Perceptuomotor compatibility effects in speech

Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

Volumn 71, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 1138-1149

  Galantucci, Bruno ^a,b   Fowler, Carol A ^a,c   Goldstein, Louis ^a,d  

^a HASKINS LABORATORIES   (United States)

^b YESHIVA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; GESTURE; HUMAN; LIP READING; PHONATION; PHONETICS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

GESTURES; HUMANS; LIPREADING; PHONATION; PHONETICS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 68949175311     PISSN: 19433921     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/APP.71.5.1138     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Bell-Berti, F., Raphael, L. J., Pisoni, D. B., & Sawusch, J. R. (1978). Some relationships between speech production and perception. Phonetica, 36, 373-383.
2. Cohen, J. D., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., & Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: A new graphic interactive environment for designing psychology experiments. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 25, 257-271.
3. Cooper, W. E. (1979). Speech perception and production: Studies in selective adaptation. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
4. D'Ausilio, A., Pulvermüller, F., Salmas, P., Bufalari, I., Begliomini, C., & Fadiga, L. (2009). The motor somatotopy of speech perception. Current Biology, 19, 381-385.
5. Diehl, R. L., & Kluender, K. R. (1989). On the objects of speech perception. Ecological Psychology, 1, 121-144.
6. di Pellegrino, G., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., & Rizzolatti, G. (1992). Understanding motor events: A neurophysiological study. Experimental Brain Research, 91, 176-180.
7. Doyle, M. C., & Snowden, R. J. (2001). Identification of visual stimuli is improved by accompanying auditory stimuli: The role of eye movements and sound location. Perception, 30, 795-810.
8. Fadiga, L., Craighero, L., Buccino, G., & Rizzolatti, G. (2002). Speech listening specifically modulates the excitability of tongue muscles: A TMS study. European Journal of Neuroscience, 15, 399-402.
9. Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Pavesi, G., & Rizzolatti, G. (1995). Motor facilitation during action observation: A magnetic stimulation study. Journal of Neurophysiology, 73, 2608-2611.
10. Ferrari, P. F., Gallese, V., Rizzolatti, G., & Fogassi, L. (2003). Mirror neurons responding to the observation of ingestive and communicative mouth actions in the monkey ventral premotor cortex. European Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 1703-1714.
11. Fowler, C. A. (1986). An event approach to the study of speech perception from a direct-realist perspective. Journal of Phonetics, 14, 3-28.
12. Fowler, C. A., Brown, J. M., Sabadini, L., & Weihing, J. (2003). Rapid access to speech gestures in perception: Evidence from choice and simple response time tasks. Journal of Memory & Language, 49, 396-413.
13. Galantucci, B., Fowler, C. A., & Turvey, M. T. (2006). The motor theory of speech perception reviewed. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 361-377.
14. Grafton, S. T., Arbib, M. A., Fadiga, L., & Rizzolatti, G. (1996). Localization of grasp representations in humans by positron emission tomography. Experimental Brain Research, 112, 103-111.
15. Gunji, A., Kakigi, R., & Hoshiyama, M. (2000). Spatiotemporal source analysis of vocalization-associated magnetic fields. Cognitive Brain Research, 9, 157-163.
16. Iacoboni, M. (2008). The role of premotor cortex in speech perception: Evidence from fMRI and rTMS. Journal of Physiology, Paris, 102, 31-34.
17. Iacoboni, M., Woods, R. P., Brass, M., Bekkering, H., Mazziotta, J. C., & Rizzolatti, G. (1999). Cortical mechanisms of human imitation. Science, 286, 2526-2528.
18. Kerzel, D., & Bekkering, H. (2000). Motor activation from visible speech: Evidence from stimulus response compatibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 634-647.
19. Kohler, E., Keysers, C., Umiltà, M. A., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., & Rizzolatti, G. (2002). Hearing sounds, understanding actions: Action representation in mirror neurons. Science, 297, 846-848.
