Dominance and leadership in research activities: Collaboration between countries of differing human development is reflected through authorship order and designation as corresponding authors in scientific publications

PLoS ONE

Volumn 12, Issue 8, 2017, Pages

  González Alcaide, Gregorio ^a   Park, Jinseo ^b   Huamaní, Charles ^c   Ramos, José M ^d,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

^b Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information (KISTI)   (South Korea)

^c HOSPITAL NACIONAL GUILLERMO ALMENARA IRIGOYEN   (Peru)

^d MIGUEL HERNÁNDEZ UNIVERSITY   (Spain)

^e HOSPITAL GENERAL UNIVERSITARIO DE ALICANTE   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUTHOR; BRAZIL; CHINA; COOPERATION; DOMINANCE BEHAVIOR; ECONOMIC ASPECT; EUROPE; FEMALE; HIGH HUMAN DEVELOPMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN DEVELOPMENT; HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INDEX; INFECTION; INTERSECTORAL COLLABORATION; LEADERSHIP; LOW HUMAN DEVELOPMENT; MALE; MEDIUM HUMAN DEVELOPMENT; PARASITOLOGY; PEDIATRICS; PUBLICATION; SOCIAL NETWORK; TROPICAL MEDICINE; UNITED KINGDOM; UNITED STATES; VERY HIGH HUMAN DEVELOPMENT; WRITING; DEVELOPED COUNTRY; DEVELOPING COUNTRY; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; PEER PRESSURE; PUBLISHING; SOCIAL DOMINANCE;

AUTHORSHIP; DEVELOPED COUNTRIES; DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; HUMANS; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; LEADERSHIP; PEER INFLUENCE; PUBLISHING; SOCIAL DOMINANCE;

EID: 85027187109     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182513     Document Type: Article

References (92)

