In-depth analysis on China's international cooperation in science

Scientometrics

Volumn 82, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 597-612

  Zhou, Ping ^a,b   Glänzel, Wolfgang ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b INSTITUTE OF SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL INFORMATION OF CHINA   (China)

^c INSTITUTE OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE   (Hungary)

Author keywords

China; International collaboration; Subject normalisation; Subject profiles

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952063986     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-010-0174-z     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Braun, T., & Glänzel, W. (1990). United Germany: The new scientific superpower? Scientometrics, 19(5-6), 513-521.
2. Braun, T., Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (1985). Scientometric indicators. A 32-country comparison of publication productivity and citation impact. World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., Singapore, Philadelphia, 424 pp.
3. Frame, J. D. (1977). Mainstream research in Latin America and the Caribbean. Interciencia, 2, 143-148.
4. Glänzel, W. (2000). Science in Scandinavia: A bibliometric approach. Scientometrics, 48(2), 121-150.
5. Glänzel, W. (2001). National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship. Scientometrics, 51(1), 69-115.
6. Glänzel, W. (2008). Turkey on the way to the European Union? On a scientific power rising next door. ISSI Newsletter, 4(1), 10-17.
7. Glänzel, W., Danell, R., & Persson, O. (2003). The decline of Swedish neuroscience-Decomposing a bibliometric national science indicator. Scientometrics, 57(2), 197-213.
8. Glänzel, W., Debackere, K., & Meyer, M. (2008). 'Triad' or 'Tetrad'? On global changes in a dynamic world. Scientometrics, 74(1), 71-88.
9. Glänzel, W., Leta, J., & Thijs, B. (2006). Science in Brazil. Part 1: A macro-level comparative study. Scientometrics, 67(1), 67-85.
10. Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2001). Double effort = double impact? A critical view at international co-authorship in chemistry. Scientometrics, 50(2), 199-214.
11. Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2003). A new classification scheme of science fields and subfields designed for scientometric evaluation purposes. Scientometrics, 56(3), 357-367.
12. Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2004). Analyzing scientific networks through co-authorship. In H. F. M. Moed, W. Glänzel, & U. Schmoch (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research. The use of publication and patent statistics in studies on S& T systems (pp. 257-276). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
13. Kostoff, R. N., Briggs, M. B., Rushenberg, R. L., Christine, A., Bowles, C. A., Alan, S., et al. (2007). Chinese science and technology-Structure and infrastructure. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 74, 1539-1573.
14. Leta, J., Glänzel, W., & Thijs, B. (2006). Science in Brazil. Part 2: Sectoral and institutional research profiles. Scientometrics, 67(1), 87-105.
15. Leydesdorff, L., & Zhou, P. (2005). Are the contributions of China and Korea upsetting the world system of science? Scientometrics, 63(3), 617-630.
16. Moed, H. F., De Bruin, R. E., & van Leeuwen, T. H. N. (1995). New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance: Database description, overview of indicatiors and first applications. Scientometrics, 33, 381-442.
17. O'Neill, J. (2005). Attention Europe: The BRICs are coming!. Internationale Politik, 60(5), 78-79.
18. REIST-2. (1997). The European Report on Science and Technology Indicators 1997. EUR 17639. European Commission, Brussels.
19. Rousseau, R. (2008). Triad or Tetrad: Another representation. ISSI Newsletter, 4(1), 5-7.
20. Schubert, A., & Braun, T. (1990). World flash on basic research: International collaboration in the sciences, 1981-1985. Scientometrics, 19, 3-10.
21. Zanotto, E. D. (2002). Scientific and technological development in Brazil. The widening gap. Scientometrics, 55(3), 411-419.
22. Zhou, P., & Leydesdorff, L. (2006). The emergence of China as a leading nation in science. Research Policy, 35(1), 83-104.
23. Zhou, P., & Leydesdorff, L. (2008). China ranks second in scientific publications since 2006. ISSI Newsletter, 4(1), 7-9.
24. Zhou, P., Thijs, B., & Glänzel, W. (2009). Is China also becoming a giant in social sciences? Scientometrics, 79(3), 593-621.
25. Zitt, M., Thèves, J., Laurens, P., Ramanana-Rahary, S., Bassecaulard, E., & Filliatreau, G. (2006). Assessing international visibility of nations in science: Citations performances of large emerging actors (BRIC). Poster presented at the 9th Science & Technology Indicators Conference, 7-9 September, Leuven (Belgium).