20. Kuhl, P. K. (1981). Discrimination of speech by nonhuman animals-Basic auditory sensitivities conducive to the perception of speech-sound categories. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 70, 340-349.
21. Levelt, W. J. M., Schriefers, H., Vorberg, D., Meyer, A. S., Pechmann, T., & Havinga, J. (1991). The time course of lexical access in speech production: A study of picture naming. Psychological Review, 98, 122-142.
22. Liberman, A. M. (1957). Some results of research on speech perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 29, 117-123.
23. Liberman, A. M. (1996). Speech: A special code. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24. Liberman, A. M., Cooper, F. S., Shankweiler, D. P., & Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1967). Perception of speech code. Psychological Review, 74, 431-461.
25. Liberman, A. M., & Mattingly, I. G. (1985). The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition, 21, 1-36.
26. Liberman, A. M., & Mattingly, I. G. (1989). A specialization for speech perception. Science, 243, 489-494.
27. Liberman, A. M., & Whalen, D. H. (2000). On the relation of speech to language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 187-196.
28. MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163-203.
29. Massaro, D. W., & Oden, G. C. (1980). Evaluation and integration of acoustic features in speech-perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 67, 996-1013.
30. Meister, I. G., Wilson, S. M., Deblieck, C., Wu, A. D., & Iacoboni, M. (2007). The essential role of premotor cortex in speech perception. Current Biology, 17, 1692-1696.
31. Porter, R. J., Jr., & Lubker, J. F. (1980). Rapid reproduction of vowel-vowel sequences: Evidence for a fast and direct acoustic-motoric linkage. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research, 23, 593-602.
32. Posner, M. I. (1978). Chronometric explorations of mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
33. Prather, J. F., Peters, S., Nowicki, S., & Mooney, R. (2008). Precise auditory-vocal mirroring in neurons for learned vocal communication. Nature, 451, 305-310.
34. Prinz, W. (1990). A common coding approach to perception and action. In O. Neumann & W. Prinz (Eds.), Relationships between perception and action: Current approaches (pp. 167-201). New York: Springer.
35. Proctor, R. W., & Reeve, T. G. (Eds.) (1990). Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
36. Pulvermüller, F., Huss, M., Kherif, F., Moscoso del Prado Martin, F., Hauk, O., & Shtyrov, Y. (2006). Motor cortex maps articulatory features of speech sounds. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103, 7865-7870.
37. Rizzolatti, G., & Arbib, M. A. (1998). Language within our grasp. Trends in Neurosciences, 21, 188-194.
38. Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 169-192.
39. Strafella, A. P., & Paus, T. (2000). Modulation of cortical excitability during action observation: A transcranial magnetic stimulation study. NeuroReport, 11, 2289-2292.
40. Stürmer, B., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2000). Correspondence effects with manual gestures and postures: A study of imitation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 1746-1759.
41. Sussman, H. M. (1989). Neural coding of relational invariance in speech: Human language analogs to the barn owl. Psychological Review, 96, 631-642.
42. Viviani, P. (2002). Motor competence in the perception of dynamic events: A tutorial. In W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.), Attention and performance XIX: Common mechanisms in perception and action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
43. Viviani, P., Baud Bovy, G., & Redolfi, M. (1997). Perceiving and tracking kinesthetic stimuli: Further evidence of motor-perceptual interactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 23, 1232-1252.
44. Watkins, K. E., Strafella, A. P., & Paus, T. (2003). Seeing and hearing speech excites the motor system involved in speech production. Neuropsychologia, 41, 989-994.
45. Welford, A. T. (1988). Reaction time, speed of performance, and age. Annals of New York Academy of Science, 515, 1-17.
46. Wilson, S. M., Saygin, A. P., Sereno, M. I., & Iacoboni, M. (2004). Listening to speech activates motor areas involved in speech production. Nature Neurosciences, 7, 701-702.