Authorship problems in scientific literature and in nuclear medicine: The point of view of the young researcher

European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging

Volumn 41, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 1251-1254

  Annunziata, Salvatore ^a   Giordano, Alessandro ^a  

^a CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFLICT OF INTEREST; HUMAN; INFORMATION; MALPRACTICE; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; RESEARCH ETHICS; RESPONSIBILITY; REVIEW; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; SCIENTIST; WRITING; AGE; ETHICS; LABORATORY PERSONNEL; PUBLICATION; STANDARDS;

AGE FACTORS; AUTHORSHIP; LABORATORY PERSONNEL; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC;

EID: 84900793909     PISSN: 16197070     EISSN: 16197089     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00259-014-2755-1     Document Type: Review

References (14)

1. Godlee F, Jefferson T. Peer review in health sciences. London: BMJ Books; 1999.
2. Hudson Jones A, McLellan F. Ethical issues in biomedical publication. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press; 2000.
3. Kovacs J. Honorary authorship epidemic in scholarly publications? How the current use of citation-based evaluative metrics make (pseudo)honorary authors from honest contributors of every multi-author article. J Med Ethics. 2013;39(8):509-12.
4. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: ethical considerations in the conduct and reporting of research: authorship and contributorship. http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/archives/2004-urm.pdf. Accessed 14 Mar 2014.
5. Albert T, Wager E. The COPE Report 2003. How to handle authorship disputes: a guide for new researchers. http://publicationethics.org/files/ 2003pdf12.pdf. Accessed 14 Mar 2014.
6. Wagena EJ. The scandal of unfair behaviour of senior faculty. J Med Ethics. 2005;31:308.
7. Kwok L. The White Bull effect: abusive coauthorship and publication parasitism. J Med Ethics. 2005;31(9):554-6.
8. Flanagin A, Carey LA, Fontanarosa PB, Phillips SG, Pace BP, Lundberg GD, et al. Prevalence of articles with honorary authors and ghost authors in peer-reviewed medical journals. JAMA. 1998;280(3):222-4.
9. Bates T, Anić A, Marusić M, Marusić A. Authorship criteria and disclosure of contributions: comparison of 3 general medical journals with different author contribution forms. JAMA. 2004;292(1):86-8.
10. Greenland P, Fontanarosa PB. Ending honorary authorship. Science. 2012;337(6098):1019.
11. Wager E. Recognition, reward and responsibility: why the authorship of scientific papers matters. Maturitas. 2009;62(2):109-12.
12. Elsevier. Publishing Ethics Resource Kit. http://www.elsevier.com/ editors/perk. Accessed 14 Mar 2014.
13. Verhagen JV, Wallace KJ, Collins SC, Scott TR. QUAD system offers fair shares to all authors. Nature. 2003;426(6967):602.
14. Borry P, Schotsman P, Dierickx K. Author, contributor or just a signer? A quantitative analysis of authorship trends in the field of bioethics. Bioethics. 2006;20:213-20.