. M., Hope, D., Deacon, C., Storeton-West, R., Hargreaves, K. J., Flechard, C. and Fowler, D. 2004. Linking land-atmosphere-stream carbon fluxes in a lowland peatland system. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 18(1) GB1024
6. Bishop, K., Phillips, A. and Warren, L. 1995. Protected forever?: factors shaping the future of protected areas policy. Land Use Policy, 12(4): 291-305. doi:10.1016/0264-8377(95)00030-h
7. Bonn, A., Rebane, M. and Reid, C. 2009. "Ecosystem services: a new rationale for conservation of upland environments". In Drivers of Environmental Change in Uplands, Edited by: Bonn, A., Allott, T., Hubacek, K. and Stewart, J. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
8. Bridgham, S. D., Pastor, J., Dewey, B., Weltzin, J. F. and Updegraff, K. 2008. Rapid Carbon response of Peatlands to Climate Change. Ecology, 89(11): 3041-3048. doi:10.1890/08-0279.1
9. Carey, P. D., Wallis, S., Chamberlain, P. M., Cooper, A., Emmett, B. A., Maskell, L. C., McCann, T., Murphy, J., Norton, L. R., Reynolds, B., Scott, W. A., Simpson, I. C., Smart, S. M. and Ullyett, J. M. 2008. Countryside Survey: UK Results from 2007, 105NERC/Centre for Ecology & Hydrology. (CEH Project Number: C03259)
10. Chapman, S. J., Bell, J., Donnelly, D. and Lilly, A. 2009. Carbon stocks in Scottish peatlands. Soil Use and Management, 25(2): 105-112. doi:10.1111/j.1475-2743.2009.00219.x
11. Christie, M., Hyde, T., Cooper, R., Fazey, I., Dennis, P., Warren, J., Colombo, S. and Hanley, N. 2011a. Economic Value of the Benefits of Ecosystem Services Delivered by the UK Biodiversity Action Plan, London: DEFRA.
12. Christie, M., Dzanja, J., Hyde, T. and Minter, R. 2011b. "Annex 3: economic valuation of the benefits of SSSIs". In Benefits of Sites of Special Scientific Interest, Edited by: Christie, M. and Minter, R. London: Defra.
13. Cliquet, A., Backes, C., Harris, J. and Howsam, P. 2009. Adaptation to climate change: legal challenges for protected areas. Utrecht Law Review, 5.1: 158-175.
14. CRC, Commission for Rural Communities. 2010. "High ground, high potential - a future for England's upland communities". Report of the Upland Communities inquiry. [Online] Available at:http://ruralcommunities.gov.uk/2010/07/02/upland-fullreport/
15. Conrad, L., Cassar, L. F., Jones, M., Eiter, S., Izakovicova, Z., Barankova, Z., Christie, M. and Fazey, I. in press. Public participation in landscape policy: practices do not match the rhetoric. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning,
16. Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O'Neill, R. V., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R. G., Sutton, P. and van den Belt, M. 1997. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387(6630): 253-260.
17. Crofters Commission. (1999) Annual Report (Inverness: Crofters' Commission)
18. Daily, G. C., Söderqvist, T., Aniyar, S., Arrow, K., Dasgupta, P., Erlich, P. R., Folke, C., Jansson, A., Jansson, B-G., Kautsky, N., Levin, S., Lubchenco, J., Mäler, K-G., Simpson, D., Starrett, D., Tilman, D. and Walker, B. 2000. The Value of Nature and the Nature of Value. Science, 289(5478): 395-396.
19. DEFRA. 2007. Securing a Healthy Natural Environment: an Action Plan for Embedding an Ecosystems Approach, London: DEFRA.
20. (2009) Adapting to Climate Change: UK Climate Projections. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. Available at:http://www.defra.gov.uk/publications/files/pb13274-uk-climate-projections-090617.pdf
21. DEFRA. 2010. "Consultation on reducing the horticultural use of peat in England". [Online] Available at:http://www.defra.gov.uk/corporate/consult/peat/index.htm
22. DEFRA. in press. Barriers & Opportunities to the Use of Payments for Ecosystem Services, London: DEFRA.
23. Dess, A. 'The CAP towards 2020: meeting the food, natural resources and territorial challenges of the future'. Draft report of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development. European Parliament. [Online] Available at:http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2009_2014/documents/agri/pr/857/857600/857600en.pdf
24. Dinsmore, K. J., Billett, M. F., Skiba, U. M., Rees, R. M., Drewer, J. and Helfter, C. 2010. Role of the aquatic pathway in the carbon and greenhouse gas budgets of a peatland catchment. Global Change Biology, 16: 2750-2762.
