Unsustainable growth, hyper-competition, and worth in life science research: Narrowing evaluative repertoires in doctoral and postdoctoral scientists’ work and lives

Minerva

Volumn 54, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 175-200

  Fochler, Maximilian ^a   Felt, Ulrike ^a   Müller, Ruth ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Academic socialization; Competition; Early stage researchers; Evaluation; Growth; Impact factor; Life sciences; Metrics; Postdoc; Research careers; Valuation

Indexed keywords

EID: 85027934282     PISSN: 00264695     EISSN: 15731871     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11024-016-9292-y     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Åkerlind, Gerlese. 2005. Postdoctoral researchers: roles, functions and career prospects. Higher Education Research & Development 24(1): 21-40. doi: 10.1080/0729436052000318550.
2. Alberts, Bruce, Marc W. Kirschner, Shirley Tilghman, and Harold Varmus. 2014. Rescuing US biomedical research from its systemic flaws. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111(16): 5773-5777. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1404402111.
3. Boltanski, Luc, and Laurent Thévenot. 2006. On justification: economies of worth. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
4. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1975. The specificity of the scientific field and the social conditions of the progress of reason. Social Science Information 14(6): 19-47. doi: 10.1177/053901847501400602.
5. Burrows, Roger. 2012. Living with the h-index? Metric assemblages in the contemporary academy. The Sociological Review 60(2): 355-372. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02077.x.
6. Campbell, Robert A. 2003. Preparing the Next Generation of Scientists: The Social Process of Managing Students. Social Studies of Science 33(6): 897-927. doi: 10.1177/0306312703336004
7. Charmaz, Kathy. 2006. Constructing grounded theory. London; Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8. Davies, Sarah R., and Maja Horst. 2015. Crafting the group: Care in research management. Social Studies of Science 45(3): 371-393. doi: 10.1177/0306312715585820.
9. Delamont, Sarah, and Paul Atkinson. 2001. Doctoring Uncertainty: Mastering Craft Knowledge. Social Studies of Science 31(1): 87-107. doi: 10.1177/030631201031001005.
10. Espeland, Wendy Nelson, and Michael Sauder. 2007. Rankings and Reactivity: How Public Measures Recreate Social Worlds. American Journal of Sociology 113(1): 1-40. doi: 10.1086/517897.
11. European Science Foundation. 2015. Career tracking of doctorate holders. A pilot study. Strasbourg.
12. Fanelli, Daniele. 2012. Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries. Scientometrics 90(3): 891-904. doi: 10.1007/s11192-011-0494-7.
13. Felt, Ulrike (ed.). 2009. Knowing and living in academic research. Convergence and heterogeneity in research cultures in the European context. Prague: Institute of Sociology of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic.
14. Felt, Ulrike, Daniel Barben, Alan Irwin, Pierre-Benoit Joly, Arie Rip, Andy Stirling, and Tereza Stöckelová. 2013. Science in Society: caring for our futures in turbulent times. ESF policy brief. Strasbourg: European Science Foundation.
15. Felt, Ulrike, and Tereza Stöckelová. 2009. Modes of Ordering and Boundaries that Matter in Academic Knowledge Production. In Knowing and Living in Academic Research: Convergence and heterogeneity in research cultures in the European context, ed. Ulrike Felt, 41-124. Prague: Institute of Sociology of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic.
16. Garforth, Lisa, and Anne Kerr. 2010. Let’s Get Organised: Practicing and Valuing Scientific Work Inside and Outside the Laboratory. Sociological Research Online 15(2): 11.
17. Gläser, Jochen, Stefan Lange, Grit Laudel, and Uwe Schimank. 2010. The Limits of Universality: How Field-Specific Epistemic Conditions Affect Authority Relations and their Consequences. In Reconfiguring Knowledge Production. Changing Authority Relationships in the Sciences and their Consequences for Intellectual Innovation, eds. Richard Whitley, Jochen Gläser, and Lars Engwall, 291-324. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18. Hecht, Gabrielle. 2001. Technology, Politics, and National Identity in France. In Technologies of Power. Essays in Honor of Thomas Parke Hughes and Agatha Chipley Hughes, eds. Michael Thad Allen, and Gabrielle Hecht, 252-294. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Heuts, Frank, and Annemarie Mol. 2013. What Is a Good Tomato? A Case of Valuing in Practice. Valuation Studies 1(2): 125-146. doi: 10.3384/vs.2001-5992.1312125
