Augmented Reality-Based Simulators as Discovery Learning Tools: An Empirical Study

IEEE Transactions on Education

Volumn 58, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 208-213

  Ibanez, Maria Blanca ^a   Di Serio, Angela ^b   Villaran Molina, Diego ^a   Delgado Kloos, Carlos ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD CARLOS III DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD SIMÓN BOLÍVAR   (Venezuela)

Author keywords

Augmented reality; computer simulation; learning effectiveness; mobile learning; physics education; self regulation

Indexed keywords

AUGMENTED REALITY; COLD ROLLING; COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DEREGULATION; EDUCATION; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; MOTIVATION; SCAFFOLDS; SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE); STUDENTS;

EFFECTIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT; LEARNING EFFECTIVENESS; LEARNING PERFORMANCE; MOBILE LEARNING; PHYSICS EDUCATION; SELF REGULATION; SIMULATION ENVIRONMENT; WEB-BASED SIMULATIONS;

E-LEARNING;

EID: 85027932938     PISSN: 00189359     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TE.2014.2379712     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. W. van Joolingen, "Cognitive tools for discovery learning," Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ., vol. 10, pp. 385-397, 1999.
2. T. De Jong and W. R. van Joolingen, "Scientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains," Rev. Educ. Res., vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 179-201, 1998.
3. D. J. Reid, J. Zhang, and Q. Chen, "Supporting scientific discovery learning in a simulation environment," J. Comput. Assist. Learning, vol. 19, pp. 9-20, 2003.
4. T. De Jong, "Instruction based on Comouter simulations," in Handbook of Research on Learning and Instruction, R. E. Mayer and P. A. Alexander, Eds. New York, NY, USA: Routledge, 2010, pp. 446-466.
5. H. U. Wu and S. Pedersen, "Integrating computer-and teacher-based scaffolds in science inquiry," Comput. Educ., vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 2352-2363, 2011.
6. P. A. Kircshner, J. Sweller, and R. E. Clark, "Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching," Educ. Psychol., vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 75-86, 2006.
7. R. E. Mayer, "Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning?," Amer. Psychol., vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 14-19, 2004.
8. H. Banchi and R. Bell, "The many levels of inquiry," Sci. Children, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 26-29, 2008.
9. J. Zhang, Q. Chen, Y. Sun, and D. J. Reid, "Triple scheme of learning support design for scientific discovery learning based on computer simulation: Experimental research," J. Comput. Assist. Learning, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 269-282, 2004.
10. N. Rutten, W. R. van Joolingen, and J. T. van der Veen, "The learning effects of computer simulations in science education," Comput. Educ., vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 136-153, 2012.
11. V. J. Shute, "A comparison of learning elements: All that glitters," in Computers as Cognitive Tools, S. P. Lajoie and S. J. Derry, Eds. Mahwah, NJ, USA: Erlbaum, 1992, pp. 47-74.
12. W. R. van Joolingen and T. de Jong, "Exploring a domain through a computer simulation: traversing variable and relation space with the help of a hypothesis scratchpad," in Simulation-Based Experiential Learning, D. Towne, T. de Jong, and H. Spada, Eds. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 1993, pp. 191-206.
13. W. R. van Joolingen, T. de Jong, A. W. Lazonder, E. R. Savelsbergh, and S. Manlove, "Co-lab: Research and development of an online learning environment for collaborative scientific discovery learning," Comput. Human Behav., vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 671-688, 2005.
14. C. Quintana et al., "A scaffolding design framework for software to support science inquiry," J. Learning Sci., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 337-386, 2004.
15. S. Pedersen and T. Irby, "The VELscience project: Middle schoolers' engagement in student-directed inquiry within a virtual environment for learning," Comput. Educ., vol. 71, pp. 33-42, 2014.
