Direct and indirect haptic calibration of visual size judgments

PLoS ONE

Volumn 6, Issue 10, 2011, Pages

  Gori, Monica ^a   Sciutti, Alessandra ^a   Burr, David ^b,c   Sandini, Giulio ^a  

^a ISTITUTO ITALIANO DI TECNOLOGIA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORENCE   (Italy)

^c CNR Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KINEMATICS; MALE; OBJECT RELATION; PERCEPTION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; RETINA IMAGE; VISION; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; DECISION MAKING; PHYSIOLOGY; TOUCH;

ADULT; CALIBRATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MALE; SIZE PERCEPTION; TOUCH; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 80054083437     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025599     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Berkeley G, (1709, 1963) An essay towards a new theory of vision Indianapolis Bobbs-Merril.
2. Gregory RL, (1999) The 26th Bartlett Memorial Lecture. From Truths of Bartlett to Illusions of Vision. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 52A: 801-812.
3. Gregory RL, Wallace JG, (1963) Recovery from Early Blindness: A case Study. In: Gregory RL, editors. Concepts and Mechanisms of Perception London Duckworth pp. 65-129.
4. Carlson VR, (1962) Size-constancy judgments and perceptual compromise. J Exp Psychol 63: 68-73.
5. Holway AH, Boring EG, (1941) Determinants of apparent visual size with distance variant. The American Journal of Pshychology 54: 21-37.
6. Norman JF, Todd JT, Perotti VJ, Tittle JS, (1996) The visual perception of three dimensional lenght. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 22: 173.
7. Mon-Williams M, Bingham GP, (2007) Calibrating reach distance to visual targets. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 33: 645-656.
8. Adams WJ, Kerrigan IS, Graf EW, (2010) Efficient visual recalibration from either visual or haptic feedback: the importance of being wrong. J Neurosci 30: 14745-14749.
9. Coats R, Bingham GP, Mon-Williams M, (2008) Calibrating grasp size and reach distance: interactions reveal integral organization of reaching-to-grasp movements. Exp Brain Res 189: 211-220.
10. Gentilucci M, Daprati E, Toni I, Chieffi S, Saetti MC, (1995) Unconscious updating of grasp motor program. Exp Brain Res 105: 291-303.
11. Van Doorn GH, Richardson BL, Wuillemin DB, Symmons MA, (2010) Visual and haptic influence on perception of stimulus size. Atten Percept Psychophys 72: 813-822.
12. Bingham GP, Zaal F, Robin D, Shull JA, (2000) Distortions in definite distance and shape perception as measured by reaching without and with haptic feedback. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 26: 1436-1460.
13. Wijntjes MW, Volcic R, Pont SC, Koenderink JJ, Kappers AM, (2009) Haptic perception disambiguates visual perception of 3D shape. Exp Brain Res 193: 639-644.
14. Adams WJ, Banks MS, van Ee R, (2001) Adaptation to three-dimensional distortions in human vision. Nat Neurosci 4: 1063-1064.
15. Atkins JE, Fiser J, Jacobs RA, (2001) Experience-dependent visual cue integration based on consistencies between visual and haptic percepts. Vision Res 41: 449-461.
16. Atkins JE, Jacobs RA, Knill DC, (2003) Experience-dependent visual cue recalibration based on discrepancies between visual and haptic percepts. Vision Res 43: 2603-2613.
17. Ho YX, Serwe S, Trommershauser J, Maloney LT, Landy MS, (2009) The role of visuohaptic experience in visually perceived depth. J Neurophysiol 101: 2789-2801.
18. Ernst MO, Banks MS, Bulthoff HH, (2000) Touch can change visual slant perception. Nat Neurosci 3: 69-73.
19. Gori M, Del Viva MM, Sandini G, Burr DC, (2008) Young children do not integrate visual and haptic form information. Current Biology 18: 694-698.
20. Gori M, Sandini G, Martinoli C, Burr D, (2010) Poor haptic orientation discrimination in nonsighted children may reflect disruption of cross-sensory calibration. Curr Biol 20: 223-225.
21. Watson AB, Pelli DG, (1983) QUEST: a Bayesian adaptive psychometric method. Percept Psychophys 33: 113-120.
22. Efron B, Tibshirani RJ, (1993) An Introduction to the Bootstrap New York, NY Chapman & Hall.
23. Granrud CE, (2009) Development of size constancy in children: a test of the metacognitive theory. Atten Percept Psychophys 71: 644-654.
24. Granrud CE, Schmechel TT, (2006) Development of size constancy in children: a test of the proximal mode sensitivity hypothesis. Percept Psychophys 68: 1372-1381.
25. Jeannerod M, (1984) The timing of natural prehension movements. J Mot Behav 16: 235-254.
26. Marteniuk RG, Leavitt JL, MacKenzie CL, Athenes S, (1990) Functional relationships between grasp and transport components in a prehension task. Human Movement Science 9: 149-176.
27. Marteniuk RG, MacKenzie CL, Jeannerod M, Athenes S, Dugas C, (1987) Constraints on human arm movement trajectories. Can J Psychol 41: 365-378.
28. Gallese V, Fadiga L, Fogassi L, Rizzolatti G, (1996) Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain 119 (Pt 2): 593-609.
29. Rizzolatti G, Fadiga L, Gallese V, Fogassi L, (1996) Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 3: 131-141.
30. Fabbri-Destro M, Rizzolatti G, (2008) Mirror neurons and mirror systems in monkeys and humans. Physiology (Bethesda) 23: 171-179.
31. Cattaneo L, Rizzolatti G, (2009) The mirror neuron system. Arch Neurol 66: 557-560.
32. Aglioti S, DeSouza JF, Goodale MA, (1995) Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand. Curr Biol 5: 679-685.
33. Goodale MA, Pelisson D, Prablanc C, (1986) Large adjustments in visually guided reaching do not depend on vision of the hand or perception of target displacement. Nature 320: 748-750.
34. Casile A, Dayan E, Caggiano V, Hendler T, Flash T, et al. (2009) Neuronal encoding of human kinematic invariants during action observation. Cereb Cortex 20: 1647-1655.