Effect of genomic deficiencies on sexual size dimorphism through modification of developmental time in drosophila melanogaster

Heredity

Volumn 115, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 140-145

  Takahashi, K H ^a   Blanckenhorn, W U ^b  

^a OKAYAMA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; HEXAPODA;

ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; ANIMAL; BODY SIZE; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; FORELIMB; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; INSECT GENOME; MALE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; BODY SIZE; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, DEVELOPMENTAL; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOME, INSECT; GENOTYPE; MALE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SEX CHARACTERISTICS; WINGS, ANIMAL;

EID: 85027939278     PISSN: 0018067X     EISSN: 13652540     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2015.1     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Badyaev AV (2002). Growing apart: an ontogenetic perspective on the evolution of sexual size dimorphism. Trends Ecol Evol 17: 369–378.
2. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B 57: 289–300.
3. Berrigan D, Koella JC (1994). The evolution of reaction norms: simple models for age and size at maturity. J Evol Biol 7: 549–566.
4. Blanckenhorn WU (1999). Different growth responses to food shortage and temperature in three insect species with similar life histories. Evol Ecol 13: 395–409.
5. Blanckenhorn WU, Dixon AF, Fairbairn DJ, Foellmer MW, Gibert P, van der Linde K et al. (2007a). Proximate causes of Rensch's rule: does sexual size dimorphism in arthropods result from sex differences in development time? Am Nat 169: 245–257.
6. Blanckenhorn WU, Meier R, Teder T (2007b). Rensch's rule in insects: patterns among and within species. In: Fairbairn DJ, Blanckenhorn WU, Székely T (eds). Sex, Size and Gender Roles. Oxford University Press: New York.
7. Cheverud JM (1982). Relationships among ontogenetic, static, and evolutionary allometry. Am J Phys Anthropol 59: 139–149.
8. Fairbairn DJ (1997). Allometry for sexual size dimorphism: pattern and process in the coevolution of body size in males and females. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 28: 659–687.
9. Fairbairn DJ (2005). Allometry for sexual size dimorphism: testing two hypotheses for Rensch's rule in the water strider Aquarius remigis. Am Nat 166: S69–S84.
10. Fairbairn DJ, Blanckenhorn WU, Székely T (2007). Sex, Size and Gender Roles: Evolutionary Studies of Sexual Size Dimorphism. Oxford University Press: New York.
11. Falconer DS (1989). Introduction to quantitative genetics. Longman Scientific: Harlow.
12. Gilchrist AS, Partridge L (1999). A comparison of the genetic basis of wing size divergence in three parallel body size clines of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 153: 1775–1787.
13. Gilchrist GW, Huey RB, Balanya J, Pascual M, Serra L (2004). A time series of evolution in action: a latitudinal cline in wing size in South American Drosophila subobscura. Evolution 58: 768–780.
14. Huey RB, Moreteau B, Moreteau JC, Gibert P, Gilchrist GW, Ives AR et al. (2006). Sexual size dimorphism in a Drosophila clade, the D. obscura group. Zoology (Jena) 109: 318–330.
15. James AC, Azevedo RB, Partridge L (1995). Cellular basis and developmental timing in a size cline of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 140: 659–666.
16. Lovich JE, Gibbons JW (1992). A review of techniques for quantifying sexual size dimorphism. Growth Dev Aging 56: 269–281.
17. Lynch M, Walsh B (1998). Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sinauer Associates: Sunderland, MA.
18. Nunney L (1996). The response to selection for fast larval development in Drosophila melanogaster and its effect on adult weight: an example of a fitness trade-off. Evolution 50: 1193–1204.
19. Pelabon C, Bolstad GH, Egset CK, Cheverud JM, Pavlicev M, Rosenqvist G (2013). On the relationship between ontogenetic and static allometry. Am Nat 181: 195–212.
20. Rensch B (1960). Evolution Above the Species Level. Columbia University Press: New York.
21. Roff DA (1997). Evolutionary Quantitative Genetics. Chapman and Hall: New York.
22. Ryder E, Ashburner M, Bautista-Llacer R, Drummond J, Webster J, Johnson G et al. (2007). The DrosDel deletion collection: a Drosophila genomewide chromosomal deficiency resource. Genetics 177: 615–629.
23. Ryder E, Fiona B, Michael A, Rosa B-L, Darin C, Jenny D et al. (2004). The DrosDel collection: a set of P-element insertions for generating custom chromosomal aberrations in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 167: 797–813.
24. Stearns SC, Koella J (1986). The evolution of phenotypic plasticity in life history traits: predictions of reaction norms for age and size at maturity. Evolution 40: 893–914.
25. Stillwell RC, Blanckenhorn WU, Teder T, Davidowitz G, Fox CW (2010). Sex differences in phenotypic plasticity affect variation in sexual size dimorphism in insects: from physiology to evolution. Annu Rev Entomol 55: 227–245.
26. Takahashi KH, Okada Y, Teramura K (2011a). Genome-wide deficiency mapping of the regions responsible for temporal canalization of the developmental processes of Drosophila melanogaster. JHered102: 448–457.
27. Takahashi KH, Okada Y, Teramura K, Tsujino M (2011b). Deficiency mapping of the genomic regions associated with effects on developmental stability in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 65: 3565–3577.
28. Teder T (2014). Sexual size dimorphism requires a corresponding sex difference in development time: a meta-analysis in insects. Funct Ecol 28: 479–486.
29. Teder T, Tammaru T (2005). Sexual size dimorphism within species increases with body size in insects. Oikos 108: 321–334.
30. Testa ND, Ghosh SM, Shingleton AW (2013). Sex-specific weight loss mediates sexual size dimorphism in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS ONE 8: e58936.