25. Dodd, A., Hardiman, A., Jennings, K. and Williams, G. 2010. Protected areas and climate change; reflections from a practitioner's perspective. Utrecht Law Review, 6(1) [Online] Available at SSRN:http://ssrn.com/abstract=1551260
26. Ellis, T., Hill, P. W., Fenner, N., Williams, G. G., Godbold, D. and Freeman, C. 2009. The interactive effects of elevated carbon dioxide and water table draw-down on carbon cycling in a Welsh ombrotrophic bog. Ecological Engineering, 35(6): 978-986. doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2008.10.011
27. Engel, S., Pagiola, S. and Wunder, S. 2008. Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: an overview of the issues. Ecological Economics, 65(4): 663-674. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.011
28. European Commission. (2010) The CAP towards 2020: Meeting the food, natural resources and territorial challenges of the future. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, COM(2010) 672 final. Brussels, 18 November 2010. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/cap-post-2013/communication/ com2010-672_en.pdf
29. European Council. 2010b. "Conclusions of the European Council 25/26 March 2010". [Online] Available at:http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/ec/113591.pdf
30. Gasparatos, A., El-Haram, M. and Horner, M. 2009. The argument against a reductionist approach for measuring sustainable development performance and the need for methodological pluralism. Accounting Forum, 33: 245-256. doi:10.1016/j.accfor.2008.07.006
31. Gorham, E. 1991. Northern peatlands: role in the carbon cycle and probable responses to climatic warming. Ecological Applications, 1: 182-195.
32. Heikkilä, R., Lindholm, T. and Simola, H. 2007. "Energy policy in favour of peat based on a questionable research report". In International Mire Conservation Group Newsletter 8-9. 2007/3 [Online] Available at:http://imcg.net/imcgnl/pdf/nl0703.pdf
33. Hubacek, K., Beharry, N., Bonn, A., Burt, T., Holden, J., Ravera, F., Reed, M., Stringer, M. and Tarrasón. 2009. "Ecosystem services in dynamic and contested landscapes: the case of UK uplands". In What is Land For? The Food, Fuel and Climate Change Debate, Edited by: Winter, M. and Lobley, M. London: Earthscan.
34. Hubacek, K., Mauerhofer, V. and Coleby, A. From polluter pays to beneficiary pays: distribution of rights and costs under PES (payment for ecosystem services). Proceedings of the International Ecological Economics Conference. August 2010. Bremen
35. IMCG. 2007. Regional News: EU Parliament thinks peat is a biomass fuel. International Mire Conservation Group Newsletter, 1(15) [Online] Available at:http//imcg.net/imcgnl/pdf/n10701.pdf
36. Jenkins, M., Scherr, S. J. and Inbar, M. 2004. Markets for biodiversity services: potential roles and challenges. Environment, 46(6): 32-42.
37. Joint Nature Conservation Committee, JNCC. 2010a. "Towards an assessment of the state of UK Peatlands". In Draft Report [Online] Available at:http://www.iucn-uk-peatlandprogramme.org/commission/StateOfThePeatlands
38. JNCC. 2010b. "UK Biodiversity Indicators". [Online] Available at:http://www.jncc.gov.uk/page-1824
39. Joosten, H. 2007. The International Peat Society: fossil or renewable? An analysis of the IPS stand towards peat renewability and climate change. International Mire Conservation Group Newsletter, 2: 4-19. [Online] Available at:http://imcg.net/imcgnl/pdf/nl0702.pdf
40. Jooste, H. and Couwenberg, J. D.R. Are emission reductions from peatlands MRV-able?. Wetlands International, Ede. Produced for the UN-FCCC meetings in Bonn. June2009.
41. Kettunen, A., Kaitala, V., Lehtinen, A., Lohila, A., Alm, J., Silvola, J. and Martikainen, P. J. 1999. Methane production and oxidation potentials in relation to water table fluctuations in two boreal mires. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 31: 1741-1749.
42. Lindsay, R. 2010. Peatbogs and Carbon: A Critical Synthesis to Inform Policy Development in Oceanic Peat Bog Conservation and Restoration in the Context of Climate Change, London: University of East London.
