The importance of accounting for the number of co-authors and their order when assessing research performance at the individual level in the life sciences

Journal of Informetrics

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 198-208

  Abramo, Giovanni ^a,b   D'Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea ^b   Rosati, Francesco ^b  

^a CNR   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ROME TOR VERGATA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Bibliometrics; Biology; Co authorship; Fractional counting; Medicine; Research evaluation

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGY; MEDICINE;

ACCURATE MEASUREMENT; BIBLIOMETRICS; COAUTHORSHIP; EVALUATION METHODS; FRACTIONAL COUNTING; RESEARCH EVALUATION; RESEARCH PERFORMANCE; RESEARCH PRODUCTIVITY;

RESEARCH;

EID: 84875255213     PISSN: 17511577     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2012.11.003     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Abramo G., D'Angelo C.A. National-scale research performance assessment at the individual level. Scientometrics 2011, 86(2):347-364.
2. Abramo G., D'Angelo C.A., Di Costa F. Assessment of sectoral aggregation distortion in research productivity measurements. Research Evaluation 2008, 17(2):111-121.
3. Abramo G., D'Angelo C.A., Di Costa F. Research productivity: Are higher academic ranks more productive than lower ones?. Scientometrics 2011, 88(3):915-928.
4. Batista P.D., Campiteli M.G., Kinouchi O., Martinez A.S. Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests?. Scientometrics 2006, 68:179-189.
5. Bhandari M., Einhorn T.A., Swiontkowski M.F., Heckman J.D. Who did what?. (Mis) perceptions about authors' contributions to scientific articles based on order of authorship. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - American Volume 2003, 85A(8):1605-1609.
6. Carbone V. Fractional Counting of Authorship to Quantify Scientific Research Output 2011, arXiv,1106.0114.
7. D'Angelo C.A., Giuffrida C., Abramo G. A heuristic approach to author name disambiguation in large-scale bibliometric databases. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2011, 62(2):257-269.
8. Egghe L. Theory and practise of the g-index. Scientometrics 2006, 69(1):131-152.
9. Egghe L. Mathematical theory of the h- and g-index in case of fractional counting of authorship. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2008, 59(10):1608-1616.
10. He B., Ding Y., Yan E.J. Mining patterns of author orders in scientific publications. Journal of Informetrics 2012, 6(3):359-367.
11. Hirsch J.E. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 2005, 102:16569-16572.
12. Laurance W.F. Second thoughts on who goes where in author lists. Nature 2006, 442:26.
13. Lukovits I., Vinkler P. Correct credit distribution: A model for sharing credit among coauthors. Social Indicators Research 1995, 36(1):91-98.
14. Lundberg J. Lifting the crown-citation z-score. Journal of Informetrics 2007, 1(2):145-154.
15. Opthof T., Leydesdorff L. Caveats for the journal and field normalizations in the CWTS (" Leiden" ) evaluations of research performance. Journal of Informetrics 2010, 4(3):423-430.
16. Schreiber M. A case study of the modified hirsch index h(m) accounting for multiple coauthors. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2009, 60(6):1274-1282.
17. Schreiber M. How to modify the g-index for multi-authored manuscripts. Journal of Informetrics 2010, 4(1):42-54.
18. Trueba F.J., Guerrero H. A robust formula to credit authors for their publications. Scientometrics 2004, 60(2):181-204.
19. Van Hooydonk G. Fractional counting of multiauthored publications: Consequences for the impact of authors. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1997, 48(10):944-945.
20. Verhagen J.V., Wallace K.J., Collins S.C., Thomas T.R. QUAD system offers fair shares to all authors. Nature 2003, 426:602.
21. Vinkler P. Evaluation of the publication activity of research teams by means of scientometric indicators. Current Science 2000, 79:602-612.
22. Vinkler P. The case of scientometricians with the " absolute relative" impact indicator. Journal of Informetrics 2012, 6(2):254-264.
23. Wan J.K., Hua P.H., Rousseau R. The pure h-index: Calculating an author's h- index by taking co-authors into account. Collnet 2008, 17. retrieved from: , Last Accessed 10.12.
24. Zuckerman H.A. Patterns of name ordering among authors of scientific papers: A study of social symbolism and its ambiguity. The American Journal of Sociology 1968, 74(3):276-291.