16. J. Ketelhut, "The impact of student self-efficacy on scientific inquiry skills: An exploratory investigation in river city, a multi-user virtual environment," J. Sci. Educ. Technol., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 99-110, 2007.
17. B. Vogel, D. Spikol, A. Kurti, and M. Milrad, "Integrating mobile, web and sensory technologies to support inquiry-based science learning," in Proc. 6th IEEE WMUTE, 2010, pp. 65-72.
18. J. J. A. van Berkum and T. de Jong, "Instructional environments for simulations," Educ. Comput., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 305-358, 1991.
19. H. K. Wu, S. W. Y. Lee, H. Y. Chang, and J. C. Liang, "Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education," Comput. Educ., vol. 62, pp. 41-49, 2013.
20. K. E. Chang, Y. L. Chen, H. Y. Lin, and Y. T. Sung, "Effects of learning support in simulation-based physics learning," Comput. Educ., vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 1486-1498, 2008.
21. K. H. Cheng and C. C. Tsai, "Affordances of augmented reality in science learning: Suggestions for future research," J. Sci. Educ. Technol., vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 449-462, 2013.
22. M. Dunleavy, C. Dede, and R. Mitchell, "Affordances and limitations of immersive participatory augmented reality simulations for teaching and learning," J. Sci. Educ. Technol., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 7-22, 2009.
23. H. Kaufmann and D. Schmalstieg, "Mathematics and geometry education with collaborative augmented reality," Comput. Graph., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 339-345, 2003.
24. S. Cuendet, Q. Bonnard, S. Do-Lenh, and P. Dillenbourg, "Designing augmented reality for the classroom," Comput. Educ., vol. 68, pp. 557-569, 2013.
25. R. Wojciechowski and W. Cellary, "Evaluation of learners' attitude toward learning in ARIES augmented reality environments," Comput. Educ., vol. 68, pp. 570-585, 2013.
26. M. B. Ibáñez, A. Di Serio, D. Villarán, and C. Delgado Kloos, "Experimenting with electromagnetism using augmented reality: Impact on flow student experience and educational effectiveness," Comput. Educ., vol. 71, pp. 1-13, 2014.
27. J. Zhang, Y. T. Sung, H. T. Hou, and K. E. Chang, "The development and evaluation of an augmented reality-based armillary sphere for astronomical observation instruction," Comput. Educ., vol. 73, pp. 178-188, 2014.
28. S. Dong, A. H. Behzadan, F. Chen, and V. R. Kamat, "Collaborative visualization of engineering processes using tabletop augmented reality," Adv. Eng. Softw., vol. 55, pp. 45-55, 2013.
29. K. R. Bujak et al., "A psychological perspective on augmented reality in the mathematics classroom," Comput. Educ., vol. 68, pp. 536-544, 2013.
30. M. Csikzentmihaly, Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York, NY, USA: Harper Perennial, 1991, vol. 41.
31. J. M. Keller, "Strategies for stimulating the motivation to learn," Performance Instruction, vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 1-7, 1987.
32. M. Rost, "Generating student motivation," in WorldView, M. Rost, Ed. Upple Saddle River, NJ, USA: Pearson, 2006.
33. M. Theall, "New directions for theory and research on teaching: A review of the past twenty years," New Directions Teaching Learning, vol. 1999, no. 80, pp. 29-52, 1999.
34. B. Schneider, P. Jermann, G. Zufferey, and P. Dillenbourg, "Benefits of a tangible interface for collaborative learning and interaction," IEEE Trans. Learning Technol., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 222-232, Jul.-Sep. 2011.
35. M. E. C. Santos et al., "Augmented reality learning experiences: Survey of prototype design and evaluation," IEEE Trans. Learning Technol., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 38-56, Jan.-Mar. 2013.
36. P. R. Pintrich and E. V. D. Groot, "Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance," J. Educ. Psychol., vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 33-40, 1990.
37. R. Bakeman, Observing Interaction: An Introduction to Sequential Analysis. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1997.