Deep Learning Is Effective for Classifying Normal versus Age-Related Macular Degeneration OCT Images

Ophthalmology Retina

Volumn 1, Issue 4, 2017, Pages 322-327

  Lee, Cecilia S ^a   Baughman, Doug M ^a   Lee, Aaron Y ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85027881492     PISSN: None     EISSN: 24686530     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.oret.2016.12.009     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data: Physician and Other Supplier. https://www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Statistics-Trends-and-Reports/Medicare-Provider-Charge-Data/Physician-and-Other-Supplier.html. Accessed May 20, 2016.
2. Huang, D., Swanson, E.A., Lin, C.P., et al. Optical coherence tomography. Science 254 (1991), 1178–1181.
3. Stein, J.D., Hanrahan, B.W., Comer, G.M., Sloan, F.A., Diffusion of technologies for the care of older adults with exudative age-related macular degeneration. Am J Ophthalmol 155 (2013), 688–696.e2.
4. Keane, P.A., Patel, P.J., Liakopoulos, S., Heussen, F.M., Sadda, S.R., Tufail, A., Evaluation of age-related macular degeneration with optical coherence tomography. Surv Ophthalmol 57 (2012), 389–414.
5. Ilginis, T., Clarke, J., Patel, P.J., Ophthalmic imaging. Br Med Bull 111 (2014), 77–88.
6. Sayanagi, K., Sharma, S., Yamamoto, T., Kaiser, P.K., Comparison of spectral-domain versus time-domain optical coherence tomography in management of age-related macular degeneration with ranibizumab. Ophthalmology 116 (2009), 947–955.
7. Keane, P.A., Liakopoulos, S., Jivrajka, R.V., et al. Evaluation of optical coherence tomography retinal thickness parameters for use in clinical trials for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Invest Opthalmol Vis Sci 50 (2009), 3378–3385.
8. Reznicek, L., Muhr, J., Ulbig, M., et al. Visual acuity and central retinal thickness: fulfilment of retreatment criteria for recurrent neovascular AMD in routine clinical care. Br J Ophthalmol 98 (2014), 1333–1337.
9. Pron, G., Optical coherence tomography monitoring strategies for A-VEGF–treated age-related macular degeneration: an evidence-based analysis. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser 14:10 (2014), 1–64 [online] http://www.hqontario.ca/evidence/publications-and-ohtac-recommendations/ontario-health-technology-assessment-series/OCT-monitoring-strategies.
10. Smieliauskas, F., MacMahon, H., Salgia, R., Shih, Y.-C.T., Geographic variation in radiologist capacity and widespread implementation of lung cancer CT screening. J Med Screen 21 (2014), 207–215.
11. Van Ginneken, B., Schaefer-Prokop, C.M., Prokop, M., Computer-aided diagnosis: how to move from the laboratory to the clinic. Radiology 261 (2011), 719–732.
12. Lemaître, G., Rastgoo, M., Massich, J., et al. Classification of SD-OCT volumes using local binary patterns: experimental validation for DME detection. J Ophthalmol 2016 (2016), 1–14.
13. Srinivasan, P.P., Kim, L.A., Mettu, P.S., et al. Fully automated detection of diabetic macular edema and dry age-related macular degeneration from optical coherence tomography images. Biomed Opt Express 5 (2014), 3568–3577.
14. Liu, Y.-Y., Chen, M., Ishikawa, H., Wollstein, G., Schuman, J.S., Rehg, J.M., Automated macular pathology diagnosis in retinal OCT images using multi-scale spatial pyramid and local binary patterns in texture and shape encoding. Med Image Anal 15 (2011), 748–759.
15. Arel, I., Rose, D.C., Karnowski, T.P., Deep machine learning - a new frontier in artificial intelligence research [research frontier]. IEEE Comput Intell M 5 (2010), 13–18.
16. Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Hinton GE. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems; 2012:1097-1105. http://papers.nips.cc/paper/4824-imagenet-classification-w. Accessed October 20, 2016.
17. Zeiler MD, Fergus R. Visualizing and understanding convolutional networks. In: European Conference on Computer Vision.2014:818–833. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-10590-1_53. Accessed October 20, 2016.
18. Kavukcuoglu K, Sermanet P, Boureau Y-L, Gregor K, Mathieu M, Cun YL. Learning convolutional feature hierarchies for visual recognition. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems; 2010:1090-1098. http://papers.nips.cc/paper/4133-learning-convolutional-feature-hierarchies-for-visual-recognition. Accessed October 20, 2016.
19. Asaoka, R., Murata, H., Iwase, A., Araie, M., Detecting preperimetric glaucoma with standard automated perimetry using a deep learning classifier. Ophthalmology 123 (2016), 1974–1980.
20. Abràmoff, M.D., Lou, Y., Erginay, A., et al. Improved automated detection of diabetic retinopathy on a publicly available dataset through integration of deep learning. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 57 (2016), 5200–5206.
21. Gao, X., Lin, S., Wong, T.Y., Automatic feature learning to grade nuclear cataracts based on deep learning. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 62 (2015), 2693–2701.
22. Prentašic, P., Heisler, M., Mammo, Z., et al. Segmentation of the foveal microvasculature using deep learning networks. J Biomed Opt, 21, 2016, 075008.
23. Simonyan K, Zisserman A. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. ArXiv:1409.1556. 2014. http://arxiv.org/abs/1409.1556. Accessed October 20, 2016.
24. Glorot, X., Bengio, Y., Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks. Aistats, 9, 2010, 249–256 Accessed October 20, 2016 http://www.jmlr.org/proceedings/papers/v9/glorot10a/glorot10a.pdf?hc_location=ufi.