1. Chetwood JD, Ladep NG, Taylor-Robinson SD. Research partnerships between high and low-income countries: are international partnerships always a good thing? BMC Med Ethics. 2015; 16:36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-015-0030-z PMID: 26017015
2. Global Forum for Health Research. (2004). The 10/90 report on health research, 2003–2004. Geneva: Global Forum for Health Research; 2004.
3. Volmink J, Dare L. Addressing inequalities in research capacity in Africa: All sides in partnerships must ensure that research aims to improve the health of all. BMJ. 2005; 331(7519):705–6.
4. Keiser J, Utzinger J, Tanner M, Singer BH. Representation of authors and editors from countries with different human development indexes in the leading literature on tropical medicine: survey of current evidence. BMJ. 2004; 328:1229–32. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38069.518137.F6 PMID: 15059851
5. Phillips K, Kohler JC, Pennefather P, Thorsteinsdottir H, Wong J. Canada’s neglected tropical disease research network: Who’s in the core—who’s on the periphery? PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013; 7:e2568. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0002568 PMID: 24340113
6. Bošnjak L, Marušić A. Prescribed practices of authorship: review of codes of ethics from professional bodies and journal guidelines across disciplines. Scientometrics. 2012; 93:751–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0773-y
7. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) (2016). Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors; 2016. http://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf.
8. Hwang SS, Song HH, Baik JH, Jung SL, Park SH, Choi KH, et al. Researcher contributions and fulfillment of ICMJE authorship criteria: analysis of author contribution lists in research articles with multiple authors published in radiology. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Radiology. 2003; 226:16–23.
9. Šupak-Smolčić V, Mlinarić A, Antončić D, Horvat M, Omazić J, Šimundić AM. ICMJE authorship criteria are not met in a substantial proportion of manuscripts submitted to Biochemia Medica. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2015; 25:324–34. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2015.033 PMID: 26526700
10. Cronin B. Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 2001; 52:515–603. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.1097
11. Al-Herz W, Haider H, Al-Bahhar M, Sadeq A. Honorary authorship in biomedical journals: how common is it and why does it exist? J Med Ethics. 2015; 40:346–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2012-101311 PMID: 23955369
12. Avula J, Avula H. Authors, authorship order, the moving finger writes. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2015; 19:258–62. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-124X.145782 PMID: 26229263
13. Baerlocher MO, Newton M, Gautam T, Tomlinson G, Detsky AS. The meaning of author order in medical research. J Investig Med. 2007; 55:174–80. https://doi.org/10.2310/6650.2007.06044 PMID: 17651671
14. Bhandari M, Guyatt GH, Kulkarni AV, Devereaux PJ, Leece P, Bajammal S, et al. Perceptions of authors’ contributions are influenced by both byline order and designation of corresponding author. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014; 67:1049–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.04.006 PMID: 24973824
15. Burrows S, Moore M. Trends in authorship order in biomedical research publications. J Elec Res Med Lib. 2011; 8:155–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/15424065.2011.576613
16. Gonzalez-Block MA. The state of international collaboration for health systems research: What do publications tell? Health Res Policy Syst. 2006; 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-4-7 PMID: 16928275
17. Wager E. Recognition, reward and responsibility: why the authorship of scientific papers matters. Maturitas. 2009; 62:109–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2008.12.001 PMID: 19147308
18. Abramo G, d’Angelo CA, Rosati F. Measuring institutional research productivity for the life sciences: the importance of accounting for the order of authors in the byline. Scientometrics. 2013; 97:779–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1013-9
19. Mattsson P, Sundberg CJ, Laget P. Is correspondence reflected in the author position? A bibliometric study of the relation between corresponding author and byline position. Scientometrics. 2011; 87: 99–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0310-9
20. Kim KW. Measuring international research collaboration of peripheral countries: taking the context into consideration. Scientometrics. 2006; 66:231–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0017-0
21. Schubert T, Sooryamoorthy R. Can the centre–periphery model explain patterns of international scientific collaboration among threshold and industrialised countries? The case of South Africa and Germany. Scientometrics. 2010; 83:181–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0074-2
22. Filardo G, da Graca B, Sass DM, Pollock BD, Smith EB, Martinez MA. Trends comparison of female first authorship in high impact medical journals: and observational study (1994–2014). BMJ. 2016; 352: i847. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i847 PMID: 26935100
