Catching up: The role of state science and technology policy in open innovation

Economic Development Quarterly

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 195-209

  Mayer, Heike ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Open innovation; Public policy; Science and technology; States

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; INNOVATION; MODELING; POLICY MAKING; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT; SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY; STATE;

EID: 77954468506     PISSN: 08912424     EISSN: 15523543     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0891242410366563     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Amin, A., & Thrift, N. (1992). Neo-Marshallian nodes in global networks. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 16, 571-587.
2. Benneworth, P. (2004). In what sense regional development? Entrepreneurship, underdevelopment and strong tradition in the periphery. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 16, 439-458.
3. Braczyk, H.-J., Cooke, P., & Heidenreich, M. (1998). Regional innovation systems: The role of governance in a globalized world. London, England: UCL Press.
4. Chesbrough, H. (2003a). The era of open innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(3), 35-41.
5. Chesbrough, H. (2003b). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
6. Crevoisier, O., & Maillat, D. (1991). Milieu, industrial organization and territorial production system: Towards a new theory of spatial development. In R. Camagni (Ed.), Innovation networks: Spatial perspectives (pp.13-34). London, England: Belhaven Press.
7. de Jong, J.P.J., Vanhaverbeke, W., Kalvet, T., & Chesbrough, H. (2008). Policies for open innovation: Theory, framework and cases. Retrieved fromhttp://www.visioneranet.org/files/408/OIPAF_final_report.pdf.
8. Feldman, M.P., Kelley, M., Schaff, J., & Farkas, G. (2000). Reinforcing interactions between the Advanced Technology Program and the states. Volume 2: Case studies of technology pioneering start-up companies and their use of state and federal programs. Retrieved fromhttp://www.atp.nist.gov/eao/ir-6523.pdf.
9. Freeman, C., & Soete, L. (1999). The economics of industrial innovation. Cambridge: MIT Press.
10. Google. (2008). Project 10100. Retrieved fromhttp://www.project10tothe100.com/why.html.
11. Lemola, T., & Lievonen, J. (2008). The role of innovation policy in fostering open innovation activities among companies. Retrieved fromhttp://www.visioneranet.org/files/369/SEMOIPI_Advansis_final_report.pdf.
12. Lichtenstein, G., & Lyons, T. (2001). The entrepreneurial development system: Transforming business talent and community economies. Economic Development Quarterly, 15, 3-20.
13. Longhi, C. (1999). Networks, collective learning and technology development in innovative high technology regions: The case of Sophia-Antipolis. Regional Studies, 33, 333-342.
14. Lowe, N. (2007). Job creation and the knowledge economy: Lessons from North Carolina's life science manufacturing initiative. Economic Development Quarterly, 21, 339-353.
15. Malecki, E.J. (1991). Technology and economic development. Harlow, England: Longman.
16. Marshall, A. (1920). Principles of economics. London, England: Macmillan.
17. Mayer, H. (2005a). Planting high technology seeds: Tektronix's role in the creation of Portland's Silicon Forest. Oregon Historical Quarterly, 106, 568-593.
18. Mayer, H. (2005b). The homeland security industry and its impact on the Arlington, Virginia, economy. Retrieved fromhttp://www.arlingtonvirginiausa.com/docs/homeland_security_short.pdf.
19. Mayer, H. (2006). Completing the puzzle: Creating a high tech and life science economy in Kansas City. Retrieved fromhttp://www.brookings.edu/metro/pubs/20061101_kansasmayer.pdf.
20. Melkers, J. (2004). Assessing the outcomes of state science and technology organizations. Economic Development Quarterly, 18, 186-201.
21. National Governors Association, & Pew Center on the States. (2007). Investing in innovation. Retrieved fromhttp://www.nga.org/Files/pdf/0707INNOVATIONINVEST.PDF.
22. Netflix. (2008). Netflix prize. Retrieved fromhttp://www.netflixprize.com/.
23. North Dakota Department of Commerce. (2008). Report on North Dakota's Centers of Excellence program. Retrieved fromhttp://www.commerce.nd.gov/uploads/resources/51/coe-preliminary-annual-report-031808.pdf.
24. Perkmann, M., & Walsh, K. (2007). University-industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9, 259-280.
25. Piore, M., & Sabel, C. (1984). The second industrial divide: Possibilities for prosperity. New York, NY: Basic Books.
26. Plosila, W. (2004). State science- and technology-based economic development policy: History, trends and developments, and future directions. Economic Development Quarterly, 18, 113-126.
27. Porter, M. (2000). Location, competition, and economic development: Local clusters in a global economy. Economic Development Quarterly, 14, 15-34.
28. Small Business Administration. (2006). The small business economy: 2006. Retrieved fromhttp://www.sba.gov/advo/research/sb_econ2006.pdf.
29. State Science and Technology Institute. (2006). A resource guide for technology-based economic development. Retrieved fromhttp://www.ssti.org/Publications/Onlinepubs/resource_guide.pdf.
30. Tekes. (2009). About Tekes. Retrieved fromhttp://www.tekes.fi/en/community/About%20Tekes/339/About%20Tekes/1279.
31. von Hippel, E. (1988). The sources of innovation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
32. The Washington Advisory Group. (2008). South Carolina Centers of Economic Excellence (CoEE): Comprehensive program evaluation 2003-2008. Retrieved fromhttp://www.theadvisorygroup.com/uploads/file/CoEE%20Eval%20Rpt%20FINAL%2012-30-08%20v3.pdf.
33. West Virginia EPSCoR Advisory Council. (2005). Vision 2015: The West Virginia Science and Technology strategic plan. Retrieved from http://www.wvresearch.org/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download&gid=10&&Itemid=26.
34. Wu, Y. (2009). NSF's experimental program to stimulate competitive research (EPSCoR): Subsidizing academic research or state budgets? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 28, 479-495.