Developing standards for reporting implementation studies of complex interventions (StaRI): A systematic review and e-Delphi

Implementation Science

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Pinnock, Hilary ^a   Epiphaniou, Eleni ^b   Sheikh, Aziz ^a   Griffiths, Chris ^b   Eldridge, Sandra ^b   Craig, Peter ^c   Taylor, Stephanie J C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Complex interventions; Dissemination and implementation; Implementation science; Reporting standards

Indexed keywords

DELPHI STUDY; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMAN; MASS COMMUNICATION; PROCEDURES; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH;

DELPHI TECHNIQUE; DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; TRANSLATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH;

EID: 84926628140     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17485908     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13012-015-0235-z     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. London: MRC; 2008 [ www.mrc.ac.uk/complexinterventionsguidance ]
2. Scottish Intercollegiate Guideline Network. SIGN 50: a guideline developer's handbook. [ http://www.sign.ac.uk/guidelines/fulltext/50/index.html ]
3. Bhattacharyya O, Reeves S, Zwarenstein M. What is implementation research? Rationale, concepts, and practices. Res Social Work Prac. 2009;19:491-502.
4. Glasgow RE, Lichtenstein E, Marcus AC. Why don't we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy-to-effectiveness transition. Am J Public Health. 2003;93:1261-7.
5. Taylor SJC, Pinnock H, Epiphaniou E, Pearce G, Parke H. A rapid synthesis of the evidence on interventions supporting self-management for people with long-term conditions. (PRISMS Practical Systematic Review of Self-Management Support for long-term conditions) Health Serv Deliv Res. 2014; 2(53): doi:10.3310/hsdr02530
6. Woolf SH, Johnson RE. The break-even point: when medical advances are less important than improving the fidelity with which they are delivered. Ann Fam Med. 2005;3:545-52.
7. Eccles M, Grimshaw J, Campbell M, Ramsay C. Research designs for studies evaluating the effectiveness of change and improvement strategies. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003;12:47-52.
8. Meredith LS, Mendel P, Pearson M, Wu SY, Joyce G, Straus JB, et al. Implementation and maintenance of quality improvement for treating depression in primary care. Psychiatric Services. 2006;57:48-55.
9. Newhouse R, Bobay K, Dykes PC, Stevens KR, Titler M. Methodology issues in implementation science. Medical Care. 2013;51 Suppl 2:S32-40.
10. Rycroft-Malone J, Burton CR. Is it time for standards for reporting on research about implementation? Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2011;8:189-90.
11. Pinnock H, Epiphaniou E, Taylor SJC. Phase IV implementation studies: the forgotten finale to the complex intervention methodology framework. Annals ATS. 2014;11:S118-22.
12. Bryant J, Passey ME, Hall AE, Sanson-Fisher RW. A systematic review of the quality of reporting in published smoking cessation trials for pregnant women: an explanation for the evidence-practice gap? Implementation Sci. 2014;9:94.
13. Altman DG, Simera I, Hoey J, Moher D, Schulz K. EQUATOR: reporting guidelines for health research. Lancet. 2008;371:1149-50.
14. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. for the CONSORT Group (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials). CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMC Med. 2010;8:18.
15. Turner L, Shamseer L, Altman DG, Weeks L, Peters J, Kober T, et al. Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 11. Art. No.: MR000030. doi:10.1002/14651858.MR000030.pub2
16. Kanea RL, Wang J, Garrard J. Reporting in randomized clinical trials improved after adoption of the CONSORT statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:241e249.
17. Moher D, Jones A, Lepage L. Use of the CONSORT statement and quality of reports of randomized trials: a comparative before-and-after evaluation. JAMA. 2001;285:1992-5.
18. Plint AC, Moher D, Morrison A, Schulz K, Altman DG, Hill C, et al. Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review. MJA. 2006;185:263-7.
19. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61:344-9.
20. Davidoff F, Batalden P, Stevens D, Ogrinc G, Mooney SE, Grp SD. Publication guidelines for quality improvement studies in health care: evolution of the SQUIRE project. Qual Saf Health Care. 2008;17:i3-9.
21. Jarlais DCD, Lyles C, Crepaz N. Improving the reporting quality of nonrandomized evaluations of behavioral and public health interventions: The TREND Statement. Am J Public Health. 2004;94:361-6.
22. Pinnock H, Taylor S, Epiphaniou E, Sheikh A, Griffiths C, Eldridge S, et al. Developing standards for reporting phase IV implementation studies. [ http://www.equator-network.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/Proposal-for-reporting-guidelines-of-Implementation-Research-StaRI.pdf ]
23. Moher D, Schulz KF, Simera I, Altman DG. Guidance for developers of health research reporting guidelines. PLoS Med. 2010;7:e1000217.
24. Dalkey N, Helmer O. An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Manag Sci. 1963;9:458-67.
25. Murphy MK, Sanderson CFB, Black NA, Askham J, Lamping DL, Marteau T, et al. Consensus development methods, and their use in clinical guideline development. London: HMSO; 2001.
26. Hasson F, Keeney S, McKenna H. Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. J Advanced Nursing. 2000;32:1008-15.
27. de Meyrick J. The Delphi method and health research. Health Ed. 2003;103:7-16.
28. Proctor EK, Landsverk J, Aarons G, Chambers D, Glisson C, Mittman B. Implementation research in mental health services: an emerging science with conceptual, methodological, and training challenges. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2009;36:24-34.
29. Proctor EK, Powell BJ, Baumann AA, Hamilton AM, Santens RL. Writing implementation research grant proposals: ten key ingredients. Implement Sci. 2012;7:96.
30. Arai L, Britten N, Popay J, Roberts H, Petticrew M, Rodgers M, et al. Testing methodological developments in the conduct of narrative synthesis: a demonstration review of research on the implementation of smoke alarm interventions. Evid policy. 2007;3:23.
31. Abraham C. WIDER recommendations to improve reporting of the content of behaviour change interventions. http://www.equator-network.org/reporting-guidelines/wider-recommendations-for-reporting-of-behaviour-change-interventions/
32. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19:349-57.
33. Hoffmann T, Glasziou P, Boutron I, Milne R, Perera R, Moher D, et al. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ. 2014;348:g1687.
34. Hooper R, Froud RJ, Bremner SA, Perera R, Eldridge S. Cascade diagrams for depicting complex interventions in randomised trials. BMJ. 2013;347:f6681.
35. Hoffmann TC, Erueti C, Glasziou PP. Poor description of non-pharmacological interventions: analysis of consecutive sample of randomised trials. BMJ. 2013;347:f3755.
36. Glasziou P, Chalmers I, Altman DG, Bastian H, Boutron I, Brice A, et al. Taking healthcare interventions from trial to practice. BMJ. 2010;341:c3852.
37. Pinnock H, Adlem L, Gaskin S, Harris J, Snellgrove C, Sheikh A. Accessibility, clinical effectiveness and practice costs of providing a telephone option for routine asthma reviews: phase IV controlled implementation study. Br J Gen Pract. 2007;57:714-22.
38. McEwen A, West R, McRobbie H. Do implementation issues influence the effectiveness of medications? The case of NRT and bupropion in NHS stop smoking services. BMC Public Health. 2009;9:28.
39. Chalkidou K, Anderson G. Comparative effectiveness research: international experiences and implications for the United States. [ http://www.nihcm.org/pdf/CER_International_Experience:09.pdf ]
40. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Guide to the methods of technology appraisal 2013 [ https://www.nice.org.uk/article/PMG9/chapter/Foreword ]