A climatology and comparison of parameters for significant tornado events in the United States

Weather and Forecasting

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 106-123

  Grams, Jeremy S ^a   Thompson, Richard L ^a   Snively, Darren V ^b   Prentice, Jayson A ^c   Hodges, Gina M ^d   Reames, Larissa J ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

^b OHIO UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

Author keywords

Operational forecasting; Radars radar observations; Severe storms; Storm environments; Tornadoes

Indexed keywords

DISCRETE CELLS; ENVIRONMENTAL VARIABLES; KINEMATIC PARAMETERS; OPERATIONAL FORECASTING; PARAMETER EVALUATION; PRESSURE LEVEL; QUASI-LINEAR CONVECTIVE SYSTEMS; RADAR MOSAIC; SEVERE STORMS; THERMODYNAMIC PARAMETER; WIND EVENTS;

CLIMATOLOGY; PRECIPITATION (METEOROLOGY); STORMS; WEATHER FORECASTING;

TORNADOES;

CLIMATOLOGY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONVECTIVE SYSTEM; DATABASE; HAIL; PARAMETERIZATION; THERMODYNAMICS; TORNADO; WEATHER FORECASTING; WIND VELOCITY;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 84863418176     PISSN: 08828156     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1175/WAF-D-11-00008.1     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Benjamin, S. G., and Coauthors, 2004: An hourly assimilation-forecast cycle: The RUC. Mon. Wea. Rev., 132, 495-518.
2. Bluestein, H. B., 1999: A history of severe-storm-intercept field programs. Wea. Forecasting, 14, 558-577.
3. Bothwell, P. D., J. A. Hart, and R. L. Thompson, 2002: An integrated three-dimensional objective analysis scheme in use at the Storm Prediction Center. Preprints, 21st Conf. on Severe Local Storms/19th Conf. on Weather Analysis and Forecasting/15th Conf. on Numerical Weather Prediction, San Antonio, TX, Amer. Meteor. Soc., JP3.1. [Available online at http://ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/47482.htm.]
4. Bunkers, M. J., J. S. Johnson, L. J. Czepyha, J. M. Grzywacz, B. A. Klimowski, and M. R. Hjelmfelt, 2006: An observational examination of long-lived supercells. Part II: Environmental conditions and forecasting. Wea. Forecasting, 21, 689-714.
5. Bunkers, M. J., J. R. Wetenkamp Jr., J. J. Schild, and A. Fischer, 2010: Observations of the relationship between 700-mb temperatures and severe weather reports across the contiguous United States. Wea. Forecasting, 25, 799-814.
6. Corfidi, S. F., 1999: The birth and early years of the Storm Prediction Center. Wea. Forecasting, 14, 507-525.
7. Crook, N. A., 1996: Sensitivity of moist convection forced by boundary layer processes to low-level thermodynamic fields. Mon. Wea. Rev., 124, 1767-1785.
8. David, C. L., 1976: A study of upper air parameters at the time of tornadoes. Mon. Wea. Rev., 104, 546-551.
9. Davies-Jones, R., R. J. Trapp, and H. B. Bluestein, 2001: Tornadoes and tornadic storms. Severe Convective Storms, Meteor. Monogr., No. 50, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 167-222.
10. Dean, A. R., and R. S. Schneider, 2008: Forecast challenges at the NWS Storm Prediction Center relating to the frequency of favorable severe storm environments. Preprints, 24th Conf. on Severe Local Storms, Savannah, GA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 9A.2. [Available online at http://ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/141743.htm.]
11. Dial, G. L., J. P. Racy, and R. L. Thompson, 2010: Short-term convective mode evolution along synoptic boundaries. Wea. Forecasting, 25, 1430-1446.
12. Doswell, C. A., III, and D. W. Burgess, 1988: Some issues of United States tornado climatology. Mon. Wea. Rev., 116, 495-501.
13. Doswell, C. A., R. Davies-Jones, and D. L. Keller, 1990: On summary measures of skill in rare event forecasting based on contingency tables. Wea. Forecasting, 5, 576-585.
14. Doswell, C. A., H. E. Brooks, and R. A. Maddox, 1996: Flash flood forecasting: An ingredients-based methodology. Wea. Forecasting, 11, 560-581.
15. Duda, J. D., and W. A. Gallus Jr., 2010: Spring and summer midwestern severe weather reports in supercells compared to other morphologies. Wea. Forecasting, 25, 190-206.
16. Edwards, R., 2010: Tropical cyclone tornado records for the modernized NWS era. Preprints, 25th Conf. on Severe Local Storms, Denver, CO, Amer. Meteor. Soc., P3.1. [Available online at http://ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/175269.htm.]
17. Gallus, W. A., Jr., N. A. Snook, and E. V. Johnson, 2008: Spring and summer severe weather reports over the Midwest as a function of convective mode: A preliminary study. Wea. Forecasting, 23, 101-113.
18. Galway, J. G., 1992: Early severe thunderstorm forecasting and research by the United States Weather Bureau. Wea. Forecasting, 7, 564-587.
19. Grams, J. S., W.A. Gallus Jr., S. E. Koch, L. S. Wharton, A. Loughe, and E. E. Ebert, 2006: The use of a modified Ebert-McBride technique to evaluate mesoscale model QPF as a function of convective system morphology during IHOP 2002. Wea. Forecasting, 21, 288-306.
20. Hart, J. A., and W. D. Korotky, 1991: The SHARP workstation v1.50 users guide. NOAA/NWS, 30 pp. [Available from NWS Eastern Region Headquarters, 630 Johnson Ave., Bohemia, NY 11716.]