23. Schrager S, Bouwkamp C, Mundt M. Gender and first authorship of papers in family medicine journals 2006–2008. Fam Med. 2011; 43:155–9. PMID: 21380946
24. Abramo G, d’Angelo CA, Rosati F. The importance of accounting for the number of co-authors and their order when assessing research performance at the individual level in the life sciences. Journal of Informetrics. 2013; 7:198–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2012.11.003
25. Abambres M, Arab P. Citation indexes accounting for authorship order in coauthored research: review and new proposal. Science & Technology Libraries. 2016; 35:263–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/0194262X.2016.1242450
26. Gregori Júnior F, de Godoy MF, Gregori FF. Proposal of an individual scientometric index with emphasis on ponderation of the effective contribution of the first author: h-fac índex. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 2012; 27:370–6. https://doi.org/10.5935/1678-9741.20120064 PMID: 23288177
27. Annunziata S., Giordano A. Authorship problems in scientific literature and in nuclear medicine: the point of view of the young researcher. Eur J Nuclear Medicine Mol Imaging. 2014; 41:1251–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-014-2755-1 PMID: 24668278
28. Adam T, Ahmad S, Bigdeli M, Ghaffar A, Røttingen JA. Trends in health policy and systems research over the past decade: Still too little capacity in low-income countries. PLoS One. 2011; 6:e27263. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027263 PMID: 22132094
29. Keiser J, Utzinger J. Trends in the core literature on tropical medicine: a bibliometric analysis from 1952–2002. Scientometrics. 2005; 62:351–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-005-0027-3
30. Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 301 acute and chronic diseases and injuries in 188 countries, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2015; 386:743–800. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60692-4 PMID: 26063472
31. Stevens P. Diseases of poverty and the 10/90 Gap. London: International Policy Network; 2004.
32. World Health Organization. Sustaining the drive to overcome the global impact of neglected tropical diseases: second WHO report on neglected diseases. Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2013.
33. World Health Organization. State of inequality: reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health. Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2015.
34. UNdata (2016). United Nations Statistics Division. Composition of macro geographical (continental) regions, geographical sub-regions, and selected economic and other groupings. http://unstats.un.org/unsd/methods/m49/m49regin.htm.
35. Bliziotis IA, Paraschakis K, Vergidis PI, Karavasiou AI, Falagas ME. Worldwide trends in quantity and quality of published articles in the field of infectious diseases. BMC Infectious Diseases. 2005; 5:16. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-5-16 PMID: 15780136
36. Falagas ME, Papastamataki PA, Bliziotis IA. A bibliometric analysis of research productivity in Parasitology by different world regions during a 9-year period (1995–2003). BMC Infect Dis. 2006; 6:56. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-6-56 PMID: 16545114
37. González-Alcaide G, Huamaní C, Park J, Ramos JM. Evolution of coauthorship networks: worldwide scientific production on leishmaniasis. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2013; 46:719–27. https://doi.org/10.1590/0037-8682-0207-2013 PMID: 24474013
38. González-Alcaide G, Park J, Huamaní C, Gascón J, Ramos Rincón JM. Scientific authorships and collaboration network analysis on Chagas disease: papers indexed in PubMed (1940–2009). Rev Inst Med Trop São Paulo 2012; 54:219–28. PMID: 22850995
39. Huamaní C, Romaní F, González-Alcaide G, Mejía MO, Ramos JM, Espinoza M, et al. South American collaboration in scientific publications on leishmaniasis: bibliometric analysis in Scopus (2000–2011). Rev Inst Med Trop São Paulo. 2014; 56:381–90. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0036-46652014000500003PMID: 25229217
40. Ramos JM, González-Alcaide G, Bolaños-Pizarro M. Bibliometric analysis of leishmaniasis research in Medline (1945–2010). Parasit Vectors 2013; 6:55. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-6-55 PMID: 23497410
41. Ramos JM, González-Alcaide G, Gascón J, Gutiérrez F. Mapping of Chagas disease research: analysis of publications in the period between 1940 and 2009. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2011; 44:708–16. PMID: 22094704
42. Berger WH, Parker FL. Diversity of planktonic foraminifera in deep-sea sediments. Science. 1970; 168:1345–7. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.168.3937.1345 PMID: 17731043
43. Stirling A. On the economics and analysis of diversity. Working Paper. Brighton: University of Sussex; 1998.
44. Chersich MF, Blaauw D, Dumbaugh M, Penn-Kekana L, Dhana A, Thwala S, et al. Local and foreign authorship of maternal health interventional research in low- and middle-income countries: systematic mapping of publications 2000–2012. Global Health. 2016; 12:35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-016-0172-x PMID: 27338707
