Public support for innovation and the openness of firms' innovation activities

Industrial and Corporate Change

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2017, Pages 421-442

  Cano Kollmann, Marcelo ^a   Hamilton, Robert D ^b   Mudambi, Ram ^b  

^a OHIO UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INDUSTRIAL PRACTICE; INNOVATION; POLICY MAKING;

EUROPE;

EID: 85024843600     PISSN: 09606491     EISSN: 14643650     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/icc/dtw025     Document Type: Article

References (92)

1. Aerts, K. and T. Schmidt (2008), ''Two for the price of one? Additionality effects of RandD subsidies: a comparison between Flanders and Germany,' Research Policy, 37(5), 806-822.
2. Ahedo, M. (2004), 'Cluster policy in the Basque Country (1991-2002): constructing 'industry-government' collaboration through cluster-associations,' European Planning Studies, 12(8), 1097-1113.
3. Alcácer, J. and M. Zhao (2012), 'Local RandD strategies and multilocation firms: the role of internal linkages,' Management Science, 58(4), 734-753.
4. Almus, M. and D. Czarnitzki (2003), 'The effects of public RandD subsidies on firms innovation activities,' Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 21(2), 226-236.
5. Anderson, R. C., A. Duru and D. M. Reeb (2012), 'Investment policy in family controlled firms,' Journal of Banking and Finance, 36(6), 1744-1758.
6. Arbussà, A. and G. Coenders (2007), 'Innovation activities, use of appropriation instruments and absorptive capacity: evidence from Spanish firms,' Research Policy, 36(10), 1545-1558.
7. Archibugi, D. and A. Filippetti (2011), 'Is the economic crisis impairing convergence in innovation performance across Europe?,' JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 49(6), 1153-1182.
8. Arora, A. and A. Gambardella (1990), 'Complementarity and external linkages: the strategies of the large firms in biotechnology,' The Journal of Industrial Economics, 38, 361-379.
9. Arrow, K. (1962), 'Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention,' in R., Nelson (ed.), The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 609-626.
10. Aschhoff, B. and W. Sofka (2009), 'Innovation on demand-can public procurement drive market success of innovations?,' Research Policy, 38(8), 1235-1247.
11. Baghana, R. and P. Mohnen (2009), 'Effectiveness of RandD tax incentives in small and large enterprises in Québec,' Small Business Economics, 33(1), 91-107.
12. Bathelt, H., A. Malmberg and P. Maskell (2004), 'Clusters and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation,' Progress in Human Geography, 28(1), 31-56.
13. Berk, R. and J. M. MacDonald (2008), 'Overdispersion and poisson regression,' Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 24(3), 269-284.
14. Busom, I. (2000), 'An empirical evaluation of the effects of RandD subsidies,' Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 9(2), 111-148.
15. Cameron, A. C. and P. K.Trivedi (1990), 'Regression-based tests for overdispersion in the Poisson model,' Journal of Econometrics, 46(3), 347-364.
16. Cano-Kollmann, M., J. Cantwell, T. J. Hannigan, R. Mudambi and J. Song (2016), 'Knowledge connectivity: an agenda for innovation research in international business,' Journal of International Business Studies, 47(3), 255-262.
17. Cantner, U. and H. Graf (2006), 'The network of innovators in Jena: an application of social network analysis,' Research Policy, 35(4), 463-480.
18. Cappelen, Å., E. Fjærli, F. Foyn, T. Hægeland, J. Møen, A. Raknerud and M. Rybalka (2010), 'Evaluation of the Norwegian RandD tax credit scheme,' Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 5(3), 96-109.
19. Cappelen, Å., A. Raknerud and M. Rybalka (2012), 'The effects of RandD tax credits on patenting and innovations,' Research Policy, 41(2), 334-345.
20. Chatterjee, S. and B. Price (1991), Regression Analysis by Example, 2nd edn. Wiley: NewYork, NY.
21. Chesbrough, H. W. (2003), 'The era of open innovation,' MIT Sloan Management Review, 127, 35-41.
