Impaired visual size-discrimination in children with movement disorders

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 50, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 1838-1843

  Gori, Monica ^a   Tinelli, Francesca ^b,c   Sandini, Giulio ^a   Cioni, Giovanni ^b,e   Burr, David ^c,d  

^a ISTITUTO ITALIANO DI TECNOLOGIA   (Italy)

^b DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENTAL NEUROSCIENCE   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FLORENCE   (Italy)

^d CNR   (Italy)

^e UNIVERSITY OF PISA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Cross sensory calibration; Movement disorders; Visual discrimination

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CHILD; CHILD HEALTH; CHOREOATHETOSIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; DISEASE SEVERITY; DYSTONIA; EYE DOMINANCE; FEMALE; HAND TREMOR; HUMAN; MALE; MOTOR DYSFUNCTION; OBJECT MANIPULATION; PRESCHOOL CHILD; TACTILE DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL IMPAIRMENT; VISUAL ORIENTATION; VISUAL THRESHOLD;

ADOLESCENT; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOVEMENT DISORDERS; PERCEPTUAL DISORDERS; SIZE PERCEPTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 84862890489     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: 18733514     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.04.009     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Alais D., Burr D. The ventriloquist effect results from near-optimal bimodal integration. Current Biology 2004, 14(3):257-262.
2. Alary F., Duquette M., Goldstein R., Elaine Chapman C., Voss P., La Buissonniere-Ariza V., et al. Tactile acuity in the blind: a closer look reveals superiority over the sighted in some but not all cutaneous tasks. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47(10):2037-2043.
3. Battini R., Sgandurra G., Petacchi E., Guzzetta A., Di Pietro R., Giannini M.T., et al. Movement disorder-childhood rating scale: reliability and validity. Pediatric Neurology 2008, 39(4):259-265.
4. Bedny M., Konkle T., Pelphrey K., Saxe R., Pascual-Leone A. Sensitive period for a multimodal response in human visual motion area MT/MST. Current Biology 2010, 20(21):1900-1906.
5. Berkeley, G. (1709/1963). An essay towards a new theory of vision (Indianapolis: 1963: Bobbs-Merril).
6. Brown L.E., Wilson E.T., Goodale M.A., Gribble P.L. Motor force field learning influences visual processing of target motion. Journal of Neuroscience 2007, 27(37):9975-9983.
7. Burge J., Ernst M.O., Banks M.S. The statistical determinants of adaptation rate in human reaching. Journal of Vision 2008, 8(4). 20 21-19.
8. Burr D., Binda P., Gori M. Combining information from different senses: dynamic adjustment of combination weights, and the development of cross-modal integration in children. Book of Sensory Cue Integration 2011, Oxford University Press. K.K.A. Julia Trommershauser (Ed.).
9. Burr D., Gori M. Multisensory integration develops late in humans. Frontiers in the Neural Bases of Multisensory Processes 2011, Taylor & Francis Group. M.M.M.M.T. Wallace (Ed.).
10. Cressman E.K., Henriques D.Y. Sensory recalibration of hand position following visuomotor adaptation. Journal of Neurophysiology 2009, 102(6):3505-3518.
11. Efron B.T.,.R.J. An Introduction to the Bootstrap 1993, Chapman\& Hall, New York, NY.
12. Ernst M.O., Banks M.S. Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature 2002, 415(6870):429-433.
13. Finney E.M., Fine I., Dobkins K.R. Visual stimuli activate auditory cortex in the deaf. Nature Neuroscience 2001, 4(12):1171-1173.
14. Ghahramani Z., Wolpert D.M., Jordan M.I. Computational models of sensorimotor integration. Self-organization, Computational Maps and Motor Control 1997, 117-147. Elsevier Science Publ, Amsterdam. P. Sanguineti (Ed.).