45. Uthman OA, Wiysonge CS, Ota MO, Nicol M, Hussey GD, Ndumbe PM, et al. Increasing the value of health research in the WHO African Region beyond 2015—reflecting on the past, celebrating the present and building the future: a bibliometric analysis. BMJ Open. 2015; 5:e006340. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006340 PMID: 25770227
46. Falagas ME, Panos G. Implications of findings of bibliometric analyses in parasitology. Trends Parasitol. 2007; 23:12–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2006.10.004 PMID: 17112782
47. World Bank Group (2016). World Bank Country and Lending Groups. http://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/articles/906519-world-bank-country-and-lending-groups.
48. Wong JC, Fernandes KA, Amin S, Lwin Z, Krzyzanowska MK. Involvement of low- and middle-income countries in randomized controlled trial publications in oncology. Global Health. 2014; 10:83. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-014-0083-7 PMID: 25498958
49. Røttingen JA, Regmi S, Eide M, Young AJ, Viergever RF, Ardal C, et al. Mapping of available health research and development data: what’s there, what’s missing, and what role is there for a global observatory. Lancet. 2013; 382:1286–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61046-6 PMID: 23697824
50. Smith E, Hunt M, Master Z. Authorship ethics in global health research partnerships between researchers from low or middle income countries and high income countries. BMC Med Ethics. 2014; 15:42. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-15-42 PMID: 24885855
51. Rohra DK. Representation of less-developed countries in Pharmacology journals: an online survey of corresponding authors. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011; 11:60. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-60 PMID: 21545706
52. Yousefi-Nooraie R, Shakiba B, Mortaz-Hejri S. Country development and manuscript selection bias: a review of published studies. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006; 6:37. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-6-37 PMID: 16879753
53. Persson O, Glänzel W, Danell R. Inflationary bibliometric values: The role of scientific collaboration and the need for relative indicators in evaluative studies. Scientometrics. 2004; 60:421–32. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000034384.35498.7d
54. Leydesdorff L, Wagner CS. International collaboration in science and the formation of a core group. Journal of Informetrics. 2008; 2:317–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2008.07.003
55. Wagner CS, Leydesdorff L. Network structure, self-organization, and the growth of international collaboration in science. Res Policy. 2005; 34:1608–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.08.002
56. Zhou P, Glänzel W. In-depth analysis on China’s international cooperation in science. Scientometrics. 2010; 82:597–612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0174-z
57. Chinchilla-Rodríguez Z, Benavent-Pérez M, de Moya-Anegón F. International collaboration in medical research in Latin America and the Caribbean (2003–2007). J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 2012; 63:2223–38. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22669
58. Katz JS. Geographical proximity and scientific collaboration. Scientometrics. 1994; 31:31–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02018100
59. Melin G. Impact of national size on research collaboration: A comparison between European and American universities. Scientometrics. 1999; 46:161–70.
60. Glänzel W, Leta J, Thijs B. Science in Brazil. Part 1: A macro-level comparative study. Scientometrics. 2006; 67:67–86. https://doi.org/10.1556/Scient.67.2006.1.5
61. Leta J, Chaimovich H. Recognition and international collaboration: the Brazilian case. Scientometrics. 2002; 53:325–35. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014868928349
62. Zhou P, Leydesdorff L. The emergence of China as a leading nation in science. Res Policy. 2006; 35:83–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.08.006
63. Wang X, Xu S, Wang Z, Peng L, Wang C. International scientific collaboration of China: collaborating countries, institutions and individuals. Scientometrics. 2013; 95:885–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11192-012-0877-4
64. Bornmann L, Wagner C, Leydesdorff L. BRICS countries and scientific excellence: A bibliometric analysis of most frequently cited papers. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol. 2015; 66:1507–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23333
65. Kozak M, Bornmann L, & Leydesdorff L. How have the Eastern European countries of the former Warsaw Pact developed since 1990? A bibliometric study. Scientometrics. 2015; 102:1101–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1439-8 PMID: 25632165
66. Adams J, Gurney K, Hook D, Leydesdorff L. International collaboration clusters in Africa. Scientometrics. 2014; 98:547–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1060-2
67. Zdravkovic M, Chiwona-Karltun L, Zink E. Experiences and perceptions of South–South and North–South scientific collaboration of mathematicians, physicists and chemists from five southern African universities. Scientometrics. 2016; 108:717–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1989-z
68. Zbar A, Frank E. Significance of authorship position: an open-ended international assessment. Am J Med Sci. 2011; 341:106–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAJ.0b013e3181f683a1 PMID: 20924283