22. Chesbrough, H. W. (2006), Open business models: How to thrive in the new innovation landscape, Boston: Harvard Business Press.
23. Classen, N., A. Van Gils, Y. Bammens and M. Carree (2012), 'Accessing resources from innovation partners: the search breadth of family SMEs,' Journal of Small Business Management, 50(2), 191-215.
24. Cockburn, I. M. and R. M. Henderson (1998), 'Absorptive capacity, coauthoring behavior, and the organization of research in drug discovery,' The Journal of Industrial Economics, 46(2), 157-182.
25. Cohen, W. and D. Levinthal (1990), 'Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation,' Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152.
26. Dahlander, L. and D. M. Gann (2010), 'How open is innovation?,' Research Policy, 39(6), 699-709.
27. Daugeliene, R. and S. Juocepyte (2012), 'The evolvent of criteria for assessment of innovation expression in the state level,' Engineering Economics, 23(2), 154-162.
28. David, P. A., B. H. Hall and A. A. Toole (2000), 'Is public RandD a complement or substitute for private RandD? A review of the econometric evidence,' Research Policy, 29(4-5), 497-529.
29. de Jong, J. P. J., T. Kalvet and W. Vanhaverbeke (2010), 'Exploring a theoretical framework to structure the public policy implications of open innovation,' Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 22(8), 877-896.
30. De Jong, J. P. J., W. Vanhaverbeke, T. Kalvet and H. Chesbrough (2008), Policies for open innovation: Theory, framework and cases, Helsinki, Finland: Research project funded by VISION Era-Net.
31. Diamantopoulos, A. and H. M. Winklhofer (2001), 'Index construction with formative indicators: an alternative to scale development,' Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 269-277.
32. Djankov, S. and P. Murrell (2002), 'Enterprise restructuring in transition: a quantitative survey,' Journal of Economic Literature, 40, 739-792.
33. Ekström, J. (2011), 'A generalized definition of the polychoric correlation coefficient,' University of California Los Angeles Department of Statistics Papers, 1-24.
34. European Commission (2007), Flash EB Series#215: Innobarometer 2007. DG Enterprise and Industry: Brussels.
35. European Commission (2011), Science, technology and innovation in Europe. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
36. Filippetti, A. (2011), 'Innovation modes and design as a source of innovation: a firm-level analysis,' European Journal of Innovation Management, 14(1), 5-26.
37. Filippetti, A. and D. Archibugi (2011), 'Innovation in times of crisis: national systems of innovation, structure, and demand,' Research Policy, 40(2), 179-192.
38. Filippetti, A., M. Frenz and G. Ietto-Gillies (2011), 'Are innovation and internationalization related? An analysis of European countries,' Industry and Innovation, 18(5), 437-459.
39. Fosfuri, A., M. S. Giarratana and A. Luzzi (2008), 'The penguin has entered the building: the commercialization of open source software products,' Organization Science, 19(2), 292-305.
40. Fu, X. and H. Xiong (2011), 'Open innovation in China: policies and practices,' Journal of Science and Technology Policy in China, 2(3), 196-218.
41. García-Quevedo, J. (2004), 'Do public subsidies complement business RandD? A meta-analysis of the econometric evidence,' Kyklos, 57(1), 87-102.
42. Garriga, H., G. von Krogh and S. Spaeth (2013), 'How constraints and knowledge impact open innovation,' Strategic Management Journal, 34(9), 1134-1144.
43. Gelabert, L., A. Fosfuri and J. A. Tribó (2009), 'Does the effect of public support for RandD depend on the degree of appropriability?,' The Journal of Industrial Economics, 57(4), 736-767.
44. Giarratana, M. S. and M. Mariani (2014), 'The relationship between knowledge sourcing and fear of imitation,' Strategic Management Journal, 35(8), 1144-1163.
45. Granstrand, O., E. Bohlin, C. Oskarsson and N. Sjö berg (1992), 'External technology acquisition in large multi-technology corporations,' RandD Management, 22(2), 111-134.
