Crafting the group: Care in research management

Social Studies of Science

Volumn 45, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 371-393

  Davies, Sarah R ^a   Horst, Maja ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

care; craft; research groups; research management; responsible research and innovation

Indexed keywords

DENMARK; LEADERSHIP; METHODOLOGY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PERSONNEL; STANDARDS; UNITED KINGDOM; UNITED STATES;

DENMARK; GREAT BRITAIN; LEADERSHIP; RESEARCH DESIGN; RESEARCH PERSONNEL; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84936876112     PISSN: 03063127     EISSN: 14603659     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0306312715585820     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. G.Adamson (2007) Thinking through Craft. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
2. G.Adamson (2010) The Craft Reader. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
3. S.Ahmed (2008) Sociable happiness. Emotion, Space and Society1(1): 10–13.
4. S.R.Barley (2006) What we know (and mostly don’t know) about technical work. In: S.AckroydR.BattP.ThompsonP.S.Tolbert (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Work and Organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 376–403.
5. C.BrosnanM.Michael (2014) Enacting the ‘neuro’ in practice: Translational research, adhesion and the promise of porosity. Social Studies of Science44(5): 680–700.
6. E.Callaway (2011) Fraud investigation rocks Danish University. Nature News. Epub ahead of print 7January. DOI: 10.1038/news.2011.703.
7. R.A.Campbell (2003) Preparing the next generation of scientists: The social process of managing students. Social Studies of Science33(6): 897–927.
8. A.CasatiC.Genet (2014) Principal investigators as scientific entrepreneurs. The Journal of Technology Transfer39(1): 11–32.
9. J.Clark Blickenstaff (2005) Women and science careers: Leaky pipeline or gender filter?Gender and Education17(4): 369–386.
10. H.M.Collins (2001) Tacit knowledge, trust and the Q of sapphire. Social Studies of Science31(1): 71–85.
11. S.DelamontP.Atkinson (2001) Doctoring uncertainty: Mastering craft knowledge. Social Studies of Science31(1): 87–107.
12. S.DelamontP.AtkinsonO.Parry (2000) The Doctoral Experience: Success and Failure in Graduate School. London: Falmer Press.
13. T.DornanD.Nestel (2013) Talking, touching, and cutting: The craft of medicine. The Journal of Modern Craft6(1): 35–48.
14. H.EtzkowitzA.WebsterC.GebhardtB.R.C.Terra (2000) The future of the university and the university of the future: Evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy29(2): 313–330.
15. M.FochlerU.FeltR.Müller (2015) Unsustainable growth, hyper-competition, and worth in doing research: Narrowing regimes of valuation in doctoral and postdoctoral life scientists’ work and lives (pre-print). Department of Science and Technology Studies, University of Vienna. Available at: http://sts.univie.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/dep_sciencestudies/pdf_files/Preprints/Fochler_Felt_Mueller_valuing.pdf (accessed 16 April 2015).
16. M.Fortun (2005) For an ethics of promising, or: A few kind words about James Watson. New Genetics and Society24(2): 157–174.
17. C.Friese (2013) Realizing potential in translational medicine: The uncanny emergence of care as science. Current Anthropology54(S7): S129–S138.
18. J.H.Fujimura (1996) Crafting Science: A Sociohistory of the Quest for the Genetics of Cancer. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19. G.N.GilbertM.Mulkay (1984) Opening Pandora’s Box: A Sociological Analysis of Scientists’ Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. C.Glerup (2014) Organizing science in society: The conduct and justification of responsible research. PhD Dissertation, Copenhagen Business School, Frederiksberg.
21. E.J.Hackett (2005) Essential tensions: Identity, control, and risk in research. Social Studies of Science35(5): 787–826.
22. E.J.Hackett (2014) Academic capitalism. Science, Technology & Human Values39(5): 635–638.
23. A.R.Hochschild (2003) The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
24. M.HorstA.Irwin (2010) Nations at ease with radical knowledge: On consensus, consensusing and false consensusness. Social Studies of Science40(1): 105–126.
25. M.B.KearnesA.Rip (2009) The emerging governance landscape of nanotechnology. In: S.GammelA.LöschA.Nordmann (eds) Jenseits von Regulierung: Zum politischen Umgang mit der Nanotechnologie. Berlin: Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, pp. 97–121.
26. D.K.Kidwell (2014) Navigating the role of the principal investigator: A comparison of four cases. The Journal of Technology Transfer39(1): 33–51.
