AHRQ series on complex intervention systematic reviews—paper 1: an introduction to a series of articles that provide guidance and tools for reviews of complex interventions

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Volumn 90, Issue , 2017, Pages 6-10

  Guise, Jeanne Marie ^a,b   Chang, Christine ^c   Butler, Mary ^d   Viswanathan, Meera ^e   Tugwell, Peter ^f  

^a OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c AGENCY FOR HEALTHCARE RESEARCH AND QUALITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^e RTI INTERNATIONAL   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Complex interventions; Evidence based medicine; Guidance as topic; Health care interventions; Research design; Review literature as topic; Systematic review

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; HEALTH CARE; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; EPIDEMIOLOGY; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; GOVERNMENT; LITERATURE; UNITED STATES;

EPIDEMIOLOGIC METHODS; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; REVIEW LITERATURE AS TOPIC; UNITED STATES; UNITED STATES AGENCY FOR HEALTHCARE RESEARCH AND QUALITY;

EID: 85025176743     PISSN: 08954356     EISSN: 18785921     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.06.011     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Turley, R., Saith, R., Bhan, N., Rehfuess, E., Carter, B., Slum upgrading strategies involving physical environment and infrastructure interventions and their effects on health and socio-economic outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev(1), 2013, CD010067 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010067.pub2.
2. Turley, R., Saith, R., Bhan, N., Doyle, J., Jones, K., Waters, E., Slum upgrading review: methodological challenges that arise in systematic reviews of complex interventions. J Public Health (Oxf) 35 (2013), 171–175.
3. Kay, N., Pennucci, A., Early childhood education for low-income students: a review of the evidence and benefit-cost analysis (doc. no. 14-01-2201). 2014, Washington State Institute for Public Policy, Olympia, WA.
4. Weitlauf, A.S., McPheeters, M.L., Peters, B., Sathe, N., Travis, R., Aiello, R., et al. Therapies for children with autism spectrum disorder: behavioral interventions update. Comparative effectiveness review no. 137. (Prepared by the Vanderbilt Evidence-based Practice Center under contract no. 290-2012-00009-I.) AHRQ publication no. 14-EHC036-EF. 2014, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD.
5. Likis, F.E., Andrews, J.C., Fonnesbeck, C.J., Hartmann, K.E., Jerome, R.N., Potter, S.A., et al. Smoking cessation interventions in pregnancy and postpartum care. Evidence report/technology assessment no. 214. (Prepared by the Vanderbilt Evidence-based Practice Center under contract no. 290-2007-10065-I.) AHRQ publication no. 14-E001-EF. 2014, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD.
6. Butler, M., Kane, R.L., McAlpine, D., Kathol, R., Fu, S.S., Hagedorn, H., et al. Does integrated care improve treatment for depression?: a systematic review. J Ambul Care Manage 34 (2011), 113–125.
7. Butler, M., Kane, R.L., McAlpine, D., Kathol, R.G., Fu, S.S., Hagedorn, H., et al. Integration of mental health/substance abuse and primary care. Evidence reports/technology assessments, no. 173, 2008, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US), Rockville, MD.
8. Moher, D., Schulz, K.F., Altman, D.G., Group, C., The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet 357 (2001), 1191–1194.
9. Stroup, D.F., Berlin, J.A., Morton, S.C., Olkin, I., Williamson, G.D., Rennie, D., et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. J Am Med Assoc 283 (2000), 2008–2012.
10. Chan, A.-W., Tetzlaff, J.M., Altman, D.G., Laupacis, A., Gøtzsche, P.C., Krleža-Jerić, K., et al. SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med 158 (2013), 200–207.
11. Davidoff, F., Batalden, P., Stevens, D., Ogrinc, G., Mooney, S., Publication guidelines for improvement studies in health care: evolution of the SQUIRE project. Ann Intern Med 149 (2008), 670–676.
12. Von Elm, E., Altman, D.G., Egger, M., Pocock, S.J., Gøtzsche, P.C., Vandenbroucke, J.P., et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Prev Med 45 (2007), 247–251.
13. Breimaier, H.E., Heckemann, B., Halfens, R.J., Lohrmann, C., The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR): a useful theoretical framework for guiding and evaluating a guideline implementation process in a hospital-based nursing practice. BMC Nurs, 14, 2015, 43.
14. World Health Organization. SURE guides for preparing and using evidence-based policy briefs. Evidence-informed policy-making 2011. Available at http://www.who.int/evidence/sure/guides/en/. Accessed June 2015.
