Origins of coevolution between residues distant in protein 3D structures

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 114, Issue 34, 2017, Pages 9122-9127

  Anishchenko, Ivan ^a,b   Ovchinnikov, Sergey ^a,b   Kamisetty, Hetunandan ^c   Baker, David ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^c FACEBOOK   (United States)

Author keywords

Homo oligomeric contacts; Protein coevolution; Structural variation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COEVOLUTION; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FAMILY; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; BINDING SITE; CHEMISTRY; GENETICS; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MOLECULAR MODEL; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN MULTIMERIZATION; X RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHY;

AMINO ACID; PROTEIN; PROTEIN BINDING;

AMINO ACIDS; BINDING SITES; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, X-RAY; DATABASES, PROTEIN; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN DOMAINS; PROTEIN MULTIMERIZATION; PROTEINS;

EID: 85027835659     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1702664114     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Morcos F, et al. (2011) Direct-coupling analysis of residue coevolution captures native contacts across many protein families. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:E1293–E1301.
2. Kamisetty H, Ovchinnikov S, Baker D (2013) Assessing the utility of coevolution-based residue-residue contact predictions in a sequence- and structure-rich era. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:15674–15679.
3. Jones DT, Buchan DWA, Cozzetto D, Pontil M (2012) PSICOV: Precise structural contact prediction using sparse inverse covariance estimation on large multiple sequence alignments. Bioinformatics 28:184–190.
4. Ekeberg M, Lövkvist C, Lan Y, Weigt M, Aurell E (2013) Improved contact prediction in proteins: Using pseudolikelihoods to infer Potts models. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys 87:012707.
5. Marks DS, et al. (2011) Protein 3D structure computed from evolutionary sequence variation. PLoS One 6:e28766.
6. Ovchinnikov S, et al. (2015) Large-scale determination of previously unsolved protein structures using evolutionary information. eLife 4:e09248.
7. Sułkowska JI, Morcos F, Weigt M, Hwa T, Onuchic JN (2012) Genomics-aided structure prediction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:10340–10345.
8. Hayat S, Sander C, Marks DS, Elofsson A (2015) All-atom 3D structure prediction of transmembrane β-barrel proteins from sequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112: 5413–5418.
9. Hopf TA, et al. (2012) Three-dimensional structures of membrane proteins from genomic sequencing. Cell 149:1607–1621.
10. Burger L, van Nimwegen E (2008) Accurate prediction of protein-protein interactions from sequence alignments using a Bayesian method. Mol Syst Biol 4:165.
11. Ovchinnikov S, Kamisetty H, Baker D (2014) Robust and accurate prediction of residue-residue interactions across protein interfaces using evolutionary information. eLife 3:e02030.
12. Hopf TA, et al. (2014) Sequence co-evolution gives 3D contacts and structures of protein complexes. eLife 3: 10.7554/eLife.03430.
13. Bitbol A-F, Dwyer RS, Colwell LJ, Wingreen NS (2016) Inferring interaction partners from protein sequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113:12180–12185.
14. Tang Y, et al. (2015) Protein structure determination by combining sparse NMR data with evolutionary couplings. Nat Methods 12:751–754.
15. Toth-Petroczy A, et al. (2016) Structured states of disordered proteins from genomic sequences. Cell 167:158–170.e12.
16. Dago AE, et al. (2012) Structural basis of histidine kinase autophosphorylation deduced by integrating genomics, molecular dynamics, and mutagenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:E1733–E1742.
17. Schug A, Weigt M, Onuchic JN, Hwa T, Szurmant H (2009) High-resolution protein complexes from integrating genomic information with molecular simulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:22124–22129.
18. dos Santos RN, Morcos F, Jana B, Andricopulo AD, Onuchic JN (2015) Dimeric interactions and complex formation using direct coevolutionary couplings. Sci Rep 5:13652.
19. Weigt M, White RA, Szurmant H, Hoch JA, Hwa T (2009) Identification of direct residue contacts in protein-protein interaction by message passing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:67–72.
20. Süel GM, Lockless SW, Wall MA, Ranganathan R (2003) Evolutionarily conserved networks of residues mediate allosteric communication in proteins. Nat Struct Biol 10: 59–69.
21. Noivirt-Brik O, Horovitz A, Unger R (2009) Trade-off between positive and negative design of protein stability: From lattice models to real proteins. PLOS Comput Biol 5:e1000592.
22. Jacob E, Unger R, Horovitz A (2015) Codon-level information improves predictions of inter-residue contacts in proteins by correlated mutation analysis. eLife 4:e08932.
23. Wollenberg KR, Atchley WR (2000) Separation of phylogenetic and functional associations in biological sequences by using the parametric bootstrap. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:3288–3291.
24. Tillier ERM, Lui TWH (2003) Using multiple interdependency to separate functional from phylogenetic correlations in protein alignments. Bioinformatics 19:750–755.
25. Espada R, Parra RG, Mora T, Walczak AM, Ferreiro DU (2015) Capturing coevolutionary signals inrepeat proteins. BMC Bioinformatics 16:207.
26. Rose PW, et al. (2015) The RCSB Protein Data Bank: Views of structural biology for basic and applied research and education. Nucleic Acids Res 43:D345–D356.
27. Sutto L, Marsili S, Valencia A, Gervasio FL (2015) From residue coevolution to protein conformational ensembles and functional dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112: 13567–13572.
28. Tyrrell R, et al. (1997) The structure of the cofactor-binding fragment of the LysR family member, CysB: A familiar fold with a surprising subunit arrangement. Structure 5:1017–1032.
29. Boyaci H, et al. (2016) Structure, regulation, and inhibition of the quorum-sensing signal integrator LuxO. PLoS Biol 14:e1002464.
30. Yang M, et al. (2015) Unraveling cholesterol catabolism in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: ChsE4-ChsE5 α2β2 Acyl-CoA dehydrogenase initiates β-oxidation of 3-Oxo-cholest-4-en-26-oyl CoA. ACS Infect Dis 1:110–125.
31. Keatinge-Clay AT, Maltby DA, Medzihradszky KF, Khosla C, Stroud RM (2004) An antibiotic factory caught in action. Nat Struct Mol Biol 11:888–893.
32. Lockless SW, Ranganathan R (1999) Evolutionarily conserved pathways of energetic connectivity in protein families. Science 286:295–299.
33. Reynolds KA, McLaughlin RN, Ranganathan R (2011) Hot spots for allosteric regulation on protein surfaces. Cell 147:1564–1575.
34. Novinec M, et al. (2014) A novel allosteric mechanism in the cysteine peptidase cathepsin K discovered by computational methods. Nat Commun 5:3287.
35. Wang G, Dunbrack RL, Jr (2005) PISCES: Recent improvements to a PDB sequence culling server. Nucleic Acids Res 33(Web Server issue):W94–W98.
36. Berman HM, et al. (2000) The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res 28:235–242.
37. Remmert M, Biegert A, Hauser A, Söding J (2011) HHblits: Lightning-fast iterative protein sequence searching by HMM-HMM alignment. Nat Methods 9:173–175.
38. Magrane M; UniProt Consortium (2011) UniProt Knowledgebase: A hub of integrated protein data. Database (Oxford) 2011:bar009.
39. Balakrishnan S, Kamisetty H, Carbonell JG, Lee S-I, Langmead CJ (2011) Learning generative models for protein fold families. Proteins 79:1061–1078.
40. Dunn SD, Wahl LM, Gloor GB (2008) Mutual information without the influence of phylogeny or entropy dramatically improves residue contact prediction. Bioinformatics 24:333–340.