27. K.L.KjølbergR.Strand (2011) Conversations about responsible nanoresearch. NanoEthics5(1): 99–113.
28. K.Knorr-Cetina (1999) Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29. B.J.KoopsI.OosterlakenH.RomijnT.SwierstraJ.van den Hoven (eds) (2015) Responsible Innovation, Volume 2: Concepts, Approaches, and Applications. Dordrecht: Springer.
30. G.Kunda (2006) Engineering Culture: Control and Commitment in a High-Tech Corporation. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
31. A.LamA.Campos (2012) ‘Content to be Sad’ or ‘Runaway Apprentice’? The Psychological Contract and Careers of Young Scientists in the Entrepreneurial University (Working Paper Series). London: School of Management, Royal Holloway University of London.
32. B.LatourS.Woolgar (1986) Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
33. J.Law (1994) Organising Modernity: Social Ordering and Social Theory. Oxford: Wiley.
34. F.Lentzos (2009) Synthetic biology in the social context: The UK debate to date. Biosocieties4(2–3): 303–315.
35. F.LevineC.Heimerl (2008) Handmade Nation: The Rise of DIY, Art, Craft, and Design. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Architectural Press.
36. P.A.Lutz (2013) Surfacing moves: Spatial-timings of senior home care. Social Analysis57(1): 80–94.
37. E.McCarthyC.Kelty (2010) Responsibility and nanotechnology. Social Studies of Science40(3): 405–432.
38. P.MacnaghtenS.R.DaviesM.Kearnes (in press) Understanding public responses to emerging technologies: A narrative approach. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning.
39. R.K.Merton (1973a) Science and the social order. In: N.W.Storer (ed.) The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 254–266.
40. R.K.Merton (1973b) The normative structure of science. In: N.W.Storer (ed.) The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 267–280.
41. A.M.MolI.MoserJ.Pols (eds) (2010) Care in Practice: On Tinkering in Clinics, Homes and Farms. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.
42. R.Müller (2014) Racing for what? Anticipation and acceleration in the work and career practices of academic life science postdocs. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research15(3): 15.
43. R.MüllerM.Kenney (2014) Agential conversations: Interviewing postdoctoral life scientists and the politics of mundane research practices. Science as Culture23(4): 537–559.
44. N.Myers (2008) Molecular embodiments and the body-work of modelling in protein crystallography. Social Studies of Science38(2): 163–199.
45. J.A.Nunes (1996) The transcultural lab: Articulating cultural difference in/although scientific work. Available at: http://www.ces.uc.pt/publicacoes/oficina/ficheiros/84.pdf (accessed 26 March 2015).
46. R.OwenJ.BessantM.Heintz (2013) Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society. Chichester: Wiley.
47. R.OwenP.MacnaghtenJ.Stilgoe (2012) Responsible research and innovation: From science in society to science for society, with society. Science and Public Policy39(6): 751–760.
48. J.Owen-Smith (2001) Managing laboratory work through skepticism: Processes of evaluation and control. American Sociological Review66(3): 427–452.
49. A.Peach (2009) Thinking through craft. Journal of Design History22(1): 82–84.
50. M.Pickersgill (2012) The co-production of science, ethics and emotion. Science, Technology & Human Values37(6): 579–603.
51. T.J.Pinch (1981) The sun-set: The presentation of certainty in scientific life. Social Studies of Science11(1): 131–158.
52. M.Polanyi (2009 [1966]) The Tacit Dimension. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
53. M.Puig de la Bellacasa (2011) Matters of care in technoscience: Assembling neglected things. Social Studies of Science41(1): 85–106.
54. P.RabinowG.Bennett (2012) Designing Human Practices: An Experiment with Synthetic Biology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
55. S.Shapin (2009) The Scientific Life: A Moral History of a Late Modern Vocation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
56. A.TliliE.Dawson (2010) Mediating science and society in the EU and UK: From information-transmission to deliberative democracy?Minerva48(4): 429–461.
57. S.Traweek (1992) Beamtimes and Lifetimes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
58. J.Vertesi (2012) Seeing like a rover: Visualization, embodiment, and interaction on the Mars Exploration Rover Mission. Social Studies of Science42(3): 393–414.
59. R.Von Schomberg (2013) A vision of responsible research and innovation. In: R.OwenJ.BessantM.Heintz (eds) Responsible Innovation. London: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 51–74.
60. M.C.Watson (2014) Listening in the Pakal controversy: A matter of care in ancient Maya studies. Social Studies of Science44(6): 930–954.