69. Conte ML, Maat SL, Omary MB. Increased co-first authorships in biomedical and clinical publications: a call for recognition. Faseb J. 2013; 27:3902–4. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.13-235630 PMID: 23839935
70. Tscharntke T, Hochberg ME, Rand TA, Resh VH, Krauss J. Author sequence and credit for contributions in multiauthored publications. PLoS Biol. 2007; 5:e18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio. 0050018 PMID: 17227141
71. Sholapurkar AA. Ethical guidelines deciding the authorship. Indian J Dent Res. 2010; 21:315. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-9290.70781 PMID: 20930334
72. Tahamtan I, Safipour Afshar A, Ahamdzadeh K. Factors affecting number of citations: a comprehensive review of the literature. Scientometrics. 2016; 107:1195–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1889-2
73. Meneghini R, Packer AL, Nassi-Calò L. Articles by Latin American authors in prestigious journals have fewer citations. PLoS One. 2008; 3:e3804. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003804 PMID: 19030227
74. Akre O, Barone-Adesi F, Pettersson A, Pearce N, Merletti F, Richiardi L. Differences in citation rates by country of origin for papers published in top-ranked medical journals: do they reflect inequalities in access to publication? J Epidemiol Community Health. 2011; 65:119–23. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2009.088690 PMID: 19934169
75. Harris M, Macinko J, Jiménez G, Mahfoud M, Anderson C. Does a research article’s country of origin affect perception of its quality and relevance? A national trial of US public health researchers. BMC Open. 2015; 5:e008993. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008993 PMID: 26719313
76. The PLoS Medicine Editors (2006) The Impact Factor Game. PLoS Med 3:e291. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0030291 PMID: 16749869
77. Vasconcelos S, Sorenson MM, Leta J, Sant’Ana MC, Batista PD. Researchers’ writing competence: A bottleneck in the publication of Latin-American science? EMBO Report. 2008; 9:700–2. https://doi.org/10.1038/embor.2008.143 PMID: 18670438
78. Glänzel W. National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship. Scientometrics. 2001; 51:69–115. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010512628145
79. Katz JS, Hicks D. How much is a collaboration worth? A calibrated bibliometric model. Scientometrics. 1997; 40:541–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02459299
80. Katz JS, Martin BR. What is research collaboration? Res Policy. 1997; 26:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(96)00917-1
81. Persson O. Are highly cited papers more international? Scientometrics. 2010; 83:397–401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0007-0
82. Confraria H, Godinho MM. The impact of African science: A bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics. 2015; 102:1241–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1463-8
83. Confraria H, Godinho MM, Wang L. Determinants of citation impact: A comparative analysis of the Global South versus the Global North. Res Policy. 2017; 46:265–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.11.004
84. Laudel G. Collaboration and reward: What do we measure by co-authorships? Res Eval. 2002; 11: 3–15.
85. Dahdouh-Guebas F, Ahimbisibwe J, Van Moll R, Koedam N. Neo-colonial science by the most industrialised upon the least developed countries in peer-reviewed publishing. Scientometrics. 2003; 56: 329–43. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022374703178
86. McCoy D, Mwansambo C, Costello A, Khan A. Academic partnerships between rich and poor countries. Lancet. 2008; 371:1055–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60466-3 PMID: 18374827
87. Sewankambo N, Tumwine JK, Tomson G, Obua C, Bwanga F, Waiswa P, et al. Enabling dynamic partnerships through joint degrees between low- and high-income countries for capacity development in global health research: experience from the Karolinska Institutet/Makerere University partnership. PLoS Med. 2015; 12:e1001784. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001784 PMID: 25646629
88. Gotuzzo E, González E, Verdonck K. Researchers training in the context of the collaborative projects: experiences of Instituto de Medicina Tropical “Alexander von Humbolt”, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia. Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica. 2010; 27:419–27. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1726-46342010000300015 PMID: 21152735
89. Ijsselmuiden C, Marais DL, Becerra-Posada F, Ghannem H. Africa’s neglected area of human resources for health research—the way forward. S Afr Med J. 2012; 102:228–33. PMID: 22464504
90. Whitworth J, Sewankambo NK, Snewin VA. Improving implementation: building research capacity in maternal, neonatal, and child health in Africa. PLoS Med. 2010; 7:e1000299. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000299 PMID: 20625547
91. Liese BH, Houghton N, Teplitskaya L. Development assistance for neglected tropical diseases: Progress since 2009. International Health. 2014; 6:162–71. https://doi.org/10.1093/inthealth/ihu052 PMID: 25096331
92. Singh D. Publication bias- a reason for the decreased research output in developing countries. S Afr Psychiatry Rev. 2006; 9:153–5. https://doi.org/10.4314/ajpsy.v9i3.30216