46. Hagedoorn, J. (1993), 'Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: interorganizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences,' Strategic Management Journal, 14(5), 371-385.
47. Hagedoorn, J. and N. Wang (2012), 'Is there complementarity or substitutability between internal and external RandD strategies?,' Research Policy, 41(6), 1072-1083.
48. Hall, B. and J. Van Reenen (2000), 'How effective are fiscal incentives for RandD? A review of the evidence,' Research Policy, 29(4), 449-469.
49. Hannigan, T. J., M. Cano-Kollmann and R. Mudambi (2015), 'Thriving innovation amidst manufacturing decline: the Detroit auto cluster and the resilience of local knowledge production,' Industrial and Corporate Change, 24(3), 635-653.
50. Hattie, J. (1985), 'Methodology review: assessing unidimensionality of tests and ltenls,' Applied Psychological Measurement, 9(2), 139-164.
51. Hausman, J. A., B. H. Hall and Z. Griliches (1984), Econometric Models for Count Data with an Application to the Patents-RandD Relationship. National Bureau of Economic Research: Cambridge, MA.
52. Henkel, J. (2006), 'Selective revealing in open innovation processes: the case of embedded Linux,' Research Policy, 35(7), 953-969.
53. Henkel, J. (2009), 'Champions of revealing-the role of open source developers in commercial firms,' Industrial and Corporate Change, 18(3), 435-471.
54. Hoffmann, W. H. and R. Schlosser (2001), 'Success factors of strategic alliances in small and medium-sized enterprises-an empirical survey,' Long Range Planning, 34(3), 357-381.
55. Katila, R. and G. Ahuja (2002), 'Something old, something new: a longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction,' Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1183-1194.
56. Keupp, M. M. and O. Gassmann (2009), 'Determinants and archetype users of open innovation,' RandD Management, 39(4), 331-341.
57. Klette, T. J., J. Møen and Z. Griliches (2000), 'Do subsidies to commercial RandD reduce market failures? Microeconometric evaluation studies,' Research Policy, 29(4), 471-495.
58. Koput, K. W. (1997), 'A chaotic model of innovative search: some answers, many questions,' Organization Science, 8(5), 528-542.
59. Lach, S. (2002), 'Do RandD subsidies stimulate or displace private RandD? Evidence from Israel,' Journal of Industrial Economics, 50(4), 369-390.
60. Laursen, K. and A. Salter (2006), 'Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms,' Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 131-150.
61. Ledesma, R. D., G. Macbeth and P. Valero-Mora (2011), 'Software for computing the tetrachoric correlation coefficient,' Revista Latinoamericana De Psicología, 43(1), 181-189.
62. Lee, S., G. Park, B. Yoon and J. Park (2010), 'Open innovation in SMEs-an intermediated network model,' Research Policy, 39(2), 290-300.
63. Liebeskind, J. P. (1996), 'Knowledge, strategy, and the theory of the firm,' Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 93-107.
64. Lokshin, B. and P. Mohnen (2012), 'How effective are level-based RandD tax credits? Evidence from the Netherlands,' Applied Economics, 44(12), 1527-1538.
65. Lorenzen, M. and R. Mudambi (2013), 'Clusters, connectivity and catch-up: Bollywood and Bangalore in the global economy,' Journal of Economic Geography, 13(3), 501-534.
66. Love, J. and S. Roper (2009), 'Organizing innovation: complementarities between cross-functional teams,' Technovation, 29(3), 192-203.
67. Martin, S. and J. T. Scott (2000), 'The nature of innovation market failure and the design of public support for private innovation,' Research Policy, 29(4-5), 437-447.
68. Mayer, H. (2010), 'Catching up: the role of state science and technology policy in open innovation,' Economic Development Quarterly, 24(3), 195-209.
69. Mohr, J. and R. Spekman (1994), 'Characteristics of partnership success: partnership attributes, communication behavior, and conflict resolution techniques,' Strategic Management Journal, 15(2), 135-152.
