An empirical model relating U.S. monthly hail occurrence to large-scale meteorological environment

Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 226-243

  Allen, John T ^a   Tippett, Michael K ^b,c   Sobel, Adam H ^a,b  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^b King Abdulaziz University ^*  (United States)

^c KING ABDULAZIZ UNIVERSITY   (Saudi Arabia)

Author keywords

climate variability; climatology; hail; severe thunderstorms; United States

Indexed keywords

CLIMATOLOGY; POTENTIAL ENERGY; PRECIPITATION (METEOROLOGY);

CLIMATE VARIABILITY; CLIMATOLOGICAL ANNUAL CYCLE; CONVECTIVE AVAILABLE POTENTIAL ENERGIES; CONVECTIVE PRECIPITATION; ENVIRONMENTAL VARIABLES; LOWER FREQUENCIES; SPECIFIC HUMIDITY; UNITED STATES;

CLIMATE MODELS;

CLIMATE VARIATION; CLIMATOLOGY; HAIL; HUMIDITY; METEOROLOGY; NUMERICAL MODEL; PRECIPITATION ASSESSMENT; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; THUNDERSTORM; TIMESCALE;

ROCKY MOUNTAINS;

EID: 85027945086     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19422466     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/2014MS000397     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Allen, J. T., and, D. J. Karoly, (2014), A climatology of Australian severe thunderstorm environments 1979-2011: Inter-annual variability and ENSO influence, Int. J. Climatol., 34, 81-97.
2. Allen, J. T., D. J. Karoly, and, K. J. Walsh, (2014), Future Australian severe thunderstorm environments. Part I: A novel evaluation and climatology of convective parameters from two climate models for the late twentieth century, J. Clim., 27, 3827-3847.
3. Baldwin, M. E., J. S. Kain, and, M. P. Kay, (2002), Properties of the convection scheme in NCEP's Eta Model that affect forecast sounding interpretation, Weather Forecasting, 17, 1063-1079.
4. Blair, S., D. E. Cavanaugh, J. Laflin, J. Leighton, and, K. Sanders, (2014), High-resolution hail observations: Implications for NWS warning operations and climatological data, in 26th Conference on Weather Analysis and Forecasting, Atlanta, GA, Am. Meteorol. Soc. AMS online, 18.1.
5. Brooks, H. E., (2009), Proximity soundings for severe convection for Europe and the United States from reanalysis data, Atmos. Res., 93, 546-553.
6. Brooks, H. E., (2013), Severe thunderstorms and climate change, Atmos. Res., 123, 129-138.
7. Brooks, H. E., and, N. Dotzek, (2007), The spatial distribution of severe convective storms and an analysis of their secular changes, in Climate Extremes and Society, edited by Henry F. Diaz and Richard J. Murnane, pp. 35-54, Cambridge University Press, N. Y. [Available at: http://www.cambridge.org/US/academic/subjects/earth-and-environmental-science/climatology-and-climate-change/climate-extremes-and-society.]
8. Brooks, H. E., J. W. Lee, and, J. P. Craven, (2003), The spatial distribution of severe thunderstorm and tornado environments from global reanalysis data, Atmos. Res., 67, 73-94.
9. Brooks, H. E., G. W. Carbin, and, P. T. Marsh, (2014), Increased varibility of tornado occurrence in the United States, Science, 346, 349-352.
10. Bukovsky, M. S., and, D. J. Karoly, (2007), A brief evaluation of precipitation from the North American regional reanalysis, J. Hydrometeorol., 8, 837-846.
11. Cao, Z., (2008), Severe hail frequency over Ontario, Canada: Recent trend and variability, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L14803, doi:10.1029/2008GL034888.
12. Cecil, D. J., and, C. B. Blankenship, (2012), Toward a global climatology of severe hailstorms as estimated by satellite passive microwave imagers, J. Clim., 25, 687-703.
13. Changnon, S. A., (1999), Data and approaches for determining hail risk in the contiguous United States, J. Appl. Meteorol., 38, 1730-1739.
14. Changnon, S. A., (2008), Temporal and spatial distributions of damaging hail in the continental United States, Phys. Geogr., 29, 341-350. Urbana-Champaign, Ill.
15. Changnon, S. A., D. Chagnon, and, S. D. Hilberg, (2009), Hailstorms across the nation: An atlas about hail and its damages, Contract Rep. 2009-12, 95 pp., State Water Surv., Ill.
16. Cintineo, J. L., T. M. Smith, V. Lakshmanan, H. E. Brooks, and, K. L. Ortega, (2012), An objective high-resolution hail climatology of the contiguous United States, Weather Forecasting, 27, 1235-1248.
