Unable to resist: Researchers' responses to research assessment in the Czech Republic

Human Affairs

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 78-88

  Linkova, Marcela ^a  

^a Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

epistemic living spaces; research assessment; resistance

Indexed keywords

EID: 84891130125     PISSN: 12103055     EISSN: 1337401X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2478/s13374-014-0207-z     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Anderson, G. (2008). Mapping academic resistance in the managerial university. Organization, 15(2), 251-270.
2. Bennett, T. (1998). Culture: A reformer's science. London: SAGE.
3. Bornmann, L. (2013). What is societal impact of research and how can it be assessed? A literature survey. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(2), 217-233.
4. Cohen, L., McAuley, J., & Duberley, J. (2001). Continuity in discontinuity: Changing discourses of science in a market economy. Science, Technology & Human Values, 26(2), 145-166.
5. Deem, R., Hylliard, S., & Reed, M. (2007). Knowledge, higher education, and the new managerialism: the changing management of UK universities (First., p. 245). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6. Felt, U. (Ed.). (2009). Knowing and living in academic research. Convergence and heterogeneity in research cultures in the European context (p. 242). Prague: Institute of Sociology of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic.
7. Felt, U., & Fochler, M. (2012). Re-ordering epistemic living spaces: On the tacit governance effects of the public communication of science. In S. Rödder, M. Franzen, & P. Weingart (Eds.), The Sciences' Media Connection - Public Communication and its Repercussions. Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook 28 (pp. 133-154). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
8. Gillies, D. (2008). How should research be organised? (p. 152). College Publications. Retrieved from http://www. amazon. com/How-Should-Research-Be-Organised/dp/1904987273.
9. Godin, B. (2002). Outline for a history of science measurement. Science, Technology & Human Values, 27(1), 3-27.
10. Chandler, J., Barry, J., & Clark, H. (2002). Stressing academe: The wear and tear of the new public management. Human Relations, 55(9), 1051-1069.
11. Karreman, D., & Alvesson, M. (2009). Resisting resistance: Counter-resistance, consent and compliance in a consultancy firm. Human Relations, 62(8), 1115-1144.
12. Lam, A. (2010). From "ivory tower traditionalists" to "entrepreneurial scientists"? Academic scientists in fuzzy university-industry boundaries. Social Studies of Science, 40(2), 307-340.
13. Law, J. (1994). Organizing modernity (p. 219). Oxford UK & Cambridge USA: Blackwell Publishers.
14. Linkova, M., & Stockelova, T. (2012). Public accountability and the politicization of science: The peculiar journey of Czech research assessment. Science and Public Policy, 39(5), 618-629.
15. McCook, A. (2011). Researchers are punks. The Scientist. Retrieved August 20, 2013, from http://www. the-scientist. com/?articles. view/articleNo/29523/title/Researchers-are-punks/#ixzz1E2G21DrL.
16. Morris, N., & Rip, A. (2006). Scientists' coping strategies in an evolving research system: The case of life scientists in the UK. Science and Public Policy, 33(4), 253-263.
17. Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2003). Introduction: Mode 2 revisited: The new production of knowledge. Minerva, 41(3), 179-194.
18. Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145-179.
19. Power, M. (2003). Evaluating the audit explosion. Law & Policy, 25(3), 185-202.
20. Prasad, A., & Prasad, P. (2001). (Un)willing to resist? The discursive production of local workplace opposition. Studies in Cultures, Organizations and Societies, 7(1), 105-125.
21. Prasad, P., & Prasad, A. (2000). Stretching the iron cage: The constitution and implications of routine workplace resistance. Organization Science, 11(4), 378-403.
22. Roa, T., Beggs, J., Williams, J., & Moller, H. (2009). New Zealand's performance based research funding (PBRF) model undermines Maori research. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 39(4), 233-238.
23. Sauder, M., & Espeland, W. N. (2009). The discipline of rankings: Tight coupling and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 74(1), 63-82.
24. Shore, C. (2008). Audit culture and illiberal governance: Universities and the politics of accountability. nthropological Theory, 8(3), 278-298.
25. Shore, C. (2010). Beyond the multiversity: neoliberalism and the rise of the schizophrenic university. ocial Anthropology, 18(1), 15-29.
26. Shore, C., & Wright, S. (1999). Audit culture and anthropology: Neo-Liberalism in British higher education. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 5(4), 557-575.
27. Smith, K. (2010). Research, policy and funding - academic treadmills and the squeeze on intellectual spaces. The British Journal of Sociology, 61(1), 176-95.
28. Sparkes, A. C. (2007). Embodiment, academics, and the audit culture: A story seeking consideration. ualitative Research, 7(4), 521-550.
29. Stöckelová, T. (2009). Politická a morální ekonomie vědy. In T. Stöckelová (Ed.), Akademické poznávání, vykazování a podnikání. Etnografie měnící se českědy (pp. 37-71). Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství.
30. Stöckelová, T. (2012). Nebezpečné známosti. O vztahu sociálních věd a společnosti (p. 110). Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství.
31. Strathern, M. (2000). Audit cultures: Anthropological studies in accountability and the academy. London, New York: Routledge.
32. Thompson, P., & Ackroyd, S. (1995). All quiet on the workplace front? A critique of recent trends in British Industrial Sociology. Sociology, 29(4), 615-633.
33. Townley, B. (1997). The Institutional logic of performance appraisal. Organization Studies, 18(2), 261-285.
34. Vláda České republiky. (2008). Reforma systému výzkumu, vyvoje a inovací v ČR. Česká republika. Retrieved from http://www. vyzkum. cz/FrontClanek. aspx?idsekce=495405.
35. Weingart, P. (2005). Impact of bibliometrics upon the science system: Inadvertent consequences? Scientometrics, 62(1), 117-131.
36. Wright, S. (n. d.). Knowledge that counts: Points systems and the governance of Danish universities. In D. Smith & A. Griffith (Eds.), Governance on the front line. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
37. Ziman, J. (2002). Real science: What it is and what it means. Cambridge University Press.