43. Littlewood, N., Anderson, P., Artz, R., Bragg, O., Lunt, P. and Marrs, R. 2010. "Peatland Biodiversity". In IUCN Draft Scientific Review [Online] Available at:http://www.iucn-uk-peatlandprogramme.org/commission/biodiversity
44. Lunt, P., Allott, T., Anderson, P., Buckler, M., Coupar, A., Jones, P., Labadz, J. & Worrall, P. (2010) Peatland Restoration. IUCN Report. Available at:http://www.iucn-uk-peatlandprogramme.org/sites/all/files/Review%20Peatland%20Restoration,%20June%
45. Lyon, G. 2010. Report on the future of the Common Agricultural Policy after 2013, to European Parliament Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development Accessed 3 January 2011. [Online]http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&reference=A7-2010-0204&language=EN&mode=XML
46. National Ecosystem Assessment. in press. "UK NEA Synthesis Report".
47. Natural England. 2008. "HLS Target Area Statement NE06". In North Pennines Target Area [Online] http://www.naturalengland.org.uk/Images/hlstargeting/The_North_Pennines.pdf
48. Natural England. 2010. "England's peatlands: carbon storage and greenhouse gases". Report NE257, [Online] Available at:http://naturalengland.etraderstores.com/NaturalEnglandShop/NE257
49. McCauley, D. J. 2006. Selling out on nature. Nature, 443: 27-28.
50. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. MA. 2005. "Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis". Washington DC: Island Press.
51. Muhr, J., Höhle, J., Otieno, D. and Borken, W. 2010. Manipulative lowering of the water table during summer does not affect CO2 emissions and uptake in a minerotrophic fen in south-eastern Germany. Ecological Applications, 21(2), pp. 391-401. doi:10.1890/09-1251.1
52. Newton, I. 2004. The recent declines of farmland bird populations in Britain: an appraisal of causal factors and conservation actions. Ibis, 146(4): 579-600.
53. Norton, B. G. 1991. Toward Unity among Environmentalists, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
54. Norton, B. G. 2005. Sustainability: A Philosophy of Adaptive Ecosystem Management, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
55. Pagiola, S., Arcenas, A and Platais, G. 2005. Can payments for environmental services help reduce poverty? An exploration of the issues and the evidence to date from Latin America. World Development, 33(2): 237-253. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.07.011
56. Quinn, C. H., Fraser, E. D.G., Hubacek, K. and Reed, M. S. 2010. Property rights in UK uplands and the implications for policy and management. Ecological Economics, 69(6): 1355-1363.
57. Rabinowitz, R. and d'Este-Hoare, J. 2009. "Financing UK Carbon Reduction Projects". WatfordL BRE Publishing.
58. Ramsar Convention on Biodiversity in Wetlands (1996) Memorandum of Cooperation with the Convention on Biological Diversity. Available at:http://www.ramsar.org/cda/en/ramsar-documents-mous-memorandum-of/main/ramsar/1-31-115%
59. Reed, M. S., Arblaster, K., Bullock, C., Burton, R. J. F., Davies, A. L., Holden, J., Hubacek, K., May, R., Mitchley, J., Morris, J., Nainggolan, D., Potter, C., Quinn, C. H., Swafes, V. and Thorp, S. 2009. Using scenarios to explore UK upland futures. Futures, 41(9): 619-630. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2009.04.007
60. Rodgers, C. P. 1999. Environmental management of common land: towards a new legal framework?. Journal of Environmental Law, 11(2): 231-255.
61. Rodgers, C. 2009. Property rights, land use and the rural environment: A case for reform. Land Use Policy, 26(Supplement 1): S134-S141. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.09.018
62. RSPB. (2011) Greening UK Gardens: A levy proposal for peat use in horticulture. A Report by the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds. Available at:http://www.rspb.org.uk/Images/Greening%20UK%20Gardens_tcm9-271944.pdf
63. SAC (Scottish Agricultural College). 2008. "Farming's retreat from the hills". In Sustainable Farming Systems Report [Online] Available at:http://www.sac.ac.uk/mainrep/pdfs/retreatreport.pdf
64. Settylmyer, S. and Eaton, J. 2010. "Feasibility assessment - program design for carbon-based restoration of UK peatlands". Terracarbon for University of Aberdeen.
65. Schmilewski, G. 2008. The role of peat in assuring the quality of growing media. Mires and Peat, 3(2) [Online] Available at:http://www.mires-and-peat.net/map03/map_03_02.pdf
66. Schrier-Uijl, A., Kroon, P., Leffelaar, P., van Huissteden, J., Berendse, F. and Veenendaal, E. 2010. Methane emissions in two drained peat agro-ecosystems with high and low agricultural intensity. Plant and Soil, 329: 509-520.