17. Craven, J. P., R. E. Jewell, and, H. E. Brooks, (2002), Comparison between observed convective cloud-base heights and lifting condensation level for two different lifted parcels, Weather Forecasting, 17, 885-890.
18. Davis, S. M., and, J. LaDue, (2004), Nonmeteorological factors in warning verification, in 22nd Conference on Severe Local Storms, Hyannis, MA, vol. 7, 4 pp., Am. Meteorol. Soc.
19. Doswell, C. A., (2007), Small sample size and data quality issues illustrated using tornado occurrence data, Electron. J. Severe Storms Meteorol., 2, 1-16.
20. Doswell, C. A., and, P. M. Markowski, (2004), Is buoyancy a relative quantity', Mon. Weather Rev., 132, 853-863.
21. Doswell, C. A., H. E. Brooks, and, M. P. Kay, (2005), Climatological estimates of daily local nontornadic severe thunderstorm probability for the United States, Weather Forecasting, 20, 577-595.
22. Eccel, E., P. Cau, K. Riemann-Campe, and, F. Biasioli, (2012), Quantitative hail monitoring in an alpine area: 35-year climatology and links with atmospheric variables, Int. J. Climatol., 32, 503-517.
23. Edwards, R., and, R. L. Thompson, (1998), Nationwide comparisons of hail size with WSR-88D vertically integrated liquid water and derived thermodynamic sounding data, Weather Forecasting, 13, 277-285.
24. Elsner, J. B., and, H. M. Widen, (2014), Predicting spring tornado activity in the central Great Plains by 1 March, Mon. Weather Rev., 142, 259-267.
25. Gensini, V. A., and, W. S. Ashley, (2011), Climatology of potentially severe convective environments from the North American regional reanalysis, Electron. J. Severe Storms Meteorol., 6, 1-40.
26. Gensini, V. A., T. L. Mote, and, H. E. Brooks, (2014), Severe thunderstorm reanalysis environments and collocated radiosonde observations, J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol., 53, 742-751, doi: 10.1175/JAMC-D-13-0263.1.
27. Giaiotti, D., S. Nordio, and, F. Stel, (2003), The climatology of hail in the plain of Friuli Venezia Giulia, Atmos. Res., 67-68, 247-259.
28. Grams, J. S., R. L. Thompson, D. V. Snively, J. A. Prentice, G. M. Hodges, and, L. J. Reames, (2012), A climatology and comparison of parameters for significant tornado events in the United States, Weather Forecasting, 27, 106-123.
29. Groenemeijer, P., and, A. Van Delden, (2007), Sounding-derived parameters associated with large hail and tornadoes in the Netherlands, Atmos. Res., 83, 473-487.
30. Hales, J., E., Jr,. (1993), Biases in the severe thunderstorm data base: Ramifications and solutions, in 13th Conference on Weather Forecasting and Analysis, Vienna, VA, pp. 504-507, Am. Meteorol. Soc.
31. Jewell, R., and, J. Brimelow, (2009), Evaluation of Alberta hail growth model using severe hail proximity soundings from the United States, Weather Forecasting, 24, 1592-1609.
32. Kapsch, M.-L., M. Kunz, R. Vitolo, and, T. Economou, (2012), Long-term trends of hail-related weather types in an ensemble of regional climate models using a Bayesian approach, J. Geophys. Res., 117, D15107, doi:10.1029/2011JD017185.
33. Karl, T. R., and, W. J. Koss, (1984), Regional and National Monthly, Seasonal, and Annual Temperature Weighted by Area, 1895-1983, Hist. Climatol. Ser., vol. 4, 38 pp., Natl. Clim. Data Cent., Asheville, N. C.
34. Kelly, D. L., J. T. Schaefer, and, C. A. Doswell III, (1985), Climatology of nontornadic severe thunderstorm events in the United States, Mon. Weather Rev., 113, 1997-2014.
35. Knight, C. A., and, N. C. Knight, (2001), Hailstorms, in Severe Convective Storms, Meteorol. Monogr., edited by Charles A. Doswell, Am. Meteorol. Soc., vol. 28, pp. 223-248, Boston, Mass.
36. Kunz, M., J. Sander, and, C. Kottmeiera, (2009), Recent trends of thunderstorm and hailstorm frequency and their relation to atmospheric characteristics in southwest Germany, Int. J. Climatol., 29, 2283-2297, doi:10.1002/joc.1865.
37. Maddox, R. A., D. M. McCollum, and, K. W. Howard, (1995), Large-scale patterns associated with severe summertime thunderstorms over central Arizona, Weather Forecasting, 10, 763-778.
38. Manzato, A., (2012), Hail in northeast Italy: Climatology and bivariate analysis with the sounding-derived indices, J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol., 51, 449-467.
39. Manzato, A., (2013), Hail in northeast Italy: A neural network ensemble forecast using sounding-derived indices, Weather Forecasting, 28, 3-28, doi: 10.1175/WAF-D-12-00034.1.