15. Hutchings, H.A., Thorne, K., Jerzembek, G.S., Cheung, W.-Y., Cohen, D., Durai, D., et al. Successful development and testing of a method for aggregating the reporting of interventions in complex studies (MATRICS). J Clin Epidemiol 69 (2016), 193–198.
16. Stirman, S.W., Miller, C.J., Toder, K., Calloway, A., Development of a framework and coding system for modifications and adaptations of evidence-based interventions. Implement Sci, 8, 2013, 65.
17. Hoffmann, T.C., Glasziou, P.P., Boutron, I., Milne, R., Perera, R., Moher, D., et al. Better reporting of interventions: Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ, 348, 2014, g1687.
18. Pinnock, H., Epiphaniou, E., Sheikh, A., Griffiths, C., Eldridge, S., Craig, P., et al. Developing standards for reporting implementation studies of complex interventions (StaRI): a systematic review and e-Delphi. Implement Sci, 10(1), 2015, 42.
19. Guyatt, G.H., Oxman, A.D., Schünemann, H.J., Tugwell, P., Knottnerus, A., GRADE guidelines: a new series of articles in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. J Clin Epidemiol 64 (2011), 380–382.
20. Guise, J.-M., Chang, C., Viswanathan, M., Glick, S., Treadwell, J., Umscheid, C.A., et al. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Evidence-based Practice Center methods for systematically reviewing complex multicomponent health care interventions. J Clin Epidemiol 67 (2014), 1181–1191.
21. Guise, J.-M., Chang, C., Viswanathan, M., Glick, S., Treadwell, J., Umscheid, C.A., et al. Systematic reviews of complex multicomponent health care interventions. 2014, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US), Rockville, MD.
22. Noyes, J., Gough, D., Lewin, S., Mayhew, A., Michie, S., Pantoja, T., et al. A research and development agenda for systematic reviews that ask complex questions about complex interventions. J Clin Epidemiol 66 (2013), 1262–1270.
23. Anderson, L.M., Oliver, S.R., Michie, S., Rehfuess, E., Noyes, J., Shemilt, I., Investigating complexity in systematic reviews of interventions by using a spectrum of methods. J Clin Epidemiol 66 (2013), 1223–1229.
24. Petticrew, M., Anderson, L., Elder, R., Grimshaw, J., Hopkins, D., Hahn, R., et al. Complex interventions and their implications for systematic reviews: a pragmatic approach. J Clin Epidemiol 66 (2013), 1209–1214.
25. Kühne, F., Ehmcke, R., Härter, M., Kriston, L., Conceptual decomposition of complex health care interventions for evidence synthesis: a literature review. J Eval Clin Pract 21 (2015), 817–823.
26. Craig, P., Dieppe, P., Macintyre, S., Michie, S., Nazareth, I., Petticrew, M., Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ, 337, 2008, a1655.
27. Burford, B., Lewin, S., Welch, V., Rehfuess, E., Waters, E., Assessing the applicability of findings in systematic reviews of complex interventions can enhance the utility of reviews for decision making. J Clin Epidemiol 66 (2013), 1251–1261.
28. Pigott, T., Shepperd, S., Identifying, documenting, and examining heterogeneity in systematic reviews of complex interventions. J Clin Epidemiol 66 (2013), 1244–1250.
29. Squires, J.E., Valentine, J.C., Grimshaw, J.M., Systematic reviews of complex interventions: framing the review question. J Clin Epidemiol 66 (2013), 1215–1222.
30. Kelly, M.P., Noyes, J., Kane, R.L., Chang, C., Uhl, S., Robinson, K.A., et al. AHRQ series on complex intervention systematic reviews—paper 2: defining complexity, formulating scope and questions. J Clin Epidemiol 90 (2017), 11–18.
31. Butler, M., Epstein, R.A., Totten, A., Whitlock, E.P., Ansari, M.T., Damschroder, L.J., et al. AHRQ series on complex intervention systematic reviews—paper 3: adapting frameworks to develop protocols. J Clin Epidemiol 90 (2017), 19–27.
32. Viswanathan, M., McPheeters, M.L., Murad, M.H., Butler, M.E., Devine, E.E., Dyson, M.P., et al. AHRQ series on complex intervention systematic reviews—paper 4: selecting analytic approaches. J Clin Epidemiol 90 (2017), 28–36.
33. Pigott, T., Noyes, J., Umscheid, C.A., Myers, E., Morton, S.C., Fu, R., et al. AHRQ series on complex intervention systematic reviews—paper 5: advanced analytic methods. J Clin Epidemiol 90 (2017), 37–42.
34. Guise, J.-M., Butler, M.E., Chang, C., Viswanathan, M., Pigott, T., Tugwell, P., AHRQ series on complex intervention systematic reviews—paper 6: PRISMA-CI extension statement & checklist. J Clin Epidemiol 90 (2017), 43–50.
35. Guise, J.-M., Butler, M., Chang, C., Viswanathan, M., Pigott, T., Tugwell, P., AHRQ series on complex intervention systematic reviews—paper 7: PRISMA-CI elaboration & explanation. J Clin Epidemiol 90 (2017), 51–58.