70. Nelson, R. R. (1959), 'The simple economics of basic scientific research,' Journal of Political Economy, 67(3), 297-306.
71. Ocasio, W. (1997), 'Towards an attention-based view of the firm,' Strategic Management Journal, 18(Suppl 1), 187-206.
72. Oxley, J. E. and R. C. Sampson (2004), 'The scope and governance of international RandD alliances,' Strategic Management Journal, 25(8-9), 723-749.
73. Pearson, K. (1896), 'Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution. VII. On the correlation of characters not quantitatively measurable,' Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical or Physical Character, 195: 1-405.
74. Rigby, D. and C. Zook (2002), 'Open-market innovation,' Harvard Business Review, 80(10), 80-93.
75. Sarkar, M. B., R. Echambadi, R. Agarwal and B. Sen (2006), 'The effect of the innovative environment on exit of entrepreneurial firms,' Strategic Management Journal, 27(6), 519-539.
76. Schroll, A., A. Mild (2011), 'Open innovation modes and the role of internal RandD: An empirical study on open innovation adoption in Europe,' European Journal of Innovation Management, 14(4), 475-495.
77. Shieh, G. (2011), 'Clarifying the role of mean centring in multicollinearity of interaction effects,' British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 64(3), 462-477.
78. Takalo, T., T. Tanayama and O. Toivanen (2013), 'Market failures and the additionality effects of public support to private RandD: theory and empirical implications,' International Journal of Industrial Organization, 31(5), 634-642.
79. Tavakol, M. and R. Dennick (2011), 'Making sense of Cronbach's alpha,' International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53-55.
80. Teece, D. J. (1986), 'Profiting from technological innovation: implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy,' Research Policy, 15(6), 285-305.
81. Tether, B. S. (2005), 'Do services innovate (differently)? Insights from the European innobarometer survey,' Industry and Innovation, 12(2), 153-184.
82. Tiwari, G. (2012), 'International Property Rights Index, 2012 Report,' Washington, D.C.: Americans for Tax Reform Foundation/ Property Rights Alliance, 1-126.
83. Uebersax, J. S. (2006), 'The tetrachoric and polychoric correlation coefficients,' Statistical Methods for Rater Agreement website. http://john-uebersax.com/stat/tetra.htm, Accessed July20, 2014.
84. Van de Vrande, V., J. P. J. De Jong, W. Vanhaverbeke and M. De Rochemont (2009), 'Open innovation in SMEs: trends, motives and management challenges,' Technovation, 29(6-7), 423-437.
85. Veugelers, R. (1997), 'Internal RandD expenditures and external technology sourcing,' Research Policy, 26(3), 303-315.
86. von Hippel, E. (1988), The Sources of Innovation. Oxford University Press: NewYork.
87. Webmoor, T. A. (2007),'Reconfiguring the archaeologicals ensibility: mediating heritage at Teotihuacan, Mexico,' PhD dissertation. Department of Anthropology, Stanford University. Electronic document from the Metamedia Lab, Stanford Archaeology Center, metamedia. Stanford. edu, accessed July20, 2014.
88. Woods, C. M. (2002), 'Factor analysis of scales composed of binary items: illustration with the maudsley obsessional compulsive inventory,' Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 24(4), 215-223.
89. Yanadori, Y. and V. Cui (2013), 'Creating incentives for innovation? The relationship between pay dispersion in RandD groups and firm innovation performance,' Strategic Management Journal, 34(2), 1502-1511.
90. Zahra, S. A. (1996), 'Governance, ownership, and corporate entrepreneurship: the moderating impact of industry technological opportunities,' Academy of Management Journal, 39(6), 1713-1735.
91. Zelner, B. A. (2009), 'Using simulation to interpret results from logit, probit, and other nonlinear models,' Strategic Management Journal, 30(12), 1335-1348.
92. Zhao, M. (2006), 'Conducting RandD in countries with weak intellectual property rights protection,' Management Science, 52(8), 1185-1199.