67. Scott, A and Shannon, P. 2007. Local landscape designations in Scotland: opportunity or barrier to effective landscape management. Landscape and Urban Planning, 81(3): 257-269. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.01.008
68. Scott, A. J. 2001. Special landscape areas: their operation and effectiveness in Ceredigion Wales. Town Plan. Rev, 72
69. Scott, A. and Bullen, A. 2004. Special landscape areas: landscape conservation or confusion in the town and country planning system?. Town Planning Review, 75(2): 205-230.
70. Scottish Executive (2006) The Scottish Forestry Strategy. SE/2006/155. Available at: http://www.http://www.forestry.gov.uk/pdf/SFS2006fcfc101.pdf/$FILE/SFS2006fcfc101.pdf
71. Scottish Natural Heritage and Historic Scotland. 2005. "Guidance on Local Landscape Designations". Battleby: Scottish Natural Heritage. Final Report
72. Scottish Government. 2011. "Getting the best from our land - a land use strategy for Scotland". (17 March 2011) [Online] Available: http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2011/03/17091927/0
73. Short, C. and Winter, M. 1999. The problem of common land: toward stakeholder governance. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 42(5): 613-630.
74. Short, C. 2000. Common land and ELMS: a need for policy innovation in England and Wales. Land Use Policy, 17(2): 121-133. doi:10.1016/s0264-8377(00)00007-7
75. Solesbury, W. 1976. The Environmental Agenda. Public Administration, 54(4): 379-397. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.1976.tb00256.x
76. Stewart, A. J.A. and Lance, A. N. 1983. Moor-draining - a review of impacts on land-use. Journal of Environmental Management, 17(1): 81-99.
77. Stewart, A. J.A. and Lance, A. N. 1991. Effects of moor-draining on the hydrology and vegetation of northern Pennine blanket bog. Journal of Applied Ecology, 28(3): 1105-1117.
78. Toman, M. 1998. Why not to calculate the value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Ecological Economics, 25: 57-60.
79. UK Government, Department for Communities and Local Government. (1995) Minerals Planning Guidance 13 (MPG13): Guidelines for Peat Provision in England. Available at:http://www.communities.gov.uk/publications/planningandbuilding/mineralsplanningguidance10
80. UNFCCC. Report of the Conference of the Parties on its 15th session, held in Copenhagen from 7 to 19 December 2009. Part One: Proceedings. [Online] Available at:http://unfccc.int/documentation/documents/advanced_search/items/3594.php?rec=j&priref=600005734#beg
81. Updegraff, K., Bridgham, S. D.Pastor, J. 2001. Ecosystem respiration response to warming and water-table manipulations in peatland mesocosms. Ecol. Appl, 11: 311-326.
82. Vickery, J. A., Bradbury, R. B., Henderson, I. G., Eaton, M. A. and Grice, P. V. 2004. The role of agri-environment schemes and farm management practices in reversing the decline of farmland birds in England. Biological Conservation, 119(1): 19-39.
83. Reid, W. V. 2006. Nature: the many benefits of ecosystem services. Nature, 443(7113): 749
84. Ward, S.E., Bardgett, R.D., McNamara, N.P., Adamson, J.K. & Ostle, N.J. (2007) Long-term consequences of grazing and burning on northern peatland carbon dynamics. Ecosystems, 10,pp. 1069-83
85. Whittington, P. N. and Price, J. S. 2006. The effects of water table draw-down (as a surrogate for climate change) on the hydrology of a fen peatland, Canada. Hydrological Processes, 20(17): 3589-3600. doi:10.1002/hyp.6376
86. Williams, J. M. 2006. "Common Standards Monitoring for Designated Sites: First Six Year Report". Peterborough: JNCC.
87. Wilson, G. A. 1997. Assessing the environmental impact of the environmentally sensitive areas scheme: a case for using farmers' environmental knowledge?. Landscape Research, 22(3): 303-326.
88. Worrall, F., Burt, T. and Adamson, J. 2004. Can climate change explain increases in DOC flux from upland peat catchments?. Science of The Total Environment, 326(1-3): 95-112. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2003.11.022
89. Worrall, F., Chapman, P., Holden, J., Evans, C., Artz, R., Smith, P. and Grayson, R. in press. "A review of current evidence on carbon fluxes and greenhouse gas emissions from UK peatlands". JNCC Review.