40. Mesinger, F., et al. (2006), North American regional reanalysis, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 87, 343-360
41. Munich, R. E., (2013), Severe weather in North America, report, 302-07563, 274 pp., Munich, Germany.
42. Ortega, L., T. M. Smith, K. L. Manross, K. A. Scharfenberg, A. Witt, A. G. Kolodziej, and, J. J. Gourley, (2009), The severe hazards analysis and verification experiment, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 90, 1519-1530.
43. Robinson, E. D., R. J. Trapp, and, M. E. Baldwin, (2013), The geospatial and temporal distributions of severe thunderstorms from high-resolution dynamical downscaling, J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol., 52, 2147-2161, doi: 10.1175/JAMC-D-12-0131.1.
44. Sander, J., J. F. Eichner, E. Faust, and, M. Steuer, (2013), Rising variability in thunderstorm-related U.S. losses as a reflection of changes in large-scale thunderstorm forcing, Weather Clim. Soc., 5, 317-331, doi: 10.1175/WCAS-D-12-00023.1.
45. Sanderson, M., W. Hand, P. Groenemeijer, P. Boorman, J. Webb, and, L. McColl, (2014), Projected changes in hailstorms during the 21st century over the UK, Int. J. Climatol., 35, 15-24, doi:10.1002/joc.3958.
46. Schaefer, J. T., and, R. Edwards, (1999), The SPC tornado/severe thunderstorm database, in 11th Conference on Applied Climatology, pp. 215-220, Am. Meteorol. Soc., Dallas, Tex.
47. Schaefer, J. T., J. J. Levit, S. J. Weiss, and, D. W. McCarthy, (2004), The frequency of large hail over the contiguous United States, in 14th Conference on Applied Climatology, Seattle, WA, 7 pp., Am. Meteorol. Soc., CD-ROM, P7.8.
48. Stumpf, G. J., T. Smith, and, J. Hocker, (2004), New hail diagnostic parameters derived by integrating multiple radars and multiple sensors, in 22nd Conference on Severe Local Storms, Hyannis, MA, Am. Meteorol. Soc.
49. Thompson, R. L., B. T. Smith, J. S. Grams, A. R. Dean, and, C. Broyles, (2012), Convective modes for significant severe thunderstorms in the contiguous United States. Part II: Supercell and QLCS tornado environments, Weather Forecasting, 27, 1136-1154.
50. Tippett, M. K., (2014), Changing volatility of US annual tornado reports, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 6956-6961, doi:10.1002/2014GL061347.
51. Tippett, M. K., S. J. Camargo, and, A. H. Sobel, (2011), A Poisson regression index for tropical cyclone genesis and the role of large-scale vorticity in genesis, J. Clim., 24, 2335-2357.
52. Tippett, M. K., A. H. Sobel, and, S. J. Camargo, (2012), Association of U.S. tornado occurrence with monthly environmental parameters, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L02801, doi:10.1029/2011GL050368.
53. Tippett, M. K., A. H. Sobel, S. J. Camargo, and, J. T. Allen, (2014), An empirical relation between U.S. tornado activity and monthly environmental parameters, J. Clim., 27, 2983-2999, doi: 10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00345.1.
54. Trapp, R. J., D. M. Wheatley, N. T. Atkins, R. W. Przybylinski, and, R. Wolf, (2006), Buyer beware: Some words of caution on the use of severe wind reports in postevent assessment and research, Weather Forecasting, 21, 408-415.
55. Trapp, R. J., N. S. Diffenbaugh, and, A. Gluhovsky, (2009), Transient response of severe thunderstorm forcing to elevated greenhouse gas concentrations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L01703, doi: 10.1029/2008GL036203.
56. Tuovinen, J.-P., A.-J. Punkka, J. Rauhala, H. Hohti, and, D. M. Schultz, (2009), Climatology of severe hail in Finland: 1930-2006, Mon. Weather Rev., 137, 2238-2249, doi: 10.1175/2008MWR2707.1.
57. Verbout, S. M., H. E. Brooks, L. M. Leslie, and, D. M. Schultz, (2006), Evolution of the U.S. tornado database: 1954-2003, Weather Forecasting, 21, 86-93.
58. Wakimoto, R. M., and, J. W. Wilson, (1989), Non-supercell tornadoes, Mon. Weather Rev., 117, 1113-1140, doi: 10.1175/1520-0493(1989)117%1113:NST%2.0.CO;2.
59. Wilks, D. S., (2006), Statistical Methods in the Atmospheric Sciences, vol. 59, 627 pp., Academic Press, Elsevier, Burlington, Mass.
60. Wyatt, A., and, A. Witt, (1997), The effect of population density on ground-truth verification of reports used to score a hail detection algorithm, in 28th Conference on Radar Meteorology, Austin, TX, pp. 368-369, Am. Meteorol. Soc.