15. Gori M., Del Viva M., Sandini G., Burr D. Young children do not integrate visual and haptic form information. Current Biology 2008, 18(9):694-698.
16. Gori M., Sandini G., Martinoli C., Burr D. Poor haptic orientation discrimination in nonsighted children may reflect disruption of cross-sensory calibration. Current Biology 2010, 20(3):223-225.
17. Gori, M., Sciutti, A., Burr, D., & Sandini, G. (2011). Direct and indirect haptic calibration of visual size judgments. art. no. e25599, PLoS ONE 6(10).
18. Gu Y., Angelaki D.E., Deangelis G.C. Neural correlates of multisensory cue integration in macaque MSTd. Nature Neuroscience 2008, 11(10):1201-1210.
19. Harris C.S. Perceptual adaptation to inverted, reversed, and displaced vision. Psychology Reviews 1965, 72(6):419-444.
20. Hillis J.M., Watt S.J., Landy M.S., Banks M.S. Slant from texture and disparity cues: optimal cue combination. Journal of Vision 2004, 4(12):967-992.
21. Hubel D.H., Wiesel T.N. Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex. Journal of Physiology (London) 1968, 195:215-243.
22. Knill D.C., Saunders J.A. Do humans optimally integrate stereo and texture information for judgments of surface slant?. Vision Research 2003, 43(24):2539-2558.
23. Kwan L., Regan D. Orientation-tuned spatial filters for texture-defined form. Vision Research 1998, 38(24):3849-3855.
24. Landy M.S., Banks M.S., Knill D.C. Ideal-observer models of cue integration. Book of Sensory Cue Integration 2011, Oxford University Press. K. Julia Trommershauser (Ed.).
25. Landy M.S., Kojima H. Ideal cue combination for localizing texture-defined edges. Journal of the Optical Society of America A: Optics, Image Science, and Vision 2001, 18(9):2307-2320.
26. Lessard N., Pare M., Lepore F., Lassonde M. Early-blind human subjects localize sound sources better than sighted subjects. Nature 1998, 395(6699):278-280.
27. Morrone M.C. Brain development: critical periods for cross-sensory plasticity. Current Biology 2010, 20(21):R934-936.
28. Muchnik C., Efrati M., Nemeth E., Malin M., Hildesheimer M. Central auditory skills in blind and sighted subjects. Scandinavian Audiology 1991, 20(1):19-112.
29. Noordzij M.L., Zuidhoek S., Postma A. The influence of visual experience on visual and spatial imagery. Perception 2007, 36(1):101-112.
30. Pasqualotto A., Newell F.N. The role of visual experience on the representation and updating of novel haptic scenes. Brain and Cognition 2007, 65(2):184-194.
31. Postma A., Zuidhoek S., Noordzij M.L., Kappers A.M. Haptic orientation perception benefits from visual experience: evidence from early-blind, late-blind, and sighted people. Perception Psychophysics 2008, 70(7):1197-1206.
32. Rauschecker J.P. Compensatory plasticity and sensory substitution in the cerebral cortex. Trends in Neuroscience 1995, 18(1):36-43.
33. Roder B., Teder-Salejarvi W., Sterr A., Rosler F., Hillyard S.A., Neville H.J. Improved auditory spatial tuning in blind humans. Nature 1999, 400(6740):162-166.
34. Sunanto J., Nakata H. Indirect tactual discrimination of heights by blind and blindfolded sighted subjects. Perceptual and Motor Skills 1998, 86(2):383-386.
35. Tassinari H., Hudson T.E., Landy M.S. Combining priors and noisy visual cues in a rapid pointing task. Journal of Neuroscience 2006, 26(40). 10154-1016.
36. Watson A.B., Pelli D.G. QUEST: a Bayesian adaptive psychometric method. Percept Psychophys 1983, 33(2):113-120.
37. Wozny D.R., Shams L. Recalibration of auditory space following milliseconds of cross-modal discrepancy. Journal Neuroscience 2011, 31(12):4607-4612.
38. Zaidel A., Turner A.H., Angelaki D.E. Multisensory calibration is independent of cue reliability. Journal of Neuroscience 2011, 31(39):13949-13962.