20. Holstein, James A., and Jaber F. Gubrium. 1995. The Active Interview. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
21. Kjellberg, Hans, Alexandre Mallard, Diane-Laura Arjalies, Patrik Aspers, Stefan Beljean, Alexandra Bidet, Alberto Corsin, et al. 2013. Valuation Studies? Our Collective Two Cents. Valuation Studies 1(1): 11-30. doi: 10.3384/vs.2001-5992.131111.
22. Knorr-Cetina, Karin. 1999. Epistemic cultures: how the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, MA; London: Harvard University Press.
23. Lamont, Miche`le. 2012. Toward a Comparative Sociology of Valuation and Evaluation. Annual Review of Sociology 38(1): 201-221. doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-120022.
24. Latour, Bruno, and Steve Woolgar. 1979. Laboratory life. The social construction of scientific facts. 1. print. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
25. Linková, Marcela. 2014. Unable to resist: Researchers’ responses to research assessment in the Czech Republic. Human Affairs 24(1): 78-88. doi: 10.2478/s13374-014-0207-z.
26. Lynch, Michael. 2000. Against Reflexivity as an Academic Virtue and Source of Privileged Knowledge. Theory, Culture & Society 17(3): 26-54. doi: 10.1177/02632760022051202.
27. Mills, David, and Richard Ratcliffe. 2012. After method? Ethnography in the knowledge economy. Qualitative Research 12(2): 147-164. doi: 10.1177/1468794111420902.
28. Müller, Ruth. 2014. Postdoctoral Life Scientists and Supervision Work in the Contemporary University: A Case Study of Changes in the Cultural Norms of Science. Minerva 52(3): 329-349. doi: 10.1007/s11024-014-9257-y.
29. Paradeise, Catherine, and Jean-Claude Thoenig. 2013. Academic Institutions in Search of Quality: Local Orders and Global Standards. Organization Studies 34(2): 189-218. doi: 10.1177/0170840612473550.
30. Plesner, Ursula. 2011. Studying Sideways: Displacing the Problem of Power in Research Interviews with Sociologists and Journalists. Qualitative Inquiry 17(6): 471-482. doi: 10.1177/1077800411409871.
31. Prinz, Florian, Thomas Schlange, and Khusru Asadullah. 2011. Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets? Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 10(9): 712. doi: 10.1038/nrd3439-c1
32. Rushforth, Alexander, and Sarah de Rijcke. 2015. Accounting for Impact? The Journal Impact Factor and the Making of Biomedical Research in the Netherlands. Minerva 53(2): 117-139. doi: 10.1007/s11024-015-9274-5.
33. Schatz, Gottfried. 2014. The faces of Big Science. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 15(6): 423-426. doi: 10.1038/nrm3807.
34. Shore, Cris. 2008. Audit culture and illiberal governance: Universities and the politics of accountability. Anthropological Theory 8(3): 278-298. doi: 10.1177/1463499608093815.
35. Sigl, Lisa. 2015. On the Tacit Governance of Research by Uncertainty: How Early Stage Researchers Contribute to the Governance of Life Science Research. Science, Technology, and Human Values. doi: 10.1177/0162243915599069.
36. Sparkes, Andrew C. 2007. Embodiment, academics, and the audit culture: a story seeking consideration. Qualitative Research 7(4): 521-550. doi: 10.1177/1468794107082306.
37. Stark, David. 2009. The Sense of Dissonance: Accounts of Worth in Economic Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
38. Stephan, Paula E. 2012. How Economics Shapes Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
39. Stilgoe, Jack, Richard Owen, and Phil Macnaghten. 2013. Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Research Policy 42(9): 1568-1580. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008.
40. Stöckelová, Tereza. 2012. Immutable Mobiles Derailed: STS, Geopolitics, and Research Assessment. Science, Technology, and Human Values 37(2): 286-311. doi: 10.1177/0162243911415872.
41. Traweek, Sharon. 1988. Beamtimes and lifetimes: The world of high energy physicists. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
42. Vatin, François. 2013. Valuation as evaluating and valorizing. Valuation Studies 1(1): 31-50. doi: 10.3384/vs.2001-5992.131131