21. Johns, R. H., and C. A. Doswell III, 1992: Severe local storms forecasting. Wea. Forecasting, 7, 588-612.
22. Johns, R. H., J. M. Davies, and P. M. Leftwich, 1993: Some wind and instability parameters associated with strong and violent tornadoes. Part II: Variations in the combinations of wind and instability parameters. The Tornado: Its Structure, Dynamics, Hazards, and Prediction, Geophys. Monogr., Vol. 79, Amer. Geophys. Union, 583-590.
23. Kain, J. S., M. E. Baldwin, P. R. Janish, S. J. Weiss, M. P. Kay, and G. W. Carbin, 2003: Subjective verification of numerical models as a component of a broader interaction between research and operations. Wea. Forecasting, 18, 847-860.
24. Kain, J. S., and Coauthors, 2008: Severe-weather forecast guidance from the first generation of large-domain convection-allowing models: Challenges and opportunities. Preprints, 24th Conf. on Severe Local Storms, Savannah, GA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 12.1. [Available online at http://ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/141723.htm.]
25. Mann, H. B., and D. R. Whitney, 1947: On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. Ann. Math. Stat., 18, 50-60.
26. Markowski, P., and Y. Richardson, 2006: On the classification of vertical wind shear as directional shear versus speed shear. Wea. Forecasting, 21, 242-247.
27. Markowski, P., C. Hannon, J. Frame, E. Lancaster, A. Pietrycha, R. Edwards, and R. L. Thompson, 2003: Characteristics of vertical wind profiles near supercells obtained fromthe Rapid Update Cycle. Wea. Forecasting, 18, 1262-1272.
28. Miller, R. C., 1972: Notes on analysis and severe-storm forecasting procedures of the Air Force Global Weather Central. Air Weather Service Tech. Rep. 200 (Rev.), Scott Air Force Base, 190 pp.
29. Moller, A. R., 2001: Severe local storms forecasting. Severe Convective Storms, Meteor. Monogr., No. 50, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 433-480.
30. Potvin, C. K., K. L. Elmore, and S. J. Weiss, 2010: Assessing the impacts of proximity sounding criteria on the climatology of significant tornado environments. Wea. Forecasting, 25, 921-930.
31. Rasmussen, E. N., 2003: Refined supercell and tornado forecast parameters. Wea. Forecasting, 18, 530-535.
32. Rasmussen, E. N., and D. O. Blanchard, 1998: A baseline climatology of sounding-derived supercell and tornado forecast parameters. Wea. Forecasting, 13, 1148-1164.
33. Schaefer, J. T., 1986: Severe thunderstorm forecasting: A historical perspective. Wea. Forecasting, 1, 164-189.
34. Schumann, M. R., and P. J. Roebber, 2010: The influence of uppertropospheric potential vorticity on convective morphology. Mon. Wea. Rev., 138, 463-474.
35. Shafer, C. M., A. E. Mercer, L. M. Leslie, M. B. Richman, and C. A. Doswell III, 2010: Evaluation of WRF model simulations of tornadic and nontornadic outbreaks occurring in the spring and fall. Mon. Wea. Rev., 138, 4098-4119.
36. Smith, B. T., R. L. Thompson, J. S. Grams, and C. Broyles, 2010: Climatology of convective modes for significant severe thunderstorms in the contiguous United States. Preprints, 25th Conf. on Severe Local Storms, Denver, CO, Amer. Meteor. Soc., P2.7. [Available online at http://ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/175726.htm.]
37. Thompson, R. L., and R. Edwards, 2000: An overview of environmental conditions and forecast implications of the 3 May 1999 tornado outbreak. Wea. Forecasting, 15, 682-699.
38. Thompson, R. L., and C. M. Mead, 2006: Tornado failure modes in central and southern Great Plains severe thunderstorm episodes. Preprints, 23rd Conf. on Severe Local Storms, St. Louis, MO, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 3.2. [Available online at http://ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/115239.htm.]
39. Thompson, R. L., R. Edwards, J. A. Hart, K. L. Elmore, and P. Markowski, 2003: Close proximity soundings within supercell environments obtained from the Rapid Update Cycle. Wea. Forecasting, 18, 1243-1261.
40. Thompson, R. L., B. T. Smith, J. S. Grams, A. R. Dean, and C. Broyles, 2010: Climatology of near-storm environments with convective modes for significant severe thunderstorms in the contiguous United States. Preprints, 25th Conf. on Severe Local Storms, Savannah, GA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 16B.6. [Available online at http://ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/175727.htm.]
41. Trapp, R. J., S. A. Tessendorf, E. S. Godfrey, and H. E. Brooks, 2005: Tornadoes from squall lines and bow echoes. Part I: Climatological distribution. Wea. Forecasting, 20, 23-33.
42. Trapp, R. J., D. M. Wheatley, N. T. Atkins, R. W. Przybylinski, and R. Wolf, 2006: Buyer beware: Some words of caution on the use of severe wind reports in postevent assessment and research. Wea. Forecasting, 21, 408-415.
43. Uccellini, L. W., and D. R. Johnson, 1979: The coupling of upper and lower tropospheric jet streaks and implications for the development of severe convective storms. Mon. Wea. Rev., 107, 682-703.
44. Wilhelmson, R. B., and L. J., Wicker, 2001: Numerical modeling of severe local storms. Severe Convective Storms, Meteor. Monogr., No. 50, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 123-166.