Strategic communication of corporate social responsibility (CSR): Effects of stated motives and corporate reputation on stakeholder responses

Public Relations Review

Volumn 40, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 838-840

  Kim, Yeonsoo ^a  

^a JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Communication strategies of CSR; Corporate reputation; CSR; CSR motives

Indexed keywords

EID: 85027935029     PISSN: 03638111     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.07.005     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Albu O.B., Wehmeier S. Organizational transparency and sense-making: The case of Northern Rock. Journal of Public Relations Research 2014, 26:117-133.
2. Crowley E., Hoyer D. An integrative framework for understanding two-sided persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research 1994, 20:561-574.
3. Forehand R., Grier S. When is honesty the best policy? The effect of stated company intent on consumer skepticism. Journal of Consumer Psychology 2003, 13:349-356.
4. Hong S.Y., Yang S.-U. Effects of reputation, relational satisfaction, and customer-company identification on positive word-of-mouth intentions. Journal of Public Relations Research 2009, 21:381-403.
5. Kim Y., Choi Y. College students' perception of Philip Morris's tobacco-related smoking prevention and tobacco-unrelated social responsibility programs; a comparative study in Korea and the United Stated. Journal of Public Relations Research 2012, 24:184-199.
6. Morsing M., Schultz M., Nielsen K. The 'Catch 22' of communicating CSR: Findings from a Danish study. Journal of Marketing Communications 2008, 14:97-111.